One day in Britain

The following are just a few of the news stories which appeared in the British papers over the last twenty four hours.

Joseph Lappin 16, stabbed through the heart

Ten people have today been arrested as part of the ongoing investigation into the murder of 16 year old army cadet Joseph Lapin, who was stabbed to death in Liverpool last October, after he and a friend were chased through the street by a mob of up to 15 "youths". (The ethnicity of the suspects has not been disclosed, however, British readers will be accustomed to the use of the code word "youths")

Convicted gang killers Femi Forde and and Richard Osborne

Yet another "Gang Killing" . Despite the fact that these killings are almost invariably involve blacks killing other blacks, or sometimes blacks killing white who were in the wrong place, at the wrong time, the media still tries to pretend that "gang violence" exists in all communities (yeah, just like female genital mutilation and Muti killing). The two charming individuals above decided to do away with Wayne Freckleton a rival, also black, gang member, and will now be costing the tax payer thousands of pounds a year for the next thirty years.

David Cauchi-Lechmere died of stab wounds

"Teenagers" Lewis Wilson, 18, Losimba Yfeko, 18, and a 17-year-old have been charged with the murder of Mr Cauchi-Lechmere at an east London party. (in this instance the use of the other common code word "teenagers" was rather undermined by the publication of two of the suspects' names)

Harold Stafford attacked his victim with a golf club

Stafford, a 54 year old psychiatric nurse from Bedford was today convicted of attacking a fellow golf player with a golf club, in an act of so called "golf rage". In his defence Stafford claimed that his battered victim Barry Barnes had "shouted a racist remark at him" but to quote Mandy Rice Davies, he would say that wouldn't he ?

The usual, you know the story

The trial continues of Ricardo Morrison, who is accused of murdering aspiring model Amy Leigh Barnes. This is another example of the same old story, white girl meets black boy, black boy (allegedly) kills white girl, society continues to pretend inter-racial sex is cool. I'll say no more.

Kenneth Erskine, the Stockwell Strangler

Twenty one years after his conviction, serial killer Erskine was today re-designated a serial manslaughterer, on account of the fact that he was allegedly suffering from a mental abnormality when he strangled seven pensioners between the ages of 67 and 94 over a period of a few months in Stockwell, South London. I am sure that makes the victim's families feel considerably better.

Bradfordistan West Yorkshire

Four people have been arrested on suspicion of murder after the suspected poisoning of a Bradford woman. Sana Abbasi, 22, of Pollard Park, died on Friday at Bradford Royal Infirmary where she had been treated for several weeks for an unexplained illness. An Honour poisoning perhaps?

Drug dealer Balasubrahaniam

Drug dealer Kandeepan Balasubrahaniam, 22, from Acton, west London was jailed for at least years following the stabbing death of mixed race teenager Craig Marshall, with whom he was arguing over payment for a drug transaction.

And thus passed another day in multicultural Britain.
_______________________

Sarah: Maid of Albion

(Spot the missing word) - Criminal gangs costing Britain £40 billion a year

Click to view larger version

A report on the BBC Website today reveals that "criminal gangs" are costing Britain £40 billion a year. The report does not say who these "criminal gangs" are, but goes on to state that many have connections with "failed states, such as Somalia". (I took a screen shot in case that line disappears)

Is it just me, or does it seem unlikely to you that indigenous gangs of white villains would have connections to Somalia, Afghanistan or any other of the world's failed states?

What the article is deliberately not saying is that "Gangs of criminal immigrants are costing the UK £40 billion a year".

Given that, before this report was released, estimates of the cost of immigration ranged from £12 to £17 billion, this would appear to be taking the figure closer to £60 billion.

I defy anyone to demonstrate a benefit to that.

____________________

Sarah: Maid of Albion

Truths we are not supposed to tell

Three of the Tottenham gang rapists

By Sarah: Maid of Albion

Anyone who watched Monday night's Dispatches documentary on Channel 4 “Rape in the City”, will have been amazed, not so much by the contents, but by the fact that the guardians of the multicultural flame at Channel 4 allowed such contents to be broadcast. Admittedly the main reporter was the refreshingly professional, and, by Channel 4 standards comparatively honest Sorious Samura from Sierra Leone, who has been responsible for some excellent past reporting from African war zones, however the subject matter was highly sensitive and focused on issues which the establishment usually seeks to suppress.

