We have been transformed into a people of an idea from a nation founded on kinship and land by stealth. There are two different views of a nation. The progressive or ideological view is that a nation is not held together by the bonds of history and memory, tradition and custom, language and literature, birth and faith, kin and territory, but by abstract ideas. An abstract or ideological nation is supposed to be united by a set of ideals or are just an economy! They think that a fondness for Democracy, the Rule of Law and Free Speech binds immigrants into a nation. But without the ethnic-cultural core a nation dissolves.
Neither Democracy and Equality nor free markets are enough to hold a people together. The progressives think we can transcend our history and origins as a common people. This is the view I remarked in “Filling the Reality Gap” where people think they are creating a new nation. This follows the rationalist idea that if you get the premise right the right conclusion will follow but in practice human nature, accidents and circumstances prevent the perfect conclusion. (1)
The natural equality ideal was well shot by Jewish Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli in Chapter 24 of “Lord George Bentinck: A Political Biography”(1852): “The Jews...are a living and the most striking evidence of the falsity of that pernicious doctrine of modern times, the natural equality of man... but the natural equality of man now in vogue, and taking the form of cosmopolitan fraternity, is a principle which, were it possible to act on it, would deteriorate the great races and destroy all the genius of the world. What would be the consequences on the great Anglo-Saxon republic, for example, were its citizens to secede from their sound principle of reserve, and mingle with their negro and coloured populations? In the course of time they would become so deteriorated that their states would probably be reconquered and regained by the aborigines whom they have expelled, and who would then be their superiors.”
Queen Elizabeth in 1596, sent an "open letter" to the Lord Mayor of London, stating "there are of late divers blackmoores brought into this realme, of which kinde of people there are allready here to manie," ordering that they be deported..
In 1601, she again complained about the "great numbers of Negars and Blackamoors which (as she is informed) are crept into this realm," "infidels, having no understanding of Christ or his Gospel," and had them repatriated.
There is concern that the immigrants will come to dominate us. We read repeated reports that we are becoming a minority in our own towns and cities. The immigrants are human and like us, are subject to the same failings and are likely to treat us badly as we did them. They would not be human if they did not bear us a grudge.
Sir Winston Churchill tried in 1955 to have a bill to control immigration drawn up which was not ready until June, two months after he stepped down because of his health. He wanted the Conservative party to adopt the slogan "Keep England White." (2)
The fifth Marquess of Salisbury, grand son of the great Conservative Prime Minister and descendant of Lord Burleigh adviser to Queen Elizabeth, fought in Cabinet to stop immigration. A letter preserved at the National Archive written to Viscount Swinton in 1954: “We might well be faced with very much the same type of appalling issue that is now causing such great difficulties for the United States. The main causes of this sudden inflow of blacks is of course the Welfare State. So long as the antiquated rule obtains that any British subject can come into this country without any limitation at all, these people will pour in to take advantage of our social services and other amenities and we shall have no protection at all.”
Oliver Lyttletton (later Lord Chandos) wanted to introduce deposits of £500 to be put down by immigrants: “ if there is to be means of controlling the increasing flow of coloured people who come here largely to enjoy the benefits of the Welfare State.”
Britain allowed anyone to immigrate but other Commonwealth countries were trict on admissions and refused “persons who are likely to become a public charge,” illiterates”, those deemed “undesirable” had “unsuitable standards or habits of life” many had quota systems and even dictation tests. Jamaica prohibited those likely “to become a charge on public funds by reason of infirmity of body or mind or ill-health or who is not in possession of sufficient means to support himself or such of his dependents as he shall bring with him to the island”.
Thirty–nine territories had entry permit systems or required prospective residents to first obtain permission.
(Lyttleton letter to Swinton 31/3/1954.)
The battle between proponents of the two views have been nasty with representatives of the dominant view treating their traditionalist opponents with contempt. I invite anyone to read in Hansard the despicable way the great Cyril Osborne was treated in his many attempts in the House of Commons to introduce Bills to control immigration. He first tried in 1954 under the 10 minute rule. Before it got to Parliament the Commonwealth Affairs committee had 17 present, 14 spoke but only one supported the bill.
In May 1958, 3 months before the race battles of Notting Hill and Nottingham, Osborne wrote to Labour leader Hugh Gaitskill who left it to his secretary to reply: “The Labour Party is opposed to restriction of immigration as every Commonwealth citizen has the right as a British subject to enter this country.” Three months after he instigated a Commons debate on the 5th of December 1958. Labour spokesman Arthur Bottomley stated, “We are categorically against it (restrictions).”
At the second reading of the Commonwealth Immigration bill (1961) he said: “The world’s poor would swarm to Britain’s welfare honey pot. We have neither the room nor the resources to take all who would like to come.”
Norman Pannell a Conservative MP in Liverpool had served in the Nigerian Legislature and lived in Africa for over 10 years. He proposed a motion at the 1958 Tory conference for reciprocal rights of entry with other Commonwealth countries, for the U.K. let anyone in.
He also addressed the 1961 conference on the perils of admitting criminals and the sick. The debate was stage-managed to stop Cyril Osborne speaking. Pannell stated that though Home Secretary RAB Butler in 1958 disagreed with limiting numbers, had agreed with his suggestion of deporting immigrants who commit crimes but done nothing.
In a letter to the Times of 13th December 1960, Birmingham Conservative Harold Gurden wrote, “on the health question we find the middle ring of the city, where immigrants are mainly concentrated, heavily peppered with dots of tuberculosis incidence. It is the opinion of medical officers that at least some immigrants are suffering with this disease before entering the country...We have a duty to our constituents.” In 2007 it was admitted that we had a record number of cases of TB which the elites have imported.
When we were homogeneous, we trusted one another and the police did not need to be armed; now they regularly have to shoot people in the street, we are under constant surveillance and have totalitarian race laws the rulers use to oppress us.
At Birmingham Town Hall, on 18 April 1968, two days before Enoch’s Rivers of Blood speech, Sir Ronald Bell warned of the forthcoming Race Relations Act, "I am profoundly convinced ... many further uses of law and of the power of the state for shaping men’s minds will follow...“To control thought totalitarians redefine words and change the meaning of legal terms.”
In 1981 K.Harvey Proctor announced the Monday Club plan to repatriate 50,000 immigrants a year. At a Monday Club dinner in early 1984, guest of honour Enoch Powell told that the Conservative party had threatened tosend Proctor to Coventry which would have been the first time in their history they had refused to speak to one of their MP’s !
In “The Unarmed Invasion”(1965) Lord Elton wrote:” We seem to be re-enacting the story of the Roman Empire, which in its decadence imported subject races to do the menial tasks.” In a biography Rock guitarist Eric Clapton tells of adverts he saw while touring Jamaica for immigrants and it was clear they were being brought as cheap labour.
The issue is not our “racism” but treason of the ruling caste that is held together by ideology. They have used propaganda and social engineering constantly to wipe us out and give our country to immigrants and their descendants. Protest and you are called a Nazi or smeared by the media with no regard to the Democratic principles they pretend to uphold. (3)
They have presented Patriotism as something evil or primitive because it is the soul of a nation and a barrier to reconstructing the nation along ideological lines. Patriotism is presented as nation-worship or the nationalism that denigrates or wants to dominate other nations, but it is an emotional bond with one's own country - its land, its people, its past, its heroes, literature, language, traditions, culture, and customs.
A nation is more than a "division of labour" or a "market,." and communities of interests makes commercial treaties. An economic union like the European Union is not a nation and can only be stopped from fragmenting by identity checks for every transaction, political police and surveillance.
An economy is not a country it operates within one and an economic system should strengthen the bonds of national union, but the nation is of a higher order than the construct of any economist. A nation is organic; lives and grows and can be destroyed.
A constitution does not create a nation it gives it order but that is after it lives in the hearts and minds of its people..
This belief that"that people of any culture or continent can be assimilated grows from John Locke’s funny idea that humans are Tabla Rasa - blank slates for experience to scribble on
and make them what they are. It’s nurture versus nature. This is why the believers or what Peter Brimelow termed “Immigration Enthusiasts” see no harm in immigration. (3)
Nation, is from a Latin root nascere, to be born, which intrinsically suggests a blood link, and a common community - an extended family. An “Ethnocultural community is”, wrote Peter Brimelow, “an interlacing of ethnicity and culture, that speaks one language”. It is handed down to the current generation by their ancestors and they have a duty to preserve it and pass it down to their children ad infinitum.
