Wednesday, 4 March 2009

Resistance: The British Counter-Jihad


"I'm experiencing an inner spiritual struggle to find Allah."

Reconquista

2. Sound The Clarion Call To Awaken Britannia

Background

In my previous essay, I explained how Islamic jihad is being prosecuted in Great Britain and how it is advancing the cause of Islam with the end goal being that Great Britain is conquered and transformed into an Islamic state. Recall that this is the duty of every Muslim in the UK; to turn our nation, a nation Muslims regard as part of "Dar al Harb" - the house of war - into "Dar al Islam" - the house of Islam. The Islamic prophet Mohammed - "al insan al kamil uswa hasana" - has personally set the example himself.

One of the issues that British nationalists need to address - and we need to address it with urgency - concerns how mired in ignorance our own people are as to the uncomfortable and harsh reality about what the Islamic religion actually is. This ignorance is as deadly as any of the weapons Islamic jihadists deploy against us and it is a weapon they cunningly exploit to the maximum.

Muslims are very well aware that infidels throughout the west are largely unaware of the serious threat Islam poses to them. In the case of Britain - and of course most western nations but let's confine this to Britain - Muslims also know that one of our noteworthy virtues is also one of our main weaknesses: our tolerance of other people and of other cultures.

They are also aware that multiculturalism and political correctness - those evil twin spawns of Marxism - have brainwashed our people into hating their own cultures and traditions and to accepting that all people are equal. Jihadists also know that if anyone dares to speak out against Islam, they can be silenced by branding them as "haters", "Islamophobes" and of course "racists".

Fear of these Orwellian thought-control hate-crimes has placed a gag on our people and blinded them to an enemy that is determined to conquer them and subjugate them. Brainwashed and blinded, they will also confront their own people who have the courage to expose Islam for the violent, oppressive and intolerant faith it truly is by apologising for and defending the Islamic religion and in so doing, they unwittingly advance the Islamic jihad.

They are not just brainwashed by PC. Muslims know these liberal-minded people will also fall for all of the lies and deceptions that portray Islam as "a religion of peace" and it is crucial that British nationalists are fully informed about all of these deceptions and falsities that will be trotted out to shelter Islam from the spotlight of truth and continue to trap people in a dense fog of ignorance so that the intolerant is tolerated.

Deception is a crucial weapon of Islamic jihad and the gullible who are taken in by it are akin to lemmings marching towards the abyss, blissfully unaware of the terrible fate that awaits them. The grave danger is that they will take the rest of us with them.

We must not let that happen and that means sounding the clarion call to awaken our people to the reality of Islam and the escalating threat of Islamic jihad. It is crucial to the British counter-jihad that we possess an informed awareness as to what we can expect from our opponents whenever we expose Islam for what it truly is.

Where's The Harm?

One of the first responses you will be confronted with is:

"Everyone has a right to practice their faith and so do Muslims. Most Muslims are peaceful, I know Muslims and they're fine. All religions are the same, they've all got their cranks and nutters and they don't represent the true meaning of religion anyway."

It's a great answer isn't it? Seems a perfectly logical and fair statement to make about all religions. All religions that is apart from Islam and here's why:

For a start everyone doesn't have the right to practice their faith. If you believe that your faith is superior to others and that those who do not accept your religion can be killed or subjugated then you most certainly do not have the right to practice that faith. Not in a society that regards itself as enlightened and civilised that is.

Most Muslims are peaceful. Is this true? If by peaceful you mean that they don't commit acts of terror then maybe this is correct. But Islamic jihadists have committed more than 12800 terror attacks since 9/11 and if most Muslims are peaceful, then where are the Muslims who are calling for those committing these atrocities to cease? These are the same peaceful Muslims who march in their millions demanding the death of Danish cartoonists, British authors and a Dutch politician but who are conspicuous by their absence when it comes to marching for peace after Islamic jihadists have slaughtered scores of infidels in yet another bombing.

But what about those Muslims who demand for Sharia law to be accommodated; mega-mosques to be built; Islam to be taught in all schools; Halal food to be sold in shops and served in schools, prisons and public buildings; who demand ramadan customs be followed by all employees in public offices and that other Islamic traditions such as Eid be openly celebrated whilst calling the celebrations of other religious feasts "offensive". Are these peaceful tolerant Muslims? Is Ahmed Lord of Jihad a shining example of a respected moderate Muslim even though he demanded the suppression of free speech and threatened to mobilise an army of 10,000 Muslims - who would all be moderate and peaceful no doubt - should his demand be ignored?

