Can Britain Survive Multiculturalism?
A must watch video with a "Guest" appearance by Lionheart. Strange how the Americans can see what is happening but our own people are still blind to the obvious truth about the evil of Islam.
This is the original home of the Green Arrow and will one day reopen.
A must watch video with a "Guest" appearance by Lionheart. Strange how the Americans can see what is happening but our own people are still blind to the obvious truth about the evil of Islam.
I have taken the following from the Lionheart site. I am not sure of its original origins but is well worthy of being distributed as fully as possible.
Lionheart is currently in America. Fellow bloggers in the U.S. have offered him support. I suppose he faces a difficult choice. Claim political asylum in the States or come back and face our enemies across a court room. Please read 29J of the following act. Hat tip to JOG for pointing it out.
An Act to make provision about offences involving stirring up hatred against persons on racial or religious grounds.
[16th February 2006]
Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:—
The Public Order Act 1986 (c. 64) is amended in accordance with the Schedule to this Act, which creates offences involving stirring up hatred against persons on religious grounds.
In section 24A of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (c. 60) (arrest without warrant by persons other than constables) after subsection (4) add—
“(5) This section does not apply in relation to an offence under Part 3 or 3A of the Public Order Act 1986.”
(1) This Act may be cited as the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006.
(2) This Act comes into force on such day as the Secretary of State may appoint by order made by statutory instrument.
(3) An order under subsection (2) may make—
(a) such supplementary, incidental or consequential provision, or
(b) such transitory, transitional or saving provision,
as the Secretary of State considers appropriate in connection with the coming into force of this Act.
(4) This Act extends to England and Wales only.
Section 1
In the Public Order Act 1986 (c. 64), after Part 3 insert—
In this Part “religious hatred” means hatred against a group of persons defined by reference to religious belief or lack of religious belief.
(1) A person who uses threatening words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred.
(2) An offence under this section may be committed in a public or a private place, except that no offence is committed where the words or behaviour are used, or the written material is displayed, by a person inside a dwelling and are not heard or seen except by other persons in that or another dwelling.
(3) A constable may arrest without warrant anyone he reasonably suspects is committing an offence under this section.
(4) In proceedings for an offence under this section it is a defence for the accused to prove that he was inside a dwelling and had no reason to believe that the words or behaviour used, or the written material displayed, would be heard or seen by a person outside that or any other dwelling.
(5) This section does not apply to words or behaviour used, or written material displayed, solely for the purpose of being included in a programme service.
(1) A person who publishes or distributes written material which is threatening is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred.
(2) References in this Part to the publication or distribution of written material are to its publication or distribution to the public or a section of the public.
(1) If a public performance of a play is given which involves the use of threatening words or behaviour, any person who presents or directs the performance is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred.
(2) This section does not apply to a performance given solely or primarily for one or more of the following purposes—
(a) rehearsal,
(b) making a recording of the performance, or
(c) enabling the performance to be included in a programme service;
but if it is proved that the performance was attended by persons other than those directly connected with the giving of the performance or the doing in relation to it of the things mentioned in paragraph (b) or (c), the performance shall, unless the contrary is shown, be taken not to have been given solely or primarily for the purpose mentioned above.
(3) For the purposes of this section—
(a) a person shall not be treated as presenting a performance of a play by reason only of his taking part in it as a performer,
(b) a person taking part as a performer in a performance directed by another shall be treated as a person who directed the performance if without reasonable excuse he performs otherwise than in accordance with that person’s direction, and
(c) a person shall be taken to have directed a performance of a play given under his direction notwithstanding that he was not present during the performance;
and a person shall not be treated as aiding or abetting the commission of an offence under this section by reason only of his taking part in a performance as a performer.
(4) In this section “play” and “public performance” have the same meaning as in the Theatres Act 1968.
(5) The following provisions of the Theatres Act 1968 apply in relation to an offence under this section as they apply to an offence under section 2 of that Act—
section 9 (script as evidence of what was performed),
section 10 (power to make copies of script),
section 15 (powers of entry and inspection).
(1) A person who distributes, or shows or plays, a recording of visual images or sounds which are threatening is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred.
