Putting real Londoners first

Download and listen to the BNP radio Election broadcast by clicking here

THE DAUNTING TRUTH ABOUT ‘ASYLUM’ AND IMMIGRATION

By Archer

“Britain has traditionally been viewed as the cushier option. Over the past three years only one per cent of migrants passing through Sangatte [French port, fittingly titled ‘The Departure Lounge’] have applied for refugee status in France. Sangatte itself is proof of how attractive passage to the U.K. remains.”

-An article in Time magazine, 2004, after their journalist spoke to dozens of ‘asylum seekers’ determined to get into Britain, the ‘promised land’. They believed that once they got here they would be allowed to stay and claim benefits. We the taxpayer pay for this.

“Immigration imports poverty, creates parallel communities and increases social tensions, crime and health problems such as H.I.V. There is little evidence the British people want to be culturally enriched by immigration from around the globe, any more than the people of Nigeria, India, Saudi Arabia or China do.” -A report by independent think-tank Civitas. The report also found that immigrants make more demands on our schools and hospitals and claim more benefits. They also dismissed the arrantly flawed claim that newcomers are needed to bolster our ageing population. Right-minded people know this is nonsense, anyway.

“Britain appears to be in the process of being turned upside down, particularly in respect of policing, criminal justice and immigration control, by inappropriate reactions to tragic individual ethnic victims and demands of pressure groups.” -Dr David Coleman, a reader in demography at Oxford University.

“The pace of the present transformation in Europe worries me. I believe it to be a recipe for conflict.” -Robert Rowthorn, professor of economics at Cambridge University.

“We have to stop pretending there is no problem. There is a slight tendency at the moment for people to go around waving their hands merrily and saying, ‘If we celebrate our multiculturalism it will all be lovely.’ Well, it won’t be all lovely. One of the things we have to accept is that sometimes people don’t like other people’s ways of life.” -Chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality, Trevor Phillips.

“If you don’t have mechanisms of this sort for people you believe to be dangerous then it is difficult to protect the security of the public.” -Labour’s John Denham, defending the need for control orders on immigrant criminals.

"The Diaspora [The dispersion of a people from their original homeland] issue is one of my biggest current concerns," he said. "Globalisation makes assimilation seem redundant and old-fashioned . . . [the process] acts as a sort of reverse colonisation, where groups of people are self-contained, going back and forth between their countries, exploiting sophisticated networks and using instant communication on phones and the internet." -Rear Admiral Chris Parry, Royal Navy.

“Muslims and non-Muslims may live in the same town, but they move in different worlds. If the two sides speak, it is only by chance, and rarely by choice.” -18-year-old law student, Yasin HajI, when interviewed by a reporter from the Daily Mail.

“We’ve been to school with non-Muslims and we know we don’t mix” -Mubarek Patel, an 18-year-old from Preston. He made this unquestionable comment when interviewed by a reporter from the Daily Mail.

“The politicians and rest might talk about us all getting on together. It’s impossible. The two sides will never integrate. Go to school together? Make friends? You must be joking. They don’t want to send their kids to Catholic schools, for instance. Why would we want to send our to theirs? How can we meet, anyway? They don’t drink. When we’re in the pub, they’re in the mosque. They don’t want their girls going with our boys. We don’t want our girls marrying their men. They grow up apart -there it is. No one wants it much different even if it could be.” -a old soldier who is a regular in the Hesketh Arms pub in Preston. These wise words were uttered in an interview given by a Daily Mail reporter.

“All the recent evidence shows that we are, as a society becoming more socially polarized. In many of our cities, things can’t get any worse.” -Trevor Phillips, head of the Commission for Racial Equality. Speaking on Sunday 22nd October to BBC 1’s Sunday AM.

“The majority of the Armed Forces either take offence or think it’s hilarious when they hear of the likes of suicide bombers Omar Sherif and Asif Hanif -or those recently released form Guantanamo Bay- being referred to as ‘British’. Such people might have been born in the UK, but that‘s as far as it goes. To accept them as Britons simply because they were born here is beyond the pale.” Major C. Blackthorne in a letter published in the Daily Mail

Get Out There and VOTE for GOVERNMENT

by johnofgwent
Yes I suppose this post is a week early. A case of 'Premature Election' maybe. But some things need to be said.