The immigrants are human like us and have attachments to their own tribe, race, nation, culture, community whence they came. Any man or woman, of any color or creed, can be a good person and law abiding citizen but will their grand children merge? The Muslims fighting us on our streets are from the smiley, servile immigrants of the fifties. They are now showing their teeth.
French counter revolutionary Joseph de Maistre wrote: "During my life, I have seen Frenchmen, Italians, Russians... but I must say, as for man, I have never come across him anywhere; if he exists, he is completely unknown to me." It is what is left out of the abstraction "tribal behavior" is what makes us human. Take it away you do not get "pure man" or "liberated man" but dehumanised man.
To traditional conservatives, this "abstract nation" is an intellectual construct, which inspires love nor loyalty. They have the superficial idea that people speaking in local accents are as British as us! But what are they speaking about? (4)
Every true nation is the creation of a unique people. Indeed, an ideological nation based on abstract ideas only appeals to the reason not the heart and it is emotion that unites people not high minded attitudes and citizenship classes. We no longer speak the same language nor do we share the same faith. We are splitting into warring factions.
We have been trained to despise our heroes yet immigrant communities are encouraged to identify with theirs. But our glorious past is treated as shameful history.
Edmund Burke definied a kin and territory nation which involves a shared identity, history and ancestory, and continuity: “As the ends of such a partner-ship cannot be obtained in many generations, it becomes a partnership not only between those who are living and those who are dead, but between those who are living and those who are dead, and those who are to be born.”
Around ten years ago President Bill Clinton proudly told some Arab leaders that he was looking forward to whites becoming a minority in the states! Our children are having their future taken away.
I hear that artists and with his new film sacha Baron Cohen is pushing the boundaries back. Well that sounds such fun that I thought I would push some back: We are not going to be wiped out and we are going to give our children a future and we do it by re-asserting our being as Patrick J. Buchanan’s “Blood and Soil people.” As three times British Prime Minister, Stanley Baldwin put it On May 24 1929 :“Let us keep this thought ever in our mind: “that each one of us, so far as in him lies, will strive to keep these islands a fit nursery for Our Race”. (5)
Friday, 31 July 2009
We have been transformed into a people of an idea from a nation founded on kinship and land by stealth. There are two different views of a nation. The progressive or ideological view is that a nation is not held together by the bonds of history and memory, tradition and custom, language and literature, birth and faith, kin and territory, but by abstract ideas. An abstract or ideological nation is supposed to be united by a set of ideals or are just an economy! They think that a fondness for Democracy, the Rule of Law and Free Speech binds immigrants into a nation. But without the ethnic-cultural core a nation dissolves.
Well I was going to work on something else today and not blog because it is the last day of the month and I have already exceeded my fair usage of 5gb with Vodafone. In fact I have exceeded by 11gb to a total of 16gb.
What am I talking about? I am talking about the price plans available for people who have to connect to the internet via their laptops and connect with what they in the trade call "dongles" - technically speaking the term is incorrect but the meaning of words change over time.
Well there is a very good article on the dangers of using dongles here in the telegraph that shows that some users who exceed the data limits can face charges of up to £200 for every extra gigabyte they download, so I figured I had better warn those of you who are thinking of switching to mobile broadband.
The charges imposed for exceeding these limits vary greatly. 3 imposes the next highest fee of £102 per additional 1GB, moneysupermarket said, although the network would disconnect the service once the charge had reached £50. O2 and 3 both sent a text to alert the user when the limit was reached, it added.Now for some background. As one of the first to use mobile connections and as a user who has no other options but to use mobile connection to the internet, I think I can speak with some authority on the subject.
Vodafone, Virgin and Orange impose much lower charges, of £15, £14.95 and £14.64 per GB respectively
I have been with Vodafone for many years and am generally happy with the service. When I first took out a mobile connection contract, the monthly charge on top of my mobile phone was an extra £56 per month plus vat. Extremely painful for someone on a really low fixed income.
But I could take the pain and by making cut backs just about manage. The occasional donation from Friends of the Green Arrow always helped (and I truly appreciate all those who have helped keep the Green Machine rolling) and somehow I could always pay my way.
At least for the £56 I was getting unlimited download as agreed when I signed the original contract. In fact I paid no attention to my usage until earlier this year when Vodafone without notification changed the terms on mobile connections.
Calling in to the Vodafone shop to replace a burnt out dongle, I was informed that my plan had changed and I was now paying £25 per month and given a faster "dongle". Great stuff I thought. I have an extra £26 per month to buy silly things like food and clothes etc.
Then the grenade landed and exploded when the next on-line Vodafone bill arrived and I quickly discovered the meaning of what service providers call "fair usage".
A quick download of the complete bill revealed that I had lost my unlimited download and was now capped at 5gb per month, with charges of £15 for every extra gb I downloaded or uploaded.
Well round about that time, I added the status of the site next to the Donate Button and I struggled on. Over the next 4 bills I discovered that I burn up 5gb of data in about 8 days.
Now 5gb should be more than enough for an average user but I am not an average user. I am not even a power user. I am a MEGA consumer of data - I eat it up like a pig eating potatoes. My appetite for information is boundless as is my need to view dozens of images and videos submitted and sent in every day. I must miss nothing if I am to do my job.
Checking with Vodafone I find that I am already on the highest download plan available. I long for the days when I paid £56 and their statement for "heavy users" taken from here that says:
With our clear and simple pricing, you'll know exactly how much it's going to cost you each month. And don't worry if you go over the 5GB limit - it's just £15 for every additional GB you use.Don't worry? When you go over by 10gb every month it is more than a worry, it is a threat to your very survival as a blogger. More pain - more sacrifices. A car that can go nowhere until they find a way to make it run on fresh air, meetings missed, membership not renewed on time so membership becomes broken, events unattended.
Well whilst I can recommend Vodafone for your average user, I understand that Orange offers a similar package for £34.25 but does allow you to "bundle" another 5gb for an extra £20 per month.
So what was the purpose of this article? Not to plead poverty again but to make you aware of the dangers of dongles.
I am pleased to say that hopefully within a few weeks or months my personal connection problems will be resolved and I will be able to eat all the data I need without worrying about that damned warning box popping up and punching me between the eyes every time I connect to the net.
Posted by The Green Arrow at 08:31
Thursday, 30 July 2009
Right, my good friend Bertie Bert and I thought we would combine our talents and have a go at producing a weekly comic strip.
The result you can see by following this link here for the large screen size, where you will be able to watch Episode One, that is the introduction to the story. You can view the smaller sized version below.
Eventually the comic strip, titled Patriots will be available on the new Home of the Green Arrow site that John of Gwent is working on.
When you have watched the video could you return to this site and leave your comments. Good and Bad. We do not take offence.
If you follow the cartoon, you will meet loads of characters who you may recognize. The bloated Weyheyman Benefit, Iman Stable and Tarka of the UAF.
Amongst the good guys you will find ...........well you will just have to follow the series to see what you see.
Posted by The Green Arrow at 19:09
CHIEF Constable Mick Creedon is to hold a meeting specially for residents of Codnor and Denby to hear their views on the forthcoming British National Party Red, White and Blue Festival.Now I think that it is only fair that a British National Party representative be allowed to attend, sit at the top table and answer any questions put to them by the residents of the villages that may be affected by the event.
The national festival is being held on Codnor Denby Lane during the weekend of August 14, 15 and 16 and police are expecting a large number of people to either attend the event or protest against it.
Officers are also consulting with the festival organisers and groups who have indicated that they will be taking part in a protest against it.
The meeting, at John Flamsteed School, Denby, will only be open to residents of the villages who will be most affected by any disruption and not members of the general public.
The meeting will start at 6.30pm on Tuesday, August 4, and anybody wishing to attend should contact police on 0345 123 33 33 to register.
I realise that were it not for the threats from David Camerons UAF Claw Hammer Gang, the residents would probably not be even aware of the event.
