Saturday, 8 March 2008

Bullied by their safe word


By Sarah Maid of Albion.

Those who indulge in S&M games tend to use what they call a “safe word”, it is a word or sometimes phrase, usually agreed in advance and which the submissive can call out to his mistress to let her know that she is spanking him too hard and that she should now stop. The supporters of mass immigration and multicultural diversity also have a safe word, but it was not agreed in advance, it is a word invented by them, and which they have used to stifle all criticism of even any questioning of what they are imposing upon us. That word is “racist”.

Like the above mentioned submissive, the forces of irrevocable change cry out their safe word as soon as the heat is turned on them, knowing that, following decades of gradual brainwashing and intimidation, in which they have persuaded the tolerant and decent British public that the crime of racism is as heinous as rape or paedophilia, the very mention of the word will both stop their opponents in their tracks whilst simultaneously placing them in the wrong. The safe “R” word, has as many definitions as Paris Hilton has shoes, and it has been used to enable the so called great and good to get away with what what they have done to us, and to prevent us from doing anything to stop them.

The most recent use of the “R” word for its backside covering properties is the case of Lee Jasper, when the media started to ask questions about what had happened to hundreds of thousand of pounds of London taxpayers' money supposedly given to various black or Asian groups. According to Lee Jasper, and many others, including Ken Livingstone, the very act of asking the question was racist, to require accountability, or indeed any proper accounts from black organizations was racist, indeed anyone who did not automatically assume total propriety on the part of black politicians or black companies were self evidently racist.

Instead of answering legitimate questions about the role for which the taxpayer paid him a vast salary, Mr Jasper and his supporters would only chant the mantra that he was “the victim of a racist campaign by racially motivated racists”, their expressions becoming progressively more alarmed at the realisation that, for the first time the magic shield wasn't working.

However, it was not just Lee Jasper, he and not even cleared his desk before the black organisations and public sector serving black and ethnic firms were complaining about this “racist” investigation and claiming that it should not have happened, because it might have a detrimental effect on the public perception of black and ethnic organisations. In effect what they were saying was that back organisations should be exempt from scrutiny or questions about malpractice or dishonesty because to do otherwise is ........ racist. Once again they were evoking the safe word in the hope that we will shut up and not ask questions.

However, we should no forget that the “R” word is a multi-purpose tool and its uses are not just defensive, it is at its most effective when it is used as an offensive weapon with which to bludgeon opponents or as a smear in order to damage the reputation of those who refuse to dance the diversity foxtrot.

For example if you question the unmitigated benefits of multiculturalism you are decried as a racist, if you suggest that any section of the community, other than the white community, might possibly have undesirable behavioural or social characteristics, you are a racist, in fact if you demonstrate anything short of total surrender to the cult of enrichment that in itself will automatically render one at risk of shrill accusations of bigotry, xenophobia, hatred, and of course racism.

So brutalised and intimidated have the British public become by the one word, that they often behave like abused children, denying naughtiness before they are even accused of it, we see this all the time when people are interviewed about immigration on TV when the first thing they always say is "I'm not a racist but ...." or display embarrassment at their failure to embrace all aspects of politically correct orthodoxy. For instance the middle class, middle aged woman I recently saw talking about the impact of immigration, at one point admitting the country had been “totally changed”, however her body language made it obvious she was clearly ashamed and embarrassed to even mention such blasphemy and afraid people would think less of her for saying it.

This phenomenon does not only manifest itself in public, who amongst us, in our own homes, with the windows shut have not noticed guests instinctively lower their voices when expressing a view or mentioning a fact which might displease the zealots at the UAF?. The campaign has been relentless and it has taken over thirty years to reduce a race which once ruled the seas to a state of fear and confusion cowering before a word which they do not fully understand.

