Are not always peacefulThe following has been shamelessly lifted from the site of Robert Baggs. Even I can understand the message he is sending out. The link to his site is at the bottom of the page.
A Fairy Story for the Festive Season
Recently, demonstrations have taken place across the country protesting the fact that Parliament is finally addressing the issue of illegal immigration. Certain people are angry that the UK might actually want to protect it own borders, might make it harder to sneak into this country and, once here, make it harder as an illegal immigrant to stay indefinitely. Let me see if I correctly understand the thinking behind these protests.
Let us say I break into your house. Then, when you discover me in your house, you insist that I leave, but I say, I’ve made all the beds and washed the dishes and done the laundry and swept the floors. In fact, I have done all the things you do not like to do. I am hard working and honest. Well, except for when I broke into your house.
According to the protesters, not only must you let me stay, you must also add me to your family’s insurance plan, educate my children, pay for all my family’s medical and other health care needs, and provide many other benefits to me and to my family. My husband will do your gardening and general odd jobs because he, too, is hard-working and honest. Well, except for when we broke into your house.
If you try to call the police or force me out, I will call my friends, who will picket your house carrying signs that proclaim my illegal right to be there. It is only fair, after all, because you have a nicer house than I do, and I am just trying to better myself. I am hardworking and honest. Well, except for the . . . . um, you know. . . . . the breaking in part.
And what a great deal it is for me! I live in your house, contributing only a fraction of the cost of my keep, and there is nothing you can do about it without being accused of selfishness and prejudice against house breakers. I want you to learn my language, so you can communicate with me, because English is too hard for me to learn. Also, you must change the rules in our schools so that my children can wear the clothes I want them to wear, rather than the uniform your children have to wear. Your schools must also provide special foods to my children and your children must eat these foods, too, because I do not want my children eating many of the foods you and your children eat. Otherwise, you must build schools that are especially for my children, and others like them, where they can wear the clothes of my choice, speak the language of my choice, eat the food of my choice and are taught the subjects of my choice.
If you are of a different religion to me, you and your children must also learn all about my family’s religion, although the schools you build for my children will not teach them about the religion of you and your family. As I am living in your house, you and your family must stop celebrating your own religious festivals but allow me always to celebrate mine. If I break the rules of your house, I should not be subject to the same punishments as your own family because my rules may be different from yours. You should also allow me to vote in my own language because I live in your house.
Only in the UK could all this happen. Why cannot people see how ridiculous this is? If you agree, why not make a New Year’s resolution that in 2008 you will do something about it rather than just sit back and let it happen.
The Robert Baggs Blogspot may be found: here .
I think this insightful essay eloquently presents the aggressively entitled mindset of the migrant community in Britain. But of course they have been catered to by the British government to such an extraordinarily perverse degree, what would we expect otherwise? The old adage of the squeaky wheel getting the grease, is most appropriate when describing this situation. If non-Occidentals don't get their way, or feel their 'rights' have been infringed, or their culture disrespected, they will organise into a cohesive group and act. Whether that action takes the form of political blackmail, ie. do what we want or you won't get our vote or financial support; or, do we want or we will take to the streets and cause an uncomfortable, economically disadvantageous disruption in social order. White protestant and Catholic Western Europeans simply don't stand up for their rights nor do they express their discontent at the polls or in polite company. And so the government has learned that they can be largely ignored until election time, when they can be soothed with empty rhetoric and comforting lies. Until Occidental man wakes up in sufficient numbers to make the threat of government persecution, social ostracism and economic disenfranchisement a diminishing deterrent for public expression of discontent with the status quo - we can only look forward to the inevitable fall of the west and of Occidental man. So wake up already!
ReplyDeleteF.
Eurosceptics.org
I am going to print this off because its simplistic and non offensive terminology just about says it all. I can think of no member of the host population with whom it wouldnt strike a chord. Now if this little essay was to be put in front of the masses along with a solution we would be on to a winner.
ReplyDeleteHad Charles Martel not been victorious," Hitler told his inner crowd in August 1942, "then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world." Hitler told Mr. Speer that Islam is "perfectly suited to the Germanic temperament."
ReplyDeleteClear explanation by Paul Belien over at The Washington Times on Nazis and Islamists. I for one am not spooked by the newly resurrected old bogeyman - NAZIS! We are not at war with the Nazis. This is a distraction from addressing the real problem, the real scourge of civilization - Islamic jihad. Paul Belien is editor of the Brussels Journal and an adjunct fellow of the Hudson Institute.
