"we've always been at war with eastasia"

by johnofgwent

(Pictures and hyperlinks to references will be added to this later. Right now I'm in a hurry and need to get the words out)

GA reminded us all a few blogs back that the European Elections are almost upon us.

It will soon be that time of year again. The time when pro-eurabian spinmeisters will dig out their prayer books embossed with the mantra of "ever closer political union" and spin you a pile of rot that justifies why they should continue once again to ride the unaudited all expenses paid gravy train taking its ever-more-lunatic road trip between brussels and strasbourg god knows how many times a year, while the rest of us are lectured - by those same road warriors - that having a "carbon footprint" is a mortal sin.

And all this at a time when our own westminster "government" says that unlike the wunch of bankers it has rescued in order to protect its job prospects after the next election, the LDV Van Company has "no good reason" to get government support and should be allowed to go to the wall. And at the same time Rhodri Morgan is falling out with his bedfellow in the Cardiff Bay Hot Air Shit Pit Ieuan Wyn Jones over the matter of university tuition fees.

But GA's post reminded me of something. Back in my younger days when taking an English Literature O Level meant something, I recall that amongst the lists of books to be studied for the exam was George Orwell's 1984. And in that book although the first time we see Winston at work is when he creates a false biography of a hero of the party about whom Big Brother can be recorded as safely waxing lyrical, in place of the "DoublePlus Ungood Dayorder" that "Refs Nonpersons", one of the most stunning, things that happen as a result of this routine rewriting of "history" is that during "hate week", when political alliances change and suddenly "Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia", no-one bats an eyelid.

The European Union reminds me of this a lot. In 1957 - the year of my birth - the six countries of the European Steel Trade Consortium got together and signed up to a pact that established the supranational "European Economic Community". But in the preamble to that document, the truth is revealed, for its very first paragraphs say the six "plenipotentiaries" nominated by the kings, queens and presidents of the six countries to sign thjis document do so as a result of their "commitment to ever closer political union".

Or did they ?

Because if you google hard enough you'll find that the keepers of the library of EU documentation seem remarkably reticent at publishing the original document. Because every time there is a new piece of legislation, they "consolidate" the tresaties and make them much easier to obtain than the one you had before. The official EU website which proclaims that it holds the original non-consolidated treaty actually says it is unpublished and for example where the original is said to have referred to an "Economic Community", the consolidated treaty has been altered so that it now reads "European Union"

It's the same as putting the Magna Carta through an Optical Character Reader, burning the original that John was forced to accede to at Runnymede and now all you can get are electronic copies modified by Microsoft Word without the change tracker on.

What have our European Masters got to hide ?

Or was Eric Arthur Blair right, Has "Oceania always been at war with Eastasia" ?

David Cameron and The United Front Against Whites

Some people will do anything to win a vote

By Mister Fox

On the Tommy Boyd's talk Radio show of 17 February Weyman Bennett described David Cameron as a supporter of the Marxist UAF!

Are the Conservatives still the patriotic party or a Con that pretends to support the nation but when in power carry on with the work of the Labour Party? Bennet accused the BNP of violence but at 2008 Red White Blue, 33 arrests were recorded - including left wing thugs throwing rocks at children and elderly people. Yet no members or supporters of the BNP were arrested. What is Cameron doing with people like that if he is a Tory?

The Daily Mail of 22 January reported his speaking to think tank Demos which is The Progressive Conservatism Project developing policies and ideas that are radical. Conservatives are now pursuing progressive goals which were once left-wing like social justice, social mobility and an end to poverty. How, they ask, can these be achieved through ‘conservative’ means? They are turning the Conservative party into a neo-Marxist outfit like Nulab!

Cameron said his party wants to abolish child poverty and increase social mobility. The four aims of 'progressive Conservatism' are - a fair society, a green environment, safety for citizens and equal opportunity... 'Yes, they are ends that we share with people in the Labour Party, the Liberal Democrat Party and right across the mainstream political spectrum. But no, we do not agree about how best to achieve those ends.”(1)

What people fail to understand is that the Conservative Party is no longer conservative. They should be done under Advertising Standards laws or change their name. They are another aspect of PC ideology Party. You cannot "change" the fundamental tenets of Conservatism but you can become something else behind the name. In 1991 the party got rid of the remaining traditionalists when it purged the Monday Club to make it another vehicle of neo-Marxism, PC and to serve the Globalists agenda.

What do traditional Conservatives believe? American Conservative Robert Nisbet (1966): "The ethos of Conservatism is tradition…...defence of social tradition and emphasis on the values of community, kinship, hierarchy, authority, and religion; add also Conservatism’s premonition of social chaos surmounted by absolute power once individuals have become wrenched from the context of these values by the forces of liberalism and radicalism. The Conservatives began with the reality of the institutional order as they found it, the order bequeathed by history".

The sense of belonging to a people and a putting their interests first was shown by Indian PM, Mrs Gandhi’s, 'Indianisation' policies commenced about 1962 in which Europeans were asked to leave their posts on the basis of race; the the Africanisation policies of Robert Mugabe, are cruel and brutal and, even though they can not run their society, they see it as theirs and want to do it for themselves; the Africanisation policies of the ANC are racist but multi-racialists and anti-racists support racist policies if they are against “white people”! There was the expulsion of over 10 million Europeans between 1945 and 1948 on the basis of their race and nationality.

