Showing posts with label Donna Bailey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Donna Bailey. Show all posts

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Another letter. This time from Donna Bailey, BNP

Donna Bailey

What a strange day. All Liars, Buggers and Thieves and now all letters from our people doing what they do best. Putting our policies forward and our enemies back in their prams.

This letter here is by Donna Bailey, BNP, Crawley & Horsham Branch. Here you go....

WE WRITE in response to your recent article regarding the British National Party contesting a seat in the Bentswood Ward in Haywards Heath on January 22.
Unite Against Fascism (UAF) has reportedly 'started a campaign against a BNP member winning a seat'. We would like to raise questions as to the validity of such a campaign by the fundamentally extremist UAF, whose own ethos is wholly totalitarian and opposed to true democracy, in the fact that it promotes the erosion of basic civil liberties such as freedom of speech and freedom of association.

Labour, Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and Greens all support and encourage the UAF who publish leaflets, such as the recent 'bottle of poison' bearing the label 'BNP fascism – Do not swallow' and the slogan 'use your vote on 1 May 2008 stop the fascist BNP'.

Section 106 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 states 106. 1) A person who, or any director of any body or

statements as association corporate which - to candidates.

(a) before or during an election,

(b) for the purpose of affecting the return of any candidate
at the election,

makes or publishes any false statement of fact in relation to the
candidate's personal character or conduct shall be guilty of an
illegal practice, unless he can show that he had reasonable
grounds for believing, and did believe, the statement to be true.

Why do the political parties not produce their own leaflets dissuading the electorate from voting for the BNP? Could it be regarded as unlawful? Are they happy for the UAF to 'carry the can' in the event of any injunction or court case?

The other parties are happy to support the activities of the UAF because they all share a common interest in the total absorption of Britain into Europe, ie, politically, culturally, and economically, currently costing over £30m per day to British taxpayers.

The BNP is the only party who will politically withdraw from Europe, thus preserving our independence as a nation and saving over £40bn per year.

Because the BNP dares to challenge the political orthodoxy which is supported by all the main parties, we face intense opposition from the UAF which itself does not stand candidates and whose weapon is based only on emotive politics without any manifesto, since the real reason for opposition towards the BNP dare not be revealed.

The accusations of 'racism' are clearly unfounded: had this been the case, we would have not been allowed to exist as a legal political party, registered with the Electoral Commission and with more than one hundred democratically elected councillors around the country. Hence the UAF relies purely on fear-mongering, distortions and sometimes even blatant lies in order to attempt to suppress the BNP vote.

This is of course demonstrated by the UAF's campaign in Bentswood against the standing of a BNP candidate. Its one and only goal is to hinder and disrupt the democratic process in Bentswood by inciting a totally unfounded fear of voting for the BNP.

The UAF states that 'The BNP generally does better in elections where there is a low turnout….'

It is a well-known fact that a significant number of those eligible to vote relinquish their opportunity to partake in public elections, hence accounting for generally low turnouts.

Many voters feel disenfranchised and believe that their vote will not count for real change. Those who choose to vote for the BNP are motivated to do so because they understand that this is the only party which will reverse the decline of this country by offering commonsense policies on Europe, immigration, law and order, education, health and defence.

In conclusion, we would like to stress that every voter, whatever their political persuasion, should be allowed to make up their own minds.

Inciting hysteria and fear amongst an electorate by spreading misconceptions and lies about a legal political party prior to an election is wrong. We all have a duty to protect those freedoms which our brave men and women fought so hard for us to enjoy, by ensuring that the election process is democratically adhered to.

Donna Bailey
Assistant Press Officer
British National Party
Crawley & Horsham Branch

Well said Donna. If I was not already voting for Kevin I would vote for you.

Looking at my past posts, I see that I first wrote about Donna back in February.



Friday, February 1, 2008

BNP's blonde bombshell

Donna Bailey - Councillor in waiting

Would not be my choice of header for an article about a Lady but that is the one used by the Daily Mail in their report on Donna Bailey, future British National Party councillor and hopefully one day, an MP.

You can go read the full story here. An excellent article that shows the True Brits that we are them and they are us despite the reporters attempt at making it a smear. Remember to leave a favourable comment.

One disappointing bit in the story is the reaction of her neighbour James Palmer who said he was the "Neighbour of the Beast" and went on to say; "I don't think there should be a place for it in a village like this."

A stupid man who does not care what happens to the rest of the country so long as his tiny part of it does not change. If he wants to keep his place in the Sun he should start supporting Donna and the British National Party because they are the only one's who really care. Even for him. Just.

UPDATE 02021418GMT

I have just got back home from helping Donna put out her election address in Lower Beeding (along with a number of her other friends and supporters) and I can tell you that there is tremendous support for her in the village.

She is a very personable, intelligent lady and is an absolute credit to the British National Party and will be a major asset for Lower Beeding if she is fortunate enough to win the upcoming election.

The article is truly excellent coverage for the British National Party and the overall tone of it is well-balanced for an establishment rag like the Daily Mail.

But there is more!! Donna also appeared in a fairish piece on the BBC's South Today programme at 6.40 p.m. and again at 10.25 p.m. yesterday, which can be viewed here http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaselector/c...nbram=1&news=1

PLUS there was another article about her in last Sunday's Observer, which can be read here http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...247679,00.html

Interestingly, the reporter from South Today intimated that Donna may be invited to appear on the Politics Show (Sundays at 1 p.m.) and indicated that the "No platform" policy could be on the way out!

Perhaps the media and their establishment controllers are beginning to wake up to the fact that the BNP are gaining much more ground than they would like to publicly admit and that our policies are resonating with the disenfranchised indigenous population.

Hat tip: Captain Swing, SF


Monday, November 12, 2007

BNP member fighting for democracy


All Donna Bailey, wanted to do was to serve her community in any way possible. But despite making a statement that "Politics should not influence decisions made at parish council level", she was rejected by her Parish Council for the second time.

But whilst Donna might feel that politics might not play a part down at Parish level, many others would disagree.

Chairman David Coldwell revealed the following:"The atmosphere at the meeting was emotionally charged and I am afraid that within parts of the council, Mrs Bailey does excite some passion."

And indeed she must. Because despite three other volunteers being co-opted onto the Council there still remains two unfilled vacancies. Of course her rejection was political. Donna is a member of the British National Party.

Wherever they can, Tri-Axis Councils and Marxist trade unions will seek to prevent British National Party patriots from serving their communities and even working. They know that to let them in is to open the door to truth and democracy. Ideals that would reveal them for the traitors and pocket pickers they truly are.

Of course the Nazis of the UAF, see things different. They are celebrating the rejection of Donna but at the end of the day the BNP will ensure that democracy has its day in Upper Breeding and will force an election.

As usual the red brigade put its foot in it again by saying that the elections will just waste money but we say this. Democracy has no price. Let the people decide.

Besides if they were really concerned about wasting tax and rate payers money, why do they continue to threaten violence outside BNP events that then require the attendance of large numbers of Police? The British National Party is a party of peace.