The subject in question was gang rape, and the troubling fact that it is a crime for which young black men are disproportionately responsible, in fact from the series of gang rapes Channel four investigated, of the 93 young men involved, 13 were white, 66 black and the others mixed race or Asian. Although I suspect that Asians may have been under represented in the sample, possibly due to the well documented reluctance of the police to prosecute such crimes within that community, as there can be little doubt the community cohesion censors at Channel 4 will have gone to great efforts to find as many whites as possible, we can be sure that blacks have not been unfairly over represented.

Based on the Channel 4 investigation, young black men of Afro Caribbean origin are committing more than five times as many gang rapes as young white men. However, the discrepancy is far greater than that, given that people of Afro-Caribbean origin are estimated to make up around 6% of the population, whilst whites are around 80% (down from 90% in 1999), by these figures, which nobody has disputed, their propensity to commit gang rape exceeds that of white youths by thousands of percent. (Perhaps someone better at maths than I can provide an accurate percentage.)

Indeed, it doesn't stop there, as came out during the programme most if not all of those white boys who did feature in the figures, were not members of gangs of white rapists, but the minority white members of mixed race or primarily black gangs, such as the single white boy amongst the mostly black gang who poured caustic soda on their victim, in the well publicised Tottenham gang rape last year.

As the whites appear to be primarily junior foot soldiers in such gangs, those who have become involved in such crimes could well be more representative of the effect which exposure to black culture can have on impressionable white boys, rather than evidence of a similar propensity amongst the white community.

Further evidence of this influence, was sadly evident amongst a number of the victims appearing in the documentary, who, although they were filmed in shadow, were clearly mostly white girls. These young women, whilst describing what was done to them, referred to other abusive events and relationships, which fell just short of rape, as if they were a natural and expected feature of the female interaction with the male.

Various references were made to young girls who appeared willing to accommodate a series of young men with mostly oral sex, almost as if they felt that was expected of them. In response to which we have to ask what sort of society we have created, and why it was created. Did young white girls think that way 50 years ago?

Of course Dispatches chanted the obligatory “tiny minority” mantra, pointing out that there are many young black men who do not commit gang rape, however, that is not entirely encouraging given how many of their brothers are at least one thousand percent more likely to commit gang rape than the host community. Let us not forget that the majority of black South Africans are not child rapists, yet a child is raped in South Africa every three minutes. It takes only a violent minority to tip civilisation into a crime ridden anarchy.

We have already seen the disproportionate number of young black men who are involved in knife crime , and the fact we actually have a separate police force Operation Trident dedicated entirely to dealing with gun crime in the black community, even the most argent of multiculturalists, it they are honest, has to accept that there is an issue here.

We have a section of our community which is disproportionately prone to violent crime to a massive degree, we see evidence of this every day, and yet we are not supposed to acknowledge it, even when programmes such as Dispatches reluctantly admit the facts. Furthermore, our leaders are actively seeking to add massively to that already growing and disproportionately criminal section of the community.

Surely this is madness and there can be only one outcome.

Another victim of the dream

By Sarah: Maid of Albion

The trial of those accused of murdering 16 year old Ben Hitchcock back in June 2007, started this week at the old Bailey in London.

By many accounts, Ben, of Lewisham in South East London, had bought into the multicultural dream, many of his friends came from the ethnic minority community, and he would often hang out with gangs of black youths.

It was when he was out with a gang of his black friends that he became involved in a fight between two of of London's many, primarily black, territorial gangs. Ben was the only white person to be involved on either side of the fight, and he was the only one to die.

As Ben lay dying his final words were “Call my Mum, Please call my Mum”, however it was too late. Later his alleged killers would speak other words describing the events of that tragic night, phoning rival gang members they announced “We've stabbed up your white boy ...... he's waste”

Despite this, and the fact that the only white person present was the only casualty, the police have stated that Ben's colour was “of no relevance” and his alleged killers have not been charged with a racially motivated crime.