Indigenous Indians are given preference in India - in fact we wouldn't be allowed in and if we did wouldn't be eligible for anything. Every country puts the interests of its own first, but our establishment want to see the indigenous British dispossessed in their own country. Why don't the elites just admit they hate us and want to destroy us?

In September(2008) , in a speech to the Israeli parliament, Gordon Brown called on the nations of the world to ensure that our era becomes the century of the global community. He swore to a “make a reality of the vision of a global society in which we create global civic institutions that turn words of friendship into bonds of human solidarity".

David Cameron is also a servant of the global elites pushing for globalism. During his visit to Rwanda last summer, while there was severe flooding in his Whitney, Oxfordshire constituency, he showed which people he supported: ˜There is no domestic or foreign any more. In this world today, we are all in it together.”

Most of his main ideological concerns are the same as the other elites and as Brown has shown a main part of the globalist vision is the creation of a new corporate and political network which would operate beyond nations.

The Utopians believed that harmony could be made on earth not heaven by world government. H. G. Wells, the science fiction writer and socialist philosopher, was an advocate of a “permanent world congress” and specialised international agencies which would end the nation state. Patriotism, he believed, was “mere flag-waving with no constructive duties”.

Now the dreamers are in power and doing it through deceit and manipulation.
Cameron visited Bolton on Monday 5th January 2009 and addressed a more than 1,000 leading members of the Asian community, at the Reebok Stadium. Cameron ignored the indigenous populatiion. He announced: “We have hitherto been able to rise to the challenge and sustain our coherence and unity. We have done so through a combination of a steadfast faith in our institutions and values, such as freedom under the rule of law, pluralism and tolerance….and because society – not only the majority community but the minority community too – were prepared to stand together as one. There is no reason to think we cannot do the same today.”

But he knows that under the EU “Rule of Law” and the other values he cited like “our institutions” are being scrapped. Very hypocritical!

The one-sided view of racism which ignores the horrendous crimes our people are subjected to including the routine raping of our little girls by older Muslim gangs is typical of the caste: “ First, a concerted attack on racism and soft bigotry. You can't even start to talk about a truly integrated society while people are suffering racist insults and abuse, as many still are in our country on a daily basis. We must also be careful about the language we use.

No Muslim I've ever met is offended by Christmas, or supports its replacement with 'Winterval'. But many Muslims I've talked to about these issues are deeply offended by the use of the word 'Islamic' or 'Islamist' to describe the terrorist threat we face today”(2) like Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith’s call to describe Muslim terrorism as “anti-Islamic activity.”

British politics are run by Utopians, optimists and Romantic Idealists since WWII - look at the practical consequences. Utopians brought millions of immigrants to make our lives better and, still say it – Cameron is one of them. There is also cheap labour for commerce.

In his 2007 conference speech Cameron spoke without notes, to suggest they were deeply felt beliefs yet he was clearly reciting a script, which said nothing. He asked the audience, “What do I believe?” and answered, “I am by nature an optimist.” We assume his answer meant, “ Everything will turn out well in the end.”

Like other “Caste” elites he has no sense of duty or honour - his political career comes first. Small differences aside the Libs, Labs, and Cons, have the same ideology and Cameron in the speech signalled that he belongs: “I think our diverse and multi-racial society is a huge benefit for Britain.” Anything less and his career is over.

He joined in the Persecution of Prince Harry demonstrating that the non-Conservatives will not defend our people's norms nor the monarchy as traditionally, but are the same as the other mainstream parties, the intellectual and cultural elites, commerce and the media - attacking our traditions and ways to prepare us for utopia. Like all Utopians, Cameron is an optimist about the ultimate conclusion of British society in a multi-racial, one-world. Prime Ministers don’t question dominant state- ideology - they slot into it.

Like the others he says what he has to to get elected not what is needed to save the country. The common features of this ilk are Political correctness, ambition and cowardice which prevents them addressing the real problems affecting us. They try to convince us that if we also fantasise that things will turn out well, they will. But things only work out well when done well.

Optimists can’t solve problems that optimists have created. They thought the multiracial society would work because they thought it would. Even though their utopia is a nightmare, they will not face it but make us scapegoats when anything goes wrong by using the all-purpose pejorative “racism” which only whites can be.

The media puff him up as they did with Gordon Brown and the Archbishop of Canterbury. Politicians are always pictured in mid-flow, with a finger raised as authority figures when really they are weak and inadequate. The Daily Telegraph said the speech: “…explained in detail his vision of how to change Britain.” It did no such thing.

It was the same script we get from all establishment politicians - changing this and changing that, but they never make a real point like what they are going to change - what into what, why and how? Our inadequate leaders haven’t got it and hope something will turn up.

What they call change is more of the same in a different guise. They mean repackaging. They’ve set us on this course and they’re determined to see it through, and there will be no change until establishment liars, cowards, and parasites have been replaced by people for whom self interest is not the prime motivating factor.

