(Spot the missing word) - Criminal gangs costing Britain £40 billion a year

Click to view larger version

A report on the BBC Website today reveals that "criminal gangs" are costing Britain £40 billion a year. The report does not say who these "criminal gangs" are, but goes on to state that many have connections with "failed states, such as Somalia". (I took a screen shot in case that line disappears)

Is it just me, or does it seem unlikely to you that indigenous gangs of white villains would have connections to Somalia, Afghanistan or any other of the world's failed states?

What the article is deliberately not saying is that "Gangs of criminal immigrants are costing the UK £40 billion a year".

Given that, before this report was released, estimates of the cost of immigration ranged from £12 to £17 billion, this would appear to be taking the figure closer to £60 billion.

I defy anyone to demonstrate a benefit to that.

____________________

Sarah: Maid of Albion

Kelly and the Cuddly Bunnies

By Sarah: Maid of Albion

Andrew Bron is, of course, entirely correct when he states that Dame Kelly Holmes can not be viewed as “entirely British”. Under the current law she is certainly a British citizen, however, part of her heritage passed on to her by her father, is Jamaican, of African origin, and I am sure that it is a part of her heritage of which she is immensely and equally proud.

To claim otherwise is to deny an vital part of her, which is surely far more offensive than the silly Telegraph article is pretending to find MEP Mr. Bron's statement.

It stands to reason, you can not make something other than what it is merely for the sake of political ideology. If I was born in China that fact alone would not make me Chinese, however, much I might, for whatever reason, wish to be Chinese. Even if my English father had married a Chinese woman rather than my English mother, I would still remain half English, as Kelly remains, no doubt proudly, half Jamaican.

The media always attempt to stress the “Britishness” of athletes and celebrities of immigrant origin, as if desperately trying to impose their new reality upon us, rather as the old soviets would stress the “gloriousness” of their crumbling republics.

It is a form of subliminal brainwashing, and it is amazing to see how widely the brain washing has taken effect. I think many of us must have been shocked at the basic ignorance of leading Political blogger Ian Dale, when he insisted to Simon Darby that second generation immigrants were “indigenous”. Clearly Mr Dale believes that, were he to import a Texan cactus, and then replant a cutting in his back garden, cactus would become indigenous to Sussex.

By Ian Dale's definition, Rudyard Kipling was probably an Indian. If someone in his position is so ignorant, why should we be surprised when ordinary people in the street parrot the same arrant nonsense?.

However, whatever the rights and wrongs of the argument over who is, or is not, fully British, we should not ignore the trick which the Telegraph is attempting to play, when they produce Kelly Holmes, and later various “Black British” footballers, as examples of what they are subliminally implying to he the “wonderful and valuable 'Britons' whom the 'nasty' BNP reject”.

This is the same trick which other Bronco substitutes, such as the Sun and Mirror have been playing for weeks, when they produce individual immigrants who are either attractive or who have made some individual contribution, as proof of the “wrongness” of the BNP position on immigration.

Like every other trick the media plays in this area, this is deeply dishonest, overwhelmingly, the British people do not (yet) have issues with individual immigrants, most of us, including the majority BNP supporters would agree that some have made a contribution to the country, however, this does not change the fact that the negative impact of mass immigration far outweighs any contribution made by the few individuals whom the media parade before us.

The contribution, and relative attractiveness, or otherwise of individual immigrants is not the issue, and the media is being shamefully disingenuous when they suggest it is. Nobody objects to immigrants, just because they are immigrants, and few would be concerned if immigration had been kept to moderate or reasonable levels. Even the numbers had only reached those which Enoch Powell had warned of in 1968 (a warning for which he was ridiculed and vilified) we would not be facing the crisis which we are. However, the numbers have so far exceeded Enoch's , by comparison, rater modest predictions, that have reached the point where our nation is set to be overwhelmed within the next two generations, this is the issue which has brought us to where we are, not how nice individual runners, pop singers and footballers might be.

What the media is doing with Kelly Holmes and their randomly selected black footballers is the same as if they produced a sweet, cuddly, bunny rabbit and announcing “Isn't it cute? isn't it sweet? harmless and cuddly? how could anyone who is not really bad and really evil object to such a sweet cuddly bunny?!!”

Of course nobody would object to an individual cuddly bunny rabbit, because there is no problem with an individual cuddly bunny rabbit. Its when there are ten million cuddly bunnies, now that's when they become a problem.

________________________

The future they have in store

By Sarah: Maid of Albion

We are told that our population is ageing, and it is certainly true that due to healthier lifestyles and improved medical treatment, more people are living into old age than was ever the case. We are also told by our government, that same government which was able to find tens of billions of pounds to support the banks, and tens of billions more to fight wars, which many call illegal, (not to mention the billions which go towards the EU) that we as a nation can not afford to support the growing number of elderly citizens.

They go on to tell us that the only way this country can survive as a thriving economy and continue to afford to support the growing, grey haired, masses is to import millions of immigrants to "boost the economy" and "pay the taxes".

