Monday, 1 December 2008

So you're a racist now Sir Gulam?


Have a laugh for a change

Just watched a really good video with fantastic images of the real people of the British National Party over on the Battle for Britain site. Truly worth a visit and a view.

So sat here wondering what to write about next, I recalled the news that Indian and Ready-meals millionaire Sir Gulam Noon had said that Our Country should stop all immigration for up to 10 years to prevent racial unrest. You remember Sir Gulam, he loaned £250,000 to Zanu Labour and was involved in the sordid "Cash for Peerages" business.

Naturally I wondered if the press would now accuse Sir Gulam of being a racist. Then (you know what my butterfly brain is like) I remembered an episode of Father Ted in which Ted was falsely accused of being a racist. Bit like the BNP really. Not racists, just realists.

Anyhow this was the best soundtrack video of the clip from the episode. I was unable to locate a copy of the actual film footage but this clip works for me.


14 comments:

Anonymous said...

BRITISH JOBS FOR AN ISLAMIC BRITAIN...5000 MEN 5000 WIVES..20.000 KIDS AT LEAST-HOW MANY RELATIVES? THE 5000 BECOMES MANY MORE ALL TO BRING BARBARIC SLAUGHTER TO ANIMALS-OLD LABOUR VOTERS SHOULD HANG THEIR HEADS.



Britain to import army of halal butchers
UK to import 5,000 Pakistani butchers


Is this really the time to be talking about bringing large numbers of Pakistani butchers into the West?

“5,000 Pak butchers to get jobs in UK,” by Asif Mehmood for Pakistan’s The Nation, November 30 (JW):

LONDON - Over 5,000 butchers from Pakistan would get employment in the halal meat industry of UK through Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between National Halal Foods Group (NHFG) of UK and Overseas Employment Cooperation of Pakistan. The MoU has been signed here at the Pakistan High Commission, London Friday.

http://sheikyermami.com/2008/12/01/britain-to-import-army-of-halal-butchers/

THIS BARBARIC SLAUGHTER SHOULD BE STOPPED NOT INCREASED!!

Anonymous said...

Dear Mr Noon it seems ok to speak in teh way you do as your a prt of Labour and for Labour and indeed a part of the problem.

Labour only listens to its own money driven power obsessed corrupt kind; thats why it was on the Marr show.

No hes not 'racist' has he can speak about it without being such oh yes and something to do with him n ot being white!

Anonymous said...

Yes a army of butchers says it all.

I am against Hal Hal. I guess this industry feed the taxes the government eagerly take up.

What is the RSPCA doing about this?? What are all the bloody vegans and veggies doing about this?? Nothing as they are probably all Labour Libs n Con supporters and oh yes its racist to speak out aginst barbarism when it involves Muslims

Anonymous said...

P.S That Clip is f**kin hilarious!

Anonymous said...

The clip is great, love the bit where the little mark is on the window, right over Teds nose.
On a serious note 5,000 paki butchers skilled in the cutting of throats?
i swear our christmas turkey just shoved two fingers up at me with a knowing smirk.

Helena

Anonymous said...

Anon: "5000 MEN 5000 WIVES..20,000 KIDS AT LEAST"

Correction ""5000 MEN 20000 WIVES..200,000 KIDS AT LEAST" Remember they're allowed to marry up to four wives.

Anonymous said...

GA: Not racists? Not racists? Goodness me, are you living in a dream land where your National Front type antics are some visionary approach free of the actual fitting defintion of what you actually do (which is to spout and advocate for hurtful, hateful, unlawful practices against humanity and against the truth ethic of our beautiful multi cultural society which we always had and always will)? You are racist. You live it, you breathe it, you are it. If you dont understand fundamental definitions, you are an idiot man. You probably know this...deep down in that hateful soul of yours. Try to at least understand what you are about, before denying the very being of what you are about. Youre a racist, your dreadful party is racist. Deal with it. Youre no different than your opposition, labour, tories and lib dems alike.

Anonymous said...

Muslims as slime moulds: http://www.6thcolumnagainstjihad.com/CUBED_P7.htm

The Green Arrow said...

Anon 20:52

"beautiful multi cultural society"?

What planet are you writing from?

Crazy clown.

Anonymous said...

Liverpool 13 "THE BEGINING"
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=IX2v4xxplSA

shaven-headed tattooed knuckledragging stereotype said...

Anon 20:52

Which part of "Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them" do you not understand?