And just where, exactly, are the cranks and nutters from other faiths who are committing thousands of terrorist attacks in the name of their religion or executing non-believers on videos viewed by believers all over the world on the Internet? Executions complete with readings from the Qu'ran and to the cry of "Allahu akhbar". Are other religious people committing such horrific murders in the name of their faith?

The Perfect Extremist

What will follow from the above as sure as eggs are eggs is the accusation that the "extremists" who are committing these atrocities whilst reciting verses from the Qu'ran are cherry-picking verses which they are then taking out of context.

I'm betting you're now nodding your head as you've heard this, right?

This is much easier to counter for two reasons: The Qu'ran is not the sole guide as to how Muslims practice their faith, for that, they have to turn to the Sunnah to refer to the perfect example of all time - the Islamic prophet Mohammed and this gives us the second reason: That of the use of the word "extremist".

It is so important that the example of Mohammed is the main focus of any debate involving Islam. Why?

Because he is the fulcrum of Islam. Mohammed IS Islam. When you examine the actions of Muslims and Islamic jihadists, always know that they are not solely following the Qu'ran but the example set by Mohammed as detailed in the Sunnah.

This is a huge problem for apologists and I have to say that I have yet to be defeated in debate because of this simple fact. When jihadists behead infidels they are following the example of their prophet who personally beheaded non-believers. When they murder infidels in terrorist attacks they are following the example of their prophet who personally murdered infidels. When they stone adulterers to death they are following the example of their prophet who ordered adulterers to be stoned to death. When adult Muslim males marry little girls - some as young as three but in Sharia Law the age is set at nine - they do so because their prophet married a six year old girl who he raped when she was just nine years old.

Does this mean therefore that the Islamic prophet Mohammed was an extremist? Obviously it does to the infidels whose religions do not have such a violent, sex-crazed psychopath as a prophet. But to Muslims, Mohammed is no such thing. He is the perfect example for all time, the final prophet of Allah, a prophet who is the embodiment of the Islamic faith. Remember the quote in my previous essay from Turkish PM Erdogan? Now you know why he said it.

Allah's Divine Law

I mentioned above that Mohammed married an infant child who he sexually abused when she was just nine years of age. The marriage to little six year old Aisha and the consummation is also witnessed in the Sunnah and if this is ever questioned, you can also add the fact that with Islam comes Sharia law, the Islamic legal system.

In Sharia law, grown men are allowed to marry girls of nine years of age. This again reflects in Islamic jurisprudence the example personally set by Mohammed with Aisha. It is one of the most damning indictments of Mohammed, and by God there are many, the fact that he sexually abused a little girl and it also puts Islam directly in conflict with British law because marrying children is illegal as we regard sex with children under sixteen as paedophilia, one of the most repulsive of crimes.

Yet apologists and Muslims will defend this heinous act. They will state that in the seventh century, such marriages between grown men and children were common-place in Arabic tribes and that Mohammed was simply following what was the custom of his time. Esteemed scholar and director of JihadWatch.Org Robert Spencer has also cited this in mitigation of Mohammed.

Although this is true I for one am simply not buying it and for a very simple but vitally important reason. If a man is regarded as a messenger of God, entrusted to deliver the will of God to God's own people, then are we to believe that God's will involves grown men enjoying sex with children? Because that is what Mohammed claimed with Aisha, that "Allah delivered her to me in a dream" - do you fully comprehend what this lust-crazed "messenger of God" is saying here?

Through medical science, we know that young children are not sufficiently physically and mentally developed to deal with sex and sexual acts. We know that if little girls are exposed to sex then their growing bodies can be damaged irreparably. Are we to seriously accept that Muslims who cite Allah as "the one God" believe that Allah doesn't know this so sex with children has the blessing of the all-knowing, all-seeing creator?

But the apology doesn't wash for another reason: That Islamic Sharia TODAY still permits grown men to marry little girls. So stating that it was something that happened back in the seventh century is ia non sequitur because it is STILL happening in Islamic countries - and non-Islamic countries where Muslims reside - all blessed by Sharia and fully in accordance with the example set by the Islamic prophet himself.