I also suggest that that BNP representative extend a publicly announced invitation to a delegation of the villagers to attend the event at any time and judge for themselves and report back on just what an innocent event it is.
A message to all students and trade unionists who have been asked to protest against the RWB by the marxists who are betraying the British People. Is this what you want to attack? Do you want to be known as someone who attacks children? Stay away and let your leaders shame themselves.
Posted by The Green Arrow at 13:57
Strange thing depression. The wind is blowing and the rain pouring down, there is some food in the fridge and cans in the cupboard and I am warm. What more can a man ask for? Well his country back for a start.
Let's go for a walk. Up later than usual, after staying up late (2300) and reading some of the chat going on over on the Unofficial British National Party chat room, where there is a general air of depression over the news that the government has ignored the wishes of the people and overturned an elected councils decision to refuse planning permission for a huge Mega Mosque in Dudley, I find that the depression from the previous day has been carried over to this morning.
Soon, the people of Dudley and visitors to Dudley Castle will be able to look up at a towering minaret from where there will be calls to prayer echoing over the town and will have a visible sign that their government has betrayed them and "Submitted" to the followers of a Dead Paedophile - no not Michael Jackson fans. The pervert Mohammed's zombies.
I attempt to cheer myself by remembering images of crashing chimneys brought down by the steeplejack Fred Dibnah and attempt to convince myself that one day I will be watching images of these Golden Symbols of Domination fall in the same way but that does not help.
Because I read of the death of another soldier in Afghanistan and think that somewhere there is another British Mother crying, whilst her family sit silently around her. Nothing they can say will help or bring that soldier back.
And I am reminded of the portrait above of Doctor Brydon arriving at Jellalabad, the last survivor of an army from the First Afghan War (Please read). And I think, will that be the end for Our Boys out there?
Eventually our Dhimmi government will have to cut a deal and then we will be allowed to pull-out claiming a moral victory but you and I will know that we will leave with our tails between our legs.
And I cannot help but think how I would feel if there were foreign soldiers patrolling the streets of Great Britain. I would not be well pleased and would probably find common cause with anyone or any party that sought to drive them from my land.
And soon though we will have "foreign soldiers" on our streets - the European Army will be here for training purposes or so they will say but we will know the real reason for their presence and Our Soldiers will be overseas fighting and occupied in another illegal and engineered war.
Already our treasonous government has put foreign police on our streets as visible reminders that we are now in a process of submission.
And I despair at the thoughts of the sheep people who continue to vote for the Lib/Lab/con alliance and I realise that we are not reaching them quick enough. I also realise that they will never read the British National Party website and they will most certainly never read this article. Already they have forgotten all the scandals, fraud, corruption and criminality of The Establishment - either that or they are just too stupid to care. Sheep who deserve to be slaughtered.
And I look at my online Vodafone account and see that the bill is even higher than last month and I realise again I will probably have to count on the repeated generosity of my kinsmen to keep going and I think "Why Bother?", "I can stop this drain and pain now -today".
My family die young. I have already outlived a younger brother and numerous younger cousins. The invaders will not reach my part of the world for at least ten years so why not say bollox to the sheep people and go have some peace and a life again.
Let the sheep people get what they deserve. Let the stupid brain dead liberals and the zombies of the LGBT and UAF get a taste of Islam at Work. It is what they want. If they wish to self mutilate themselves, let them. Why should I care? I tried, along with all my kinsmen to warn them. So why don't I just go and long live the new Green Arrow.
Because I read something like the following from an account of the First Afghan War
And I realise that I could not live with myself if I were to turn my back on my nationalist comrades and kinsmen. And there in lies the rub. For they feel the same way and so we continue to fight and either win or die together. Because Kosovo is coming. You can trust me on that one.
Among the 1,000 British and Indian dead were 286 men of the Martini-armed 66th (Berkshire) Regiment, who made a last stand in a walled garden in the village of Khig. When only two officers and nine men of the 66th remained alive, they charged the hordes of tribesmen surrounding them.
An Afghan witness described the end: "These men charged from the shelter of a garden and died with their faces to the enemy. So fierce was their charge, and so brave their actions, no Afghan dared approach to cut them down. Standing in the open, back to back, firing steadily, every shot counting, surrounded by thousands, these British soldiers died. It was not until the last man was shot down that the Afghans dared to advance. The behaviour of those last 11 was the wonder of all who saw it."
Posted by The Green Arrow at 08:33
Wednesday, 29 July 2009
Why put this up? No reason. I just like it.
Foreword by Green Arrow
Another foreword for another long and lengthy but important article. I can see that this blog is in danger of being taken over by intelligent, articulate writers with something serious to say.
Good. I must either up my game or stand aside for better men. That is a view that others must also take.
By Mister Fox
There is reality gap between the dominant anti-British ideology and our common sense view. In “The Abolition of Britain” Peter Hitchins descibes it as being like a civil war as the two sides are mutually incomprehensible. Edmund Burke summed up the idealistic view: ”You think you are combating prejudice but you are at war with nature.”
When it comes to immigrants orthodox people lose control and become sentimental and unrealistic. They treat them not as having human nature like us but as “victims.” They are invested only with good qualities and can do no wrong. Ethnic crimes are kept quiet by the media as they pretend immigrants are all virtue and sentimentalised like Sarah’s “Cuddly Bunnies.” (1)
This is a legacy of colonial arrogance as they did not give up deep-seated ideas but changed so instead of lording it over colonials the elites become goody goody and want to care for them and give them privileges over us. The Imperial attitude gave way to charity and caring but still wants to rule their lives as they treat them like children. To put it in the vernacular, the rulers lost their bottle.
Corruption and this PC attitude are linked because they see themselves as separate from us by ideology and we are regarded as the new primitives because our views are treated as backward and unenlightened; yet, they impose this on us but do not live it themselves by mingling with ethnics. They send their own children to the best schools while condemning us for objecting to our own children becoming a minority in state schools. (2)
In fact to see how corrupt and evil they are consider this: they introduced smoking bans in pubs throughout the country and destroyed much of our community spirit but smoking is still allowed in the House of Commons bars!
A YouGov survey for Migration Watch revealed that in Alan Johnson’s constituency 78% of voters oppose his attitude to immigration. Last week Alan Johnson told a House of Commons Committee that ‘he does not lie awake at night’ worrying that the population of the UK will reach 70 million and that he would not put a cap on the number of immigrants settling in the UK.
This is interpreted as being out of touch. It is not. He is against his own people because he does not have the strength to stick up for those who elected him. (3)
They do not have the moral courage to defend their own people because they have sold out to Saudi money and the Saudis want open-door immigration for Muslims so they can take over Europe.
Franco Frattini of the EU Commission, says Europeans should accept further tens of millions of immigrants within a generation. Where? By where he lives? No, forced onto our communities by these dirty hypocrites.
Jewish Foreign Minister David Milliband stated in 2007 that the EU should expand to include Muslim nations in North Africa and the Middle East but he lives in exclusively white Primrose Hill in London along with the likes of Kate Moss. (4)
The leaders of the Jewish communities are bringing a Europe-wide holocaust on their people by importing Muslims and I urge Jewish people rebel against them to save themselves..
The French President Sarkozy and the German Chancellor Angela Merkel confirmed this early in 2008. In fact, false Sarkozy, who is quarter Jewish, advocates that the French commit suicide by inbreeding with immigrants! What do Muslim’s think of that?
This is part of an organized attempt to surrender Europe to Islam and as the E U has the free movement of people across borders, E.U. leaders are encouraging tens of millions of Muslims and others at a time when native Europeans are losing their jobs to cheap labour and have been made foreigners in their own cities.
They support what Ernst Uhrlau, the president of Germany's foreign intelligence agency, warned of, the growth of violent Jihadist organizations in North Africa. Other commentators worry about the “far-right” parties making progress in the recent EU elections. They have caused this themselves by opposing the interests of the voters.
I have written previously about the “Ideological Caste” being in league with Muslims against Whites and Jews and more evidence comes in Michael Savage’s legal action against ridiculous Jacqui Smith.