Thus ended another young life in the enriched multi-cultural paradise our leaders have bequeathed us.

________________________

Crime in our times

By Sarah: Maid of Albion

On those rare occasions when members of the establishment and other multi-culti fanatics are forced to admit that newly arrived enrichers, together with first and second generation colonisers of overseas origin, commit disproportionate levels of of crime, they inevitably blame poverty and social deprivation. To support their case, they will point to statistics which they will insist show the percentages of various ethnic groups who are apparently living in poor circumstances.

What they will never do, of course, is show you statistics based on the overall population, because that will display a very different picture. By failing to do so, they are deliberately misrepresenting the situation. They have to, because, if they told the truth their argument would fall apart. Secretly, they know, when you are talking about numbers, the only fair comparison is with other numbers, not with percentages. Unfortunately, most people are not as devious as they are, and will not think about what they are being told.

In fact, what they are doing is playing what I like to call “The two Eskimo trick”. (Take note of this as they play this trick on us all the time and you need to be prepared to counter it) it works as follows, let us assume for argument sake that there were no Eskimos living in Barnstaple Devon, until two Inuit brothers immigrated there from Nunavut in Northern Canada. One of the Eskimo brothers works hard and does quite well for himself, whereas the other suffers a string of unlucky breaks and falls into poverty. By using the two Eskimo trick, over night Eskimos become the most deprived group in the West Country on the basis that 50% of all Eskimos in Barnstaple are living in poverty, even though it is actually only one person.

Meanwhile, if the other Eskimo becomes a successful businessman and employs a school leaver in his take away seal meat and fried blubber shop, the same pair of Eskimos can be used to show how much benefit Eskimos have brought to the local community because 50% of all Eskimos moving into the area have created employment .... you get the picture?.

As I have explained in previous articles, they also apply this same trick when they present their statistics on alleged race hate crimes. For instance, they will point to figures which show that 4% of Asians have suffered racial violence, whereas “only” 0.3% of indigenous whites have. They imply by this that much larger numbers of Asians are being attacked than whites were. Whereas, in fact the figures were based on 1999, when whites were still 90% of the population (how things change!!) hence 0.3% of whites was a vastly greater number than 4% of Asians. In truth their figures showed that, even back then, whites accounted for more than 60% of all race hate crime victims in this country (See this article I wrote last year for sources and calculations), of course that is not how they were presented to a gullible public.

In reality, and in numeric terms, across the country a far greater number of whites are living in poverty and often severe deprivation, than all other ethnic groups put together. Hence, if poverty and deprivation were the cause, you would expect to see disproportionately higher numbers of whites involved in crime, however, that is far from what we are seeing. In facts white criminals are heavily under represented in terms of the numbers living in poverty, if that were the test.

Let us test the argument that people of immigrant origin commit disproportionate numbers of crimes because nasty, racist, white society force them to live in poverty a little further.

To do so, I suggest we visit the hallowed portals of the the Financial Services Authority, or “FSA”, the body set up to police the activities of those working within the financial services industry. That is to say, bankers, financial advisers and mortgage advisers, people who, even in a credit crunch, few would describe as “impoverished” or “deprived”.

As part of the FSA's regulatory process, they issue press releases whenever they fine or ban members of the financial services industry who have been found guilty of incompetence, or in this instance, malpractice.

I have done a trawl through the press releases the FSA have issued in the first four and a half months of this year, and this is what I found:

On 19th January 2009 the FSA banned North London broker Moses Luzinda trading as Remos and Co for submitting false mortgage applications. (in the interests of fairness, I note that the same press release mentions that is a separate case Mortgage broker Richard Kennedy was also banned and fined for mortgage fraud.)

On the 9th February the FSA obtained a Court Order that Mr Aniz Kassamali Dhanji Manji the owner of Bayshore Nominees Limited will return £1m to investors and Mr Suresh Maganlal Bhowan a director of Bayshore will pay £17,233. These investors were victims of a share scam operated by overseas entities which sold worthless shares to UK investors.

on the 16th February the FSA banned mortgage broker Leo Kusi-Appiah, who was recently jailed after pleading guilty at St Albans Crown Court to obtaining property by deception in connection with mortgage fraud.