It is this very example of a prophet who abused a child that inspired the abhorrent fatwa issued by the Ayotallah Khomeini permitting grown men to pleasure themselves on tiny babies. Advising not to penetrate, this despicable act is known as "thighing" and you can read the fatwa for yourself here: Khomeini: Fatwa On Sex With Infants

How on earth can ANYONE, I don't care if you are Muslim or not, tolerate these vile acts of child abuse? Millions of little girls have had to suffer at the hands of adult Muslim males because of what Mohammed did to Aisha and we are supposed to tolerate this and remain silent because "it's their religion, they have a right to practise their faith and we shouldn't offend them."

Well I refuse to accept that the God of any religion will send his messenger to commit paedophilia. This shameful issue alone should be enough to condemn Islam as an evil ideology that is totally incompatible with British moral values and British law. The bottom-line is this:

If society tolerates Islam then that society tolerates the abuse of children. Child abuse is enshrined in Islamic Sharia law so wherever Islam goes child abuse will follow. IT IS PART OF ISLAM. Tolerating child abuse doesn't make a society enlightened it makes it morally bankrupt and if society refuses to speak out through fear of the consequences then that society has hoisted the white flag of cowardice and it is failing to protect its most vulnerable citizens. And dressing up child abuse as the divine will of a deity to justify it is quite frankly an abomination.

This highlights the importance of the choice all Britons face: We either stand for our values, our morals, our way of life or we sell them out to accommodate the way of life of a people whose morality is based wholly on the craven behaviour of a seventh century paedophile.

Time To Get Personal

In my experience, it is at this point that apologists realise that you are well-informed about Islam and that the example of the Islamic prophet Mohammed is a problem they cannot address whilst maintaining that Islam is a religion of peace. So the apologists will now focus on you.

The tactic at work behind this is to distract attention from Islam and to stifle your quite reasonable criticisms of Islam by portraying you as either a misunderstander, ignorant, bigoted, Islamophobic and finally - go on, take a guess, I'm sure you'll get it without needing 3 attempts!

The "you're a misunderstander of Islam" is a favourite tactic usually deployed by Muslims. They will say you don't understand the message of Islam because the Qu'ran is written in classical Arabic and this cannot be translated accurately into English.

And they're right, the Qu'ran is written in classical Arabic. But like any language, it can and has been translated accurately into various languages, not just English. Also, the New Testament was largely written in Aramaic, the Old Testament in Hebrew. Does this mean that those who are not native speakers of these languages cannot understand Judaism or Christianity?

But here's the killer blow for this lame distraction: There are Muslims whose first language isn't Arabic - Turks, Pakistanis, Indians, Chinese, Russians, Africans etc. - does this then mean that these people will not be able to understand the Qu'ran so therefore they can't ever be Muslims?

The bigot and Islamophobe accusations are easily brushed off. Highlight that the accuser is now resorting to ad hominem attacks rather than responding to the serious issues being raised. It isn't bigoted to criticise and question ANY religion or for that matter any ideology. Muslims themselves criticise Judaism and Christianity and it isn't referred to as "Judophobia" or "Christophobia" and those words also don't apply to anyone who criticises these religions.

Sorry, did I say "Muslims..criticise these religions?" My mistake, let's make that "Muslims...slaughter, execute and scourge Jews and Christians." That's a damn sight more accurate don't you think?

I also like to mention something which I believe is a fundamental truth: If a religion is true and strong then it will be able to deal with criticism. If it is a sham it will prevent criticism through threats and violence. As my late father advised me: "Anything that has to threaten you to make you believe isn't worth believing in."

That Old Chestnut

The racist card will be played against you without a doubt. People who resort to this quite ridiculous smear - Islam and Muslims are not a race - are ensconced in the gutter and they simply aren't worth debating with because they are dishonest. Better to say: "You are lowering the debate into a sewer and I refuse to join you there."

I've completely and utterly had my fill of resolutely continuing only to be on the receiving end of "Whatever you say mein Fuerher", raised right-arm salutes accompanied with "Sieg Heil" and being asked "where are you going to build the ovens for the Muslims?"

Been there, done it worn the tee-shirt and I now simply refuse to debate with pig-ignorant retards who resort to this dishonest tactic. Trust me it isn't worth wasting your valuable time.

