Germany is a big player in the European Union and usually gets its way along with France in the direction this undemocratic organisation moves in.
If you want yet another reason for why Great Britain should withdraw from this soviet style mess of evil then read about what the German Government is pushing as a normal healthy lifestyle for families.
"Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and vagina of their daughters. Their caresses too seldom pertain to these regions, while this is the only way the girls can develop a sense of pride in their sex,"
The above is from a booklet published by the Germans Ministry of Family Affairs and makes worrying as well as stomach churning reading.
Canadian author and public speaker Michael O'Brien who has written and spoken extensively about the crisis of culture in the West spoke to LifeSiteNews.com about the shocking and extremely disturbing phenomenon. It is, he said, "State-encouraged incest, which in most civilized societies is a crime." The development is, he suggests, a natural outcome of the rejection of the Judeo-Christian moral order.
Well go read it and if not yet a member of the British National Party then think about doing it soon. Time is running out and only the BNP would withdraw within 24 hours of forming a government. Your choice really or are you waiting for a European Directive on how to abuse your children?
When men cease to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing anything
Hat Tip: The Midnight Sun
Tags:
Come back Adolf!! Almost all is forgiven!!!
ReplyDeleteGreen Arrow, thanks for the link. It's great to see you rallying up some action on this. Although Germany appears to be one of the vanguard of the moral imploders in Europe, there are others as well, for example, the Netherlands. If you can raise up some voices over there, you can make a difference!
ReplyDeleteGreetings Kuffar Scum,
ReplyDeleteI see the Islamisation of Germany is progressing according to plan.
The practices known as Mufa Khathat (try googling) are sacred Islamic rituals performed by males (especially fathers and uncles) on young children - http://news.speeple.com/blogspot.com/2007/06/22/islam-and-the-gay-muslim.htm )
"The Prophet of Islam married his first 'wife' when she was six years old. Molestation of small children is widespread amongst Devout Muslims and considered manly. At weddings, the habit of mufaâ'khathat of the children. ( mufaâ'khathat – literally translated, it means 'placing between the thighs' which means placing the male member between the thighs of a child and masturbating) is common. The prophet, the peace of Allah be upon him, also practiced the 'thighing' of the six year old Aiesha so all good Muslims should follow his example.
The Holy Prophet of Islam was quite enamored of this practice..
Narrated by his child wife 'Aiesha : I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible). (Book #4, Hadith #229)
Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar : I asked 'Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, "I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah 's Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. " (Book #4, Hadith #231)
Narrated 'Amr bin Maimun : I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that 'Aiesha had said, "I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah 's Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them. (Book #4, Hadith #232)
Narrated 'Aiesha : I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them. (Book #4, Hadith #233)
Islamic jurisprudence (FIQH) sanctions child sex.
"A man can quench his sexual lusts with a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. Sodomizing the baby is halal (allowed by sharia). If the man penetrates and damages the child, then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however, does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl's sister. It is better for a girl to marry when her menstruation starts, and at her husband's house rather than her father's home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven." Khomeini, "Tahrirolvasyleh" fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990
Islamic law permits any adult male to 'thigh' or enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her but young boys are even more attractive."
Any kuffar who criticises these sacred rituals and cultural practices is a racist Islamophobic bigot (and probably a potential BNP supporter) and must be sent for compulsory re-education and multicultural sensitivity training.
Ayatollah Khomeini
ALLAH'S SNACKBAR (formerly Funny Boyz)
16A Dickson Rd,
Blackpool.
Lancashire.
FY1 2AE
1 - Adolph was from Austria.
ReplyDelete2 - In case anybody has doubts about the validity of this story, my blog post on this has hyperlinks to German-language MSM sources commenting on this.
Green, our nation destroyers adopt many strategies, and in order to undermine society, one must attack its very pillars, morality and personal probity, stand in the way of their new order. For their plan to work they must create disunity and chaos, they must foster and promote, any and all aberrant behaviours. There are many fields in which the nation destroyers have excelled; in fact, they invented a whole new discipline, psychoanalysis, which is distinct from empirically verifiable Psychology. Psychoanalysis doesn’t bother to scientifically study mental processes, at least in any scientific way, under controllable conditions; instead, it works to its own agenda. The principal instigator of this pseudo-science was one Sigmund Freud, known as "the father of psychoanalysis" (sic), who almost single-handedly created a movement of such destruction, it completely undermined societal morality.