Like Obama’s inaugural speech Cameron’s vision to the conference had no substance: “We need change for the long term, hope for our country and optimism for the next generation…”. Merely buzz-words - “…change …long term …hope …our country …optimism …next generation,” but no ‘detailed’ explanation of the vision that the Telegraph praised.

The only thing he stated with certainty was that he supports mass immigration: “I think this country has benefited immeasurably from immigration”. If immigration isn’t the problem, what is? He enlightened us: “I want to tell you what's wrong with our country and I want to explain what I am going to do to put it right “ …if we really want to tackle crime, if we really want to make our society stronger then you have got to make families stronger and society more responsible …we must make our country safer and greener and give people more freedom and control of their lives…” …families …stronger …responsible …our country …safer …greener …freedom - more buzz-words without meaning.

The population does not see society through the same ideology and have to be browbeaten by moral lectures and corralled by totalitarian laws and a politicised police. Few indeed share his view that immigration has benefited Britain ‘immeasurably’ and most people were they not frightened of being persecuted by the state and “free” would say so.

What he really means is that he wants people to be free to say what the “caste” want them to say, and to have control over their lives so that the “caste” can manage them in the way they want to.

His knee jerk response to faux pas of Patrick Mercer and Nigel Hastilow show what this “freedom” means - persecution of dissidents.

A new kind of Tory? In his 68 minute long conference speech ostensibly about British society he didn’t refer to our Christian traditions or the threat that Islam poses to them. He is on the other side. He interpreted the worries over immigration as concern about the effect it has on services, education, health, housing, and ignored the more important effect it is having on British culture and the dispossession of ethnic Britons.
Then he enthused about what he thinks important – persuading ethnic groups to become Tories. He told the audience they must, “…get out amongst Britain's ethnic minority communities and find the brightest, the best and the most talented and get them in.”

One of “...the brightest, the best and the most talented” members of “…the ethnics ” is Baroness Warsi. He was so impressed by Warsi that he wanted her on board at any price. And when she failed to make it and lost to Labour’s Shahid Malik in the 2005 general election he had her made a Baroness to encourage other Asians. She became minister responsible for ‘cohesion’.

We’re in safe hands. He told the conference, “I am proud that I can stand here with the first Muslim woman of a Shadow Cabinet or Cabinet in Sayeeda Warsi who will be a great talent for our party and our country.” Baroness Warsi is a former immigration lawyer. She was involved with Operation Black Vote and the left wing pro-immigration Joseph Rowntree Trust. Last year she was co-author of a report that made the case for allowing refused asylum seekers to enter the economy.

She is his Lord Ahmed who Blair appointed to the House of Lords, swearing his oath of allegiance to Queen and Country on the Koran. Ahmed was both the first Muslim to be appointed to the Lords, and the first Lord to lead delegations on behalf of the British government to Saudi Arabia for the Haj, or Muslim pilgrimage.

In February 2005 he hosted a book launch for the infamous anti-Semite Jöran Jermas at the House of Lords, where Jermas launched into a fundamentalist Muslims tirade against Zionists. This fawning on immigrants presents us as weak and afraid of them which is what emboldened Ahmed to threaten to mobilise 10,000 Muslims to stop Geert Wilders entering The Palace of Westminster!(3) Jacqui smityh, Home secretary banned Wilders!

In May 2007 Cameron stayed with a Muslim family in Birmingham and wrote in the Observer of 13th may 2007: “Last week, I spent two days staying with Abdullah and Shahida Rehman and their family in Birmingham. The experience has strengthened my conviction about the right way to build a more cohesive Britain... by using the word 'Islamist' to describe the threat, we actually help do the terrorist ideologues' work for them, confirming to many impressionable young Muslim men that to be a 'good Muslim', you have to support their evil campaign.” Cameron’s argument that otherwise peaceful Muslims can be persuaded to embrace terrorism by the mere association of the words ‘Islamist’ and ‘threat’ is either absurd or the ultimate in unintentional truths.

He uses us whites as scapegoats: “Many British Asians see a society that hardly inspires them to integrate. Indeed, they see aspects of modern Britain which are a threat to the values they hold dear - values which we should all hold dear.” It’s our fault, again. I should have guessed.

He revealed the establishment agenda to deculture as well as dispossess us: “Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.”

To help shift society in this direction Cameron set up the Conservative Muslim Forum, a sort of Tory equivalent of the National Black Police Association, which ‘advises’ the Conservative Party on how best to assimilate us to Muslims. The CMF wants the compulsory history curriculum in schools changed to give full recognition to the “…massive contribution (sic) that Islam has made to the development of Western civilisation".and the “caste” is introducing the same agenda into our schools and teaching our children to see 7/7 through the eyes of the bombers! This is teaching our children to submit to Islam and to cover the terrorists in glory. (4)

Recently, Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari head of the Muslim Council of Britain was calling for Britain to adopt Islamic customs and labelling us a Nazis for daring to question the infinite benefits of Islam. Good old Tory values! Conservative Cameron concludes that British society is collapsing because it’s not sufficiently Asian: “We have a responsibility to change to accommodate immigrants so they fit in”. He’s made this perfectly clear which is why the Conservative Muslim Forum and the Muslim Council of Britain are emboldened to demand that Britain change to take account of their ways and laud their achievements.

