Tuesday, 9 December 2008

No political party can govern if they upset the Asian vote


We had better be able to drag the sheep people away from their roman circuses and point them towards the gathering storm clouds or within a few decades, it will be all over for the True British owners of this sad land.

Numerous people have pointed out time and time again what happens when the colonisers start to become the majority in their lands of occupation. Their demands increase exponentially. Eventually, over time they will become the majority, not by immigration but by demographics.

India-born Rami Ranger, who heads the Sun Group of Industries stripped of his shirt in front of British Immigration Minister, Liam Byrne and said;
"No political party can govern if they upset the Asian vote,"

"We can elect 40 to 50 members of parliament from several inner cities... They cannot afford to go wrong,"
Who are ‘we’ and ‘they’? I thought multiculturalism meant that ‘we’ means ‘everybody?

Apparently not - only when it suits ‘them’.

If the British National Party does not prevail then the whole country is to put it bluntly, bolloxed and the same fate will await us as Fiji, where over 50% of the population is now Asian, 11% of them being Moslems, the rest mainly Hindu. Civil War and a Military Coup are both on the horizon again.

But our little immigrant Sun seeker is wrong. There is one political party that can and will govern and who does not give a toss about the Asian Vote. The British National Party, fighting for you now, so your children do not have to fight on the street in a couple of decades.

Interesting article here about why Indians now prefer to colonise New Zealand rather than occupy the UK and you can also read how they manage to get some of "their" people elected by clicking here.


Be a man and get up of your knees and join
the Activists of the BNP in the Shieldwall

2 comments:

  1. The Fiji story shows that demographic invasions can be more successful than military ones. They take longer but the result is more assured. As I've mentioned before somewhere, invasion via steady immigration does not trigger our otherwise natural urge to fight back.

    In the case of Fiji is just so happened that the invaders from the Indian sub-continent had a more developed work ethic compared to the indigenous people, who found themselves being squeezed out of the labour market and ultimately out of the seat of power.

    If, instead of using military force, Hitler had hatched a 50 year plan to colonize the UK via immigration, he might have succeeded. In the context of his planned 1000 year Reich, 50 years are nothing. Of course, our borders were more secure back then because - unlike their counterparts today - politicians in those days tended to want to do what was right and hadn't been bamboozled by globalism, political correctness and multiculturalism.

    Now, though, colonization by stealth is actually happening. Although it is apparent that, instead of being instigated by some foreign power, it is our own leaders who are orchestrating the invasion.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I bet the opposite is not true in Asian countries, something the do-gooders and liberal leftie loonies never thought about.

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.