Secret Government documents made public show that Savage was put on a British government ‘banned list’ to give it balance as it was dominated by Muslims. The documents were made public as part of the discovery process in Savage’s £100,000 libel case against former Home Secretary Smith.
Speaking to the World Net Daily news service, Savage said the Home Office chose him to balance the list of Muslim extremists because he is Jewish.
The political police discriminate against whites by stopping us to give racial balance to their pretend anti-terrorist campaign. Whites are discriminated by the law in other ways: Blacks call one another nigger, but if you are white you can get arrested for it: homosexuals call one another queers, but if you are not homosexual you can get arrested for it. If you are not white you can claim hundreds of thousands of pounds for hurt feelings. How much could you claim if you are white against Muslims?
Harriet Harman is introducing the most racially discriminatory laws giving preference for employment in law to women and ethnics over white men since The Nuremburg Race Laws. It has emerged that Gypsies and Homosexuals get priority in state benefits.
I understand that the state propaganda service the BBC is staging a drama that pretends that Muslim and Christians are equal in their behaviour. What twisted liars! Paying for a TV license is becoming an act of treason against our people.
The dominant ideology is a variant of Nazism - a “Cultural Nazism” that treats us as the enemy group and scapegoats us for all problems in the move to utopia. The groups Hitler despised are given preferential treatment over us in our native homeland but Jewish people are losing favour because of Arab money. It is a misappropriation of taxpayers money to give preferential treatment to imported groups against our interests like homosexuals and gypsies.
The move from traditional liberalism to totalitarian thinking came in the 60's when the New Left, inspired from America, changed the traditional liberal notion of individual rights to group rights. From the individual to the group - ethnics, women and gender. Individual rights refer to the rights of individuals, in contrast with group rights. Even now, forty years later, people who follow this totalitarian ideology still think they are liberal and tolerant.
The mentality of this “caste” is a puzzle of back-to-front thinking. Homosexual activists, feminists and ethnics are claimed to be superior to us; they crow about diversity but in practice demand conformity of thought and behaviour; They preach equality but impose an hierarchy of prejudices and privileges; women and ethnics are encouraged to celebrate their identities but white only groups are a going to be made illegal by evil, totalitarian Harman.
There is an ideological caste system of identity imposed as everyone is defined by their race or sex instead of class and anyone who does not conform like women, say, who cleave to traditional religion, are castigated, or discrete homosexuals, outed, and exposed to public obloquy.
Immigrants are human like us and subject to the same instincts and impulses. They have grudges against us for the Empire and the slave trade. They have loyalties, belong to a people and bonded with their territory and when they come here they do so as groups not individuals and reproduce their own countries on our territory. It is because they are human like us that they are dangerous.
They want to pay us back and will do to our children what they are doing to our people abroad. We see from Zimbabwe and the genocide of white South African farmers what our evil elites are visiting upon our children. Foreign countries are reasonable to us as they want our technology. But every so often we hear of a terrible crime against a tourist that tells us there is underlying hostility to us. They would not be human if they did not bear us a grudge.
There is a need for a cultural womb to raise children within and this applies to all peoples. It is an emotional need like needing to belong or see yourself affirmed around you, not have a different type of people represented in adverts etc.
In contrast to the elites we perceive the world through common sense which is to see the world as it is and tends to be based on our own experience rather than how we are told it is. It relates to events within human experience rather than science, for example. It is the framework of ideas and beliefs through which we interpret the world and interact with it.
As you get older you learn how people behave and learn to discriminate between who you should associate with and who avoid. You make judgements based on that. As politics is a practical affair requiring these qualities, it is disastrous to live by dreams.
When Nick Griffin MEP, was on the Moral Maze a couple of years ago Clifford Longley put it to him that he wanted to round people up to deport them. But it is Longley’s ideology prevents him seeing that it people like him causing our people to be ethnically cleansed in favour of immigrants.
Both he and other panellist Clare Fox talked of new societies being formed as if a magical process would transform this chaos of tribes into a utopia of racial harmony. What a simple view of the world!. They never deal with what is really happening but appeal to some vague utopian future as if this will come about naturally as long as we just sit back. But they ignore reality, what is happening in practice to our people. The ideologues falsify reality to fit their ideology whereas we examine it to draw more honest conclusions from it.
The gap is evident in that we refer to the world around us not to a possible future society. The battleground is reality, or what truth is. This is why we have networks sending links of events and press reports to one another and Blogs like Green Arrow starting a rolling news service to show people what is really going on.
Since the French revolution ways of organising our lives and understanding the world have been learnt from blueprints and people have been forced to conform to the ideology but I leave that to mental cases like Pol Pot, Mao and Stalin and the multi-racialist zealots. This is also true in family matters where “How to do guides” replace traditional skills being taught to the children by the parents. We have to separate ourselves from the ideology of ethic suicide the elites are inculcating in us.
For those who want philosophy we have the value of piety which comes from the latin, pietas, and refers to the respect shown in the family to the father and in the wider community to the ancestors. We show due deference to our ancestors by passing what they handed down to us onto our children not dissipating it around the world as our evil rulers do.
The very type of this is Virgil’s Aeneas carrying his aged father Anchises pick-a-back from the blazing ruins of Troy. This is beautifully expressed in the great Welsh anthem “Land of My Fathers.”
An indispensable quality of human nature that is essential to a wise and secure life is prejudice. This is the traditional wisdom we inherit from our ancestors which saves us having learn every lesson anew. We would not be getting pushed out of our jobs and communities if we had not pretended that it was something bad.
You would not be human if you were not prejudiced: we are prejudiced in favour of our own people and despite their arrogant claims to have transcended prejudice the elites are as prejudiced as anyone else only they are prejudiced against us in favour of ethnics.
Our way is developing naturally from collating examples of the results of immigration and is rooted in tradition, common sense and experience of how people really behave. We learn it from dealing with people in our everyday lives, the prejudice we learn from tradition. You run your home and family by practical thinking and common sense and that is why we need to jettison the unrealistic ideologies created by unworldly academics that don’t make any sense in the real world.
Our view of the world is in the interests of our people not those of the “caste” - politicians, bankers, newspaper moguls and politicians.
(2) Christian teacher tells of race slurs by pupils aged 8 |
(3) http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/columnis....le-Ma lone.html
The two views.
Posted by The Green Arrow at 06:47
Foreword by the Green Arrow
My my. What a deceptive article. First glance, images of beautiful butterflies but when you read the article, the message is loud and clear. Tornadoes to follow. Talk about the Butterfly Effect.
Photo by Alvesgaspar
This year has been a bumper year for British butterflies, and readers who have ventured out into the countryside or explored overgrown corners of their towns may have been surprised to find large numbers of common species such as the Red Admiral, Peacock or Large White fluttering around fragrant Buddleia bushes or amongst tall stands of grass, nettles or wildflowers.
Last week, in the water-meadows near my home, I saw a Painted Lady, or Vanessa cardui, to use the scientific name. She – or it might have been he – settled on the path in front of me and opened up as if to say, "Look at me, look how beautiful I am!" And she was beautiful, with her large, perfectly intact wings, black, white and vivid orange in the afternoon sun. After a couple of minutes of silent admiration, I stepped over and continued walking. Then, by the river, I saw another, and another and another, until it seemed that the whole riverbank was alive with these creatures, fluttering to and fro in a random, collective dance of a kind that I had not seen since childhood.
I am happy to report that it was not an isolated incident. Some weeks previously, in another field, I had chanced upon dozens of Small Tortoiseshell butterflies; and a few days after that, whilst cycling down a country road, I had noticed something flickering above a patch of roadside weeds: it was a multitude of Meadow Browns.
Photo by Fujnky
Last week was Save our Butterflies Week. I only discovered this yesterday, and it prompted me to Google for an explanation of the unusual abundance of butterflies in my locality. Apparently, it is mainly to do with weather conditions. In the case of the Painted Lady, which migrates here from North Africa, it is to do with conditions in the Atlas Mountains of Morocco, which this year have been especially good for the plants that the caterpillars like to eat. Experts estimate that by the beginning of August, Britain may host a billion of these butterflies – a rare example of a mass immigration that Brits will be delighted to see!