BTW, Paul will be joining me on my radio show next Monday at 3pm. Listen and learn.
Nazis and Islamists Paul Belien, The Washington Times
During the Second World War, the Nazis worked on plans to build the "Amerikabomber," an airplane specially devised to fly suicide missions into Manhattan's skyscrapers.
Albert Speer, the Nazi minister for armaments, recalled in his diary: "It was almost as if [Hitler] was in a delirium when he described to us how New York would go up in flames. He imagined how the skyscrapers would turn into huge blazing torches. How they would crumble while the reflection of the flames would light the skyline against the dark sky." Hitler hated Manhattan. It was, he said, "the center of world Jewry." Less than 60 years later, Hitler's plans were executed by Muslim immigrants living in Germany. At the 2003 trial of the network around Mohamed Atta (the pilot who flew into the World Trade Center), Shahid Nickels, a German convert to Islam and a friend of Atta's, said that the Islamists had targeted Manhattan because it is "the center of world Jewry, and the world of finance and commerce controlled by it."
The parallels between Nazism and Islamism are overwhelming. Yet the subject is a taboo. When last March the German historian Matthias Kuentzel, author of "Jihad and Jew-Hatred: Islamism, Nazism and the Roots of 9/11," was to give a lecture at the University of Leeds (Britain), the university authorities cancelled the lecture after threats from Muslim students.
Read more on this subject here: Nazi/Islam Nexus: Inspiration or Conspiracy
There is a war going on between the Jihadists and the West. We are losing the battle because, as so often in man's history, our political leaders think that they are still fighting the previous war. Europeans who warn against the danger of Islamism are considered — and sometimes even prosecuted — as xenophobes, racists, even neo-Nazis.
The European left, in league with the Islamists, is constantly reminding the Europeans of Hitler and the Nazis, accusing Europe's identity, the very core of its being, of being intrinsically evil. Hence, attempts to rob Europe of its identity are seen as "good," even when those eager to eradicate this identity leave no doubt that they will eradicate the Jews first.
Unfortunately, some American "conservatives" are also blind. Last year, Ralph Peters wrote in the New York Post that Europe's identity is stained by "ineradicable viciousness." He said that the Europeans are "world-champion haters," who have "perfected genocide and ethnic cleansing." Mr. Peters' message is similar to that of Ayyub Axel Koehler. Last June, Mr. Koehler, a convert to Islam and the chairman of the German Council of Muslims, told German church leaders that Europe should be ashamed of the "trail of blood" that it had left throughout the world down the centuries.
Please read it all.
ARTWORK:Charles Martel de Steuben from 1834 till 1837
He is best remembered for winning the Battle of Tours in 732, which has traditionally been characterized as an event that halted the Islamic expansionism in Europe that had conquered Iberia. "Charles's victory has often been regarded as decisive for world history, since it preserved western Europe from Muslim conquest and Islamization."
SEE BLOGGER. "ATLAS SHRUGS"
OUR POLITICAL LEADERS KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING. AFTER ALL THEIR EXPENSIVE EDUCATIONS SURELY TO GOD THEY WERE TAUGHT ABOUT THE REASONS THE CRUSADES CAME ABOUT.
IN 1400 YEARS OF ISLAM ONLY 13 YEARS WERE FREE OF JIHAD EUROPE IS NOW ON IT'S THIRD.
BUT TO AID THE JIDADISTS THE EU DROP PHRASES THAT WOULD ALERT PEOPLE. ISLAMIC TERRORIST. JIHAD.
MUSLIM. UNLESS IT'S TO GIVE PRAISE.
THEY EQUATE ISLAM WITH PEACE.
THEY USE THE WORD MODERATE MUSLIMS.
MUSLIMS WILL TELL YOU,THERE ARE ONLY MUSLIMS NO SUCH SEPERATE CREED AS THE MODERATE MUSLIM.
THE UKs MAIN AREA NOW IS FINANCE..ISLAMIC FINANCE!
SHARIA FINANCE BROUGHT INTO BEING BY THE BROTHERHOOD.ANOTHER FORM OF JIHAD! 'ECONOMICAL JIHAD'
THOSE THAT RULE THE POWER HOUSE WILL RULE THE COUNTRY.
ASK THE ROMANS!