Lord Ahmed is a repugnant individual. Not only in appearance, but in association, character and morality. And to hear that he has threatened jihad on the House of Lords if their lordships should fail to meet his demands only serves to intensify Cranmer’s loathing of the man.
It appears that a member of the House of Lords had invited the Dutch politician, Geert Wilders, to a private meeting in the Palace of Westminster. She had intended to invite her colleagues in the Lords to a private viewing of his ‘documentary’ Fitna, followed by discussion and debate in true parliamentary fashion. This is, after all, a liberal democracy, and their lordships enjoy the rights of freedom of expression and freedom of association, not to mention certain parliamentary privileges for the protection of their function in the legislature.
But no sooner had the unsuspecting baroness sent out her invitations, Lord Ahmed raised hell. It is reported that he ‘threatened to mobilise 10,000 Muslims to prevent Mr Wilders from entering the House and threatened to take the colleague who was organising the event to court’.
And so Fitna has been cancelled: it shall not now be screened in the House of Lords on 29th January.
The Pakistani Press is jubilant, and Lord Ahmed is praising Allah for delivering ‘a victory for the Muslim community’.
It is a sorry state of affairs indeed that a parliament whose liberties have been forged through centuries of religious intolerance should succumb to the threats of one intolerant Muslim. Lord Ahmed is manifesting a notion of Divine Right, and one suspects it is precisely the sort of defence of Islam that Prince Charles shall make when he is sworn ‘Defender of Faith’. The blasphemy laws are being re-forged to protect one god, one faith and one prophet; they no longer defend YHWH, Christianity, Jesus Christ or the Church of England. Lord Ahmed is not functioning as a Labour peer; he is the self-appointed khalifa of all things Islamic. He is not concerned to protect freedom of expression or freedom of speech, but to stifle debate and ensure that Parliament submits to the Dar Al-Islam.
It is for moments such as these that one might hope the Lords Spiritual might enter the fray and defend the right of the noble baroness to extend an invitation to a democratically-elected Dutch MP. Their silence is deafening. They no longer believe anything strongly for fear of causing offence; they no longer defend anything for fear of being abolished.
If Lord Ahmed had threatened Cranmer with ’10,000 Muslims to prevent Mr Wilders from entering the House’, His Grace would have assured his Lordship of 100,000 people of all faiths and none to prevent the Muslims from preventing Mr Wilders from entering the House.
There are occasions when turning the other cheek is sheer folly.
Source: Archbishop Cranmer
Tags:
This film should be shown to let peple make up their own minds. What are the muslims afraid of the Truth?
ReplyDeleteA copy should be sent to Prince Charles also to see if he agrees with being defender of this faith.
These thuggish, bullying vermin have now reached critical mass where they can dictate to Parliament by the threat of violence. There is only one solution to this problem and we all know what it is.
ReplyDeleteA copy should be sent to each member of the house of Lords, for their own pivate viewing, this can easily be done anonymously I would imagine.
ReplyDeleteI dont think Ahmed and his threat will go down too well with the majority of people in this country.
Well done Ahmed for showing your true colours.
Cheers,
Harry.
The Dutch authorities are also trying to prosecute Geert for the Fitna video, but many have died for free speech in the west, Geert should be allowed his rights.I would have thought that the religion of peace would have welcomed any dialogue between unbelievers, put it this way if i was a religious person and people continually critised my religion for being violent, barbaric, medieval, un-democratic etc etc etc i personally would like to open up the channels of debate and prove the critics wrong, sometimes the truth hurts. political mizz
ReplyDeleteIts a pity that we cant mobilise 10,000 to protest at the terrible treatment of men in this feminist/matriarchal country, how about the CSA having the right to take away a mans driving licence, and perhaps even more sinister, his passport?. How the hell has it got to this stage?
ReplyDeleteThe end, is indeed nigh!
ReplyDeleteOur parliament has bowed to dar-al-Islam and they are facilitating the takeover of our lands.
God forgive me but the time of defending ourselves is almost here. May God save and forgive us all.
Anon 19:52 -
ReplyDeleteDisaster could strike even before they are ready to take over, if they go into intifada-mode.
Those of us who haven't got our heads in the sand know that Islamageddon - the final World War between Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb, is inevitable.
The trigger could be a nuclear war between Israel and Iran, or between India and Pakistan; or it could be a military government coming to power in a European county and vigorously purging its undesirables.
Whatever sets it off, the war will go viral and rapidly spread worldwide, as we have seen with the savage rioting in London.
When the balloon goes up, every country in the world with a substantial Muslim population will suffer a wave of bloodshed and sabotage attacks with Indian-style 'communal' massacres, train, bus and plane bombings, poisoning of food and water, destruction of gas and electricity supplies, dirty bombs, biojihad etc etc.
There is only one way to protect ourselves and our children from Islamageddon, and that is to request the Muslims to leave Dar al-Harb (the 'Domain of War' - that says it all doesn't it?) while we are still capable of enforcing our wishes.