My own sightings would seem to suggest that UK butterflies are doing well. However, according to Butterfly Conservation, a charity dedicated to the protection of Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) and their habitats, the long-term trend is downwards:
"Five of the UK's 60 resident butterflies have become extinct over the past 100 years and over half the remainder are threatened. Moths too have suffered major declines".Scientists are mostly in agreement as to the causes of this crisis: they include intensive farming, pollution, land drainage and the destruction of habitats by development, both in greenfield sites and so-called brownfield sites (those derelict, urban spaces partially recolonized by nature). The scientists also agree that, because butterflies are especially sensitive to environmental degradation, the decline of species such as the Heath Fritillary, the Silver-studded Blue and the Duke of Burgundy may provide early indications of more general threats to biological diversity. This was acknowledged by the government back in 1994, when it published the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. This report describes many of the threats to plant and animal species and habitats, and makes numerous policy recommendations, but it is perhaps as notable for its omissions as for its scholarly inclusions. Under the heading, The Main Threats to UK Biological Diversity, is listed "built development – houses and roads", but nowhere is there any real discussion of the human population growth that is the main cause of such development. The report contains analyses of ant populations, rabbit populations, seal populations and so forth, but evades the issue of the UK's human population and its likely impact on environment and biodiversity.
reintroduction of the Large Blue butterfly, which 30 years ago had disappeared from Britain and was facing global extinction. (There are now 33 colonies of Large Blues in the UK, including the world's biggest colony, in Somerset.) But the fact is that scientists don't wield political power, and it only takes a handful of malign or stupid, short-termist politicians to negate their collective efforts. Thus, for example, whilst ecologists urge conservation of wildlife habitats to reduce the possibility of mass extinctions of native species, present government policies support rapid population expansion and development, entailing fragmentation or wholesale destruction of countless habitats.
The Optimum Population Trust (OPT) believes that current rates of population expansion could turn Britain into "an environmental disaster area". They convincingly arue that a sustainable population for Britain would be around 30 million, at most. What this means is that if we want to be self-sufficient in food, water, clean energy and other resources, then we must halve the population. Otherwise, we will continue to be dependent on other countries (including some politically dodgy ones) for many of our essentials. Though a 50% reduction in numbers seems drastic, in principle it could be achieved naturally in a matter of decades, because the British birthrate is below replacement level. Unfortunately, present conditions make this unworkable, because each year mass (legal) immigration adds more than a quarter of a million to the UK population.
According to David Nicholson-Lord, Policy Director of the OPT:
"As the main force driving current population growth, immigration feeds through into rising greenhouse gas emissions; more crowding, congestion, development; increased pressure on water and energy supplies, farmland and green space. A population of 85 million would require 15 million more houses – nearly five times the number in London. At least 10 million new dwellings – three Londons, in housing terms – would thus be needed for immigrants and their descendants, as well as, for example, at least six new nuclear power stations or 10,000 wind turbines."These constructions would kill countless millions of plants and animals and, more significantly in the long term, would destroy habitats. Dispersing developments around the country would do little to mitigate the impact, as research has shown that even smaller-scale, fragmentary development can be severely damaging, since many species require an unbroken range of a certain, minimum size.
With the growing human population also comes pollution, to which some species of plants and animals are especially vulnerable. Certain lichens, for example, are intolerant of airborne pollutants such as sulphur dioxide, whilst some aquatic insects can be driven out by quite low levels of water-borne pollutants. You might ask: So what if we lose a few lowly insects? Well, the answer is that nobody really knows the long-term consequences of their going extinct. But consider the honeybee, which plays such a crucial role in pollinating crops; or the much-maligned wasp, which helps to keep down aphid populations; or the various types of plants that can help to purify water. The eminent biologist Lord May of Oxford has argued that such "services" provided by other species have immense economic value.
The financial costs of environmental damage caused by overpopulation are certainly worrying. But there is another, more subtle danger, which is to do with our psychological and spiritual connection to the landscape, flora and fauna of our place of origin. Unquestionably, our identities as individuals and as a people are closely bound up with our natural surroundings – with the trees, flowers and creatures that have co-evolved with us on these islands over hundreds of thousands of years. Elements of the natural world are embedded in our religious and cultural traditions, in our buildings and crafts, in the pictures we make and the stories we tell. Such intimate connections to nature are evident the world over, and the Siberian no doubt feels the same sense of attachment to the living tundra as the Australian Aborigine feels to his, very different, environment. I believe that, underneath the masking distractions of civilization, this sense of attachment to nature survives also in modern people, and is an important part of what makes us want to protect and sustain it.
Whether such a primal feeling can survive transplantation to foreign surroundings is a moot question. Does the Englishman in Alaska, the Swede in West Africa or the Somalian in Scotland feel the same sense of ownership and responsibility for his surroundings as he would at home? It is my contention that the indigenous peoples of any geographical region or nation are most likely to nurture the natural endowment of that region or nation, and that foreign peoples having no historical or emotional connection to it, are least likely to.
Butterflies and moths have existed on the earth for a very long time indeed: the oldest butterfly fossils uncovered so far are around 50 million years old. Yet in the space of a few generations, some of our native British species have been pushed to the very edge of extinction. Butterflies are important because they are beautiful and because they are an integral part of the web of life on these islands. They are valuable indicators of the health of the environment, and can give us early warning of bigger threats to biological diversity. And, like the oak and the elm, the rose and the thistle, the sparrow and the robin, the fox and the badger, British butterflies are a part of our national psyche, our identity as a people.
We have seen that one of the main problems for butterflies and for wildlife in general is the destruction of habitats by development, primarily housing and transport infrastructure. We have seen also that the main driving force for such developments is population expansion, to which mass immigration is a major contributor. It is impossible, then, to avoid the conclusion that present UK immigration policy poses a serious threat to biodiversity – which is a measure of the richness and stability of the web of life – and hence to our natural heritage. Once lost, biodiversity is difficult, perhaps impossible, to restore, and this factor alone should be enough for us to oppose the recklessness of the government's position on this issue. Perhaps the greatest irony is that, in pursuing its ideological objective of increasing human "diversity", the establishment may bring about a potentially catastrophic reduction of plant and animal diversity.
We need to ask ourselves this: Are we prepared to risk losing native species in order to accommodate a massively expanded population? And are we willing to face that day, in the not-too-distant future, when our grandchild or great-grandchild looks up and asks: "What's a butterfly?".
Discover Butterflies in Britain David Newland, 2006. By all accounts one of the best printed guides to British butterflies, where to find them and how to identify them.
UK Butterflies An online guide to the butterflies of the British Isles. Includes comprehensive photographs and detailed descriptions of all British species.
Posted by The Green Arrow at 06:00
Tuesday, 28 July 2009
Foreword by The Green Arrow
Oh dear, dear, dear. Freedom of the Green Arrow writers to be as controversial as they please might just come back to bite me here.
Right, first off, I am not in complete agreement with Reconquista and without getting into a debate with him, I leave that to you. However, as usual he writes a very well put together essay and although I flinched when I saw the size of it, I was soon engrossed and nodding and shaking my head in either agreement or disagreement.
In the coming comments conflict, that will surely follow, please be polite and civil to each other whilst making any points you have. Insults and abuse will be removed.
4. Slaying David, Crippling Britannia
So far in this series of essays discussing the serious predicament the white race currently faces, I have tried to explain what I believe to be the lemming-like suicide of the white race and by lemming-like I am asserting that the white race is knowingly choosing to behave in ways which will assure its own destruction.
Central to the series is the way Marxist ideology has been embraced by the white race whose societies impose Multiculturalism and Liberalism in the trivial pursuit to establish equality between all races and all peoples. I have attempted to describe how these ideologies are being imposed upon white societies through the creation of numerous minority groups - e.g. blacks, asylum seekers, criminals, Muslims, homosexuals, women, animals, planet earth etc. - groups who are portrayed as oppressed victims of the powerful strong majority.
Multiculturalism and Liberalism is being forced upon white societies by force and by deploying a moral inversion that is fundamental to Christianity and identified by the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche whereby the strong and the powerful are always portrayed as immoral and the weak whereas the wretched and the oppressed are the moral and the good. Nietzsche described Christianity as "The religion of pity" because of this flaw and he predicted that the West - white societies - would abandon the Christian religion but cling steadfastly to this moral inversion of the weak and oppressed as being moral and noble.