Cameron's false Conservatives like Labour are increasing the influence of Islam on this country.

Lets end by reminding ourselves what a traditional Tory is: On May 24 1929, Stanley Baldwin, three times Prime Minister, said :“Let us keep this thought ever in our mind: “that each one of us, so far as in him lies, will strive to keep these islands a fit nursery for Our Race”.


(1) http://www.divinity.cam.ac.uk/cip/documents/DavidCameronSpeech2.pdf

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/may/13/comment.communities

(2) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....o-Muslim s.html

(3)http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/3344161/britain-capitulates-to-terror.t
html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/....liberty-central

(4) http://www.independent.co.uk/news/educat....t-1627062.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/apr/07/race.world

Tags: David Cameron, BNP, UAF

The Redeeming of Miss Goody

By Sarah Maid of Albion

On Sunday, as anyone resident in the United Kingdom will know, the reality TV star and terminal cancer victim, Jade Goody married her handsome, if troubled, younger lover Jack Tweed in a no-expenses spared ceremony and reception, with the setting provided by rock superstar Elton John and the gown donated free by Harrods owner Mohamed al Fayed.

With the national media crowding around, straining for the chance to catch a glimpse of the nation's latest favourite celebrity couple, the proceedings took place behind closed doors, this being due to the fact that the publication rights have been sold to OK Magazine and the "Living" TV channel, as the dying star seeks to earn enough money in her final months to support her two young sons, by a previous younger lover, after her death

In the course of what it seems will be a tragically short life, Jade Goody has, within her homeland, joined that tiny group of celebrities instantly known by a single Christian name. If you mention "Kate" a any number of possibilities spring to mind, Kate Winslet's Oscar triumph notwithstanding. However, mention "Jade" in Britain and everyone knows who you mean.

The degree to which this young woman's plight has touched the nation's heart is demonstrated not only the fact that her photograph no adorns on the front pages of even our more serious newspapers, but the Justice minister has seen fit to waive the 7:00 PM curfew requirements of her grooms parole conditions, enabling him to spend his wedding night with his new bride.

There is speculation that Jade may agree to allow her final moments to be filmed, in order to further secure her children's future, and if she does, the purchaser can be assured of a large and tearful audience for the end of what must be, by any standards, a truly bizarre life.

It is even more bizarre when one considers that it is only two short years since these same newspapers now gushing with praise for Jade's courage and paying a fortune for a single photograph of her, were indulging in a hate campaign targeted at the destruction of this same young woman, who, to a hack, they referred to as "Britain's most hated woman".

For it was then, in 2007, what that same media declared Jade guilty of one of the greatest crimes of our age.

Appearing on that year's Celebrity Big Brother, Jade, the then nineteen year old Jack Tweed, who, together with her mother, had accompanied Jade into the house, and two other young female contestants of a similar socio-economic background decided to take exception to a fourth female contestant, from a different socio-economic background, whom they apparently considered to be, false, "stuck-up" and altogether too pleased with herself.

As any fan of reality TV will know, this is not an uncommon occurrance in such an artificial and claustrophobic situation, where personal likes and dislikes become exaggerated in an environment which is uniquely conducive to conflict and the taking of sides. It was certainly not the first time that such a antagonism has arisen on Big Brother.

However, what made this conflict different in the eyes of the media, and the ever vigilant guardians of social cohesion, was that whilst Jade, Tweed and their two companions were white, the contestant whom they had taken against was the strikingly beautiful, but clearly rather pleased with herself, Bollywood star Shilpha Shetty.

To the media and assorted zealots this automatically meant that, rather than a conflict of characters or classes, the bickering took on an entirely different and more sinister element. To them, this was unquestionably racially motivated bullying, and as Jade was the most outspoken (and famous) of the four, she was viewed as racist in chief, as such she was singled out for special criticism.

Unaware of the controversy swirling outside "the house" which had now taken on international proportions, the bickering and bitcing continued, at one point descending into a shouting march, which was repeatedly re-broadcast over the following days, carefully edited to highlight Jade's role as victimiser and Shilpha as victim.

To the obvious irritation to the forces of multicultural purity there was a marked lack of racist language involved in the conflict, except from fellow contestant Jermaine Jackson, who referred to Jade and her friends as white trash, although he was immediately excused on account of being black. Muttered allegations were made that Jack Tweed had used a "word" in a conversation which had not been broadcast, but, despite 24 hour filming, footage never appeared, and it was eventually admitted that the word, although offensive, was not racist, in any event Jack Tweed was not a celebrity in his own right, he had no careeer to destroy and was, therefore, not the target the press were aiming at.

Yet, for all her famed lack of education or sophistication, for days Jade failed to utter a syllable which event the most committed UAF zealot could construe as racist. Then, at last, those crowding round the scaffold got what they had been waiting for, when, in an angry outburst, well out of Shilpha Shetty's hearing, Jade blurted out the "P" word. …uh? … no not THAT "P" word. In a moment of anger, Jade referred to Ms Shetty as "Shilpha Poppadom" and the forces of racial outrage exploded.