Perhaps the most vicious use of the “R” word is reserved for those white people who love their own race and presumes to express that love. Let anyone dare claim that white people have the same right as any other to feel proud of our race and our achievements, that our culture is as valuable and as worth preserving as any other culture, and they will surely feel the wrath of the defenders of the multi-coloured flame.

Let any scholar or academic remind us that Europe and North America were only briefly involved in the international slave trade, compared to the millennia it had existed, but travelling in an Easterly direction and in much greater numbers, or let him or her express the opinion that the British Empire was one of the most benign forces for good in history, which brought benefits to its subjects they had never known, and of which independence has since deprived them, then they will be hunted down. There homes may be targeted, they will be pilloried in the media, and any speaking engagement they attend will be besieged by placard carrying protesters, chanting, like some medieval mob “Racist, racist, burn the witch, racist, racist burn the witch” until the miscreant is silenced.

By the very act of writing this article I am forever condemned as a racist, by the definition of our enemies. However, as their definition is forever being rewritten and redefined so that it can apply to every new threat to their ideology, it is hard to avoid such a label. Indeed why avoid it? If it is racist by their definition to love my country and be proud of my race, then I am a racist. If it is racist to demand accountability from a public figures irrespective of their colour, then I am racist. If it is racist to tell the truth about racial crime and the fact that, despite the government misinformation, the home offices own figures show that white people are disproportionately the victims of race crime, and to a staggering degree, then I am a racist.

By their definition I am a racist, and yet I hate nobody, I would not wish to harm a hair on any non-white head, I wish them only happiness and that their lands thrive in peace and prosperity and that we can cohabit as a harmonious and mutually supportive international community. I ache for the people of other nations when I see the horrors inflicted upon them by their own governments and acts of God. I believe totally that third world countries need our aid and our support, I honour and admire many of their national traditions and customs and feel that the world would be a poorer place were they not preserved, in the same way that I honour and love the culture and traditions of my own land, and believe the world would be a poorer place were they to be lost.

I am happy to welcome reasonable numbers of foreigners to my land, but as visitors to my home, not as the new occupiers, if they abide by our laws and accept that they are our guests, then they will receive nothing but friendship and hospitality from me.

By the definition of those who hate me, I am a racist, not because I hate, but because I love too much, because I love my native land in whose earth I can trace my line back a thousand years, for which my ancestors fought and in which their bones are buried. To them, I am a racist because I love my people, a race which has done more to benefit mankind and the greater good than almost any other which has walked the earth.

Let them call me racist I will not renounce my love for my land and my people, even if, as a result I must accept the ugly words my enemies throw at me.

If as the gay community have embraced the word “queer”, and black rap stars have embraced the words once used to oppress them, I must embrace a word so long used to deride and intimidate me and mine, then so be it, is it not better to embrace a word than it is to be ruled by one?.

Am I alone?, is it wishful thinking? or is change in air? have some tectonic plates begun to shift deep within the British psyche, is the veil lifting and the film falling from our nations eyes, have the people of our land begun to awake to what has been done to us and how we have been manipulated?. I hope I am right and that that day is approaching when we as a nation stand up and refuse to ever again be bullied by a word.

10 comments:

  1. the word racist has lost much of its power when used out of context, people like Jasper as you note can no longer get away with such abuses.

    they have cried wolf too many times.

    in fact i used to be alarmed by the word, now i just shrug it of as a sick hate tactic or pure ignorance.

    i would feel pity for those who use it did i not know better that these people would gladly throw us and our children in the gas chambers should they ever get the chance, such is their hate.

    these people are liberal fascists and the term is sticking since the book liberal fascism came out in the states.

    it has in part woke people up.

    yes the book with a smiley face and hitlers trademark facial hair.

    because these people have always spouted that they are there for the oppessed and that therefore qualifies them as the nice party,

    yet they themselfs oppress the majority in the most vicious abusive manner to prop up whatever their deluded pet cause it is that week!

    all people are equal blah blah blah, yet not all people are equal, paedophiles for example, vicious criminals, there has to be a line drwn somewhere or society collapses and guess what since the liberal fascists have dominated and terrorised society society has collapsed.

    it will eventually reach th point where it will be rejected outright as people see it for what it really is, an opressive destuctive dogma, either that or society will be so damaged that it will be reduced to continued and spiraling insanity which results in civil unrest, totalitarian goverment an third worl ecconomics and politics - looks like we are almost there?