Anonymous said...

shaven....the name says it all. Dont be so dramatic. You think the christian bible is free of war, hate and murderous threats? Do you think that Bush's chats with God (after all, was it or was it not Gods will that backed the latest illegal invasion and occupation in Iraq according to Bush)? Just because the bible is full of war and slaying as advocated in the Corrinthians and more, it doesnt mean that every christian who goes to church wants to live like that does it? And similarly, to take the Koran out of context in the same way that one might for the bible is equally stupid. Wars and murdering doesnt occur because those people's versions of god, allah and so on sanction it. War and murdering goes on because disagreement and a need for power or self determination of some sort or another. Taking the written word for justification of bad deed is nothing more than an excuse. You cannot tar everyone with the same brush and you are naaive if you think that written words are a commonality of all people who share a faith. After all, if you add up what is good about the written word and what is good about humanity, there is more good than bad in our world. And may I remind you that your own support for a party that sanctions violence, control and destruction of human's lives and rights does not make you any better. Goodness, you do not even allow freedom of speech. And thats a basic. As for GA: I see you're back to allowing the odd post now and then from those who disagree with you. What is this? Platform one day, refusal the next? Curious. Some might think youre manipulating viewpoints to 'create' a reaction. Nay matter. Fact remains, youre still racist. And somewhere in the recesses of your mind, you know it.

shaven-headed tattooed knuckledragging stereotype said...

The murder and violence in the Bible is DESCRIPTIVE of events long ago. The murder and violence in the Koran is PRESCRIPTIVE of current attacks and attacks yet to be carried out...

Muslims torture Mumbai hostages: http://www.rediff.com/news/2008/nov/30mumterror-doctors-shocked-at-hostagess-torture.htm

Muslims burn women with acid http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2008/12/religion-of-peaceful-inner-struggle-and.html

watling said...

Anonymous:

similarly, to take the Koran out of context in the same way that one might for the bible is equally stupid. Wars and
murdering doesnt occur because those people's versions of god, allah and so on sanction it. War and murdering goes on because disagreement and a need for power or self determination of some sort or another. Taking the written word for justification of bad deed is nothing more than an excuse.


You couldn't be more wrong. Can you name any Christian groups who justify acts of violence by pointing to verses in the Bible? I'm not aware of any but if you know different please post their details back here.

By contrast, Islamic jihadists use verses in the Qur'an to justify their murderous exploits. The verse of the sword (9:5) is Osama Bin Laden's favourite. In addition, Christianity's most revered prophet - Jesus - was a man of peace who preached "love thy neighbour". Islam's last prophet - Mohammed - was a war-mongerer and a paedophile, who spread Islam by the sword across Arabia, the Middle East and North Africa. Egypt, for example, used to be a Christian country.

Muslims regard Mohammed as the perfect man, whose conduct is to be admired and copied. When Muslims commit violence and oppress non-Muslims, they are simply apeing the founder of their cult.

Of course, most Muslims are not violent and do not want to oppress followers of other faiths. Nevertheless it is incumbent upon Muslims to spread their cult across the globe, and in those countries with large or majority populations, life is more fraught for non-Muslims. Look at our airport security, for example.

On the subject of racism, the dictionary I used has the following definition:

Racism - the belief that people's qualities are influenced by their race and that the members of other races are not as good as the members of your own, or the resulting unfair treatment of members of other races

I believe - and the evidence backs this up - that the separate races do indeed exhibit separate characteristics.

The sports of sprinting and boxing, for example, tend to be dominated by blacks, although there are exceptions. As we saw from this year's Olympics, whites dominate cycling, swimming and rowing. A coincidence?

Blacks also seem to be over represented in Premiership football teams compared to their proportion of the general population. Therefore, on average, I conclude that blacks are better at football. However, that isn't to say that there aren't exceptional white footballers, in the same way that there must be some exceptional black cyclists and oarsmen. I've left out black swimmers because, generally speaking, blacks seem to be so far behind whites in that sport that an exceptional black swimmer probably does not exist.

Studies have shown that, on average, blacks are less intelligent than whites. Again, that isn't to say that there are no highly intelligent blacks - of course there are. Similarly, there are plenty of thick whites. Again, we're talking averages here.

All I'm saying is that if you took a random sample of blacks and whites, the average IQ for the whites would be slightly higher than that of the black sample.

Additionally, I'll happily accept that, on average, whites are less intelligent than the Chinese.

So, by the above definition of racism, I must be racist if I accept that there are differences between the races. Guilty as charged, but I prefer the truth than some lie about us all being identical, regardless of race.

Regarding the second part of the definition, no - I do not believe that a member of one race is better or worse than a member of another. Being different does not equate to being better or worse.

And no, I don't believe that people should be treated unfairly because of their race, which is why a lot of white people get angry about so-called "positive discrimination" and exclusively ethnic minority candidate lists.

P.S. I think "shaven" was being ironic in his/her choice of name.