The real colours of the Conservative PartyThe news that the Conservative party in Wales has now formally joined up under the Communist party anti-democracy organisation known as ‘Searchlight’ should come as no surprise, particularly as it has long been known that Tory leader David Cameron has been signed up to this Communist organisation for some years, and of course, following Welsh Tory leader Nick Bourne’s gratuitous use of such Marxist phrases as ‘sub-human’ to describe ordinary Welsh voters who dare to voice opposition.
In case the Conservative party spin machine doesn’t publicise this fact properly at their party convention this weekend in Llandudno, you can check out the facts for yourself at the following Communist party website here.
As can be seen, with Tory Assembly Member Mark Isherwood officially joining forces and getting very pally indeed with fellow anti-democracy advocates such as Plaid’s Dafydd Ellis Thomas and Leanne Wood, Lib-Dem Michael German, as well as Labour’s Huw Lewis and Unison’s resident Communist Darren Dupre, the question that Welsh voters should surely be asking now is: What sort of a ‘democracy’ are we living in? – a vote for any of the main parties is now a vote for ‘Searchlight / Communist’.
In fact, even though the Electoral Commission has remained rather silent about the whole affair (surely they can’t be controlled by this establishment clique called Searchlight too can they? – surely not!), the list of collaborators working together to squash any possible democratic opposition in Wales continues to grow.
The ‘Searchlight Cymru’ party now includes:
The Communist party
The Conservative party
The Welsh Assembly
Unison:-------------------versus:----------British National Party
Wales TUC
Plaid and the Labour party
Lib-Dem party
As can clearly be seen, with such stacked odds, we feel that this is a bit of a one-sided and unfair contest. Wales BNP therefore respectfully suggest that the Communist party also rope in their collaborators from the Westminster Parliament, the European Union and the Press to help them out too. Bring it on !
Long live Freedom of Speech! Long live Democracy! Long live Britain!
The above article was submitted by the British National Party in Wales. Links added by the Green Arrow. A great article and great spirit at the end. I am proud to be a member of the Welsh BNP.
Tags:
I RECALL BEING CALLED SUB HUMAN SHOULD I WISH TO VOTE FOR THE BNP..I WAS NOT AMUSED TO HEAR THIS TORY USING NAZI TERMS TO DESCRIBE WHAT I'D UNDERSTOOD TO BE A LEGAL PARTY AND MY RIGHT TO USE MY VOTE TO ELECT A PARTY THAT STOOD FOR MY BELIEFS.
ReplyDeleteI DID EXERCISE MY RIGHT AND MADE AN OFFICIAL COMPLAINT AGAINST THE TORY USE OF NAZI TERMINOLOGY IN RELATION TO ME.
AFTER WAITING A FEW MONTHS AN E-MAIL INFORMED ME. NOTHING REALLY WOULD BE DONE TO THIS NAZI BUT THEN I'D EXPECTED NO MORE OR LESS. I DON'T KID MYSELF THAT THIS IS A DEMOCRACY ANTMORE.
EU enabling act means were red lines to exist they could be swept away....2006 Blair also brought in the same act into the UK...no wonder they ignore the people when just the stroke of a pen can pass or change any laws without our knowledge...........
ReplyDeleteThe EU gets its ‘Enabling Act’
POSTED: Friday, February 01, 2008
FROM BLOG: Cranmer - Examining Religio-Political Agendas with Politico-Religious Objectives
The following blog post is from an independent writer and is not connected with Reuters News. The opinions and views expressed herein are those of the author and are not endorsed by Reuters.com.
The president of the European Parliament has acquired the powers to arbitrarily override the limitations upon his power, the authority to crush dissent and silence those who oppose the creation of a totalitarian European empire. And according to Dan Hannan MEP, the stifling of free expression is so outrageous that he was ‘almost tempted to compare it to the Nazi Ermächtigungsgesetz - the Enabling Act of 1933’ which granted Adolf Hitler unlimited power.
Of course, by ‘almost’ comparing, he was manifestly alluding to the historical precedent, and he ought to have known that in Brussels one may never refer to history, democracy or teleological theology, even if that reference is ‘almost’. And this ‘don’t mention the war’ mentality has got him thrown out of the EPP. Yet the very manner of Mr Hannan’s expulsion was evidence for the arbitrary exercise of absolute power, for it was declared in the Chamber by the EPP leader, Joseph Daul, just as Mr Hannan sat down. ‘Enough is enough!’, he said. There was no discussion, no hearing, no due process. The EPP belongs to Mr Daul, and it was therefore his sole prerogative to expel the turbulent member. Mr Daul told Mr Hannan he ‘did not want the Tory MEP calling for an EU treaty referendum as a member of the EPP’.
Since this is the official position of all British Conservative MEPs, by that reasoning Mr Daul should be expelling the entire group.
The EPP –the ‘European People’s Party’ - belongs about as much to the European People as anything else that emanates from this fascist Tower of Babel. In order to give the European people what they need, the EU’s führers dictate that the European people shall neither be consulted nor given voice. 'Ein Volk, Ein Reich' is precisely the spirit of the Treaty of Rome, and so Mr Hannan succinctly observes: ‘ "Yes" votes are treated as final and binding, "No" votes as obstacles to be overcome. Unaudited accounts are treated as a small price to pay for the goal of closer integration. The end justifies the means’. It is no surprise that Christians of the millennial doom ilk view the EU as the seat of the Antichrist.