Of course, what they say is total codswallop (says she, once again resisting a more colourful choice of language). This claim is made repeatedly, and I am sure that many otherwise intelligent people accept it as a fact, yet it is both incorrect and it is dishonest.

Firstly to accept this argument requires us to ignore the evidence of our very eyes, in that immigrants have self evidently not “boosted our economy”. As I pointed out in a post I made a few weeks ago, after 10 years or more of mass immigration at levels never before seen in this country, our economy is now in the worst state it has ever been, other than at the end of the last world war. Much good immigration did us!!!!

Many, and I am one of them, have argued that both immigration and pandering to various minority groups was at the heart of the sub-prime fiasco, which brought about the recent financial crisis, however, whatever the cause, even the most passionate multiculturalist can not argue that immigration has made our situation any better.

It can not be disputed that our economy is in a far worse state than it was before the decade long tsunami of immigration we have just lived through, so how exactly has immigration made it any better?!

Secondly, this demented theory that mass immigration is the solution to coping with an ageing population, assumes that all the new arrivals which the establishment is so frantically importing have discovered the secret of eternal youth, and will never, become pensioners themselves.

It is beyond belief that so many fail to see through the dishonesty and basic madness of this argument. This strategy depends on an ever increasing number immigrants providing for an ever increasing number of immigrant pensioners. Very much like the health service, where we are told we need to strip the third world of qualified medical staff in order to cope with the strain caused by ever increasing numbers of third world immigrants.

The indigenous population of Britain is not growing, yet the strain on our services and infrastructure is increasing by the year, and it does not take a genius to work out what is causing it.

The earlier waves of immigrants are now becoming pensioners, each year their numbers grow, and in twenty or thirty years, those arriving now will be joining them. If you believe the crazy argument we are being fed we will then need even more new immigrants to support them., and more again after that. Given that space is finite, do we continue this lunacy until we are required to stand on each others shoulders? And what then? Is this the legacy we want to leave to our children?

Beyond this is the inescapable fact that at the current rate of immigration, immigrants, and their descendants, will have outnumbered the indigenous population within the next fifty, or at the very outside sixty, years. (if anyone reading this has a child or grandchild under the age of 10 they have to accept that, if nothing changes, by the time those children collect their pensions they will will be living in a Britain where white Europeans – let alone white Britons - are in the minority).

That is not a BNP scare story, it is a mathematical certainty, which every politician is aware of but will not admit.

If you are happy with the prospect of Britain becoming a majority non-white nation within two generations, than that is a view you are entitled to, but remember you were never given the option of a vote on it.

However, even if you are one of those who do look forward with pleasure to a time when this country's indigenous population become an ethnic minority, you have to accept that it will not solve the pension problem.

Non-European immigrants have a considerably higher birth rate than Europeans, and there are no political or cultural reasons which suggest that is going to change any time soon, in fact very much the reverse. Hence, as more and more come the faster the population will grow, causing greater stress on the infrastructure, and inevitably creating more pensioners, and more, and more.

To any rational person, this argument in favour of immigration to pay for pensions, services or anything else is total lunacy, which is merely storing up problems for the future.

However, as you must have realised by now, the ideologues who run our country are not rational.

Every main political party in Britain subscribes to the same discredited belief that the insane levels of immigration we have seen are somehow good for the country, not one of them, Labour, Tory or Lib Dem, will do a thing to change the current reality. no matter how mad it becomes. And the same applies to UKIP, they are a single issue, anti-European pressure group, who's policies might effect the number of white, Christian Europeans coming to Britain, however, as far non-European immigration is concerned, UKIP are in bed with the Lib/Lab/Con troika. In any event, a single issue pressure group like UKIP is not going to solve the multiple issue problems we face, particularly one which refuses to acknowledge the main problem.

Do not be fooled, continued mass immigration into Britain is not going to solve the pensions crisis, or anything else, in fact it will make them all infinitely worse. It has not helped us, and it will not help us, it is creating a monster which will destroy our Country's future. If you vote for any of the main parties you will be embracing their failed policies on immigration and the blighted future that will bring.

Do not be lured into voting UKIP either, for they do not offer an alternative. Surely the very attempts by the controlled media to make UKIP seem attractive should warn you it is not in Britain's best interests to vote for them.

If you wish to avoid the nightmare future which will inevitably follow from continued, uncontrolled mass immigration, there is only one option, and only one way to vote on June 4th, and that is for the BNP. If you do not, you will be choosing a future which your children, and your country will not thank you for, worse, they may well curse you for it.

____________________

The proof of the lie

By Sarah Maid of Albion

With today's budget, it is now official, our economy is in the worst state it has ever been in peace time. The only equivalent in our history is the end of World War II, an event which brought to an end Britain's role as a leading world power and effectively forced us to abandon our empire.

Devastating world wars apart, we have never been in such a dire situation, the true levels of which our leaders have only been able to disguise from us by levels of borrowing so huge that they will impact on the prosperity of this country for years to come, and which our children ,and maybe even our grandchildren, will be repaying well into their adult years.