On the 2nd of March 2009, the FSA banned Wakefield-based mortgage adviser Mohammed Ahmed for submitting mortgage applications on his and a customer’s behalf that were supported by false income details .

On 30 March 2009 the FSA banned Walthamstow-based mortgage adviser Ashfaq Ahmed for fraud. The regulator found that Ahmed had submitted mortgage applications on his own behalf that were based on false and misleading information about his income.

On the 6th of April 2009 the FSA succeeded in banning Mr Milan Vukelic from working in the financial services industry in the UK. The Tribunal found that Mr Vukelic’s actions whilst CEO of Alternative Solutions (AltSol) lacked integrity.

On the 16th of Apri 2009 the FSA banned banned a South London mortgage broker Abiola Agbalaya and fined him £100,000 for his knowing involvement in the submission of false mortgage applications.

Grace Olatunji, who worked as a mortgage consultant for Mr Agbalaya, has also been banned for submitting mortgage applications based on false income information.

On 30th April 2009 the FSA banned Tower Hamlets based mortgage adviser Zia Chowdhury for certifying client identities for fraudulent mortgage applications.

On 14 May 2009 the FSA banned a Bradford mortgage adviser, Sofique Ullah, who traded as M A Financial Services and M A Mortgages, for knowingly submitting mortgage applications supported by inaccurate and misleading employment details for himself and on behalf of his customers.

And we are only half way through May

Certainly there are other press releases featuring more Anglo Saxon names, however, those listed above are, again, disproportionately misrepresented, making up over half of those involving alleged criminal behaviour, and, in respect of those fined and banned for misbehaviour involving mortgage crime, they make up over 70%.

I accept that it is always possible that Englishmen and women with a British heritage dating back to 1066 and beyond may have adopted names such as Ashfaq, Mohammed and Dhanji Manji after converting to Kabbalah, and certainly if any Searchlight bot reading this can prove that to be the case I sill certainly publish a correction.

However, I would point out that I have already excluded the following from the above count, on the basis that their names, although exotic I have been unable to verify that they are of foreign origin.

Mr Loic Albert Antoine Montserret, a former portfolio manager at BlueCrest Capital Management Limited (BlueCrest), £35,000 for deliberately mismarking his positions in an attempt to avoid losing his job over losses he was making on his trading book.

Mr Anthony Abonia of Renbee Associates banned for submitting mortgage applications containing false or misleading information to lenders on his own and his customers' behalf.

Gabriel Aramide, banned and fined £101,279 for submitting a fraudulent mortgage application and for concealing a fraud conviction when applying to the FSA for approval as a director.

However, excluding them does not change the overall picture.

Once again we are finding evidence of people of immigrant origin who are disproportionately involved in, at the very least, malpractice, and in circumstances where social deprivation is unlikely to be to blame. Therefore, what can be?

I present you with the facts and leave it to you to make your conclusions.
_______________________________

The truth about crime

My scanner has decided to stop working, so if anyone has a copy of tonight's West End Final issue of the London Evening Standard (Tonight being January 19 2008) and a functioning scanner, I would be grateful if they would scan the table on page 18 headed “Homicides in 2008 by Ethnicity and Age” and send a copy to me at sarahmaidofalbion@gmail.com

The table gives interesting figures, which reveal more than perhaps the Evening Standard meant them to. Apparently in 2008 there were 154 homicides in London of which 59 were white Europeans the remaining 95 were from other non white races. In 2007 the total of homicides were slightly higher, totalling 161 overall of which 63 were white Europeans and 98 were from non-white races.

As, the breakdown appears to relate to homicide victims, I assume that the Standard believes that their figures prove nothing more than that the majority of victims were non-white, however, they forget to take their own behaviour and that of the rest of the media into account when making that assumption.

