By Sarah Maid of Albion
Those who believe that the central goal of Islam is to create a global Caliphate which will eventually conquer and rule the world, certainly appear to have cause to for concern. Many scholars and commentators have chronicled the steady invasion of the UK, Europe and elsewhere by Muslims and the atrocities committed in the name of Islam. A relatively new Muslim movement is to create an internationally enforceable "legal instrument" by which mu slims can stifle any type of free speech, in the Western world, against Islam. Currently Muslims are being encouraged to file lawsuits against anyone they deem to be offensive to Islam often using Human Rights legislation to do the dirty work as in the famous Ezra Levant case.
Many may find the very idea of the supporters of Islam resorting to legislation designed to defend and respect Human Rights laughable, if not hypocritical to the extreme, but then again, the followers of Aisha's elderly husband have never been slow to exploit that which they would otherwise condemn, and many are happy to take advantage of the Western taxpayer's generosity whilst condemning the west and all its works.
Now Islamic "scholars" have decided there is yet another way to implement their Global Caliphate. Insisting that "Mecca is the center of the world's land" they want to change the reference point for world time from Greenwich, England (Greenwich Mean Time) to, where else, but Mecca.
It seems the have even invented the Mecca watch so much do Muslims balk at what they feel is the Western world inflicting Greenwich upon them. (Gosh that must be the first new Muslim invention, interesting new means of torture aside, since 600 AD)
If this were an isolated example, I would perhaps join with the Politically Correct commentators who seek to portray this as little more a cultural issue, but given the long line of examples of Islam seeking to impose itself on the West only a fool could be so naive. For those who continue to keep their heads in the sand and refuse to believe in Muslims desire for world domination I suggest it is now time for such dhimwits to wake up, as the time (GMT or Mecca) for such self delusion may soon be running out.
____________________
Hat tip: The Opinionator
I'm just hoping the decision to alter GMT won't be decided by David Cameron [DHIMMI]
ReplyDeleteHe was on LBC radio this morning trying to drum up support for the Turk Boris.
Close to the end of his little rant he added; get out and give Boris your vote then God willing the change will come,added afterwards [INSHA'ALLAH] God willing in Arabic.
He'd spoke of ending PC his bowing to moslems just proved he'd do no such thing.
What a flaming Dhimmi! the lot of them need kicking out otherwise pretty damned soon bowing down by choice will become forced under sharia laws.
Has he ever spoken another language to any other section of this countries immigrants POLES,HUNGARIANS,GERMANS,FRENCH.CHINESE ETC ETC?
So why did he feel he had to bow to moslems FEAR?
This is England part of the United Kingdom had he spoken Welsh or gaelic then that would be fair infact i'd kinda like that but bloody Arabic it's an insult!
Arabs were killing British soldiers less than 50 years ago in Eygpt how quickly these politicians forget the British blood spilt in these foreign sand pits.
REMEMBER REDWOOD TORY MP COULDN'T EVEN SING THE WORDS TO LAND OF MY FATHERS AND HE WAS WELSH SECRETARY?
NOW THE TRAITORS TAKE TIME TO LEARN ARABIC.
Even i can sing Land of my fathers right through but then i took the trouble to learn the words to a beautifull piece of music from the island of Britain.
POLITICAL ISLAM IS WHAT'S GOING ON HERE WITH THE SAME APPEASEMENT THAT POLITICIANS FIRST TRIED WITH HITLER!
ReplyDeleteWHEN POLITICIANS SAY TO WIN THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF MOSLEMS..FALSE THEY CAN LOAN THEM WITH JIZRA TAXES PAID IN THE FORM OF BENEFITS!
Of Interest:
Most Westerners think of the Islamic mosque as a church, primarily a place of worship. A mosque is much more than this. These articles give a clear picture of its functions.
Part One
Part Two
An Ethical Basis for War Against Political Islam: Part 3
This newsletter is one of a series on the subject
Islam and Political Islam
Throughout the world, Islam is perceived as a religion, but it moved quickly from strictly religious teachings into one of the world’s most successful political systems. Political Islam has an unbroken 1400-year history and continues to spread rapidly today through immigration and population growth as well as military conquest. The most recent of these wars of conquest is that of the Islamic regime of Khartoum, which is actively engaged in a genocidal war against Sudanese Christians and Animists.
In its early years, the spread of Islam both as a religion and as a political and military force was explosive. Within ten years after Mohammed established an Islamic city-state in Medina he had absorbed the divided tribes of Arabia into one nation.
Religious vs. Political islam
Religious Islam is focused on Five Pillars:
Repeating the creed, “There is no god but Allah, and Mohammed is his final prophet.”
Praying five times a day facing in the direction of Mecca.
Contributing to charity to benefit other Muslims.
Fasting during the month of Ramadan.
Going on pilgrimage to Mecca.
None of the Five Pillars includes the non-Islamic world. Jihad, which is incumbent on all Muslims, is sometimes called the Sixth Pillar, but the first five pillars are religious and jihad is political.