The Cure For Islam

Hopefully you will be debating with sincere folk who have a genuine desire to question, to criticise, to argue and to debate with an intention to leave the debate with increased knowledge. My goal is not just to present an argument that reveals the reality of Islam but to arouse curiosity so that people will continue to ask questions about Islam so they increase their knowledge after the debate is finished.

Genuine debaters frequently make a statement about Islam which they believe will modernise Islam and bring it from where it is now, anchored in seventh century traditions and customs, into the modern world. This "cure" for Islam will be presented something like this:

"I agree that there are problems with Islam and what I believe Islam needs is to undergo a reformation, similar to the reformations that Christianity has performed so that Islam becomes a more peaceful, tolerant religion more in-tune with the peaceful messages of the Qu'ran than the violent intolerant messages."

Again, this is a perfectly reasonable statement to make. Islam could indeed modernise by becoming more tolerant of other faiths and ditching the violent Medinan verses of the Qu'ran and focusing more on the peaceful Meccan messages.

There are a couple of serious problems with this though and I wonder if you've spotted the first one? You know that the Qu'ran is not the sole guide to how Muslims should practice their faith, that the Sunnah is also an essential book of reference because it details how the Islamic prophet Mohammed practised his faith.

For Islam to undergo a reform and focus on the more peaceful verses it would need to do two things:

1. Alter the absolute word of Allah. Muslims believe that the verses of the Qu'ran are words spoken directly by Allah.

2. Abandon the last ten years of the life of Prophet Mohammed. Given that Mohammed is "al insan al kamil" - the perfect man - to Muslims, I think the chances of this happening are not particularly promising.

What is crucial to understand about Islam is that the Qu'ran and the Sunnah are sacred to Muslims. For humans to start to change these in anyway is forbidden. Innovation in Islamic Sharia - bida - meaning altering in anyway the texts or the history of these sacred books is not common and indeed, although there are Muslims who are calling for reform, whether or not that reform would entail a rejection of the Medinan verses and the last ten years of Mohammed's life I believe is highly unlikely.

With the Christian reformation, reformers wanted Christians to be more in-tune with the teachings and the example of their Messiah Jesus Christ. What needs to be considered with Islam is that if a reformation were to occur that had the same idea, that Muslims should be more in-tune with the teachings and the example of their prophet, well, can you see a small problem here?

Christ's greatest commandment was: "Love one another so that all will know you are my disciples."

Contrast this with Mohammed. This is a verse taken from the Qu'ran, Sira 8 (Al Anfal "War Booty") verse 39, that Mohammed also recited when he was close to death:

Translated Pickthal:

"And fight them until persecution[al-fitnah or disbelief and worshipping things other than Allah] is no more, and religion is all for Allah."

Unfortunately, there are many more verses like this and they make a peaceful reform of Islam almost impossible. The other problem to consider is that even if a peaceful reformation occurred, would all Muslims accept it or would sects form who remain true to the original teachings of Allah and the Islamic prophet Mohammed?

I have a question for you: What kind of religion includes a verse like 8:39 in its holy texts?

Watch and Learn

I began this essay by questioning the definition of what a "peaceful Muslim" is and I stated that Muslims who demand Sharia law in the UK are actually jihadists. This is because the duty of every Muslim is to transform "Dar al harb" into "Dar al Islam" - also stated in 8:39 of the Qu'ran as you've just seen.

Whilst I was writing this essay, I came across the following video of an Islamic march on the streets of the capital of Great Britain which will provide you with a visual and audio reference that gives further supporting evidence for the claims I have made in this essay, all from the actions and words of Muslims themselves:

Islamic Jihadists March Through London 28/02/09

Please note the following:

1. Look at what the poster of the video "Soldier For Islam" has written regarding establishing Britain as part of an Islamic "Khilafa".

2. The video begins with the shahada, and I mentioned the importance of this in part one. On this march, the shahada is being shouted to intimidate watching infidels and to impose Islam on them. Note that it is followed by cries of "Takbir - Allahu Akhbar", the battle cry of Muslims.

3. There is an abundance of Islamic flags. Not British flags or any other flags, just Islamic ones. Are they trying to tell us something?

4. "Islam for UK, Sharia for UK" - Meet the jihadists.

5. "Those who reject Allah love to live in darkness." You've been warned!

6. The purpose of this march is a call to Islam for the infidels, known as "Da'wa" in Islam and this is very very important and I will discuss why in my next essay. This has more meaning than you may realise, one being that this is how Mohammed waged jihad.