This morning as I wandered around the various news sources I like to peruse (and not just for the images one finds on page three) I found a sorry tale of a man, a celebrity in his own field, so disillusioned by politics he has not even bothered to vote. Ever.

Read the tale for yourself here.

I know little of the person concerned, but it would seem that the Olympic Medal winning boxer Amir Khan apparently posed for a picture with Mrs Amina Lone, an employee of the "Race Equality Foundation" and New Liebour Party Candidate for the Manchester Whalley Range ward. Mrs Lone then used the picture of herself apparently about to land a blow on Mr Khan's chin on her election leaflets with a caption 'Amina shows Amir Khan who is the champion in Whalley Range'.

Mr Khan (or at least his manager) has expressed anger that his image has been used in this way. It is claimed that Mrs Lone failed to obtain express permission for the use of that image in that way. And for a political party candidate to act in that way is a serious matter. It shows complete contempt for the regulatory framework under which elections, and election campaigns, are conducted. Not that new Liebour seem particularly concerned with adhering to the rules on anything these days least of all matters pertaining to the conduct of their politicians and their candidates.

Mr Khan's manager claims that his client has no interest in politics or political matters and has never, nor would he, endorse any particular political party. And that is an honourable position. Far more honourable, indeed, than the position many celebrities find themselves in after making such an endorsement.

But Mr Khan's mangager goes on to state that his client has never even voted.

Really ? Now I wonder what all those who campaigned, who fought and who even died over the years first to gain, and then to defend, the right to universal suffrage would say about that. Actually I hope they would think, as I do, that the right NOT to vote, for whatever reason, including disinterest, is just as precious as the right TO vote, and that NOT voting brings no dishonour, except perhaps upon those politicians and political parties who so failed to spark your interest.

But to sit back and do nothing means that Mrs Amina Lone and asll those like her who ride roughshod over your rights will succeed in landing their killer blow.

I have a postal vote. I have had a postal vote for many, many years because the nature of my job entitled me to one for DECADES before new Liebour found the device a handy one for following the example set by Robert Mugabe. And this morning I have used it. I shall later this morning deliver my vote by hand to the Electoral Registration Office because last year my ballot papers were intercepted and it was only when I went to complain that I found my ballot papers had been returned by someone other than me.

Regrettably this morning I see no candidate for the British National Party on my ballot paper. Mind you, when there was one, last year, thanks to the corrupt regional seat allocation system, my vote for the BNP handed the Regional Assembly seat to a Pakistani canddiate for Plaid Cymru whose sole aim was to establish an "electoral dynasty" by getting his daughter elected up the road. He failed in that aim.

So this morning I am reduced to voting for the people I best feel are able to deal a killer blow to the corrupt swine in charge in my neck of the woods. I have done my bit, to the best of my ability. Time will tell if I have acted wisely, or not.

All I ask is that, to quote wholly out of context from the Gospel of Luke, in the tenth chapter, and in verse 37, that you "GO, AND DO THOU LIKEWISE"

For if you do not, the corrupt scum we have in power right now have won.

Thanks for your time.

BNP takes 2nd place in Hinckley by-election

News just in has it that Mike Shore, BNP candidate in the Hinckley by-election, has come from nowhere to take second place with a stunning 18.8% of the poll. This is the first time that the BNP has ever contested an election in this part of Leicestershire and is particularly noteworthy as the ward is considered a Lib-Dem stronghold!

The full results are:

Hinckley & Bosworth District Council, Hinckley Castle Ward, 24th April 2008.

Lib-Dem 802 56.9%
BNP 264 18.8%
Con 226 16.1%
Lab 116 8.2%

Well done to Mike and his team in an amazing first outing!

Source

Tags: Hinckley Castle, by-election

UAF lies regarding Party Political Broadcasts

By johnofgwent

Recent posts by Sarah, Maid of Albion pointed out the BBC's apparent lack of adherence to its charter, and its definite lack of adherence to its word, by failing to place the BNP video on the website along with all the others broadcast under their obligations towards parties fielding candidates in the London Mayoral and wider Local Elections.