How did we reach this state, and how did it get so bad? What are the factors which have brought us so low?

The press and the politicians are quick to blame the banks and of course, the legendary “greedy bankers", who, of course, certainly played their part in what has happened. However, banks and greedy bankers have been a feature of Western civilisation for centuries, and they have made huge mistakes before, but they never brought us to this pass, what is different now?

Despite the fact that Britain is arguably the western nation worst placed to face the current situation, many will point out that we are in a global recession which has effected most of the world, and to some degree that is certainly true. However, most of the emerging, or recently emerged economies, such as China and India and many of those in Eastern Europe, have been damaged by the knock on effect of what has happened to the major western economies, in Europe and America, those countries which historically created the wealth which supported the rest of the world.

To find the cause of what has happened, it is necessary to look at what has so dramatically changed in those rich Western Nations where the foundations of this catastrophe were first laid, It certainly does not take long to identify one of them.

In the last two decades, the main Western European economies have seen levels of non-European immigration, unprecedented at any point in the history of our continent. Some have compared the degree of demographic change to that following the fall of Constantinople in 1453, however, in fact what is happening now is greater and even more wide ranging than that, we have never seen anything like this.

Meanwhile, America has experienced levels of immigration higher than anything that nation has seen since before World War 1 at the beginning of the last century. However, the great difference between then and now is that the immigration to America in the last twenty years, has not come from other western nations, but primarily from the third world.

It is a self evident fact the single greatest and most unprecedented demographic change to all the main western nations in the period leading up to the worst peace time economic crisis they have faced, is the advent of massive levels of third world immigration.

I, and others, have argued before that there is a direct connection between this crisis and the crazy levels of immigration which have been undemocratically imposed on the West. It is certainly the general consensus that at the root of our predicament is the sub-prime lending fiasco in America, however, what is not admitted is that over 90% of that sub-prime lending was to minorities, in particular immigrant, groups, an insanity mostly forced upon banks by agenda obsessed politicians and PC courts.

However, I have made that argument before, and although I believe clear-eyed historians will take the same view, it is not the purpose of this particular post. The point I am making is a far simpler one, and one which is hard to argue against.

Over the years, those who have supported the insane levels of immigrant colonisation they have forced us to endure have insisted that our economy benefits from immigration, and that we are all better off because of the contribution immigrants have made to our country. They have made those claims over and over again, and we have all heard them, and we all knew they were lies, now we have the proof.

After years during which we have seen a foreign invasion far in excess of anything we have ever experienced in our history we are facing the greatest peacetime financial crisis we have ever experienced. Whether or not Immigrants are part of the cause, their presence amongst us has not made our situation any better, in fact our problems are far worse than we have ever faced before.

Britain has not benefited from immigration, and the nightmare which has been imposed upon us has contributed nothing to our National well-being, arguably it has made our plight infinitely worse.

The main argument in favour of mass immigration, has been proved a fallacy, in fact it has been proved to be a lie. We as a nation are now living with the proof of that lie, we are all poorer for it, and the millions we have let in have not improved our situation.

The lie have been exposed and must never again go unchallenged
___________________________

No word From The Gravy Train (Yet)

by johnofgwent

As every patriot true to this country knows, there's an election for the european parliament just around the corner.

Not that the 'ordinary' voter or even the activists for parties other than the British National Party would know, or even have have noticed.

I mean, if it were not for Nick Griffin and his team, buoyed up by the time, effort and money given willingly by god knows how many people, all of whom have "done their bit" to get the "Battle For Britain Roadshow" out and about, and all the campaigning that has gone alongside that roadshow, would any of this country's electorate even know there was an election ? OK I admit the voters of Bridgend know - the Labour Party in that area had "an imodium moment" a week or so back and in a knee-jerk act of stupidity chucked out loads of leaflets urging the people to go out and "Stop the BNP at all costs". Funny how their leaflet urged them to do this "lest the BNP's candidate get elected and thereby have access to "unlimited unaudited european parliamentary expenses" though, but at least we can all see what the Labour Party see as the prime reason for standing for the European Parliament. The filthy lucre. No mention at all in their leaflet of the service "their man" (or woman) wishes to commit themselves to for the good of the electorate or the country. Hell they don't even say what their people will do.

And I donl't know about you, but round here I have seen neither hide nor hair of candidate or activist campaigning on their behalf, for any of the other parties.

Maybe they know what we all do, that their discredited representatives ought to be hanging their heads in shame at what they have allowed to be done to this country and its people on their watch.

So I decided that it was time to take the fight to them and see whether they have the stomach to engage in battle. I used the facilities of the excellent "writetothem" website (formerly known as "faxyourmp", but now expanded to allow contact between a concerned constituent and a much wider range of their elected representatives - including MEP's) and joy of joys I found out my current EU constituency was represented by a right shower, including none other than Glenys Kinnock, the wife of the Welsh Windbag Neil, whose first job once packed off to Brussels was to impose VAT on the Severn Bridge Toll so as to more heavily tax the people wishing to enter the Principality of wales.