7. "What we are doing is a divine obligation for all Muslims." Is there a bell ringing with you?

8."Inviting the non-Muslims to Islam" - My word this is so important. It also indicates how confident the Muslim community now is in London.

9. "And we bear witness that Mohammed is the final messenger for mankind." So, he isn't really all that important then!

10. "All people of Bethnal Green, Muslims and non-Muslims: This is a public invitation to Islam...1400 years ago, the best man who walked the face of the earth..." As well as telling us exactly how revered their Prophet is, we have Da'wa again and I can't emphasise enough how important this is. This essay is long enough as it is but I will go into more detail in the next one which will be looking at how Muslims treat non-believers so it will tie-in nicely.

Conclusion

Islam represents a very serious threat to our nation and future generations. It is vital that we British nationalists expose Islam for what it is via sincere debate and factual criticism. We need to be aware of how our opponents will try to prevent us from speaking the truth about Islam so being informed about what to expect and how to handle opposition will give us a huge advantage.

The truth about Islam and its perverted, psychopathic prophet is its Achilles heel and the more we spread this truth the quicker Islam will be finished in our land without the need for violent conflict.

Should Islam continue to flourish in our nation, there will come a time when the British people will have to convert to Islam, accept subjugation or fight. That is the reality of Islam wherever it goes and you'll see why this is so in the next part. I believe that should Islam continue to grow in Britain, the responsibility to defeat Islam will be passed on to future generations who will be forced to fight for their nation and their freedom. We don't have the right to bargain away their future for our comfort today and that is why it is critical for us to rid Islam from our land now, while we can without resorting to violence.

Every British nationalist can play a part in sounding the clarion call to awaken our people to the truth about Islam. Forums, blogs, websites all give us the chance to comment, debate and challenge the lies and myths about "the religion of peace". The truth is the deadliest weapon we possess to help us defeat the global Islamic jihad. If we use it, we will prevail.


You think things are bad now?

Soon men like these will walk the streets of Our Country

For a long, long time now, Nationalist Blogs have been saying that Pakistan is all but finished. The nation that was born out of bloodshed will end in even greater bloodshed by toppling into the Abyss of real Islam, with Sharia Law implemented to the letter.

And if it were not for their nuclear capability, that we helped pay for with our "Foreign Aid", I would not give a fig how they run their country, slaughter each other or how many of them die.

Sounds hard? Well in these days, you must learn to become hard because things are going to get really bad in Our Country before they can become better. And we are going to see a lot of blood and death on our streets in the years to come. Do not believe me? Sadly you will one day.

Because as Pakistan collapses, hundreds of thousands of them will flee to Our Country to escape the growing violence and in with those hordes will come the preachers who have helped destroy Pakistan and they will continue their World War on our soil.

And as they consolidate their positions in their enclaves they begin their attacks on surrounding white neighborhoods by physically attacking our young men, by targeting our young girls and by intimidation.

Eventually, those whites who can, will flee. Ask yourself this. If multiculturalism is so good why does the phrase "White Flight" even exist? Then their ghetto expands ever outwards until an whole village, town or city is under their control and a no go area to the white people who once lived there.

There can be no integration, Moslems are forbidden from integrating or having friends with the Christian Monkeys. They do not want our friendship, all they want is Our Land and eventually our lives. You must learn to understand the mentality of the Moslems if we, the True British are to survive as a people.

And as their positions become stronger, so to do their "demands" increase for more and more "concessions". And our treasonous politicians, safe in their Ivory Towers give into their demands in the hope of gaining their blackmailers votes to maintain their personal power and wealth at our expense. What deals are being done behind closed doors to buy peace?

And in parts of the country still unenriched, parts of the country becoming smaller every day, there are True Brits who refuse to even acknowledge that there is a problem and continue to live their lives hoping that the crocodile of Islam will eat them last. Those people are cowards and traitors to their children. In short, they make me vomit because they are a part of the fifth column that will help destroy us.

Make no bones about it, our enemy is well organised. They are operating to a well tried and tested plan of violence and demographics that has gobbled up many other countries to the east of us.

They have been brain washed since birth. They are prepared to fight. They have been bred to fight. And many of them are prepared to die, either with a gun in their hands or their finger on the button of a bomb. They will walk our streets with weapons in their hands as casually as they walked the streets of India and Pakistan in their recent terror attacks.

