The oppression of the word

By Sarah: Maid of Albion

We will all have noticed that, in the run up to the European elections in June, the BNP has been mentioned in the press more often than usual. Very little of it is flattering, although they do say that no publicity is bad publicity, especially as I think the public are at last beginning to realise that the party has been the victim of a relentless campaign of vilification and lies.

Of course, whenever there is a mention of the BNP there is one word which its enemies repeat like a mantra, and that multi-purpose, multi-application, multiple meaning, and exhaustively over-used of words is “racist”. “The BNP is a racist party!” they cry, whilst those around them nod their heads in agreement. however, does anyone actually know what they mean, for what does “racist” mean this evening, given that it was probably meant something totally different yesterday.

This invidious little word pops up in so many situations and means so many things that it is all but impossible to live one's life without committing an act (or thought crime) which falls within its all pervading grasp.

As the excellent Tess Culnane from South London described in her recent speech, being the victim of noise pollution, after one has been forced to endure, months and often years of living next to pounding music twenty four a day can be a racist act, if you finally can take no more and complain about it. The noise polluter, of course, is not a racist, they are under no obligation to consider you or your culture, whilst you are required to consider them and at least pretend to enjoy their culture, whatever the decibels or time of night when they choose to express it, to fail to do so is .... racist.

Indeed any failure to appreciate or wholeheartedly welcome and enjoy any culture other than your own can result in accusations of racism, whereas expressing an affection and appreciation of your own culture too enthusiastically can render you, at the very least, liable for suspicion of racism.

As we all know it is an act of heinous racism for victims of violence to make reference to the ethnicity of their attacker, and it appears that this sanction is also applied to other protected groups, as members of the gay community discovered when they complained about gangs of black gay bashers attacking clubers leaving venues in the Vauxhall area.

As you would soon find out were you to attempt to set up an organisation or group exclusively for white people, that would be racist, and probably illegal, whereas there are a phone book full of organisations, pressure groups and clubs exclusively for blacks, Asians or other minorities ,which are not only not racist or illegal but are often generously subsidised by the tax-payer.

In this connection, there are many who claim that racism is something which non-whites can not be capable of, however, confusingly, sometimes they can be, but only if they express a prejudice by word or act against another ethnic group, except. of course, whites. A neutral observer might conclude that actively excluding acts against whites was in itself an act of racism, but, apparently it is not, or so we are assured.

Whites it appears can only ever be the perpetrators of racism, but never the victims. Bizarrely enough that apparently isn't racist either, or so we are told by those who make the rules.

Being “subconsciously” racist is always a hard one to avoid and leads to all sorts of dire results, such as the fabled “institutional racism”, most frequently demonstrated by irrational acts, such as the police arresting disproportionate numbers of black boys for no better reason that that they commit disproportionate numbers of crimes.

However, subconscious racism can extend into any number of areas of one's life, including, it seems one's sexual preferences. Within the last year, on an internet forum I was accused of sexual racism when I stated that I have never felt sexually or romantically attracted to a non white male. To some, such as him, it would appear any number of sexual eccentricities are acceptable, provided that they are multicultural.

The man who accused me of sexual racism, went on to express the view that a mother's preference for her own child, over that of another's child had racism at its very roots. The gentleman in question appeared to view a mother's love as reprehensibly lacking in inclusiveness which may seem bizarre to most of us. However, in making that claim, weird as it may seem, he perhaps became closer to telling a truth about racism, or at least what is often condemned as racism, than he, or many of his ilk would ever admit.

There is a natural instinct within most people to protect, cherish and prefer the company of one's own kind, it is an innate instinct which has existed throughout history, but does not necessarily translate into “hatred” of “the other”. The mother may prefer her own child, but she does not hate another woman's child, provided it eventually goes home, she is merely more attached to her own. This is the truth which those who hate us refuse to accept, namely that one of the myriad things they call racism, the instinctive preference for one's own, is a fact within the nature of humanity.

For a while, brain washing and intimidation may have have suppressed human nature in much of the West, but the Left have not learnt from there previous attempts to suppress human nature, in the Soviet Union because it will not last for ever.