It was too good an opportunity to miss. Regular readers of this column might remember I blogged here recently about a BBC TV News item covering the behaviour of a group of people camped out in filth and squalor near the French port and rail terminals at Calais hoping to smuggle themselves aboard something bound for england so they can claim political asylum.

I have often wondered what the official line on these people is in France. And whilst I know that every one of our readers and every member of the British National Party could provide me with more enlightenment on the subject than i could possibly ever wish for, it is still useful to ask the people at the top for an officlal statement.

And who better to ask for a European perspective on this issue than a woman who has been paid quite a few million over the past few years to be there as our elected representative ...

I confess the temptation was irresistible. Here is a copy of my recent letter to Glenys Kinnock MEP sent courtesy of "www.writetothem.com". I don't expect an answer, of course, but that doesn't mean I shouldn't make the woman work for her money once in a while, and as my company went under courtesy of this bunch of wasters a few years back so I no longer have the means to fund the BNP's campaign to anything like the degree that others have done so generously, the one thing I can do is give our enemies in this fight a hard time. Whilst remaining at all times impeccably polite, of course.

So, to all of you out there reading this and other articles on this blog who are then - or are already - moved to think "I wish I could do something but I don't know what to do or where to start", here is an example of one small deed by one man who considers himself a tiny cog in the well oiled machine that is going to bring these corrupt scum to book to answer for their action - or inaction.

Enjoy (!)

Thursday 26 March 2009

Dear Glenys Kinnock,

I understand from the website www.writetothem.com that you are one of the Members of the European Parliament representing the constituency in which I live. If this is not the case and I am mistaken, please accept my apologies.

I am having great difficulty understanding a matter that I first saw on a BBC News at Ten broadcast a few weeks ago. I have sought answers but have not yet been able to find any, and I think someone with a EUROPEAN perspective may be able to provide some insight.

On March 12th the BBC ran a piece on a large number of people living in conditions I would describe as filth and squalor outside a suburb of Calais, each trying to break into lorries to catch a free ride to Britain. The camera crew interviewed one such person who beamed straight at the camera and said "I want to go to england and claim political asylum"

Now I spent a month or so working a few miles from the French "Le Shuttle" terminal, albeit a few years ago. From my first hand experience I do not see any easy way that I could describe the area as a war zone or famine area, neither does France appear to me to be a country riven with dictatorial corruption or political or religious persecution.

So I find it most confusing that this man wishes to depart a land built on the principles of "equality, liberty and fraternity" to come to my country and I am even more confused as to how he can possibly be given asylum from persecution in France should he succeed in illegally entering here.

But the thing I find most confusing of all is this.

What is the status of this person standing there in that field in France ? What are the authorities there doing about him. How did he get there and why is he being allowed to behave in the manner he is?

I would REALLY like some answers to those questions and perhaps now you understand why I think someone with a European perspective on the matter might be better equipped to provide those answers.

No-one has seen fit to explain any of this to me in the past. but with the European elections coming up, I think I would like to hear some answers before I cast my vote.

Thank you for taking the time to read this and I hope to hear from you on this matter at your convenience.

Yours sincerely,

John Of Gwent

.... of course, I don't expect to hear a word from her at all.

Not going home

By Sarah: Maid of Albion

Before anyone starts cheering at the sight of unemployed Polish and Eastern European immigrants being flown home you need to take a reality check, because it is ONLY the Polish and Eastern Europeans who are going home, and they were always going to anyway. The non-European immigrants are not going anywhere, they are here for good.

As I have said before, the Poles, Czechs and Latvians were used as a smokescreen by the media and the government, who even encouraged a level of anti-Polish feeling, by, for instance, focusing so strongly on them whenever the subject of immigration came up. European immogrants were deliberately used as a distraction, to hide Nu-Stazi's true purpose, which is to import as many new Permanent, non-European, residents into the country as possible.

The only real problem with the Europeans was that they were used to keep wages artificially low, however, even if things had remained as they were before the sub-prime lead financial crisis, most of them would not have stayed for more than a few years. The Poles, Czechs and other Eastern Europeans were here to work, not to shirk. That is not so with the Somalis, that is not so with the Algerians and Iranians, and it is certainly not the case with the Bangladeshi immigrants or most of the West Indians, they ain't going anywhere!

To be fair, would you go back to where they came from?

Get on any bus in South or East London, Leeds, Bradford or Birmingham and you will see the second fastest growing group in the country. No-European pensioners (the fastest growing group, of course, is immigrant mothers). This vast number of people. Arrived in Britain over the last forty years and, and they intend to stay. And why wouldn't they, there is no old age pensions, subsidised housing and free health care in the places they left, and unlike the Poles and Estonians, when did you last see a black man or an Asian rough sleeper? There certainly are not very many.

We are constantly told that we need to import immigrants to support an ageing population, however, it seems that in fact we are importing immigrants to support ageing immigrants. In turn. the latest batch will grow old as well, and there are even more of them.

Yes, the Poles are going home, but they are the only ones who are.