Across the nation, television screens were alive with people explaining how offensive this reference to a quick fried, flatbread, wafer was. Indeed, I recall seeing one particular Asian lady puffing out her ample bosom and asking in a decidedly Lady Bracknell like tone, "Would they call her Jade Fish and Chips?"

To which the obvious answer would be "probably not, but who'd give a toss if they did?", but in Britain in 2007, such an answer would be unthinkable.

As a result Jade became a pariah, her later tearful attempts to make amends were scorned, and she became the first Celebrity big Brother contestant who's departure from the house was filmed in silence, without the usual cheering or catcalling crowd, so fearful were the programme makers that the public reaction to her might actually be violent.

Now officially the most hated woman in Britain, a title previously only bestowed on child murderers and Margaret Thatcher, Jade's career was in ruins, and was hurting into that dark void where fallen stars, broken on the wheel of political correctness are consigned.

Having uttered the word "Poppadom", Jade was cast as a villain, guilty of an unforgivable sin. All but unemployable, her celebrity endorsement income drying up and the once thriving sales of her personal brand of perfume non-existent, Jade had to look overseas to earn a living for herself an her children, her every appearance dogged by recriminations and the ghost of Big Brother.

She was still walking the march of shame when, whilst appearing on the Mumbai version of Big Brother again with Shilpa Shetty in an attempt to show how non-racist she was, she received news of the positive cancer diagnosis which will eventually kill her. Again, as with so much in her life the news was relayed on live TV.

With the news of that diagnosis, Jade's career underwent its second major reversal, from scorned pariah one moment, she went to much loved national icon the next, with a far larger fan base even than she had before. As I said in an earlier article realities can change and Jade's reality again changed overnight, It seems certain that when, in the next few months she loses her battle against the ravaging disease which is rapidly overwhelming her, she will die as a larger than life and well loved star.

Does the short life of Jade Goody tell us anything valuable about the world we now live in? A creature of the celebrity age, without any perceptible talent, she became rich and famous, merely by being herself, then it was being herself which all but destroyed her, before, by being physically destroyed herself, she has found some form of salvation.

And what of those who shrilly screamed for her ruin, who wanted her broken to make an example of her because she had dared to dislike someone whom society requires her to embrace. How do they feel now, watching her as she plays out her final scenes in the public spotlight, do they feel any qualms for what they tried to do to her? I doubt it.

Sadly, perhaps all it does teach us is that in the distorted and unnatural world we currently inhabit, when you are accused of racism, whether those claims have merit or not, it will take a death sentence to redeem you.

_____________________

Time to attack the European Union

As much fun as it is, to attack and ridicule the Labour Party, the time as now come for the British National Party supporting sites to start attacking the European Union and revealing to the True British People just how evil and expensive it really is.

The Labour Party has done a very good job of ensuring that they will never be reelected again or at least not in my lifetime and good riddance to bad rubbish, for they have brought nothing but death and destruction to us. Pray God, these "professional politicial" vampires will have a stake driven through their hearts so they can never rise again. Their time is almost over.

The conservatives will be elected at the next general election, not because the people believe them, they certainly do not trust them but because the people have had enough of the Labour Party. Just as once the people voted overwhelmingly for Labour and swept the conservatives into the wilderness where they have learned nothing.

And the cycle of the rotating dictatorship will continue until the ring is broken. Each wing of the "establishment" party taking Buggins Turn at government whilst advancing the same one world cause that sees Our Country as nothing more than a cash cow that now needs to be slaughtered.

Those of us who are politically aware know all of this but our memories are longer than that of a Goldfish Population who seem to live in a permanent state of drug induced tranquility no matter what is done to them and we will reveal the lies and duplicity of the new marxist conservatives, just as we have revealed those of the marxist Labour party.

Then when the damage done to Our Country is so great that even a blind man can see the truth, the people will not just turn to the British National Party, they will run to it for salvation. A salvation that the BNP can deliver.

But before the war can be won, there are battles to be fought and the next major battle is the European Elections in June.

Ancient Brit of the Green Arrow Forum wrote:

Have you noticed that none of the other parties have started any sort of EU campaign yet, but the BNP mention it all the time? I’d like to see how the other parties are going to promote their pro EU campaign considering most people want to opt out.

In the present climate of unemployment and recession the chance for us to forge ahead is huge; we are the only party of any significance that is against the EU and all it stands for, but, we have to make the people understands what it means to them with regards to their daily lives.

Housing, jobs and immigration seem to be the top priorities for the man in the street; they want security and peace of mind, something that they certainly don’t have at the moment, it is up to us to explain to them in simplified terms just how the EU affects housing, jobs and immigration and that whilst we are in the EU we will never have that security and peace of mind again.

And the Lady is right. We must register to vote, we must ensure that our friends and families are registered to vote and we must push, push and push again, the British National Parties policy on Europe.

We are not going to sweep the board but with proportional representation we are going to win a few seats. And with those seats in hell, will come much needed funds and access to information that will be needed in the final battle that is now just a few years away.

These times are the most interesting of times in the entire history of Our Country. If the British National Party fails, Our Country will also fail and in another 30 years it will just be a memory to some, for its name will be erased from the history books.

You know what you must do. You must now make a stand and to be honest there is only one party that is worth making that stand with. The British National Party.