Returning to the multiple meanings of “racism”, who can forget the recent attacks on conservationists by historian Professor Christopher Smout, who claimed that seeking to preserve an indigenous animal or plant species from being overwhelmed by an alien species, was a form of “ecological racism”. Following the example of many other modern historians, who interpret their occupation as requiring them to re-write the past, Professor Smout suggests that the destruction of an indigenous species by an alien one, is a “natural process”. In making this claim the “good” professor ignores the devastation which has been wrought upon so many species buy the unnatural importation of alien species, usually by the act of man.

Britain's once thriving water vole population did not reach its current endangered status through “nature”, that tragedy was brought about by the deliberate release of alien and veracious American mink into the British countryside. Likewise the dodo did not become extinct because of Mother Nature, again the fault lay with mankind and the deliberate act of importing pigs and dogs into the unfortunate bird's previously safe Island home.

The theme of ecological racism popped up again in a recent Channel Four documentary, to which I can't find a link, but I am sure that many of you saw it, in which those seeking to protect the indigenous red squirrel from being driven to extinction by the larger and more aggressive foreign grey variety were mocked and subjected the the implicit implication that their motives were racist.

A more common use of the “r” word is in respect of those who object to the fact that the most significant changes ever to have occurred in this country were imposed upon us over the last forty years without even a pretence of democracy, a choice or the opportunity to vote on it. It is used also against those who do not unquestioningly welcome uncontrolled levels of immigration, or accept as gospel that the newcomers bring nothing but benefits to our ancient homelands.

Likewise, anyone who draws attention to the multiple disadvantages of the un-managable levels of immigration, or shines the light of truth onto the lies we have been told is immediately condemned as the most vile of racists.

And this is where we get close to what this invidious little six letter word is really all about. It is a political tool, a word with an army of meanings but a single purpose. It is a word which has been used relentlessly in order to achieve a political aim, without the necessity to trouble with obtaining a mandate. It has been used to bully, to harass and intimidate, and most importantly it has been used to suppress any opposition to the greatest demographic change our country has ever experienced, a change imposed upon us, against our will and, on which, we were never allowed to vote.

Of course the BNP are accused of “racism” they are the only party standing up against all those things which the enemies of our country have used that evil little word to force upon us. That is why the BNP must succeed, because, if they don't will continue to suffer the tyranny of that most dishonest of words.

___________________________________

Ignoring the cracks

By Sarah Maid of Albion

When a great structure or edifice begins to crumble, be it a towering rock face, a mighty building or a huge and imposing statue, the early warnings of imminent disaster are often small, and easy to miss or to ignore. A distant rumble, a shifting rock or a small cascade of pebbles are ominous signs of what is to come, but frequently only spotted by those who are truly prepared to look. Thus it can be for a sovereign nation state, and is how it has been with Britain.

Those who wish to undermine a society are most effective when they embark on their campaign of sabotage in small ways, so that their dark work remains undetected for as long as possible by those they seek to destroy, until the foundation upon which they stand is so weakened that it cannot withstand the final push which will send all which it once supported hurtling to oblivion.

Some have been warning us for years that there are forces within this land which are committed to destroying everything which is great about Great Britain. For a long time they were lonely voices calling to deaf ears, although more recently others, including one time New Labour voters, such as myself, have begun to see the truth in what they are have been telling us, and to appreciate the growing threat which we, as a nation, face.

However, for many the erosion of our culture has been so gradual and piecemeal that, even many of those who suspect that something is happening, do not yet realise how far it has gone and how narrow are the remaining planks on which they stand.

Commenting on an earlier post of mine which focused on the recent protests against the employment of foreign workers, a very aptly named blogger calling himself “Not my Granddad's Labour party” wrote:

The reason that this dispute has woken the British people is because it's a sudden change rather than a gradual, almost imperceptible attrition. If you look at the way that 'enrichment' has been implemented up to now, it has been a gradual destruction of our way of life - a death by a thousand cuts.

Each cut has been a minor annoyance, but not enough to bring people out on the streets.

- Nobody's actually rioted about the banning of 'Three Little Pigs' or crucifixes.

- People haven't been willing to die in a ditch about the gradual extension of the definition of Politically Incorrect speech.

- Nobody has taken to the barricades when the Union Jack and Flag of St George were deemed 'inappropriate'.