There are going to be riots, there are going to be more bombings, there are going to be political assassinations, there is not going to be a river of blood, there is going to be a tidal wave of it. Maybe not this year, maybe not next year but that wave is rushing towards us and hit us hard it will.

The True Brits of this Country have but one hope and that hope is the British National Party and rest assured if they do not prevail then neither do we as a people.


Although we have been fighting in Afghanistan for six years, the reality is that the war may just be starting in Pakistan - a nuclear-armed country of 170 million with its huge immigrant diaspora living in our midst.

Interesting article in the Daily Backstabber.

The BNP Vrs The Rest

I'll put my money on these guys

By Albion

The art of the confidence trick has been with us since the time of Christ and to this day it still fools many people. It even includes doctors and Lawyers. I have seen many Current Affairs exposés where these greedy people have been conned out of thousands of pounds by Nigerian scam artists. Yes Nigerian fraudsters. It’s Nigeria’s second main import earner after oil.

We have seen recently Company Accountants being creamed for millions by investing other people’s money in dodgy hedge funds but walking away with millions in bonuses.

But let us deal with the matter in hand. The ordinary person is also being duped daily but is totally unaware, and the con is being committed every day in their newspapers and it is cruelly relentless. It is abetted by the TV media, all political bodies, the church, and all government services.

That includes the Police Force, the Fire service, the education department, Labour councils, Unions, Police commissioners, even the head of the Church of England, his Holiness the Right Reverend the Mentally Disturbed Bishop of Canterbury. Silly man; in the day of Henry the eight he would not have lasted a day with his inane, crackpot ideas. Heads have rolled for far less.

When the ordinary peasants got the vote after a long struggle a second party appeared ostensibly to look after the workers. It was called the Labour party. For the ordinary man it was always them and us, the bosses and the workers. Certainly nothing wrong with that.

Today we have still have two political parties but their ideologies are so blurred as to be almost identical. The Libs/Dems are no threat to anyone. I liken them to a work experience political wannabe’s that will always pick up a few votes from a few number of disaffected voters but nevertheless riding a jolly political bandwagon to nowhere.

That’s how politics has remained for many years. A Nationalist party originally called the Empire Loyalists who saw in the very early days the treason that was taking place in this country and was aware that the UK had been ordered by Roosevelt to divest itself of its empire.

The American leaders were determined to castrate England as a world power. It was vulnerable too, it had no choice the country was flat broke.

Time passed and politics turned nasty. Any new opposition that tried to flex their muscle was torn to shreds by the Media and establishment even before they got to first base.

Now this arrangement I write of suited both sides of politics. They would govern turn about. One party might stay in government for two terms, even three terms in exceptional circumstances, but eventually the opposition party would take power, then it would be the turn of the party in waiting. What dislodge a lying political party are the same old promises which are never kept as Gordon is going to find to his chagrin.

Now from the ashes of past a new party emerges; the British National Party. The two entrenched political parties are horrified to discover the status quo that has given them a comparatively easy, comfortable and predictable life for decades is now under threat.

The thuggish group The U.A.F, the bully boys, the hire a mentally retarded thug for a day was formed wholly and solely, for no other purpose than to attempt to destroy the BNP by every means at its disposal.

Even it’s an acronym U.A.F is a lie, it is fabricated, what we see with the U.A.F is Fascism in its most purist form. This criminal arrangement has suited both entrenched parties.

At the U.A.F’s disposal are funds from a government department, but more funding is raised by other vested interest groups in an attempt to destroy the BNP, but it is not working, in fact the BNP is getting stronger.

So the government in consultation with the News Media, BBC and the ITV bosses were ordered at a round table conference to use all means at their disposal using slander, accusations of racism, smear, and downright lies to try and crush the BNP of making any inroads into British Politics.

These lies are spoon fed to you daily by courtesy of the BBC and news media. It is a political character assasination. Worthy of any third world despot.

Start shredding boys and girls and retain yourself a good Lawyer. Your disgusting lies and accusations which you have used freely for your own self preservation are not working any more. Your days are truly numbered.


Tuesday, 3 March 2009

BBC Spinmeisters "at pains" to specify that attacker of soldier was white.



by johnofgwent

Oh this makes me SO BLOODY FURIOUS on SO MANY grounds I don't know where to start. Doing the daily trawl round the pages of the pro-enrichment BBC's excuse for a news site I came across a story that makes me want to scream. So let'sstart at the beginning before I burst a blood vessel.

