Television news report on the British National Party and the distribution of the excellent (The Londoner) leaflet for the GLA election on May 1st 2008 in which supporters of the opposition falsely accuse the BNP of incitement of racial hatred. Anyone who has read this leaflet will know it only contains facts, if it does incite racial hatred it is not the BNP who is to blame!
Some people, intent on trying to split and discredit the British National Party in order to benefit the Tri-Axis pact of the Lib/Lab/con have got it wrong again.
This time, Alas Smith & Loser are supporting Red Ken Livingstone, The Mayor of Londonistan, who also happens to be the Chairman of the violent and anti-democratic Urinate Against Freedom(UAF) mob, in his attempt to silence the British National Party in the run up the elections in May.
Leaflets entitled The Londoner have been and continue to be, distributed by an army of BNP activists all over our former Capital City, now almost fully colonised by the enrichers.
Livingstone, in a desperate attempt to silence the BNP,as well as drawing attention away from the continuing investigations into the disappearance of vast sums of Londoners money has threatened legal action if the BNP continues to publish the leaflet on the grounds that it is trading on the "goodwill of the GLA". Roll on the floor laughing.
The GLA claims that
The Mayor publishes a monthly newspaper called "The Londoner" which is distributed to homes throughout London. The Greater London Authority has been the registered owner of "The Londoner" trademark since 2002
As ever, with the Stalinist, GLA press office propagandists, this is misleading and not strictly true.
They do have a Trade Mark that was registered in 2002, but it is not for a newspaper
The description of their Trade Mark 2317413 entry filed in 2002 and published in 2003 says:
List of goods or servicesClass 16:
Newsletters sent by the Mayor of London to all London households.
So where are the GLA legal threats to the Evening Standard and the Associated Newspapers Group?
They do have a Trade Mark for the "Evening Standard The Londoner" Trade Mark 1346786
List of goods or servicesClass 16:
Newspapers included in Class 16.
So if anyone is infringing on trade mark rights to 'The Londoner", it is the Newt Man and his crony Lee Jasper.
Were Ken Livingstone, to take the Evening Standard to court over this issue, then he would be defeated and waste even more money then he currently does with massive legal fees and a settlement.
By using intimidating threats of taxpayer funded legal action with the letter to the British National Party stating: "The GLA believes that you are intentionally trading on the goodwill of the GLA in the trademark of ˜The Londoner" he hopes to ward off his day of judgement.
There is no "goodwill" in the sense of paying customer loyalty to a commercial business, which is what Trade Marks are all about - GLA's "The Londoner"is utterly non-commercial and nothing but a waste of taxpayers' money, whereas the BNP's, "The Londoner" is crammed with informative facts.
Neither is there "goodwill" involved in this blatant attempt to suppress political free speech of political opponents in the run up to the election.
Red Kens attack, supported by Alas Smith & Loser on the BNP is just an expensive, taxpayer funded legal threat used by rich and powerful bullies to intimidate those people without the funds to fight expensive court cases. The British National Party does not scare easily.The Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats are calling for The Londoner, a 20-page free newspaper sent to millions of homes in the capital, to be withdrawn in the run-up the mayoral election on May 1.
An hat tip to Mayor of London blog for information on Trade Marks.