The "benefits" of immigration

Governments, such as the USA, the UK together with most in Europe and those media organisations who favour an open door immigration policy keep telling us how much our economy benefits from immigration on account of all the wealth immigrants allegedly create and "bring into the country".

As an answer to this claim, I would like to suggest a little exercise, which you can try whilst sitting at you computer. First go to www.google.com or any other search engine, and type in the words Sending money home then click search, and count the number of result options you are given.

I suspect that the figure you see will come as a surprise, and may give you an inkling as to exactly which economies are benefiting from mass immigration into countries like Britain.

Have fun and send it on!

Sarah Maid of Albion

Imported Culture

By Sarah Maid of Albion

The young girl begged for her life, “Please don't kill me, let me live!” she cried, but her pleas were in vain, as she was dragged into the centre of the stadium where she was to die a terrible death. To the jeering crowd she was guilty of the great sin of having sex outside marriage, and for that she must die, no matter that she was the victim of gang rape, no matter that she was a a thirteen year old child. (Not 23 as the news media bizarrely first tried to suggest)

The child's age aside, it was a scene unchanged from that described two millennia earlier, where, according to the Bible, Jesus Christ confronted a group of men about to stone a young woman to death, with the words “Let he who is without sin amongst you cast the first stone”. Such words would have fallen on deaf ears, had anyone dared to repeat them in that stadium in Somalia, where no less than fifty adult men picked up stones and set about their evil deed.

This girl was not tortured to death two thousand years ago, but two months ago, and it was no isolated incident, across the Muslim world young women and girls face a similar fate at the cruel hands of their culture. I have decided not to include any pictures from the scene as they are too violent.

At my own blog, Sarah Maid of Albion I have also addressed the issue of the treatment of homosexuals in the Arab world, where, as one commentator recently put it, people such as the President of Iran claim there are no homosexuals, yet young gay men hang from cranes along the roadside merely for expressing their nature in a manner disapproved of by the cult of the dead paedophile.

I am aware that some Green Arrow readers have strong views on homosexuality, I do not share those views but will not impose my views here, other than to say I am sure that despite your views, like all decent people you are all horrified by such savagery, and grateful that our Western society long ago did away with the horror of officially sanctioned public executions, and the casual cruelties which are commonplace elsewhere.

Sharia law prescribes all sorts of imaginative and painful deaths and mutilations, for a variety of crimes, including many which are no longer crimes in our society. Hence it is even more disturbing to note that around 40% of British Muslims want Sharia law in the UK.

Whatever, the crimes of the child in the pictures above, I doubt they were sexual, and even the most persuasive of Islamofascists would have difficulty claiming that he was a rapist. However, clearly certain cultures believe that torturing a child in this manner is acceptable.

However, that is the crux of the issue, culture, and things which are viewed as acceptable within different cultures. The whole point of a multi-cultural society is to import different cultures into our society and pay them equal regard to our own long established cultures.

The question the supporters of multiculturalism fail to address is how do we prevent the sharper sides of foreign cultures from being imported together with the marginally less unattractive ones, because the answer is that you can not.

Many undesirable aspects of foreign cultures are already being seem within our British communities, just a few examples:

* Instances of so called honour related violence, including frequent “honour killings” are now regular occurrences in the UK, as are arranged and forced marriages.
* We have churches where children are accused of witchcraft and subject to violent abuse.
* We have already seen one instance of Muti killing - aka medicine murder (an increasingly common phenomenon in sub Saharan Africa) and a disturbing number of “missing” black and Asian children.
* Female circumsism is being practised in Britain and bush meat is being imported and consumed.
* We have a special police force (Trident) which exclusively deals with gun crime in the black community, and we have seen acts of Islamic terrorism on our streets.
* A new and far more vicious imported gang culture, has devastated communities in ways undreamed of back in the 50's and 60's, the Kray brothers not withstanding

These are not cultural benefits, and what else will follow.

There is no point in claiming that our laws will stop undesirable cultures from flourishing, because they patently are not doing so. Furthermore laws are frequently changed to accommodate newcomers or simply are not applied to them. Free speech was banned in Britain in the 1970's because of immigration, and as we have seen repeatedly, for instance with the Danish cartoon protests, only certain people now get prosecuted for incitement to murder.

As for grooming minors for sexual purposes, as we all know if the victim is white and the “groomer” is not, the police will not dare to touch it.

Year by year the ugly face of many foreign cultures are becoming part of every day life in Britain, and throughout Western Europe. It is only a matter of time before the very worst is here, much of it already is, gang rape was once all but unknown in Europe, it is now occurring with sickening regularity, and as events, such as the hideous (but unreported in Britain) 2006 death of Ilan Halimi show us, it does not take much to turn the streets of Paris into those of Baghdad.

Our leaders claim that we receive great benefits from immigration, but with escalating unemployment, stretched public services, and a health service beset by health tourism together with third world standards of hygiene, that lie is gradually being exposed for what it is.