(2) In this Part “recording” means any record from which visual images or sounds may, by any means, be reproduced; and references to the distribution, showing or playing of a recording are to its distribution, showing or playing to the public or a section of the public.
(3) This section does not apply to the showing or playing of a recording solely for the purpose of enabling the recording to be included in a programme service.
(1) If a programme involving threatening visual images or sounds is included in a programme service, each of the persons mentioned in subsection (2) is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred.
(2) The persons are—
(a) the person providing the programme service,
(b) any person by whom the programme is produced or directed, and
(c) any person by whom offending words or behaviour are used.
(1) A person who has in his possession written material which is threatening, or a recording of visual images or sounds which are threatening, with a view to—
(a) in the case of written material, its being displayed, published, distributed, or included in a programme service whether by himself or another, or
(b) in the case of a recording, its being distributed, shown, played, or included in a programme service, whether by himself or another,
is guilty of an offence if he intends religious hatred to be stirred up thereby.
(2) For this purpose regard shall be had to such display, publication, distribution, showing, playing, or inclusion in a programme service as he has, or it may reasonably be inferred that he has, in view.
(1) If in England and Wales a justice of the peace is satisfied by information on oath laid by a constable that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that a person has possession of written material or a recording in contravention of section 29G, the justice may issue a warrant under his hand authorising any constable to enter and search the premises where it is suspected the material or recording is situated.
(2) If in Scotland a sheriff or justice of the peace is satisfied by evidence on oath that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that a person has possession of written material or a recording in contravention of section 29G, the sheriff or justice may issue a warrant authorising any constable to enter and search the premises where it is suspected the material or recording is situated.
(3) A constable entering or searching premises in pursuance of a warrant issued under this section may use reasonable force if necessary.
(4) In this section “premises” means any place and, in particular, includes—
(a) any vehicle, vessel, aircraft or hovercraft,
(b) any offshore installation as defined in section 12 of the Mineral Workings (Offshore Installations) Act 1971, and
(c) any tent or movable structure.
(1) A court by or before which a person is convicted of—
(a) an offence under section 29B relating to the display of written material, or
(b) an offence under section 29C, 29E or 29G,
shall order to be forfeited any written material or recording produced to the court and shown to its satisfaction to be written material or a recording to which the offence relates.
(2) An order made under this section shall not take effect—
(a) in the case of an order made in proceedings in England and Wales, until the expiry of the ordinary time within which an appeal may be instituted or, where an appeal is duly instituted, until it is finally decided or abandoned;
(b) in the case of an order made in proceedings in Scotland, until the expiration of the time within which, by virtue of any statute, an appeal may be instituted or, where such an appeal is duly instituted, until the appeal is finally decided or abandoned.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(a)—
(a) an application for a case stated or for leave to appeal shall be treated as the institution of an appeal, and
(b) where a decision on appeal is subject to a further appeal, the appeal is not finally determined until the expiry of the ordinary time within which a further appeal may be instituted or, where a further appeal is duly instituted, until the further appeal is finally decided or abandoned.
(4) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) the lodging of an application for a stated case or note of appeal against sentence shall be treated as the institution of an appeal.
Nothing in this Part shall be read or given effect in a way which prohibits or restricts discussion, criticism or expressions of antipathy, dislike, ridicule, insult or abuse of particular religions or the beliefs or practices of their adherents, or of any other belief system or the beliefs or practices of its adherents, or proselytising or urging adherents of a different religion or belief system to cease practising their religion or belief system.
(1) Nothing in this Part applies to a fair and accurate report of proceedings in Parliament or in the Scottish Parliament.
(2) Nothing in this Part applies to a fair and accurate report of proceedings publicly heard before a court or tribunal exercising judicial authority where the report is published contemporaneously with the proceedings or, if it is not reasonably practicable or would be unlawful to publish a report of them contemporaneously, as soon as publication is reasonably practicable and lawful.
(1) No proceedings for an offence under this Part may be instituted in England and Wales except by or with the consent of the Attorney General.
(2) For the purposes of the rules in England and Wales against charging more than one offence in the same count or information, each of sections 29B to 29G creates one offence.
(3) A person guilty of an offence under this Part is liable—
(a) on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years or a fine or both;
(b) on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or both.