- Families have just had to grin and bear it when they've been pushed to the back of housing waiting-lists to make way for vibrant fast-breeders and their multiple wives.

But losing your job, and then inevitably your house, is hardly a minor annoyance. The EUrabians have made a major tactical error here. They have awoken a sleeping giant.

Not My Granddad's Labour is correct that the average Briton is less likely to fully grasp what they are loosing if it is chopped away gradually and by stealth, especially when there are so many deliberate and carefully placed distractions put in his way.

The enemy has, of course, been less cautious where they are unobserved, or, more accurately observed only by the innocent, be in little doubt that were hidden cameras secreted in many classrooms, and people were able to see the lies, disinformation, historical inaccuracies and blatant propaganda being fed to our children they would at last grasp what is being done. Of course, a corrupt media own the cameras, and they would not tell us the truth, so away from the public gaze, the next generation continue to receive an education which is little more than multicultural propaganda, hate and lies.

I wonder though whether the terrorists amongst us do believe them made a tactical error over the foreign workers dispute, or whether they believe that their work has been so successful that they no longer need to hide and that their years of work have brought our society to the point where a final push will send what remains of a once great culture tumbling into the historical void.

If they did think that, it would be hard to fault their logic, for look at where we are, and look at where we came from.

It is hard to think of another culture which has become quite as diminished as ours has and which has done so quite so rapidly. With our culture, our once rich language has been reduced to dumbed down politically correct mush. Words and phrases which tripped off the tongues of our mother's generation, and many before, have been condemned and silenced for fear that they might offend cultures which a hundred years ago struggled to master the wheel.

Members of a legitimate political party are banned from working in our police force, and now in our churches, but nobody dares to say “Hey this is what happened in East Germany in the 1960 's (or indeed Nazi Germany in the 1930's)”.

Pictures of the Boxing day crowds in Oxford street, appear in the news papers and on TV, and nobody has the courage to point out that there is not an indigenous, white, face amongst them.

Day after day we see clear evidence of the totally disproportionate levels of murder, rape, and mayhem committed against us by ethnic minorities, yet we remain silent when our lying media and politicians tell us that they, the ethnic minorities, are our victims.

The moment a single European voice, such as Geert Wilders' is raised against what is being done to us and our European brothers across our continent, he is banned from our shores (albeit that may be reversed if in dawns on David Silly-Bland that was a tactical error). Yet a days before a Muslim Peer makes a totally undemocratic threat and our legislators fawningly and instantly submit.

Earlier generations of Britons would have died fighting before they allowed this to happen, but we cringe and submit to it like beaten mutts. Yet, what is it we cringe before? A bunch of ill educated or hate filled communists, a dishonest media and a regiment of alleged human rights lawyers, who defend only the human rights of a selected few, together with a few lying, soul selling, politicians and above all the terrorism of a single word. We cringe because if we do otherwise we might be called “racists” or we might offend people from cultures, where wife beating, infanticide, honour killing, female genital mutilation, gang-rape, homophobia, murder, torture and corruption are endemic, - some indeed where ritual killing, cannibalism and slavery still occur, - and people we have granted sanctuary to and yet whom we are taught to feel indebted – and often inferior - to.

How have we, the British, come to this?

We have reached this point through the gradual, drip, drip, drip erosion of our culture and or national self esteem. In many ways Briton has come to resemble the brave soldier who would once have taken on and bettered any foe, but who now submits, childlike, to his hectoring wife, because after years of nagging, she has broken his spirit.

That analogy, albeit sexist (there are many men who nag their wives) sums up quite well how this has been achieved. By a process of first making us feel uncomfortable, then guilty, followed by telling us repeatedly that we are in the wrong, they have brought us to a point where what they say is the commonly accepted truth and what tell us has become the dogma of the state.

Is it any surprise that our enemies believe that we are vanquished, that they have won and as such no longer have to take their time and stealthily kill us by a thousand cuts?. That they have become bolder and more blatant and have moved to the next phase. You need not take my word for it, look around you and you will see it happening.