I firmly believe Nietzsche's analysis of Christianity and his prediction of how the West would maintain the moral inversion he identified were both totally accurate and it is this pity for the weak that is enabling alien invaders to colonise and flourish throughout the West along with the destruction of traditional values and morals that once made the west so strong.
But there is one minority group that is singled out as being the root cause of the West's problems. They are a minority group despised by Marxists and Liberals and, I'm sad to say, equally despised by a section of British Nationalists and other nationalist groups. The Marxists despise them for the very reasons I am describing in these essays, some Nationalists hate them for this reason too but they also hate them for a very different, convenient but ultimately self-destructive reason as we shall now see.
I am of course talking about the Jews and as a very proud, white British Nationalist who is absolutely fed-up of reading ill-informed, hate-filled and often asinine comments around British Nationalist blogs about Jews I believe it is now time for the various myths and excuses trotted out to justify Jew hatred to be challenged. Because if this nonsense continues it is going to damage British Nationalism and therefore, serve to promote the interests of all of the enemies who are destroying our land.
Know Your Enemy
So who are the enemies of Great Britain and how do British Nationalists empower our enemies by joining in with this nasty Jew hate-fest? It is vitally important to identify our enemies because if we do not correctly identify them then we handicap ourselves. Here in no particular order are the enemies who are busily destroying Great Britain along with other Western societies in the pursuit of their desire to first turn whites into a minority, then to wipe them out:
The Left - Marxists, Communists, Multiculturalists, Liberals, Socialists. Not all are malicious, along with the dyed-in-the-wool West-hating Marxist/Socialist raving red nutjobs are the well-meaning but totally misguided and terminally naive Liberals. Useful idiots who provide oxygen for the enemy, an enemy who will one day turn on them too.
Islam - The goal of EVERY Muslim is to establish the single global ummeh - "fight the infidel until the world belongs solely to Allah" . There is nothing more they desire than the conquest of the West and they are prosecuting Islamic jihad in a number of ways both violent and non-violent. Islam has declared war on Great Britain - unlike Judaism - and presents perhaps the most serious threat to the entire West and and that includes Israel.
The Black Race - Look at what has happened to whites in Africa since the end of colonial rule and look at what blacks have done in the US and the UK. Blacks blame whites for all of their many failings and the level of racist hatred blacks have directed upon whites in Britain, the US, South Africa and Zimbabwe is appalling.
Global Capitalists: Note the word GLOBAL. There is nothing wrong with Capitalism, but Global Capitalism is evil and it is causing enormous harm to the West. In this I include the huge banking corporations who thanks to their greed and incompetence have had to be bailed out by taxpayers. Politicians of all faiths and all parties betrayed their people and instead of serving their own people served the Global Capitalists instead. Not content with that they then allowed cheap foreign labour to take the jobs of British workers during a recession. Thus, each of the main political parties have sold-out their own people and along with their support for the colonisation of Britain via mass immigration, are ipso facto now at war with the British people.
The Western Media - From Hollywood movies to Porn flicks, from commercial broadcasters like Sky to state broadcasters such as the BBC, from world respected newspapers such as The Times to the free local papers, the media is now a Multicultural propaganda machine that makes Pravda look like The Beano. As they brainwash the British people with a continual stream of lies and deceptions to condition the British people into accepting their own demise, the Western Media have also declared war on their own people. Not all of the Western media is owned by Jews and it certainly is not predominantly staffed by Jews, not by a long chalk.
Now I can hear the cries of Jew-hating Nationalists as though they were next to me: "Yes Recon, they all are, but the Jews are behind all of this, they control the world, they're responsible for all of it IT'S THE JOOOOZ!"
To which I simply respond by highlighting the worst of our enemies, the enemy who is doing more damage to Western societies and the white race than any other:
OUR OWN PEOPLE. That is, the majority of indigenous Britons who have willingly accepted guilt, self-loathing, treason, cowardice and pity as worthy virtues and who have swallowed the Multicultural vomit spoon-fed to them by the ruling elite and who simply do not have the wit or the will to defend the freedom paid for in blood that they deem to be their right. Let's look at this in more detail.
If I Were A Rich Man
The most common smear I hear against the Jews is the charge of avarice, and it goes something like this: "The Jew is motivated by greed and money and the Jew is never satisfied. They own all the world's banks and control most of the world's money."
First, if anyone seriously believes that only the Jews are avaricious then they must be barking mad! ALL races containing multiple faiths are motivated by money, the desire for wealth is not limited solely to Jews and to suggest so is plain folly. There are avaricious Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Hindus etc. but look at the group who will most often use this smear against the Jews, those moral beacons on the left, our socialist enemies. Whilst telling all and sundry "everybody is equal" they were were busy plunging their grabbing grubby paws into the public purse lining their own pockets to pay for all manner of luxuries, not forgetting socialist politicians who were busy playing the property market with tax-payers' money.
The black race is also as avaricious as any other. The problem with blacks is that they will steal the white man's wealth - and they have just look at Rhodesia and South Africa - but won't contribute anything whatsoever to take humanity forward. Unless of course you consider gangsta rap with its lust for bling and violent sex as being an enriching contribution?
Hmm, not contributing anything of worth to humanity yet demand riches - no wonder African blacks embrace Marxism so readily, they have so much in common. Stealing the wealth created by others because they are incapable of creating anything of worth to earn it being the most obvious.
Perhaps the second accusation, that the Jews control the world's money flow because they own the banks carries a little more weight. Without doubt many financial institutions are owned or controlled by Jews but the Jews no longer exercise as much control as people think. It is also prudent to realise that not all Jews are Jews just as all Christians are not Christians. The Jews, just like whites, are affected by self-loathing, guilt and self-hatred and are also cursed by Marxism-Liberalism. More on this later, but do please be aware of the existence of JINO: Jews In Name Only. They too hate their own and are going about destroying their own as well.
The biggest transfer of wealth in human history - a transfer that is ongoing - has been the transfer of US$13 trillion from the oil-thirsty West to the Middle East. It has resulted in a catastrophic resurgence of Islam - that's Islam, not misnomers such as "Radical Islam" or "Militant Islam" or "Extreme Islam" - and one country in particular is using its enormous unearned wealth to spread Islam in the West: Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Arabia is at war with Britain - make that the West but let's keep it to Britain, after all we're British Nationalists. The Saudis are funding the building of Mosques throughout our land, they are funding the establishment of Islamic Centres in our towns and cities, they are funding legal jihad and provide the financial clout behind organisations working hard to promote Islam and silence critics and who now wield considerable political influence in British politics - e.g. Lord Ahmed who threatened to mobilise an army of 10,000 Muslims should Dutch MP Geert Wilders be afforded free speech in the House of Lords - and Islamic lobby groups and organisations such as The Muslim Council of Britain. With the oil-weapon, the Saudis can manipulate the oil-dependant West and does so frequently.
And let's not forget that Saudi Arabia committed an act of war on September 11th 2001, murdering 3000 people in an act of Islamic jihad committed predominantly by Saudis. It is the Saudis who are bankrolling Islamic jihad terror groups such as Muslim League Worldwide, International Islamic Relief Organisation, Islamic Association for Palestine, Al Qaeda and The Taliban, those lovely examples of Islamic tolerance and peace who not only commit the most heinous acts of barbarity against their own people, the Taliban are sending British soldiers home in coffins much to the delight of Muslims in the UK who also enjoy abusing British soldiers returning from active service over in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Amazingly, Saudi Arabia is deemed an ally of Great Britain and the United States. Oh, and Saudi Arabia forbids Jews to enter their Kingdom and if you think you as a kuffar fare any better, think again. Kuffars are forbidden to enter the cities of Mecca and Medina on pain of death and I will bet you a pound to a pinch of the proverbial that you will not find many Christian churches or Christians in that delightful country and if anyone was stupid enough to preach Christianity there and demand Saudi school-kids be fed pork and study Christianity they'd be killed in a heart-beat.