(1) Where a body corporate is guilty of an offence under this Part and it is shown that the offence was committed with the consent or connivance of a director, manager, secretary or other similar officer of the body, or a person purporting to act in any such capacity, he as well as the body corporate is guilty of the offence and liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.
(2) Where the affairs of a body corporate are managed by its members, subsection (1) applies in relation to the acts and defaults of a member in connection with his functions of management as it applies to a director.
In this Part—
“distribute”, and related expressions, shall be construed in accordance with section 29C(2) (written material) and section 29E(2) (recordings);
“dwelling” means any structure or part of a structure occupied as a person’s home or other living accommodation (whether the occupation is separate or shared with others) but does not include any part not so occupied, and for this purpose “structure” includes a tent, caravan, vehicle, vessel or other temporary or movable structure;
“programme” means any item which is included in a programme service;
“programme service” has the same meaning as in the Broadcasting Act 1990;
“publish”, and related expressions, in relation to written material, shall be construed in accordance with section 29C(2);
“religious hatred” has the meaning given by section 29A;
“recording” has the meaning given by section 29E(2), and “play” and “show”, and related expressions, in relation to a recording, shall be construed in accordance with that provision;
“written material” includes any sign or other visible representation.”
Taken directly from Anorak news
Tony Bennett Says:
January 4th, 2008 at 8:54 pm
I have been asked to represent Paul (’Lionheart’).
For the public record, here is a full copy of the e-mail sent by Ian Holden of Bedfordshire Police to ‘Llionheart’ yesterday, Thursday 3 January 2008:
QUOTE FROM IAN HOLDEN, BEDFORDSHIRE POLICE
The offence that I need to arrest you for is “Stir up Racial Hatred by displaying written material” contrary to sections 18(1) and 27(3) of the Public Order Act 1986.
You will be arrested on SUSPICION of the offence. You would only be charged following a full investigation based on all the relevant facts and CPS consent.
Paul I will see you on the 19/02/08 when I will tell you everything that you need to know. Due to being out of the office for six weeks I will not have access to my email as of tomorrow 04/01/08.
Ian
UNQUOTE
There are already a number of aspects about this case involving not only ‘Lionheart’ but concerning other friends of his which are almost certain to result in a complaint being made to the Independent Police Complaints Commission.
After my success in getting the I.P.C.C. to agree to a top-level, ‘managed’, investigation into *38* separate complaints about Essex Police’s woeful first investigation in 2001/2 into the death violent death of Stuart Lubbock (which is ongoing), and my success this week in getting the I.P.C.C. to enquire into another disastrous set of Essex Police investigations, this time into their three so-called ‘investigations’ into the death of Lee Balkwell in controversial circumstances in the early hours of 18 July 2002*, my mentioning the I.P.C.C. is no idle threat.
Bedfordshire Police had better be very careful.
=====
* Lee Balkwell’s inquest is due to take place from 22 January to 31 Janaury 2008, after an unprecedented delay of over five-and-a-half years since his death. The inquest is likely to hear detailed allegations of police corruption and serious criticisms of the way the Coroner, Mrs Caroline Beasley-Murray, has conducted the inquest proceedings to date. There were also serious criticisms about the way she conducted the inquest into the death of Stuart Lubbock
I am copying the whole shooting match from Lionheart in case it vanishes sometime soon.
I do not know Lionheart personally but know him to be a very sincere religious man with deep convictions. We have not always agreed on everything but have been united in our fight to make our fellow True Brits aware of the dangers of Islam.
Since I started blogging, I have always expected the knock on the door and still do. That knock may now have come for Lionheart.
Lionheart - A real Christian Crusader as asked me to post the following. I do so with pleasure.
Posted by
The Green Arrow
at
00:27
7
comments
Labels: British National Party, green arrow, ic wales, Lionheart
You may have heard me mention a fellow blogger called Lionheart in the past. I start the day of by mentioning him again. You see on your left an image of him that was taken in the Holy Land I believe.
Lionheart is, I repeat, a true Christian Crusader and living in the front line as he does he needs every ounce of faith that God has given him. Which is immeasurable as far as I can tell.