    ReplyDelete
  2. GA i love the pictures of the UAF etc, they always look like the freak show that they are.

    what better recruting agent for the BNP than to show them as the pysical freaks that they are, keep posting the pictures it totally undermines any coolness that they seek through their music sidelines which usually invlve a group of untalented rent boy junkies at best!

    these people are losing the war and the best part is - they know it!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Change is indeed in the air. This gentle breeze started some 18 months ago, and was felt by many. Perhaps it was the increasingly desperate attacks upon the BNP, the use of what should be impartial bodies such as the police and the CPS to intimidate them, whatever the reason the awakening has begun. This is no more typified than be the new found confidence that the BNP have aquired, the transformation from defensive apologism to seeking out coruption and dealing with it. The media will always steer any mention of their name towards immigration so that the "racist" word can be rolled out, but then they need to counter that mantra by guiding the conversation away from purely immigration - one look at the BNP website should be enough to show most observers that corrupt government and its associated "agencies" and quangos are mainly the target of BNP investigations. By continually directing any debate toward the racism goal the establishment re-instate the years of propaganda into the minds of the viewers. I would imagine that the powers that be realise that their window of opportunity is fast closing, and as the the native population become aware, than they must counter this with further immigration, up until the day when even the entire indigenous vote would not be sufficient to overthrow the imported one. Dangerous times are ahead for Britain and the West, those that have been behind this gross treason know that should sanity prevail and the breeze become a force 10, then they will be held acountable. And this accountability should it ever materialise, must be swift and without mercy I'm afraid, no imaginary compassion or giving the benefit of the doubt, as this cancer requires immediate and complete extraction. As a father, the recent left wing threats against innocent children neccesitate this.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good comments on the word "racist" and "Change in the air".

    I am copying them to our forum and posting them in the comments section with others that should not be lost on a blog.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sarah.

    I cannot see the problem of saying that the Caucasian races (which represent only about 6% of the planets total) have done more than any other race to push forward the frontiers of knowledge/understanding, on just about every aspect you care to mention.
    It may go just a teezy weezy way to explain why the black & brown races are queuing up in their millions to come here and partake of those benefits.
    Their own countries have naught else to offer other than disease, early death and poverty.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I totally agree with you Bernard, I can not see how saying such a think would be a problem or racist. However, I can assure you that in modern Britain anyone saying it would be accused of racism.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think Lee Jasper is an advance warning of things to come if Obama would become president in the U.S.

    The democratic party have decided a "black" president will be an ideal "leader" because then no one will be able to criticise anything he does without being called a racist, and he basically has carte blanche to do whatever he likes. No more controls and checks, because they are "racist," you know.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes far better than a Teflon coating that our 'Tone had, Obama's would not only be able to repel any accusation, but it would also be able to throw them back and injure the opponent. BTW, Obama?, very close to another name is it not?

    ReplyDelete
  9. You are not alone. I have come to exactly the same conclusion. I am a racists, and quite happy to admit it, now.

    My biggest question is now, how to effect change. Supporting the BNP is one way, and possibly the best in the short term. As each and every vote for them will be noticed.

    But I want effect a healthy change through our society, to wake it up speedily, to protect its self, but as yet I'm not sure how, apart from blogging and writing to MPs.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The 'racist' and 'nazi' name-slinging thing is also known as the 'Godwin's Law effect'. I wrote a little something on this earlier this month which got interesting reactions from American readers. The real question is how we can move past Godwin's Law fully and effectively, I think.

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.