And as Christians are persecuted and driven out of almost every single nation in the Middle East, only one nation provides a safe place for Christians to practice their faith in the region. It's the same one Jew haters throughout the West marched against in their millions in 2009, screaming for the Jews to be sent back to the ovens or to the gas in reference to an event in Jewish history that they often claim simply didn't happen.
So to those who hate the Jews let me ask this:
Are synagogues being built throughout our lands and are Jews committing acts of terror against Britons to establish Judaism as the dominant religion? Is Israel - a country facing exactly the same Islamic jihad as the West - funding Jewish terror organisations enabling them to commit murderous acts of violence against innocent people in every country where Jews co-exist alongside people of other faiths? Are your children being force-fed kosher meals in schools, are Jews raping your teenage girls and are Jews waging a legal war against anyone who dares criticise the Jewish religion?
But the evil Zionist-Jew-Nazis are controlling the world, right?
More food for thought:
Of the 13,155,000 Jews in the world, 300,000 live in the UK. Of the estimated 1.3 BILLION Muslims, two million live in the UK and I can tell you that along with their 1 billion fellow Muslims they will not be controlled by Jews, "the descendants of apes and pigs" as their prophet Mohammed referred to them, no way whatsoever.
Hate Not Reason
I find it very difficult understand this rabid hatred for the Jewish people displayed by a few British Nationalists. With the left-wing red rabble I can understand it because the reds absolutely despise success because success is evidence of inequality. Since the Jews returned to their homeland of Israel from around 1870, Israel has developed into a first-world nation, the sole democracy in the Middle East and a nation that shines like a beacon when compared to the brutal and retarded Islamic garbage dumps that surround it.
Yet the Jew-haters will rant and rave about Zionists as if these people are the most evil people on planet earth, indeed, they will claim the Zionists are controlling the entire world and that they are going to destroy all non Jews. I'm sure you'll have heard some unbalanced individual spewing out numerous Zionist conspiracy theories all based on suspicion and the flimsiest of evidence, e.g. that the Mossad were behind 9/11.
These are the same people who cannot wait to label the Israelis as "Nazis" whenever Israel has the affront to defend itself against Islamic jihad, a jihad waged by proxy by Iran and, yes,you're right, Saudi Arabia who finance and equip the fanatical Muslim jihad organisations HAMAS, Fatah and Hizballah to "drive the Jews into the sea" in full accordance with Islamic Sharia law. Funny how the Western media and the Jew-haters never mention how Sharia law is the core reason for this conflict isn't it?
That most people in the West believe this jihad is all about the persecution of "Palestinians" and their "right of return" to their state of "Palestine" that is being "illegally occupied" by Israel shows how clueless the West is about Islam and how eager Jew-haters are to give vent to their intense anti-Jew hatred instead of understanding how this conflict is being played on the world stage to establish the global ummeh, therefore, how this conflict affects Britain.
I have written about this previously but the fact that there has never ever been a state called "Palestine" and therefore, no such people as "Palestinians" doesn't get in the way of the haters.
Nor does the fact that the Saudis and their puppet Yasser Arafat used the threat of Islamic terror to force Europe to not only fund with taxpayers' money the "Palestinian Cause" but also to increase Muslim immigration into Europe and the Europeans cowered and they still cower.
So Israel defends itself against an Islamic jihad being funded by the US, Europe, Saudi Arabia and Iran and is labelled as "Nazi Jews" for doing so.
But what's been happening while the Jew haters have been chewing their comfort blankets and blaming the Jews, is that Muslims around the world are committing the same heinous acts the Jew haters lyingly accuse Israel and the Jews of. And those who worship a prophet who was a paedophile and a murderer of Jews hate the Jews more than anybody else does and you know what? They hate you the dirty kuffar even more, and it doesn't matter if you hate Jews or not.
First comes Saturday then comes Sunday, first the Jews then the Christians. Then the Buddhists, the Hindus, the Sikhs the Zoroastrians, the atheists, the Liberals, the Multiculturalists - ALL KUFFARS until all of the world belongs to Islam. And all of the groups mentioned in this paragraph are being enriched by the "religion of peace" as you read this essay.
This conflict in the Middle East begs a question:
If the Jews are trying to control the world why is it they can't even control Israel? They've already given up the Sinai, they've given up Gaza, they pulled out of Southern Lebanon, they've allowed Arab refugees - not Palestinians - to flourish in Judea and Samaria (The West Bank as the Muslims and their allies want you to believe) and they've also given them a third of Jerusalem. This in addition to the loss of Jordan, half of the land of Israel which was originally promised to the Jews. And in Israel, these Arab refugees enjoy more rights and freedoms than they would be afforded in ANY Islamic country.
For all of this, the Israelis and the Jews have earned the hatred of the world and the murderous terror attacks of HAMAS, Fatah and Hizballah. If Israel and the West had any sense at all, they would kick-out every single Muslim back to the Islamic cesspits where their beasts spawned them and where they and their retarded, brutal evil death cult truly belong. And if they dared attack any other nation then they face the severe consequences.
But we can't have that can we? Oh no, instead, whites join in the Jew hate-fest whilst pandering and cowering before an evil enemy who not only imposes Islam on the West, it gets the myopic, gullible, Liberal-Multicultural fools to pay for their own destruction. These the same simple-minded hate-filled useful idiots who scream "Kill the Jews!" as their own society is destroyed by Muslims before their very eyes.
So blinded are they by their hatred and stupidity they cannot see it. They cannot see the thousands of Buddhists slaughtered in Thailand. The millions of Hindus slaughtered in India - who also lost a large part of its land to Muslims. They cannot see the extermination of the Zoroastrians and Bahias in Iran. They cannot see the Jews murdered by suicide bombers in Israel or Jewish children cowering in fear from rocket attacks deliberately launched at them as they are on their way to school but they're Jews so who cares and besides, those "poor oppressed Palestinians" are only firing piddling little fireworks right? Nor can they see the thousands of Christians executed and mutilated in Iraq, Pakistan, Indonesia, Turkey, Egypt, Nigeria, Somalia, The Sudan.
Of course they can't because IT'S THE JOOZ innit?
Please. Instead of hating the Jews, let's wake up to the very real nightmare of Islamic jihad before it's too late.
Lessons From History
One aspect surrounding Jew-hatred involves a quite nauseating and frankly misguided admiration of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany. I have read on various Nationalist blogs comments about Adolf Hitler being some kind of champion for the white race. This is the same Adolf Hitler whose insanity caused the deaths of millions of whites right after millions of whites had been slaughtered on the killing fields of France and Belgium just 20 years previous.
But many of the people making these comments do not seem to understand that Hitler was not about "White supremacy" but Aryan supremacy. He held all other races - including Anglo-Saxons, Celts and Picts - as biologically inferior to the Nordic Aryan and would've had no trouble at all in exterminating inferior non-Aryan races - who many of these Hitler admirers belong to - but why let facts spoil a good "sieg heil" from these misguided, wannabee Nazis.
There are also the questions surrounding the Holocaust, those who deny it ever took place and those who like to have a pissing contest about what the real numbers of victims actually were. But whose history is being denied here - is it solely the Jewish history?
Most definitely not because it also denies British, American, Canadian, Polish and Russian histories because it was their soldiers who liberated the death camps and who the deniers accuse as "liars". Are we seriously to believe that after almost a year of heavy and intense fighting the allies and the Russians decided to embark on such a grand deception? And how convenient of them all to agree, along with the support of the International Red Cross, the International media, the citizens imprisoned in the camps and of course, the Nazis and the German people, including those who committed the atrocities and those who witnessed them along with those white Germans who were victims of their own master race.
Isn't it a tad odd that only this aspect of WWII is denied? There is no denial of British WWII history: Dunkirk, The Blitz, Arnhem, D-Day, or the dreadful abuse endured by allied POWs in Japanese camps. Only the "Jewish" holocaust - Jewish history - is denied. And along with denying the "Jewish Holocaust", the history of other victims is denied too. Ignored by these Jew haters are the 4 million other victims of the Nazis: Gypsies, Slavs, the mentally and physically handicapped, the political dissenters, Christians, members of the white race including women just take the camp at Ravensbrueck, where Jewish prisoners were the minority, as being one notorious example from the 55,000 concentration camps established by the Nazis throughout Europe. Kind of all those European nations to play an active part in creating this "Jewish Myth".