It is not over, but my God we have left it late to fight back, and there will be damage which can not be repaired. However, much can still be saved, if we decide to save it. In the dark days of World War II it looked as if all was lost, but it was not. A few hundred years before that the enemy appeared set to breach the walls of Vienna, but they were forced back. We have come back from the edge before, and we can do so again, but the window will not remain open forever.

The edifice crumbles slowly and can be repaired, but there comes a point where the fall will be fast and inevitable. Let us as a people awake before we reach that point.

________________________

This could be your Mother

This woman shows more courage then many much younger than herself. Some of us should feel shame when they think back on the number of times they have voted Labour.

If you think this old Lady has been treated badly then you wait and see how you will be treated if the British National Party does not prevail and the whites become a minority.

Tags: racism

Racism in any form will not be tolerated

Me to Darling. Me to.

Racism will not be tolerated. Those were the words used by Judge Paul Batty when he sentenced Mr Bryan Cork to six month imprisonment for shouting "proud to be British" and "go back to where you came from " outside a Cult of the Dead Paedophile mosque. The charge being racially aggravated assault.

Personally I have no problems with either of those statements. It is what the True British really think and would say openly. If they were not afraid of being arrested that is.

Now compare that sentence to the one handed out by Judge Mushtaq Khoktar to an Asian man who threatened people with shooting after calling an hospital receptionist and care worker a white bitch and a white bastard.

The agitated Asian (aren't they always) lost his rag when visiting an hospital with his pregnant wife (aren't they all) and was asked to take a seat.

“At reception, Scott Morris was taking a call. He told the defendant he wouldn’t be a moment and to take a seat.

“Mr Morris then had to leave the reception momentarily but indicated he would be back quickly. He said he could hear the word “bastard” being used.

“Mr Morris warned the defendant that he would call security and asked if the words were being directed at him.

“At this point a health care assistant came to reception and the defendant swore when telling her the man had been on the phone and was ignoring him.

“She said the defendant had his finger constantly pressed on the bell.

“When she asked him to take a seat, the defendant became very agitated. He came so close their faces were touching.

“He then shouted ‘listen white bitch I’ll sit down when I want to sit down’.

“She said he lifted his left hand above his head and she believed he was about to hit her.

“A security guard tried to deal with the incident. He said the defendant was gesturing with his fingers in the shape of a gun, saying ‘I’ll come back and shoot you’.

Finding the defendant guilty of racially aggravated assault, the Judge sentenced Miah to four months jail suspended for 18 months. Way to go Judge. Racism should be punished severely but only if the accused is white.

Remember in this Orwellian World of Eurabia, you no longer even need to be guilty of a crime to be found guilty and to be punished.

Cast your mind back to this case where a member of the British National Party was convicted of racially abusing an Asian Woman who may or may not have even existed and whose only evidence against him was by a woman rewarded by the police despite admitting that the exact words the accused was supposed to have used could not be heard.

Because Robert McGlynn said in his defence;

“Basically, I do not remember anything about that morning. I am completely surprised about how this case came about. I believe she is mistaken, that is all. I just took my car to the garage for an MoT and that was that.”

He said that he had refused to answer questions after his arrest because he had felt intimidated. He added: “I thought I was safer saying nothing."

Well there you go. As the magistrates said when finding him guilty. His refusal in exercising his right to say nothing led them to conclude that he was guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

After the case, McGlynn, who is unemployed, single and lives with his mother, said: “I was hung, drawn and quartered before I even set foot in court.

“This is a crime without a victim with evidence from someone who admitted they didn’t really hear what was happening and who had already had an award for reporting the case before she stepped into court.

“I am completely innocent and it worries me what is happening in Britain today.

“You have mad mullahs preaching death and destruction in our streets and nothing is done while law-abiding people can be convicted of nothing more than driving their car with the window open.”

There will be no justice in this Country until there is a British National Party government. Help in the creation of that government by supporting and joining the BNP. Our only hope for justice.

Freedom is never free

Tags: racism

BNP memorial to white victims of racism RWB 2008

At this years Red White and Blue British National Party family festival, a memorial for the white victims of racism was erected by Coventry BNP. However, the LIB-Lab-Con don't acknowledge the fact that the indigenous British folk can be victims of racism. Remember that we indigenous folk have the highest percentage for being victims of racism.

Tags: RWB, Coventry BNP, BNP, racism