And what of the so called moral argument for immigration, that we should welcome people here so that they can enjoy a better life than in the third world hell holes they are escaping?. This is self evidently madness, in that, in the long run, it simply enables the despotic or criminal regimes from which those seeking asylum come, to perpetuate.

If you live near a school where the teachers are murdering the children, you do not solve the matter by offering sanctuary to those kiddies who are fortunate enough to escape. At some point, someone has to sort out the school.

Offering asylum to those who escape tyranny, can only ever be a humanitarian act in the short term, beyond that it serves only to aid and abet the tyrants. Unless you believe that the entire population of the third world can move here, whilst, Africa and huge swathes of Asia and the Middle East are handed back to nature, as maybe some on the lunatic fringes of multiculturalism probably do, the international community must aim to improve the lot of the third world, within their homelands.

The so called benefits of immigration extend to some individual immigrants, but certainly not their homelands, to some politicians seeking to add to their voters, and to a small number of ruthless businessmen who believe that an unending flow of low paid immigrants will forever keep wages low. For the rest up us, the benefits are far less easy to identify.

Even those cynical politicians and businessmen may soon find the benefits are not what they imagined. Across Europe new immigrant based parties are popping up, and we now face an economic crisis, fuelled in great part by politically correct politicians forcing banks to lend to immigrants and minority groups, which has caused immeasurable damage in the financial sector.

Is it too much to hope that, at last, even they will wake up to the madness of the multicultural dream?.

_________________________________________

Immigration Invasion is Destroying the NHS

The quality of NHS care has plummeted because ministers failed to predict a massive rise in the birth rate among immigrant mothers, according to a survey by the Royal College of Midwives.

Four in 10 of midwives questioned by the RCM said care is worse as a direct result of the rising birth rate - and was putting mothers and babies at risk.

Almost all - 91 per cent - said the birthrate had shot up on their wards over the past few years, putting their units under intolerable pressure..............

All you expectant True Brit fathers and mothers listen to what the man says. Your unborn children's lives are at risk because of this governments policy on immigration. Gamble with your own life but do not gamble with those of our future.

Tags: NHS, BNP, immigration

Material Worth

Fooled you all again.

Material “Worth”, Treacherous Trade Unions, and the Public’s licking of the Boots that Kick Them.

We are in the rudiments of a recession. Perfect timing, if you ask me. Let us now see how the materialistic public react when their I-pods and other gadgets need to be sold; when football matches, alcohol and drugs need to be sacrificed; and those 'heavenly' shopping trips for unneeded possessions are forced to a halt.

Let us see the reaction of the pitiful public when they lose their jobs but see foreigners still in work; let us see it finally register in their minds that, even though we are in a recession, politicians and their secretaries in the BBC are still claiming inflated wages; let us see their reaction to the millions of pounds being given to the sub-continent, Africa, and the E.U. while we struggle to pay doctors and nurses...

I could go on, but you get the point. I personally can't wait until those who have kept in power the corrupt and decadent Lib-Lab-Con regime finally reap what they have sown and are completely out of a job, out of pocket, desperate and afraid. The men who voted these idiotic mainstream parties will, after the economy crumbles, be sat at home, the baby crying, the wife terrified, and they'll be left with nothing to do apart from THINK.

He will sit there and muse. With the benefit of hindsight he will draw the conclusion that for the last decade or so he has been constantly and consistently lied to by the state and their scribes in the media. The thought at this stage will be terrifying: how, amidst the dream of capitalism, did it get so bad? How –and why– has the glorious state mistreated him and its people –the very people it is charged to represent and protect? Why, as the world’s fifth richest country, can we not feed, house and clothe our people properly? Why, with so much money in the country, are we cancelling major operations, employing superfluous NHS management staff, but our wards and hospitals are filthy and mismanaged?

He will think of all these things, but more forcefully he will think of their own position and of how foolish he has been in supporting a union and political party that holds him in contempt. Now he is out of a job he will realise the fundamental cause of immigration: to undercut the native workforce, thus enforcing down wages, curtailing the strength of the workforce, and setting man against man in the twisted system that needs well-oiled cogs in its machine; cheap but well-oiled –by the master (the state)– cogs that continually turn and never stop when something (exploitation of the workforce) is amiss in the engine. He will look to his union and ask himself the following uncomfortable and difficult questions:

Did my union voice its opposition to the invasion of foreign workers that are brought here to undercut MY wages?
NO.

Did it oppose the outsourcing of British jobs to the Sub-continent?
No.

Did my union ever redistribute MY membership money to the upkeep of British farming or any other British industry?
No.

Will my union ever stop using MY money to fund and enrich its political masters in the perverse Labour Party?
No.

Is my union (like them all) controlled by thuggish Communist agitators who use MY hard-earned cash to fund anti-British organisations yet will not fight for MY jobs? YES, unfortunately that is the case.

This man might then do well to make a strong and admirable decision to leave his union and join Solidarity –the ONLY pro-British union.

These thoughts will abound his mind and eat the man alive, crush him, and reduce him to confusion and desperation. But out of this ruin there is saving grace. Like the phoenix rising from the ashes the state will lose its grip on the people, and the people will again be free –free of mind and free action. No longer will they –as the realisation dawns on them– follow blindly those who have used, abused and mistreated them like master would his slave.

