Sunday, 28 December 2008

Imported Culture

By Sarah Maid of Albion

The young girl begged for her life, “Please don't kill me, let me live!” she cried, but her pleas were in vain, as she was dragged into the centre of the stadium where she was to die a terrible death. To the jeering crowd she was guilty of the great sin of having sex outside marriage, and for that she must die, no matter that she was the victim of gang rape, no matter that she was a a thirteen year old child. (Not 23 as the news media bizarrely first tried to suggest)

The child's age aside, it was a scene unchanged from that described two millennia earlier, where, according to the Bible, Jesus Christ confronted a group of men about to stone a young woman to death, with the words “Let he who is without sin amongst you cast the first stone”. Such words would have fallen on deaf ears, had anyone dared to repeat them in that stadium in Somalia, where no less than fifty adult men picked up stones and set about their evil deed.

This girl was not tortured to death two thousand years ago, but two months ago, and it was no isolated incident, across the Muslim world young women and girls face a similar fate at the cruel hands of their culture. I have decided not to include any pictures from the scene as they are too violent.

At my own blog, Sarah Maid of Albion I have also addressed the issue of the treatment of homosexuals in the Arab world, where, as one commentator recently put it, people such as the President of Iran claim there are no homosexuals, yet young gay men hang from cranes along the roadside merely for expressing their nature in a manner disapproved of by the cult of the dead paedophile.

I am aware that some Green Arrow readers have strong views on homosexuality, I do not share those views but will not impose my views here, other than to say I am sure that despite your views, like all decent people you are all horrified by such savagery, and grateful that our Western society long ago did away with the horror of officially sanctioned public executions, and the casual cruelties which are commonplace elsewhere.

Sharia law prescribes all sorts of imaginative and painful deaths and mutilations, for a variety of crimes, including many which are no longer crimes in our society. Hence it is even more disturbing to note that around 40% of British Muslims want Sharia law in the UK.

Whatever, the crimes of the child in the pictures above, I doubt they were sexual, and even the most persuasive of Islamofascists would have difficulty claiming that he was a rapist. However, clearly certain cultures believe that torturing a child in this manner is acceptable.

However, that is the crux of the issue, culture, and things which are viewed as acceptable within different cultures. The whole point of a multi-cultural society is to import different cultures into our society and pay them equal regard to our own long established cultures.

The question the supporters of multiculturalism fail to address is how do we prevent the sharper sides of foreign cultures from being imported together with the marginally less unattractive ones, because the answer is that you can not.

Many undesirable aspects of foreign cultures are already being seem within our British communities, just a few examples:

* Instances of so called honour related violence, including frequent “honour killings” are now regular occurrences in the UK, as are arranged and forced marriages.
* We have churches where children are accused of witchcraft and subject to violent abuse.
* We have already seen one instance of Muti killing - aka medicine murder (an increasingly common phenomenon in sub Saharan Africa) and a disturbing number of “missing” black and Asian children.
* Female circumsism is being practised in Britain and bush meat is being imported and consumed.
* We have a special police force (Trident) which exclusively deals with gun crime in the black community, and we have seen acts of Islamic terrorism on our streets.
* A new and far more vicious imported gang culture, has devastated communities in ways undreamed of back in the 50's and 60's, the Kray brothers not withstanding

These are not cultural benefits, and what else will follow.

There is no point in claiming that our laws will stop undesirable cultures from flourishing, because they patently are not doing so. Furthermore laws are frequently changed to accommodate newcomers or simply are not applied to them. Free speech was banned in Britain in the 1970's because of immigration, and as we have seen repeatedly, for instance with the Danish cartoon protests, only certain people now get prosecuted for incitement to murder.

As for grooming minors for sexual purposes, as we all know if the victim is white and the “groomer” is not, the police will not dare to touch it.

Year by year the ugly face of many foreign cultures are becoming part of every day life in Britain, and throughout Western Europe. It is only a matter of time before the very worst is here, much of it already is, gang rape was once all but unknown in Europe, it is now occurring with sickening regularity, and as events, such as the hideous (but unreported in Britain) 2006 death of Ilan Halimi show us, it does not take much to turn the streets of Paris into those of Baghdad.