As we all know, when a member of an ethnic minority is killed by a white European or even if white Europeans are suspected, this becomes front page news and is the subject of outraged debate on the TV and in the news papers for days on end. As, to my recollection. no such media frenzy has occurred in the last two years, we can be confident that if any of the non-white victims were killed by whites, they are a truly tiny minority, which the media have inexplicably omitted to tell us about. Whereas we know for a fact that some of the white victims were killed by non-whites, and in other cases, such as the murders of Robert Knox and Ben Kinsella, non-whites have been charged.

What the figures published in tonight's Evening Standard do demonstrate is that non-white Londoners, whilst still in the minority, are overwhelmingly more likely to commit murder than white Londoners are, a fact proved day after day by the convictions which we see in our courts.

Which shows the recent complaints by the black police association that High numbers of black youths are being stopped and searched to be the dishonest cant that they are.

Sarah Maid of Albion

News management

Various news sources are reporting a very unpleasant attack on a young girl in Manchester , who was apparently shot in the face with a pellet gun by three "males". However, as further evidence of the continued news suppression in Britain, I have attached below screen shots of the account of the crime which currently appears on the Greater Manchester Police Website (screen shot at 05:30 GMT) and a further screen shot showing how the story has been reported by the BBC.

Note the significant detail missing from the BBC account. Anyone who still believes that our news media tells us the truth is too naive to be allowed out on their own.

Greater Manchester Police Website 17:30 pm 03/01/2009

BBC News Website at 17:30 PM 03/01/2009

(screen shots were taken as experience has shown us that website copy can change!!)

________________________________________________

Imported Culture

By Sarah Maid of Albion

The young girl begged for her life, “Please don't kill me, let me live!” she cried, but her pleas were in vain, as she was dragged into the centre of the stadium where she was to die a terrible death. To the jeering crowd she was guilty of the great sin of having sex outside marriage, and for that she must die, no matter that she was the victim of gang rape, no matter that she was a a thirteen year old child. (Not 23 as the news media bizarrely first tried to suggest)

The child's age aside, it was a scene unchanged from that described two millennia earlier, where, according to the Bible, Jesus Christ confronted a group of men about to stone a young woman to death, with the words “Let he who is without sin amongst you cast the first stone”. Such words would have fallen on deaf ears, had anyone dared to repeat them in that stadium in Somalia, where no less than fifty adult men picked up stones and set about their evil deed.

This girl was not tortured to death two thousand years ago, but two months ago, and it was no isolated incident, across the Muslim world young women and girls face a similar fate at the cruel hands of their culture. I have decided not to include any pictures from the scene as they are too violent.

At my own blog, Sarah Maid of Albion I have also addressed the issue of the treatment of homosexuals in the Arab world, where, as one commentator recently put it, people such as the President of Iran claim there are no homosexuals, yet young gay men hang from cranes along the roadside merely for expressing their nature in a manner disapproved of by the cult of the dead paedophile.

I am aware that some Green Arrow readers have strong views on homosexuality, I do not share those views but will not impose my views here, other than to say I am sure that despite your views, like all decent people you are all horrified by such savagery, and grateful that our Western society long ago did away with the horror of officially sanctioned public executions, and the casual cruelties which are commonplace elsewhere.

Sharia law prescribes all sorts of imaginative and painful deaths and mutilations, for a variety of crimes, including many which are no longer crimes in our society. Hence it is even more disturbing to note that around 40% of British Muslims want Sharia law in the UK.

Whatever, the crimes of the child in the pictures above, I doubt they were sexual, and even the most persuasive of Islamofascists would have difficulty claiming that he was a rapist. However, clearly certain cultures believe that torturing a child in this manner is acceptable.

However, that is the crux of the issue, culture, and things which are viewed as acceptable within different cultures. The whole point of a multi-cultural society is to import different cultures into our society and pay them equal regard to our own long established cultures.

The question the supporters of multiculturalism fail to address is how do we prevent the sharper sides of foreign cultures from being imported together with the marginally less unattractive ones, because the answer is that you can not.