I could go on but I, like the GA, actively work to defend and save Britain, and I have consequently much to do.

I’ll leave you all with this thought that has brightened my day: your capitalist dream is almost over. Rejoice, rejoice, rejoice in its ruin for only now will you be truly free.

Fyrdist

Tags: Solidarity, freedom, slavery, immigration, Fyrdist

Immigration and the Seven Deadly Spins

The following has been taken from UK Migration Watch. If you can handle the depressing statistics that show how Our Country is being swamped by colonisers then pay them a visit and add them to your bookmark list.


(The Governments shifting arguments for large-scale immigration)

There is no disagreement that limited skilled migration in both directions is valuable to all concerned. Not all impacts of immigration can be measured. Neither the benefits of innovation or diversity can be calculated, nor can the costs of additional congestion be accurately assessed. However, in so far as measurement is possible, we have examined carefully the government’s arguments and have found them to be either false or misleading as the following indicates.

1. Immigrants are needed to pay our pensions Dismissed by the Turner Commission on Pensions.

2. 600,000 vacancies need to be filled Disproved by the facts. Net immigration since 2001 when the government first made this claim is approaching 900,000 but vacancies are still at nearly 600,000. The reason is that immigrants fill jobs but also create demand. To argue from vacancies is therefore to advocate an endless cycle of immigration. (See also Briefing paper 1.6)

3. Immigrants made a net contribution to the budget of £2.5 billion per year in 1999/2000 False. The Home Office study charged the full cost of children of mixed households to the native population. Splitting the cost of these children 50/50 between the two groups results in a net cost to the tax payer of £100 - £200 million in that year. (See Briefing Paper 1.10)

4. Immigration adds £4bn to production Misleading. This amounts to 0.32% of GDP but the population increase due to immigration was 185,000 in 2005 or 0.31%. So the annual benefit to the host population was 0.01% or just 4p per head per week. (See Briefing Paper 1.15)

In July 2006, Robert Rowthorn, Professor of economics at Cambridge, wrote that “The government’s claim about the economic benefits of immigration is false…..all the research suggests that the benefits for the existing population as a whole are either close to zero or negative.”

5. Immigration provides 15% of trend growth. The government also claim that immigration adds 10-15% to trend growth which was 2.5%. Even 15% of that amounts to only 0.375 % of GDP so the benefit per head is still very small. Major studies in the US, Canada and Holland have reached similar conclusions.

6. Immigrants reduce inflation and interest rates, permitting higher growth Correct. But immigrants also add to population so the benefit per head to the native population is very small. The latest ITEM Club simulation, addressed only to East European immigration and using the Treasury model, found that 300,000 workers would add 0.8% to GDP after 4 years. But this assumed that these migrants would earn, on average, the same as UK workers. In fact their earnings per head are just over half the UK average so their addition to GDP is likely to be 0.4% to 0.5%. On a conservative assumption of one dependant for every five workers these migrants would add 0.6% to the population. So, far from adding to GDP per head, they actually reduce it. (See also Briefing Paper 4.6)

However, the main effect is to hold down low wages with the result that that employers and the middle classes benefit while the low paid suffer. Furthermore, it becomes even more difficult to move from welfare to work the 4.2 million British people on unemployment and incapacity benefit.

7a. Immigrants comprise 8% of the workforce but contribute 10% of GDP. Rejected by the Statistics Commission. This takes no account of the higher unemployment among immigrants and the lower participation by women. Correcting for these factors gives migrants making up 10% of the working age population and contributing 10% of GDP. (See Briefing Paper 1.5)

In May 2006, the government revised this claim to 10.5% of adults and 11% of GDP. (House of Lords answer HL 5379). Even this calculation was biased by the omission of children. Correcting for this omission gives 11.2% for the immigrant population and 10.9% for their contribution to GDP – slightly negative.

7b. Immigrants earnings are 13% higher than those of indigenous workers. Dismissed by Statistics Commission for the same reason. Correcting for lower participation rates and higher unemployment among immigrant communities makes average wages across the working age population the same as for the population as a whole. Only about 1 in 5 of the foreign born population earns more that the average salary for full time work – the same proportion as the UK born.

Tags: immigration

A lesson from America

You really must watch this 9 minute video if you want to know about immigration and how it affects an host community. If we do not learn from it then, as Private Frazier would say. We are doomed. Doomed I tell you.



Could fellow bloggers either link, post or include in your mailing lists.

If you have watched the video in full, you know what you must do. You must join the British National Party, you must vote BNP at every opportunity and you must warn your friends about the danger Our Country faces. Your children are counting on you.

Tags: British National Party, BNP, immigration

True Brit Children to bond with immigrants

Official Labour Policy - Treatment money needed for immigrants

It seems that Our Children are going to have to go and pledge allegiance to the Queen just as immigrants must do when getting their (the BNP will make it temporary) British Citizenship.