Our leaders claim that we receive great benefits from immigration, but with escalating unemployment, stretched public services, and a health service beset by health tourism together with third world standards of hygiene, that lie is gradually being exposed for what it is.

And what of the so called moral argument for immigration, that we should welcome people here so that they can enjoy a better life than in the third world hell holes they are escaping?. This is self evidently madness, in that, in the long run, it simply enables the despotic or criminal regimes from which those seeking asylum come, to perpetuate.

If you live near a school where the teachers are murdering the children, you do not solve the matter by offering sanctuary to those kiddies who are fortunate enough to escape. At some point, someone has to sort out the school.

Offering asylum to those who escape tyranny, can only ever be a humanitarian act in the short term, beyond that it serves only to aid and abet the tyrants. Unless you believe that the entire population of the third world can move here, whilst, Africa and huge swathes of Asia and the Middle East are handed back to nature, as maybe some on the lunatic fringes of multiculturalism probably do, the international community must aim to improve the lot of the third world, within their homelands.

The so called benefits of immigration extend to some individual immigrants, but certainly not their homelands, to some politicians seeking to add to their voters, and to a small number of ruthless businessmen who believe that an unending flow of low paid immigrants will forever keep wages low. For the rest up us, the benefits are far less easy to identify.

Even those cynical politicians and businessmen may soon find the benefits are not what they imagined. Across Europe new immigrant based parties are popping up, and we now face an economic crisis, fuelled in great part by politically correct politicians forcing banks to lend to immigrants and minority groups, which has caused immeasurable damage in the financial sector.

Is it too much to hope that, at last, even they will wake up to the madness of the multicultural dream?.



Anonymous said...

Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. We must be mad, literally is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre.

A great article.

The Green Arrow said...

Sarah, thank you for your article. As usual it is excellent.

But it gives me a chance to make my own position on homosexuality clear and I hope that it is similar to many members of the British National Party.

I know several homosexuals. Some of them are very "camp" and others you would never suspect of being that way "inclined".

Some of them are very nice, genuine people others would have been nasty whatever their sexual preferences.

I do NOT care what they do in private but I do care about what some of them do in public.

I also object and will strife with all my life to raise the age of consent until a young person is mature enough to make a rational choice.

Like wise I will also strife to stop the teaching of homosexual practices to young children.
I am sure you will agree with those last two points.

We have a busy year next year, Sarah: Maid of Albion. I am glad you are back in the battle.

Anonymous said...

David Ben-Gurion, May 1948, to the General Staff.
From Ben-Gurion, A Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978:

"We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population." (What a Sicko)

Sarah Maid of Albion said...

I don't wish the post to get diverted by the topic of homosexuality, which is why I limited what I said about it in the version I posted here. However, I don't think one can address the subject of Sharia Law without mentioning the barbaric treament gays receive from Islam.

I do not agree that there should be an unequal age of consent. I would listen to an argument that it should be raised to 18 for all, but I doubt that would be workable in the modern age, and no young person should be made a criminal because of their nature.

As to sex education, I think that maybe we should try to allow all children to remain children for a little longer, and start teaching these difficult subjects a little later on.

I share many of your views and your main aims. I differ with you on a couple of issues such as this one, but we have been aware of that for a long time, and it has not stipped us from being friends or working together.

Anonymous said...

CEEFAX 28.12.08


North Wales Fire and Rescue Services is to launch a campaign to recruit female, black and ethnic minority firefighters in the New Year.

Llinos Gutierrez Jones, human resources manager, sAid the numbers employed at present must be boosted.

"The numbers are significantly lower than we would like them for a modern Fire and Rescue Sevice," he said.



Anonymous said...

Hey just to let you know there are gay men in the BNP. We aren't all camp as Christmas! I haven't ever solicited in a gents toilet and I have absolutely no interest in youths but I have been aware of my sexuality from adolescence and despite hoping i wasnt it can't be changed. I dont flaunt it nor do I hide in the closet. We seek tolerance and understanding and we are British and proud

Anonymous said...

Fantastic post Sarah, one that everyone should cut and paste and send to all others.

Top Notch.