That number doesn't include the death camp at Jasenovac, run by the Croatian Ustashe, the beloved allies of the Nazis. I wonder if this is denied too? If so, we can add the Serbs to our growing list of liars and deceivers.
What is telling for me about the Holocaust is that those who perpetrated it didn't deny it, indeed, many were defiant about it to the end, monsters such as Irme Grese and Adolf Eichmann. The trial of Klaus Barbie in France in the late 1980's also re-enforced this because the prosecution didn't deny that he'd committed war crimes but that those who aided him were still at large in the very government that was prosecuting him.
One thing I will agree on with the Jew haters is that the Jews have hijacked the holocaust and depicted it as solely an atrocity committed against Jews when it most certainly was not and stating so does not diminish from what the Jews suffered but by hijacking it they diminish the suffering of other races and peoples and I condemn them without reservation for it.
Another accusation thrown at those who defend the Jews is one of re-writing history, an accusation I find somewhat amusing. If the Jews have been such a threat throughout British history and they damaged Great Britain so badly, well how did Great Britain manage to build the greatest Empire the world has ever seen?
Yet these are the people who vote for the British National Party because they want to make Britain great again! I'm really glad they feel this way, I do too but I wish they'd drop this glaring contradiction. The British Empire was so mighty because it was built largely on Judeo-Christian foundations and let's remember that the systems of commerce that brought trade all around the Empire and contributed to Britain's wealth were developed in the main by Jews.
When discussing the current dire situation the West is now in, the blame for the situation is always laid at the door of the Jews. When it comes to Marxism, Jew haters will claim Marx was a Jew but fail to mention that his family had converted to Lutheran Christianity. But Marx isn't the only figure to have influenced the left, the philosophy of Antonio Gramsci, founding member of the Italian Communist Party is also greatly admired by the leftards and he was not a Jew.
Jew haters conveniently blame the Jews for the current situation the West is in and will claim Multiculturalism for example, has been imposed upon the West by the ruling Jewish elite who want to destroy the West. I reject this absolutely. Jews are not responsible for the nightmare of Multiculturalism and to single out one race for blame is ridiculous. Are some Jews involved in enforcing Multiculturalism? Of course. But there are also blacks, Asians, Orientals, Arabs and of course whites including leading Christians who are all involved in inflicting this unnatural and destructive social experiment upon the British people.
But the elite who are imposing Multiculturalism in Great Britain have only been able to do so because the majority of the British people have chosen to accept it. In addition to the malicious - the Marxists and the Socialists - there have been the naive Liberals who went along with it because they truly believe in the fantasy of a rainbow utopia, a Shangria-La where the lion lies down with the lamb, where all of the races live side-by-side in peace and tranquillity. All races that is except the Jews because they'd only spoil it no doubt.
I'm sure Jew-haters will now say something like: "Yes, but these naive fools have been betrayed and lied to, they trusted those who brainwashed them and those doing the brainwashing are the Jews."
To which I say: Ignorance is not an excuse for stupidity and it isn't just the Jews who are doing the brainwashing, other races have noticed the suicidal stupidity of the West and are busy exploiting it.
This last point is absolutely crucial to this essay and is something every British Nationalist I believe needs to have a very clear awareness of. Blaming the Jews is nothing more than an excuse, it is an opt-out, a get-out-of-jail card that absolves our own people from the responsibility of the mess THEY have created. Throughout these essays I have tried to explain how the white race is behaving in ways that fly in the face of nature by WILLINGLY accepting the Multicultural ideology, indeed many British people - and of the white race as a whole - are amongst the most vehement defenders of this destructive and unnatural ideology.
Let me make it clear: The Jews didn't force Britons to gorge themselves on porn, to sink themselves into ever-increasing debt, to consume with insatiable greed the cheap foreign goods that flooded Britain. The Jews didn't force Britons to watch their Hollywood movies, to read Jewish and Marxist-Liberal propaganda through their media and the Jews didn't force anybody to vote for corrupt, devious, treacherous and avaricious politicians - politicians who come from a variety of backgrounds - native Brits, Catholics, Protestants, atheists, blacks, Muslims and Jews. The Jews didn't vote them in and what these traitors have done to their own people wasn't solely conducted by Jews and it has caused Britain far more harm than any other race has, including the Jews.
Clear evidence of this was provided in a timely manner by the good people of Norwich in the recent by-election. In a year where the economy has collapsed, where taxpayers bailed out the banks, where slave ships returned to British ports and where the sickening greed of politicians from the lib/lab/con one party con-trick was exposed for all to see - ironically, in the Jew-controlled media - these rational and intelligent Britons did what they have always done and voted for these incompetent, greedy, self-serving, duplicitous thieves in their thousands. The Jews didn't put a gun to their heads to make them vote this way, they voted willingly and in full knowledge of what the politicians had done to them.
In the last essay, I discussed Einstein's definition of insanity and applied it to the behaviour of the white race. And Norwich provided the perfect example of people doing the same things over and over again and expecting different results. It is absolute insanity, no question about it.
The Jews are infected with this suicidal madness too, Jews like George Soros and the anti-Israel "Jewish" lobby group J-Street who continue to make demands on tiny Israel to give up its land to the Arabs in return for a non-existent peace. In so doing, these juicidal Jews are aiding the current global Islamic jihad and they are far more useful to the enemy than any other Jew.
Blaming the Jews doesn't just detract from the root cause of the problem - the suicidal stupidity of the majority of the white race - it also diverts attention greatly from the responsibility other races bear for the grave damage they have maliciously inflicted upon Great Britain. Races such as the African and the Afro-Caribbean black, parasites who have invaded our nation, sponged off our welfare system, introduced their retarded culture including gang culture with its drug abuse and tribal violence. Then there are blacks who've made careers out of being black, blaming the white race for all of the many failings of blacks and screaming "WAYCISS" at anyone who disagrees with them, demanding more and more "positive discrimination" to handicap the native Briton so the black invader prospers - at the expense of the now weakened indigenous Briton.
Blacks never accept responsibility for their failures, they always blame another race, another tribe, another person for their own short-comings and I reject this absolutely. Blaming the Jews is exactly the same as blacks blaming the whites and throughout the West, blacks are using the hate-crime of racism to colonise us whilst deceitfully blaming whites for the mess Africa is in.
Yet back in the lands of Africa, the whites have been almost ethnically cleansed from Zimbabwe, the Boers are facing an ongoing genocide and whites in South Africa are facing an escalating violent and anti-white racist crime-wave. All in addition to the appalling horrors blacks inflict on their own people. The behaviour of blacks has nothing to do with the Jews, blacks and blacks alone are responsible and nothing should distract from that uncomfortable truth.
Along with many other parasitical races who see Great Britain and the British people as a life-support system, who invade our land, grab as much as they can and give little if anything in return, these white-hating invaders present a much more serious threat than the Jews and we shouldn't allow ourselves to be distracted from that.
Blaming the Jews for the plight of the white race will only render British Nationalists powerless. The Jews are not responsible for this situation, whites are. The sooner we accept this, the sooner we accept that we are responsible for what has happened and therefore we accept that we and we alone are responsible for getting ourselves out of it. Blame is an excuse and an admittance of inferiority and there is no way I will ever admit that I as a white man - a proud white Briton - will ever admit anyone from any other race is superior to my own and that includes the Jews.
What I resent the most when I read Jew-hating comments on BNP supporting blogs is the damage that they do to the efforts of all the BNP supporters and activists who are working tirelessly and determinedly to try and save our country and our people from being destroyed. All of their good work can be scuppered in a moment, all undermined by this crass and self-destructive hatred of a people who do not present anywhere near the level of threat to Britain as either Islam or mass immigration or the EU. Yes I know some comments are left by the red retards who will do anything to damage the cause of British Nationalism but still Jew-hating nationalists remain. This Jew hatred turns people off from the more important message that the BNP are trying to promote: That Britain is for the British people, that the British people have a right to their identity and their nation and the world has to accept this.
Those who do not are our enemies no matter what race, creed or colour they are and that includes those who have placed our people in great peril: The white race themselves.
Posted by The Green Arrow at 09:18