Footnote

Articles and links wanted on information revealing the evil of the European Union.

Digg it

I have had a lot of grief with adding Digg code to the Blog HTML Source. Unless anyone has a link to source code that does not give a TAG error and does not take you to new page when Digging, then this will be the first and last time I use it. A Greasemonkey script would be even better.

Tags: european union, BNP, British National Party

"Bigoted" ??

by johnofgwent

As I said in my previous post, first two stops of the morning are the GA Blog and UK Debate. And it is from that latter site that I must thank the local anti-BNP faction for a truly fascinating nugget of information.

The resident "left whingers" (ooh sorry that should be "left wingers" but I'll leave the spelling mistake in place for i think the phrase it creates is far more descriptive) over there regularly have competitions in the forums to see who can best rearrange the dribblings of the likes of Weyman Bennett into something that might look like it's a new angle. Sadly they have little success.

But this morning I was taken by the contribution to one ukdebate thread from a chap who has admitted on that forum one of his relatives was a member of Meibion Glyndwr (the Provisional Wing Of Plaid Cymru,whose actions are best summed up by the phrase "Come Home To A Real Fire Buy A Cottage In Wales"

In a loaded forum post "Why Are The BNP Bigots" he pulled a most interesting dictionary definition of "bigot" from Merriam-Webster. Here you can read their spin on the word, which they define as

"a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices ; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance"

So that set me googling. And look what I found here

big·ot

n.

One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.

---

[French, from Old French.]

Word History: Bigots may have more in common with God than one might think. Legend has it that Rollo, the first duke of Normandy, refused to kiss the foot of the French king Charles III, uttering the phrase bi got, his borrowing of the assumed Old English equivalent of our expression by God. Although this story is almost surely apocryphal, it is true that bigot was used by the French as a term of abuse for the Normans ....

Well, King Rollo's descendants can verbally abuse my Norse ancestors all he likes. It was Rollo, after all, who handed those same Norse ancestors what we now know as the coastal areas of France in order that he could set an example for French Military Conduct the World Over, ever since, which is to retreat home and have fun, preferabley before a single shot is fired.

But I have to say that if a love of one's own group, religion, race or politics is what it means to be bigoted, then please pass an extra large cap adorned with that label over here, as I find it a most snug, and comfortable, fit.

In fact the left whingers on ukdebate have missed the point, of course.

For there is a far better label for those who like this land the way it was until fairly recently and are intolerant of those who wish it to be different. And you can find that definition in the same place I found the definition of 'bigot'.

And the wierd thing is, both words are rooted in the same language .... Here you go ....

pa·tri·ot

n.

One who loves, supports, and defends one's country.

---

[French patriote, from Old French, compatriot, from Late Latin patriota, from Greek patriotes, from patrios, of one's fathers ...

Another example of "Joined Up Government"

by johnofgwent

I don't know who coined the phrase "joined up government" but I have to say I think it would be a jolly good idea if there was some. You know what I mean, don't you ? The idea that when two politicians are thinking of laucnhing a policy, they talkto each other and have someone, somewhere, think it over to see if the two ideas will co-operate with each other, or exterminate each other.

Well, I have to say, the exterminator faction is having a field day this morning.

First port of call of the day for me (after the Green Arrow Blog and UkDebate of course) is the BBC News Web Site to see what gems and pearls of wisdom the spin doctors of Westminster are trying to force out into the public gaze - and what is being allowed to quietly slip under the radar and through the catflap.

But this morning what I found was priceless.

Over here you will see a "plea" from a shadowy organisation calling itself "the newly formed 2020 Group of building bodies, councils and unions" clamouring for action to enable the construction of 100,000 new affordable homes to rent over the next two years.

Nothing wrong with that, I suppose, except that I've never heard of this organisation before and wonder if they have any relationship to, for example, the shady-sounding accounting firm, or the so called "turnaround specialists" both of whose websites can be pulled from a google search for "2020 group" but strangely google can't pull anything for 2020 unions builders... if you can please comment and let me know.

Anyway, to come back to the point, so, this morning, we have a pressure group making its case via some Max Clifford Clone for a lot more new housing. Not that we'd need it if we did something about our wide open borders, but I'm digressing again.

No, what made me almost fall off my chair in fits of laughter was the very next BBC News page I went to read. For while under "UK Business" (for which read England Business thanks to the BBC Mentality) they clamour for investment in building projects, over in wales the BBC see fit to denounce Government Schemes to launch public sector building projects as taking tenders from "Large English firms" rather than small welsh ones.

The Welsh Assembly Government says this is because of a need to ensure value for money through economies of scale.

Yeah, right. Nothing to do with the fact that Labour is going to be wiped out in England at the next election and wales doesn't matter because Peter Hain and Rhodri Morgan feel it is their god-given right to demand they receive the loyal adulation from everyone west of Offa's Dyke .

By God are these tossers in for a shock.

First Peter Hain Panicked. Now its Jacqui Smith's turn.

Is this woman waking up to the reality that her days in power are numbered ?

by johnofgwent

It's been quite a week for imodium sales. First Peter Hain realises the game is up and all is lost and launches himself into a frenzied declaration that anything and everything must be done to stop the British national Party at all costs regardless of all other issues and difficulties.