Aberdeen P

Anonymous said...



If the queer perverts seek "tollerance" and "understanding"perhaps they should begin by extending some to the wider society by not criminalising us when WE disagree,by not imposing laws upon people whos religion expressly forbids such "abomidable"practices.

A Thurrock Patriot said...

To green arrow and Sarah Maid of Albion .

Only the BNP family truly allow democratic tolerant debate on different views, but for me you got it spot on with homosexuality arrow.

The little boy having his arm broken under a car wheel was convicted of stealing a loaf of bread in the article i read.

Anonymous said...

Homosexuality is not a civil right. Its rise almost always is accompanied, as in the Weimar Republic, with a decay of society and a collapse of its basic cinder block, the family.”
– Patrick Buchanan

Anonymous said...

Homosexuality involves sexual acts most men consider not only immoral, but filthy. The reason public men rarely say aloud what most say privately is they are fearful of being branded “bigots” by an intolerant liberal orthodoxy that holds, against all evidence and experience, that homosexuality is a normal, healthy lifestyle.”
– Pat Buchanan, September 3, 1989

Anonymous said...

Pat Buchanan the great American windbag, achievement in his political career, zero. Gay men have always been around, you may choose to inprison them, or exterminate them; they may be in your family. What if they are your brother or cousin, still want to kill them?

Sarah Maid of Albion said...

I really do not see what the fact that some men have issues with other people's sexuality has to do with the future of this country, or why you feel it appropriate to express such views on a blog supporting the BNP.

Like many people who have moved towards the BNP recently, I have not done so, as our enemies like to suggest, because I hate anyone who is not like me.

In fact, I am not motivated by hate or prejudice in any respect.

What has borough me to this blog, and the reason I write for it is the uncontrolled invasion of my country which is changing it beyond recognition. That is what is bringing most people to the BNP, especially the young.

Although I do not share your views on other people's sexuality, you are entitled to them. However, expressing them in the way that some have will not win the BNP one vote, and will probably alienate may young voters.

It also gives our enemies ammunition to use against us.

Anonymous said...

After many letters and linked articles sent to gay magazines and newspapers about the violent effects of muslim immigration on once centres of 'gay Freedom and tolerance', there is no response or interest from the gay media community. Why?

Do they consider the BNP and such other parties to be more detrimental to gays than young muslims from north africa who regularly attack and throw gay men itno canals in Amsterdam?

Anonymous said...

Homosexuals have been in most societies nad have been differently represented. It is perhaps in this one more than any other that they have been given a greater role and greater value and purpose asa political tool for the elite

Anonymous said...

Gay men have been in all western societies actually. In most western societies in the nineteenth century it was thought appropriate that they should be sent to prison as well as shamed for what they were. Some countries eg the Netherlands never had such laws however. Today most people are tolerant and would prefer to live next door to a gay couple than a family of Somali immigrants. Sarah is right, if the BNP were to be perceived to be gay bashers they would loose a lot of support and quite a few members.

Anonymous said...

I agree, everyone should have the freedom to agree whether they think homoseuxality is a good or bad thing. But I have the right to be homosexual in my own country. I did not invade this country and despite what many belief I have very strict morals and values, and care about the future of the children of my nation, even if I don't have any myself. And not all gay men are cowards, I have beaten off quite a few homophobic ethnics already, and more so I am always willing to defend another white person in need when threatened by ethnics. Ethnics come from another land and have no right to this territory and have no place in a Western society that demonstrates its civilized state, by allowing people to choose their sexuality without having to face violence.

Anonymous said...


According to the Telegraph in 2007, 'Mohammed' was poised to overtake 'Jack' as the favourite name for baby boys in Britain:

But if you check the official list of favourite baby boys’ names in 2008, 'Mohammed' is nowhere to be seen:

Either the Muslims have stopped breeding, or have started calling their sons 'Olivia', or the British establishment is being economical with the truth.

Anonymous said...

Albino Africans live in fear after witch-doctor butcheryA series of horrific murders of albinos in Tanzania has shocked the nation. As children are hacked to death for their body parts, believed to bring good luck, the authorities are failing to stop a trade in organs that relies on superstition and greed