I thought I'd pop over to see how the opposition was rejoicing. And I came up with a few choice links. Let's start with "Urinate Against Freedom"'s attempt to deny the BNP the 'oxygen of publicity' shall we. Pop over to this page on Urinate's site and you will see they were so terrified that people might listen to the voice of reason that they actually mounted a protest outside Auntie Beeb's offices hoping to get the broadcast cancelled.

Really ? I can't say I noticed any such protest and it clearly achieved its aims of stopping transmission, didn't it. Well, I bet "Urinate" will claim so in a year or two. But what set me thinking was their statement on the page linked above.

They start off by saying "We believe the BNP should not be handed free broadcast opportunities to spread their message of hate.". Well we must accept with open arms and joy in our hearts that they are entitled to their beliefs. If we do not, we are no better than their supporters in the cult of mohammedanism who strive at every opportunity to ensure we are NOT entitled to ours. And let us be honest, Daytime TV is so BORING these days we NEED some of these left-leaning organisations to brighten up our day. Well the broadcast that came after the BNP one had ME rolling on the floor.

But then they go on "There is no legal obligation on the television and radio companies to broadcast the views of any political party simply on the grounds it is fielding a certain number of candidates"

Really ? That set me thinking, and then sent me hunting for answers. This link to the Westminster Parliamentary web site lists the judgement in the house of lords which became the last word on the Pro-Life Alliance complaint against the non-transmission of their Party Election Broadcast (PEB) for the 1997 election. (The one with the pictures of the aborted foetuses which were ruled to breach the taste and decency requirements)

But this rather detailed study of Party Political Broadcasting in the '97 election is definitely worth a read.

As for "Urinate"'s claim, well, I will leave it to Auntie Beeb herself, or at least her cousin north of Hadrian's wall, to tell the truth. Read it here.

Why are there Party Political Broadcasts?
To achieve comprehensive coverage during an election campaign, UK broadcasters must ensure that political parties currently represented at Westminster and all parties contesting more than 50 seats are allowed at least one Party Election Broadcast on television and radio. The BBC has no editorial control over the content of Party Election Broadcasts. However, we are responsible in so far as that we act as a publisher - broadcasts must observe the law and must follow the accepted standards on matters such as taste and decency. The BBC and independent television companies have outlined proposals for changes to the arrangements of broadcasting Party Political Broadcasts. To assist with the review they set in place a consultation paper, designed to invite feedback from viewers, listeners and the political parties.

Rock Against Racism - Politics for Dummies

By Brighton Rock

There are plenty of great rock bands with shambolic lifestyles. One of my favourite bands is Alice Cooper (1968-74), and they were certainly no angels. But they knew their limitations, they knew they were no role models, and they stuck to playing Rock and Roll rather than preaching politics.

"If you're listening to a rock star in order to get your information on who to vote for, you're a bigger moron than they are. Why are we rock stars? Because we're morons. We sleep all day, we play music at night and very rarely do we sit around reading the Washington Journal."

Babyshambles however seem to think they can advise us how to vote. The big babies can't take care of themselves and yet think they know best how to look after our country.

Singer Pete Doherty was sentenced to six months imprisonment, later reduced on appeal to two months, for burgling band member Carl Barât's flat, and he was recently jailed for 14 weeks by a court for breaching a probation order after a string of drugs and driving offences. But he's urged fans to vote for any party other than the British National Party, so that's alright then.

Bass player Drew McConnell is now urging London residents to vote in the forthcoming London assembly elections to prevent the British National Party from having a chance of getting a seat. He doesn't care about the future of the indigenous British people. But then he's not even British, he's Irish, so why should he care about us, and why should we listen to him?

No, it might make Babyshambles feel better about their disastrous lives to throw their dummies at the BNP, but grown up indigenous Britons want a civilised, safe London, not a scene of chaos, full of thieves and drug addicts. Don't let the maniacs of multiculturalism turn London into a complete shambles; vote BNP. Goodbye, big babies, we're gonna be elected.