Now it's Jacqui Smith's turn. Over here on the BBC News website I see she has been forced to reach for the sticking plaster in the hope it can stem the flow of blood from the multiple stab wounds her government have inflicted on the british economy. In a thinly veiled, and pitiful, attempt to make out they were in favour of the British National Party stance all along, Jacqui is now bleating that Labour must do something about immigrant workers taking british jobs.

Speaking on "Andrew Marr's Political Showcase For Andrew Marr" today she said ...

"Immigrants should not be able to take a skilled job in the UK unless it has been advertised to British workers" and went on to say "I'm proposing, for example, that it shouldn't be possible for somebody to come into this country to take a skilled job unless that job has been advertised to a British worker through Jobcentre Plus."

An interesting idea, which should work well at keeping out such people, since a brief tour of "Jobcentre Plus" shows more than 100 jobs available in Cardiff right now, but the teensy weensy problemette is that fifty of those are for the same five £6.50an hour cleaning jobs advertised by fifteen different "temping agencies". There is ONE "skilled manual" job for a "Testing Electrician", and that's yer lot.

Further more, it seems that in a spectacular waste of our tax money, this bimbo who is too scared to walk to her sister's London Home at night despite being paid rather a lot for a single room there, has gone out and ...

... ordered an investigation into the impact of the arrival of families of immigrant workers.

Listen, bimbo. Save your pennies. If you don't like what the British National Party and the UK Independence Party are both telling you about that very subject, then why not finally listen to what the House of Commons Scrutiny Committee formed back in the late nineties told you after they finished their review ofthe imapct of your catastrophic - and illegal - "fast tracked visas".

But it gets better. Not interested in approaching the problem of the elephant in the room with the words "FREE ENTRY AND WORK FOR ANY EU PASSPORT HOLDER" tattooed on its arse, Smith insists that ...

... her latest action to do something about the 3.8 million people working in the UK last year who were not born here is to demand that any "skilled worker" coming here from outside the EU will need to have a masters degree and have earned a salary of at least £20,000 or local equivalent will make sure our points-based system(of opening the doors to all and sundry) is responding to the current economic circumstances.

But anyone who has any knowledge of the professional jobs sector knows this is just bollox. Pop over to jobserve and enter the single word "graduate" into their search engine and you will pull up six pages of jobs each paying over that to a rank amateur with the ink still wet on their "bachelor's degree in mickey mouse studies". Lots of those, like the jobcentre plus "jobs" are repeats put in by multiple agencies of course, but in a country where the National Minimum Wage is £5.76 that means the government's idea of a "professional skilled person" is one earning slightly less than twice what MUST be paid to a McJobber operating a "ground cow grilling machine".

And anyone, and i mean anyone who has ever seen a cv from the indian subcontinent knows every one is nothing but a long list of one "academic achievement" after another, followed by course after course after course. Not a moment's actual experience gained on the coalface in the white heat of dealing with a customer amongst the lot of 'em. Which is why I have spent half my professional career cleaning up the mess they have made.

Thought for the day

If immigration is such a huge benefit to our economy and our wider national well being, how is it that after ten years of virtually uncontrolled immigration, which has seen the greatest demographic change in a European nation in thirteen hundred years, our economy is now in worse shape than it has been for a century?

Answers on a post card to G.Brown, SW1

Transitory realities

By Sarah Maid of Albion

A subject which I had planned to write about last week, resulted from a discussion on BBC2's Newsnight, hosted by Kirsty Walk, between a columnist from the Spectator and someone who had previously held a high ranking position in the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE). The discussion focused on the recent news story regarding Prince Harry who, as I mentioned in a couple of recent posts, has been required to undergo re-education, due to a perceived failure to pay sufficient homage to the modern day dogmas of multiculturalism and the unquestioned benefits of ethnic diversity.

The guy from the CRE was naturally firmly in favour Harry's punishment, whereas the Spectator columnist was less enthusiastic, and indeed expressed a healthy scepticism for the diversity worship which is now an essential qualification for holding down a position within the mainstream media. As such, I doubt we will see or hear much more from him.

However, the debate itself, and indeed those debating, are of less relevance than was the parting shot by the bigwig from the Campaign for Racial Engulfment, who, just as Kirsty was terminating the discussion, turned to his adversary and smugly announced that a multi-cultural society was “the reality of modern Britain”.

This, of course is a statement we are hearing more and more, as the party faithful, who have worked so feverishly to undermine our national soul, flaunt what they consider to be their victory, and seek to trump our hand with the apparent fait accompli that what they sought so hard to achieve, has come to pass.

Of course, they are correct that multiculturalism is a reality of of today's Britain, in the same way that communism was the reality of Czechoslovakia in the 1960's, warfare is the reality of the Congo and Afghanistan, whist bankruptcy is the increasing reality of Zimbabwe, and it is no more wholesome or welcome.

The multiracial “reality” of our country has been achieved by deception, by intimidation and bullying, by bribery, corruption, propaganda and lies, it was however not achieved by either consent or democracy.