Religious Islam strictly deals with Muslims. Political Islam is the doctrine that drives all Islamic policy about the kafirs.
Political Duality
In the Sunna, the part of the Trilogy that records Mohammed’s actions, jihad, slavery, killing and oppression are clearly considered ethical when used to advance Islam. It is this “us” and “them” mentality that results in an ethical inequality, the duality, that is inherent in Islam. And, according to Muslims, the laws of Islam are eternal and cannot be changed, reformed or altered. It is ordained by Allah. It was not created by Man. It is permanent and it is universal and no on has the right to amend or reform it.
The Koran, the Hadith and the Sira all emphasize that the only politics recognized by Allah are the politics of Islam. From that viewpoint, all governments must become Islamic in order to preserve peace, because Muslims can use the violence of jihad on any Free who do not submit.
Mohammed was a master of this dualistic thinking. He used the tribal jealousies and conflicts to convert, conquer and unite on a global scale. Populations quickly recognized that they would fare better as Muslims under Islam, than as “others,” or kafirs. While the kafirs are unimpressed by Islam’s threats of Hell as the only hereafter available to kafirs, they do care about how they are treated ethically and legally in this plane of existence. However, Islam declares that all kafirs are second-class citizens.
In the Islamic Trilogy, the kafirs can be treated well only if they submit to the demands of Islam. The sacred texts of Islam are adamant that domination is the only way to treat the kafirs.
Stages of Duality
Islam has two modes of Koranic behavior-the Koran of Mecca and the Koran of Medina. In Mecca, Mohammed was weak and Islam was beginning and the Koran of Mecca is religious. In Medina, Mohammed became political and strong. So the Koran of Medina is political, violent, judgment and demanding.
Bear patiently with what the kafirs say, and leave their company without recrimination. Leave to Me those that deny the Truth, those that enjoy the comforts of this life; bear with them yet a little while. Koran of Mecca 73:10
Mohammed is the perfect Muslim. At first he was nice, then demanding, then violent. Demanding as in: if you don’t do what Islam dictates, first come the threats and then come the violence.
So the “good” Muslim is a Meccan Muslim.
In Medina Mohammed transformed the religion of Islam into a political system. Killing, theft, and rape became sacralized. He became powerful and the Koranic message changed. A terrorist follows the Koran from Medina.
Prophet, make war on the kafirs and the hypocrites, and deal sternly with them. Hell shall be their home, evil their fate.
Koran of Medina 66:9
These Koranic verses contradict each other. How do you tell which one to follow? Simple. According to the Koran, the later verse replaces the earlier verse. And where ever there is contradiction, the Koran of Medina abrogates the Koran of Mecca.
But knowing which verses to follow is much more complicated than that. The “nice” Koran of Mecca is still to be used if Islam is weak in political power. When Islam has the strength-force is the answer; use the Koran of Medina. All verses can be used as needed. The Koran is duality.
The Koran also establishes a different form of logic. Since the Koran is both true and contradictory it violates the normal rules of logic. In unitary logic if something is contradictory it is false. But the Koran is contradictory and true. This is dualistic logic. So Islam operates under a different form of reasoning than the rest of the world.
The Practice of Islamic Politics
The practical outcome of this dualistic thinking in government by Islam is the following:
Force, pressure, demands, and violence are always options.
Sharia (Islamic) law must replace all other forms of law and government
Jihad must be practiced
Jihad must be everywhere, in all aspects of private and public life in the dar al harb (land of war)
The jihadists must imitate history’s model of the perfect political Muslim: Mohammed.
Islam is not just the faith of another immigrant group. No, political Islam is here to Islamicize us. Our culture must submit to the culture of Islam. That has been Islam’s mandate towards every other culture for 1400 years, and here and now it’s no different. Islam is devoted to an unchanging doctrine, to follow Mohammed’s plan until all the earth is Islamic. This goal is repeated stated in the Koran, the Sira and the Hadith. In short, all Muslims agree with the goal; they just differ on which method of the duality ethics-peaceful tactics or violent ones-is the most efficient way to reach the goal of dominance.
The political nature of Islam is to control 100% of the public sphere: the media, books, poetry, music, art, the law, constitutions, dress, food, the courts. If something is in the public domain, then Islam must control it. That means this book or anything that stakes out fundamental rights of the kafirs is forbidden by Islam.
Political Islam has another feature. It never acknowledges and never apologizes. In the last 1400 years jihad has killed more than 270 million of the kafirs, yet political Islam denies having killed a single soul. Islam denies its role in slavery, even though every black slave sold to a white man was wholesaled by a Muslim. Islam has even carried on the slave trade in the 20th and 21st centuries and has never made a single acknowledgment or apology; there is no guilt. Muslims feel shame if they fail but never guilt about their successes. After all, their ethical doctrine supports all of their positions.
Bill Warner
copyright 2008, CBSX, Inc.
Permalink:http://www.politicalislam.com/blog/an-ethical-basis-for-war-against-political-islam-part-3/