The lies of Mayor Livingstone

This was previously posted to the Sarah Maid of Albion blog, however, given that the mayoral elections are now but a week away, I thought it deserved a wider audience.

As another of the never ending string of so called "Anti-Racist" events organised by the current London Mayor Ken Livingstone, (Chairman of the ludicrous UAF) he was asked about the teenage violence that had plagued London in 2007.

The reporter put the following question to the Mayor:

"Are you worried about this recent spate of teenage violence is it something new and alarming?... Tony Blair said, not long ago, that this was a black, cultural thing, do you agree?"

To which the mayor replied:

"There is an element of that, particularly around the drug trade but NO! IT’S A LOT OF WHITE KIDS STABBING OTHER WHITE KIDS!"

That, of course, is as a blatant Lie! and Livingstone knows it is a lie

(And here he is telling it)

According to the honorable Mayor of London these are "white kids stabbed by white kids"

In fact fact three of the 26 teen aged murder victims in London during 2007 were white, however, all the murderers and suspected murderers are non white.

Again Ken Livingstone shows as that political correctness and the truth are not the same thing.

If Ken will lie so blatantly about something as important as the murders of young children, what will he not lie about? Ask yourselves that when you cast your vote next Thursday.

Already in 2008 more teenagers are being killed on our streets, and the 2007 patten is continuing, and it will continue until our politicians start to tell the truth, or we start electing those who will.

_____________________
Hat Tip: UK Tabloid

“Scholars” Want MECCA to replace Greenwich as the reference point for the world's time

By Sarah Maid of Albion

Those who believe that the central goal of Islam is to create a global Caliphate which will eventually conquer and rule the world, certainly appear to have cause to for concern. Many scholars and commentators have chronicled the steady invasion of the UK, Europe and elsewhere by Muslims and the atrocities committed in the name of Islam. A relatively new Muslim movement is to create an internationally enforceable "legal instrument" by which mu slims can stifle any type of free speech, in the Western world, against Islam. Currently Muslims are being encouraged to file lawsuits against anyone they deem to be offensive to Islam often using Human Rights legislation to do the dirty work as in the famous Ezra Levant case.

Many may find the very idea of the supporters of Islam resorting to legislation designed to defend and respect Human Rights laughable, if not hypocritical to the extreme, but then again, the followers of Aisha's elderly husband have never been slow to exploit that which they would otherwise condemn, and many are happy to take advantage of the Western taxpayer's generosity whilst condemning the west and all its works.

Now Islamic "scholars" have decided there is yet another way to implement their Global Caliphate. Insisting that "Mecca is the center of the world's land" they want to change the reference point for world time from Greenwich, England (Greenwich Mean Time) to, where else, but Mecca.

It seems the have even invented the Mecca watch so much do Muslims balk at what they feel is the Western world inflicting Greenwich upon them. (Gosh that must be the first new Muslim invention, interesting new means of torture aside, since 600 AD)

If this were an isolated example, I would perhaps join with the Politically Correct commentators who seek to portray this as little more a cultural issue, but given the long line of examples of Islam seeking to impose itself on the West only a fool could be so naive. For those who continue to keep their heads in the sand and refuse to believe in Muslims desire for world domination I suggest it is now time for such dhimwits to wake up, as the time (GMT or Mecca) for such self delusion may soon be running out.


____________________

Hat tip: The Opinionator

Surprise suprise!!

Suddenly, at 07:20 pm, the BNP broadcast turns up on the BBC London Election Broadcasts website only 48 hours late.

I would love to know what happened, but I guess we'll never find out the truth.

As reported earlier on this site, it initially appeared that the BBC were attempting to skip the broadcast by moving straight from Friday's Conservative broadcast to the Left List one on Tuesday, but it seems they have changed their mind. It would be nice to think that we played some role in drawing attention to this, and getting it resolved, but who knows.

Thanks to Green Arrow correspondent Like the Roman for initially spotting this.

Sarah Maid of Albion

The BNP Pre-election Broadcast