ReplyDeleteIt can be argued that one basis for his warped theories, began with the study of totemism, although this was primarily used to destabilize, in-group unity. Semitic Freud hypothesised that individuals had an almost irresistible urge to commit incest and spent a lifetime repressing the desire. Sigmund Freud’s theories were incredibly warped, and almost all centred around undermining the family, corrupting this most precious of groups, associating the most innocent of inter-family actions as somehow perverse. He popularised the “Oedipus complex” whereby a child of a particular gender, will harbour aberrant sexual thoughts towards the parent of the opposite gender, in this event the same gender parent becomes a rival.
Of course this turns the entire parent child relationship on its head, especially that involving dissimilar sexes, rather than Freud’s sinister interpretation, the relationship between sexually different family members is extraordinary, precisely because they are sexually different, with no loathsome overtones. Freud’s quite terrible “Oedipus complex theory” gave rise to Jung’s “Electra complex” the theory, that the female child harbours sexual feeling’s towards the father. These appalling ideas became quite mainstream influencing a number of disciplines, I would say that the pamphlet you refer to, is merely a reinterpretation of the theme, we must contest any and all expressions of paedophilia, be they wrapped in the clothes of supposed science or expressed in other ways.
Our children are our most precious gift; it beggars belief the current sexualisation of young girls, promoted by major retailers,. It seems that not only are young girls forced to grow up quicker, by peer pressure, but also that retailers and the mass media are willing advocates. I believe that children should be children, and that each should grow at their own pace, it would seem that egalitarian thought, and capitalistic exploiters, do not believe the same. As an aside, I must say, that there is no such thing as a Judeo-Christian moral order, as referred to by Michael O'Brien, the concept is completely erroneous. The term Judeo-Christian, gives Judaism equal footing with Christianity, in the formation of Western culture, this is an obvious lie, an attempt to distort history. 14
"The term Judeo-Christian, gives Judaism equal footing with Christianity, in the formation of Western culture, this is an obvious lie, an attempt to distort history."
ReplyDeleteNATIONALIST14 Please explain from history how you can have Christianity without a Jewish foundation?
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imprinting_(psychology)
ReplyDeleteFreud was a sicko who lusted after his parents because he hadn't been (non-sexually) kissed and cuddled by his Mum and Dad in early childhood. Check out the Westermarck effect.
Westermarck and Freud
Freud argued that as children, members of the same family naturally lust for one another, making it necessary for societies to create incest taboos, but Westermarck argued the reverse, that the taboos themselves arise naturally as products of innate attitudes. Subsequent research over the years has supported Westermarck's observations and interpretation ([1]; see here for other concrete studies), but still some psychoanalysts maintain or modify the Freudian concept.
One argument used to support the psychoanalytic stance is that such taboos would be pointless if there were no desire to perform the acts in question.[citation needed] However, this argument assumes that cultural taboos emerge to turn people against evolved ("natural") tendencies. It is equally plausible that cultural taboos (like many other cultural beliefs and systems) exist to support adaptive behavior. This is supported by the fact that the incest taboo is pretty much universal (in no known culture is sex between siblings promoted by most or even a substantial proportion of people).
In his book How the Mind Works, the psychologist Steven Pinker noted the following: "The idea that boys want to sleep with their mothers strikes most men as the silliest thing they have ever heard. Obviously, it did not seem so to Freud, who wrote that as a boy he once had an erotic reaction to watching his mother dressing. But Freud had a wet-nurse, and may not have experienced the early intimacy that would have tipped off his perceptual system that Mrs. Freud was his mother. The Westermarck theory has out-Freuded Freud" (p. 460).
Kids need geniune parental affection - kisses and cuddles to grow up O.K. The two opposite extremes of sexual 'fiddling' and total rejection of all physical contact will produce perverts of one kind or another.
Anonymous, I’m afraid I fail to understand, my comment did not pertain to the creation of Christianity, and in any event, Christianity at its very foundation, faced considerable opposition from Judaism. The term Judeo-Christian is a relatively new term, an attempt to lump together two quite disparate philosophies; we as a people have the absolute right to our history, without the distortion prevalent in contemporary times.
ReplyDeleteI would take it as read, that a people raised to disregard the cross, cannot be considered friends of Christianity. It is not the Christian faith that teaches its adherents to spit three times, in the presence of the star of David, nor do we find the red cross emblem offensive. One only has to read the history of Europe, to realise that the Jews were always considered an alien kind, their practice of usury condemned by Christians in other times. I’m afraid that it is for others to distort history to their own agenda, I myself prefer facts, and the fact is that the jews are as alien as the Mohammedans. 14