Many undesirable aspects of foreign cultures are already being seem within our British communities, just a few examples:

* Instances of so called honour related violence, including frequent “honour killings” are now regular occurrences in the UK, as are arranged and forced marriages.
* We have churches where children are accused of witchcraft and subject to violent abuse.
* We have already seen one instance of Muti killing - aka medicine murder (an increasingly common phenomenon in sub Saharan Africa) and a disturbing number of “missing” black and Asian children.
* Female circumsism is being practised in Britain and bush meat is being imported and consumed.
* We have a special police force (Trident) which exclusively deals with gun crime in the black community, and we have seen acts of Islamic terrorism on our streets.
* A new and far more vicious imported gang culture, has devastated communities in ways undreamed of back in the 50's and 60's, the Kray brothers not withstanding

These are not cultural benefits, and what else will follow.

There is no point in claiming that our laws will stop undesirable cultures from flourishing, because they patently are not doing so. Furthermore laws are frequently changed to accommodate newcomers or simply are not applied to them. Free speech was banned in Britain in the 1970's because of immigration, and as we have seen repeatedly, for instance with the Danish cartoon protests, only certain people now get prosecuted for incitement to murder.

As for grooming minors for sexual purposes, as we all know if the victim is white and the “groomer” is not, the police will not dare to touch it.

Year by year the ugly face of many foreign cultures are becoming part of every day life in Britain, and throughout Western Europe. It is only a matter of time before the very worst is here, much of it already is, gang rape was once all but unknown in Europe, it is now occurring with sickening regularity, and as events, such as the hideous (but unreported in Britain) 2006 death of Ilan Halimi show us, it does not take much to turn the streets of Paris into those of Baghdad.

Our leaders claim that we receive great benefits from immigration, but with escalating unemployment, stretched public services, and a health service beset by health tourism together with third world standards of hygiene, that lie is gradually being exposed for what it is.

And what of the so called moral argument for immigration, that we should welcome people here so that they can enjoy a better life than in the third world hell holes they are escaping?. This is self evidently madness, in that, in the long run, it simply enables the despotic or criminal regimes from which those seeking asylum come, to perpetuate.

If you live near a school where the teachers are murdering the children, you do not solve the matter by offering sanctuary to those kiddies who are fortunate enough to escape. At some point, someone has to sort out the school.

Offering asylum to those who escape tyranny, can only ever be a humanitarian act in the short term, beyond that it serves only to aid and abet the tyrants. Unless you believe that the entire population of the third world can move here, whilst, Africa and huge swathes of Asia and the Middle East are handed back to nature, as maybe some on the lunatic fringes of multiculturalism probably do, the international community must aim to improve the lot of the third world, within their homelands.

The so called benefits of immigration extend to some individual immigrants, but certainly not their homelands, to some politicians seeking to add to their voters, and to a small number of ruthless businessmen who believe that an unending flow of low paid immigrants will forever keep wages low. For the rest up us, the benefits are far less easy to identify.

Even those cynical politicians and businessmen may soon find the benefits are not what they imagined. Across Europe new immigrant based parties are popping up, and we now face an economic crisis, fuelled in great part by politically correct politicians forcing banks to lend to immigrants and minority groups, which has caused immeasurable damage in the financial sector.

Is it too much to hope that, at last, even they will wake up to the madness of the multicultural dream?.

_________________________________________

The Colour of Crime

PCSOs Crime Stoppers posing. Don't make me laugh.

The chilling report by The New Century Foundation, called The Colour of Crime [PDF], shows in unflinching statistical detail, that in the USA:

• Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
• The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic.
• Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.
• Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.
• Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.
• Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa.

Meanwhile, over here in Our Country the pattern appears to be much the same

• Blacks are 5 times more likely to commit violence against the person.
• Blacks are 4 times ‘more likely’ to commit sexual offences.
• Blacks are fifteen times ‘more likely’ to commit robbery.
• Blacks are over six times ‘more likely’ to commit fraud and forgery.
• Blacks are over twice as likely to commit criminal damage.
• Black are five times ‘more likely’ to commit drugs offences.

Source: The UK Government

5.5. For the Prison figures referred to above see Sheet 8.5]

A big Hat Tip and original article here at LimbicNutrion. Please read.

Tags: Colour of Crime