They will also be encouraged to bond with the colonisers who "choose" to occupy Our Country at the expense of the True Brit population and their children.

Despite admissions from the government that areas that have never before experienced racial tensions are now scenes of almost daily turmoil and violence, they still continue to swamp Our Country with unwelcome immigrants as part of their plan for the genocide of the True British people.

The only positive thing that comes out in this report is the news that a recent poll has shown that over 68% of the population are now seriously concerned about the swamping of Our Country and the preferential treatment that the colonisers receive in the shape of preferential treatment in housing queues.

In recent years, flats and houses have been designed by councils and housing associations specifically to cater for Muslim tenants, for example.

At last an admission of guilt and the proof that the BNP spoke the truth when they first revealed the racist discrimination against local white people in housing queues.

Another admission is the the enormous cost of the mad multiculturalism plan to exterminate England as a Country and the complete break-up of Our Great Britain.

Whilst they waste millions of pounds on immigrants, over 20,000 British People a year are denied treatment and allowed to go blind to fund their evil plans. These are crimes for which one day, the politicians who have brought us to this will be punished for.

So read the words of the bloated vampire,Darra Singh from the Commission on Integration and Cohesion.

"We have to recognise that there are communities who are experiencing migration in a way they haven't before and that can be unsettling.

"Whilst there is no cause for alarm, there is a clear case for action."

Damn right it is unsettling and there is every cause for alarm if your British. But there is a real case for action. What action? You know what action and you know what you have to do. Join the British National Party and help reclaim Our Country for your children and their children after them.

Tags: British National Party, BNP, Blind, bonding, immigration

And Then Felicity said

I continue with posting comments made by our cyberspace warriors who are everywhere. Nothing better than landing on an enemy site and finding a comment from one our troops already there. So this is what Felicity said...

I despair of my fellow countrymen and women I really do. Its as though they were sleep walking over a cliff to oblivion, and thats exactly what they are doing.

They buy newspapers that spout party policy, and bury stories that dont go with the programme. They vote for smiling clones in red/blue/yellow and now green rosettes, and they give up the freedoms their grandchildren should inherit.

Bit by bit inch by inch we give up more ground until the only ones left dissenting can be safely labelled nutters or bigots for refusing to fit a government mould.

Orwell saw the future when he wrote 1984 and remember Winston lost in the end. He loved Big Brother.

I feel I'm banging my head on a wall about the BNP to some people.
"I dont like their thoughts on gays" "I agree with the immigration but what about...?"

For Gods sake wake up Britain, you dont have the luxury of time to nit pick about fringe policy because immigrants from foreign and hostile lands are landing in their thousands on our shores.

Still never give up. I'll never love Big Brother.

The Elastic Band of British Tolerance

I sometimes think that the Great British people combined are like a strong, giant piece of elastic. No matter how much the elastic is stretched and pulled away from its original shape and otherwise abused by the world, it always springs back into its original form.

Until now that is. Now I suspect that the weight of abuse placed upon this heroic band of elastic is becoming very close to causing it to sunder and when it does, all the burdens hung from it it will tumble into the abyss. The burden of Immigration, the burden of cheap labour, the burden on our jails, the burdens on health and education and the support of illegal wars. Stretching and stretching and stretching the British Tolerance.

Well the band is about to snap and when it does the U.K. will be a better place. All these burdens on the Great British subjects will be gone and the elastic band will spring back to its original shape. Maybe a tad smaller but definitely healthier and fitter.

But something else will also happen. An elastic band that is stretched so cruelly, that it finally snaps will recoil on the people who stretched it. I imagine that when the British Band does snap the recoil on the rotating dictatorship of the Tory and Labour Parties will be along the lines of the Nuremberg War Crimes trials. I can only hope that the sentences will be as severe.

Join Nick Griffin and the B.N.P. in releasing the burden on the Great British People.

A Benefit Of Immigration - The White Death

As we all know the financial benefits brought to the UK by immigrants are so small that your "share" of this wealth would be less than a third of a Mars Bar per month. You can read more about the financial benefits of Immigration here.

However, I am more concerned about something else that some of these immigrants - whether under the guise of refugees or under lorries bring concealed within them. T.B.

The number of cases of tuberculosis, one of the worlds deadliest and hardest to treat diseases is back and on the increase in the U.K. Usually known as TB or sometimes, the “White Death”, this killer is back. Not that you would believe the seriousness of this disease from the B.B.C.s tiny report. Read it here.

With the introduction of powerful drugs back in the mid 20^TH century, the U.K. was on the point of kicking this one particular killer into the history books. Then back in the 90’s it started to increase.

You know why. I know why. The World knows why. Immigrants. The only ones who will not see the truth are the B.B.C. and Multi-culturists who see this killer as politically sensitive because the increase over the past decade has been almost wholly confined to the immigrant community.

So the next time someone tells you about the benefits brought to Our Country then remind them of the increase in the growth of the White Death. Read more about this killer here

Enjoy that mouthful of Mars Bar – Some of us will pay an heavy price for it.