Since its foundation, the EPP has been strongly committed to the creation of a United States of Europe and has been at the forefront of demands for a constitution. Most Christian Democrats are keen Euro-federalists, and view themselves as somehow divinely ordained to fulfil the European vision. And the incongruity of the Conservative Party's domestic policy with its European allegiance has created intolerable tensions of 'Jekyll and Hyde' proportions. A party in Westminster which stands for British sovereignty and parliamentary supremacy cannot be allied in Brussels with a group which seeks to destroy those very foundations.
In fulfilment of David Cameron’s pledge, the Conservative Party is in the process of leaving the EPP group in Brussels because of this ‘federalist’ agenda. Mr Hannan is thereby hastening the day of liberation, and has fulfilled Mr Cameron’s word before Mr Cameron himself.
WON'T HOLD MY BREATH...
While many may disagree with Mr Hannan, he is manifestly a man of principle and integrity - a truly honourable politician who restores credibility to an otherwise debased profession.
from The Canadian Sentinal..
ReplyDeleteCommunist Goals, Circa 1963 Vs. Current Reality
Think of all the things that have gone inexplicably wrong with the Free World. Let's focus on the United States of America as the prime example.
We know that the "liberals" are responsible for these crazy things that are no doubt weakening the very foundation and fabric of American institutions and society and threatening its national security.
How did this happen? I've been thinking and openly musing about it for a while now. Even been called "paranoid" by a very intelligent, knowledgeable conservative blogger I used to listen to.
But now I've found evidence to support my contention that today's successful liberal extremism and the resultant decline of the Free World's vitality and security, ethically and morally, and the rise of the awesome, virtually insurmountable power of today's corrupt, non-accountable Free World state apparati (various institutions and agencies of the state, including judicial, educational, etc, which aren't directly controlled by the party currently in power, but rather by bureaucrats who were frequently appointed as partisan loyalists and who were chosen for their ideological activist philosophies. The MSM is to be included as a non-state state apparatus node) is part of a set of long-term Communist goals started during the Cold War (which, when we think of it, with all the facts taken into account, isn't really over, but had simply entered a new phase, in which Russia adapted to new realities but bought time until it could rearm and regroup, which it has been doing, and is now acting ever more aggressive towards America).
This evidence is derived directly from the U.S Congressional Record.
Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
-January 10, 1963
Reads like the islamist plan to take over the west.
Anonymous - I've come to the conclusion that you are a coward, with a yellow streak a foot wide down your back. You don't have the courage to give your name, or have the decency to have a blog where you can put your own opinions instead of cluttering up other, more braver bloggers, comment boxes. Are you running scared of the consequences if the PC brigade find out where you are.
ReplyDeleteEither put up, or shut up!
labour voters still pouring in and allowed to make our votes useless..is this democracy?
ReplyDeletemigration watch figures correct on immigrants, government ones a pack of lies.
can't halt immigration due to european union but most come from outside of the eu.
almost 70% not from eu states....but then we can all see that can't we?
February 21, 2008
Migrants should also 'earn' their vote
The Government's proposals outlined yesterday for 'earned' citizenship should also be an opportunity to make sweeping changes to those eligible to vote in elections in the UK, says think-tank, Migrationwatch.
In a paper out today the group point out that about a million people from Commonwealth countries who are not British citizens have the right to vote in Britain.
Said Migrationwatch chairman, Sir Andrew Green,' It is completely contrary to the Government's proposals for earned citizenship that one of the most important benefits of citizenship - the right to choose our leaders - does not have to be earned. If the government are serious about earned citizenship, they will bring forward measures to abolish this anachronism.'
See also Briefing Paper 8.15
February 13, 2008
Government figures wrong on where immigrants come from, confirms Statistics Commission
The Government has the ability to control a much larger percentage of immigrants coming to the UK than it claims.
This has emerged after think tank Migrationwatch asked the independent Statistics Commission to look at Government claims that 52% of immigrants are from outside the EU whereas Migrationwatch say the figure was 68%.
After reviewing the figures the Statistics Commission has agreed that the Migrationwatch figure is the more accurate.
Migrationwatch numbers were arrived at by looking at net migration of foreign nationals (the difference between the number of foreign nationals migrating to the UK and emigrating from the UK). The Government arrive at their 52% figure by including migration of British citizens which Migrationwatch say are not relevant to the debate about where immigrants come from.
The Statistics Commission makes the point that, for control of immigration purposes, it may be better to consider in-migration only. On this basis, even if returning British citizens are included, the Statistics Commission confirms that non-EU citizens make up the majority (58%) of immigrants to the UK.
‘This is highly significant in practical terms,’ said Sir Andrew Green, Migrationwatch chairman. The Government has no control over who comes from EU states, but it could reduce the numbers from non-EU countries. We can understand that they want to play down the numbers of non-EU immigrants because, if they are made to appear relatively unimportant, it lets them off the hook of taking effective action. They further compound matters by refusing any discussion on immigration issues as the House debates the details of the new EU’ Treaty. ’ Not a single line on this subject will be debated.
‘But none of this will fool the public of whom 80% want to see immigration sharply reduced. These figures prove that more than two thirds of immigrants come from outside the EU and show that there could be a substantial reduction if the Government had the will to do it,’ said Sir Andrew.
See the full exchange of letters between Migrationwatch and the Statistics Commission.
migration watch site....
Don't overstretch yourself GA.
ReplyDeleteYour blog has become boring and the forum just isn't up to scratch.
Concentrate on one or the other.
Anon: 18:20
ReplyDeleteYou might be right Anon. That is why I cannot understand why the page views have kept rising, the number of unique visitors increasing and the return visitors, returning rising.
We are having the same problems on the Forum. Membership growing according to plan, initatives taken to increase members and links build to increase output of information to the True Brits.
But your right. Time to slow down. The radio station will have to wait for awhile.
Thank you for your concern. The donate button to help pay for my medical care is on the right.