Every day, whilst I sit here and type or look out at the mountains, Lionheart also types. But Lionheart looks out at a different view. His view is of an alien world. He looks out on a world where he is the alien. He is the foreigner. To his "neighbors". The colonisers. He is less than human. He is a infidel.
Now infidel is an offensive word that is akin to calling a black man a nigger. Yet we accept it much as we accept the term honkies as the enricher's of our society call us. More shame on us.
We must save Lionheart and all like him who live in the shadow of the evil cult of Muhammad. We must regain our land or pass from the face of this Earth having failed Gods final test on mankind. The triumph of good over evil. The fight back begins by voting for the British National Party in May.
So look at the photo of Lionheart and salute him, for he has far more courage then I.
Do you think it will get that bad? It will if the British People do not wake up to the clarion calls of the resistance fighters who are trying to wake them from the sleep of apathy.
There is a blogger called Lionheart. This man is a true Christian Crusader and despite personal problems and much hardship he continues to post from the front line in our battle against the forces of evil and the supporters of Eurabia.
Irregardless of whether your are religious or not, there is no doubting this Mans sincerity or love of Nation. You must read his essay here. Be advised it very well resourced with many, many links and so will take time to read. Bookmark it and go through it slowly.
When finished, resolve to stand with your countrymen in the fight for Our Nation and do something to help. A British National Party government is the only hope for the United Kingdom and perhaps even Europe.
I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be mistaken.
Lionheart, a great Christian Crusader has a slight problem with his Blog and as requested that I post the following here on The Home of the Green Arrow.
He suggested that first we read these two warnings. The first from the Telegraph and the second is an article he published over on Lionheart. All make disturbing reading.
The British Coliseums
The current government are appeasing the Muslim community in Britain so as to attain the block vote from them. Labour has given them the majority of the things they ask for and promise them more. I have another article coming with a horrendous example of Labour with their gifts on the golden plate for their loyalty and votes.
We as a country have a population of 60 million non-Muslims and 2 Million Muslims. If 1.5 million votes is that important to Labour then why don't the British National Party achieve two million votes or more and create another block vote.
I do not know about politics but what I do see is the British National Party being a real political voice because they know how serious a threat Our country faces in relation to Islam and the Muslims.
It is sad to say but another terrorist attack is inevitable, so say our Security services and government, so please don't just take my word for it. Why should we appease this psychotic murderous death cult and give in to its demands because it threatens us with terror and bloodshed.
The whole of the country needs to be aware of this murderous enemy speaking treason and murder against us.
Every week around the country there are large 50 - 60,000+ capacity football grounds with True British Anglo Saxon non-Muslim men who's country this is, who have children they need to protect.
The Muslim community threaten us with violence at every opportunity and they try to intimidate with their numbers. 60 million non-Muslims to 2 million Muslims means that a block vote to counter 2 million is a more than achievable target.
These modern coliseums containing 60,000+ spectators watching their football teams is the perfect counter action to those threats against us and Our children.
Imagine every single football stadium around the country singing a song of solidarity in one accord. This will send a clear sign to the Muslim Kingdom in Britain and around the world, that the non-Muslim Anglo Saxons whose country this is will not 'tolerate' their behavior. I do not know the math’s of how many stadiums and capacities, I imagine it is possibly a very large number. 99% non-Muslim.
If they attack us and kill more people like the atrocity on 7/7 then that mass majority of normal British citizens will be left with no alternative but to make a noise for the sake of their families and children. The question is: How can the message of solidarity go out to every football club around the UK. A mass public media protest will send out a very clear message of solidarity amongst the people of Our country in the face of this enemy.
We see public demonstrations like the Anti-War protests which carry large scale media attention. Imagine 2 million Anglo Saxon men singing a song of solidarity across the landscape of this Our beautiful green homeland.
Terrorist attacks against us are inevitable, vigilance at all times is a necessity because these murderous psychopaths kill at random without any warning and they are actively continually plotting against us.
The threat is real and present, there is a major patriotic block vote there to make a stand if Islam continues its path of war, which we all know it will because the Koran teaches them to.
God bless
LionHeart
Contact Green Arrow: voteforbnp@hotmail.co.uk