At no stage during the last fifty years, whilst they were laying the foundations of the monster they have created, did any mainstream party stand for election with a manifesto which even admitted that they would encourage increased immigration, let alone facilitate the creation of a multiracial society, especially not when another mainstream party stood on a manifesto promising that they wouldn't do so. When it came to elections, none of the main parties acknowledged the “reality” of unchecked immigration, therefore “NO” was never an option on offer, and when one party, the BNP, did stand up and say “NO” it was vilified and lied about in a manner which continues to this very day.

When those who hate us brag of the reality they forced upon us, they are no better than the rapist who taunts his victim with the reality of her rape, for that too was taken without consent.

On first reading that may seem an extreme analogy, but before you dismiss it consider the parallels.

The multicultural “reality” was achieved first through lies and deception “Your safe, ... it wont happen” and by seduction “its cool, its exotic .... love that Burundi beat.. feel the rhythm .... you know you want it” but, when that only worked with a few airhead bimbos, then came the fear, the intimidation, the bullying and, of course, the allegations .. “if you don't let me you are a racist! ... racist! ....racist!!”.

That one word became the WMD, which they used against us relentlessly.

To speak out against the creation of a multicultural society, or to mention any potential downside was to be a racist. Name one person who has dared speak out against the shrieking gods of diversity, or pointed out that nothing is enriched by being changed beyond recognition, who has not been labeled with that multi purpose word, which we have been brainwashed, beyond reason, to dread being called.

However, to submit through fear or because of fraud is not to consent, and no matter how many times our abusers tell us we were asking for it, the truth is we were not. As a nation we never consented to what has been done to us, we were merely never permitted to say NO.

The reality of a violation does not make the act any less wrong or mean that what was done can not be put right, and victims, no natter how wounded, can move in to a new reality, where they are no longer victims.

Realities live within a time frame, they are not inevitably eternal and many one time realities have gone on to become historical anachronisms. The brave Czechs fought hard and finally shook off the yoke of Communism, they are now a free nation and their president is one of the few great statesmen and defenders of freedom left in Europe. The Czech reality has changed, and surely we all hope that the Congo, Afghanistan and Zimbabwe will also, in time, find new realities.

Britain has lived through prior realities which have passed into the history books, we were, after all one of the early European republics, and no doubt those living under drab Cromwellian rule believed their reality had changed forever.

The belief that the present is forever and can never be changed is the friend of demagogues and abusers, it is a lie designed to enslave us. Don't get me wrong, I know how convincing that lie can be, given that so much of what we see and read is designed to promote that lie. However, we must not be deceived by, for instance. the diversity worship we see daily on our TV screens, that is nothing but the Western equivalent of the little flower girl singing to the Dear Leader, it is state sponsored propaganda and no more proof of permanence than she is.

Today's “reality” exists only for so long as it is permitted to. History shows us that one time realities fade and new ones take their place. Today's reality may seem ugly and depressing, but it is mostly smoke and mirrors. Our enemies can flaunt today's victories, as Hitler might have flaunted Dunkirk, but that should not stop us fighting for a better tomorrow.

The truth is that, for all their bragging, our enemies were never so weak as they are today, and it is at times like this that realities can change.

__________________________

In fairness to Moslems

Those of us who have been forced over just a few short years to become almost experts on the Cult of the Dead Paedophile have known for a long time that in fairness to Moslems, they do not just hate white people, they also hate each other, despite their so called religion. But it is still nice to have it confirmed.

Not going to start now on how Arabs consider themselves the cream of Islam and how black Moslems are way down the ladder or even the differences between the Sunni Moslems and the Shiite Moslems but on how they view each other in the country they are currently "guests" in.

Sixty years after independence in the Indian sub-continent, we have a community in the North West which still refers to each other by their nationality.

Oh he goes to an Indian mosque or that is a Pakistani mosque. We have prejudices against each other more than the non-Asian people have against us.

We continue to paint each other with the same brush and then say to our non-Asian brothers and sisters we are not all the same.

And more of the same in this article here which reveals the divisions between the enrichers who clearly hate everyone and everything, even those of the same Cult.

I‘ve also heard of people living in and around one area are of one nationality and they frown upon the fact someone else buys a house in that particular area.

Funny that? I thought apartheid had been defeated; it seems it still exists in some people’s heads. These attitudes must change and they must change now.

And what do we do. We let them all in so that some time down the road, after they have pushed us into the sea, they can then start to fight amoungst themselves like rats in a barrel. They do get one thing right about the BNP though.

The BNP does not care if you are from India or Pakistan and think you are different, because they don't view you any differently.

No we don't. It is not about your race or Cult, it is about whose country this is and your attempts to import your hatreds and medieval culture into it.

Different story but interesting to read if only to confirm that Ken Livingstone and David Cameron are singling from the same little red book.

Former London Mayor Ken Livingstone added: “Today the prime targets of the BNP are Muslims. Why? Because the Islamophobic message chimes with those in the press and media on an almost daily basis.

”The reality is the Muslim community is one of the most integrated communities in Britain. Opinion polling in London showed that more Muslims in London felt patriotic towards and identified with England, than the average Londoner.”

So would that be the reason they blow up the tube and buses Ken? Funny form of patriotism. Please live to a ripe old age Ken. I want to see you rot in prison.

Tags: Moslems, BNP