21 year old Chris Jones from a welsh valley not too far from here recently completed a tour of duty with the Army in Afghanistan and managed to survive that well enough to travel to Southampton to watch Cardiff City play an away game. After being refused entry to the St Mary's stadium before kick off, Mr Jones headed off to the Chapel Arms pub at around 3pm. Thirty minutes later he was felled by a single blow from a man with whom he "had a disagreement". A blow that, combined with the fall and the impact of his head on the ground gave him a fractured skull and broken cheekbone.

Det Insp Linda Howard from Shirley CID, who is leading the investigation, said the assault did not appear to be football-related.

"We believe the victim received one blow to the head causing him to fall to the ground and as a result has sustained some very serious injuries including a fractured skull and broken cheekbone," she said.

"We don't think this was a pre-arranged fight involving Cardiff and Saints fans, but we do know the victim received a single blow to the head after a disagreement with another man and we are very keen to try and trace this other person and speak to them about what happened."

I'll bet you are, Detective Inspector Howard. But answer me this, if you please. Why did you also allow the BBC to publish these words
Police said a fight broke out between Mr Jones and a white man at around 1530 GMT Andersons Road, which is near the pub.
You wouldn't have let the BBC News say if Mr Jones had been beaten senseles by a black man or a pakistani, would you ? No, that would be a breach of your sodding code of practice on the censorship of interracial crime on the grounds it is bad for multiculturalism, wouldn't it.

Bridgend BNP activists Blitz Town Centre !


Sorry, I am late posting this but I have been away for a few days and had no internet access. Never mind all is well that ends well and by all accounts it was a great day.

Adam Lloyd, the Bridgend BNP Organiser on the left in the above video, is a top guy and a pleasure to work with. He will make a fine Councillor for the BNP one day.

If you live in the Bridgend area and wish to become involved then follow the links over on the Bridgend Patriot. Now on with the report....

St. David’s weekend in South Wales saw BNP activists flood Bridgend Town Centre with an information and display stall set up in the pedestrian precinct, members with BNP rosettes handing out leaflets and talking with shoppers in the streets, and further leafleting teams out and about in the surrounding residential areas.

Even as the stall was still being setup, once the ‘British Jobs for British Workers’ banner was unfolded, the first enquirer came up straightaway asking for information and a membership form, and this then set the scene for a steady stream of enquirers throughout the morning approaching the stall to chat and to take copies of ‘Voice of Freedom’ and other literature.

Other activists in the surrounding streets, easily identifiable in smart dress and BNP rosettes were kept busy throughout handing out leaflets and talking with inquisitive shoppers. One thing that was noticeable was the increasing amount of people who were actually walking across the street to ask our activists for a leaflet !

During the morning, Carwen Jones the Assembly Member for Plaid, or is it Labour? (difficult to tell the difference nowadays as they work hand in glove together anyway), was seen walking past the stall making furtive sideways glances whilst muttering something, - (we think he was trying to recall the standard press statement crib sheet for politicians of all the failed parties, you know - the one that goes along the lines of ‘...their politics of division and hate are not welcome on the streets of insert name of constituency here’ etc . But whatever he was muttering, we were all very disappointed he didn’t come over to say a hello or good morning. After all, we are the very people his failed and sordid party is supposed to be representing.

Meanwhile, other leafleting teams were delivering door to door in residential streets in areas around the town, and again reported favourable responses.

Yes, we did get the occasional rather rude, typical Labour bigot using foul language – which is only to be expected in this formerly safe, ‘rock-solid’ Labour rotten borough, but this was by far outweighed by the positive messages of support for the BNP we received. We were also approached by various people asking us to stand candidates in their part of Bridgend. Well, on June 4th, in the forthcoming European Elections, we are standing a full slate of candidates and everyone in Wales will be able to vote BNP !


Dydd gwil Dewi hapus iawn !

Happy St.David’s day !

"Would You Open Fire On Your Own People"

If this lot came upon armed rioters in the next street ...
...who would they shoot first ?


By johnofgwent. Hat tip to the wigan patriot

Norman Tebbit is famous for more that one soundbite. The one he will probably have carved on his tombstone is that he, like his father before him, has finally "got on his bike" to seek a better life elsewhere. But the one I shall remember him for was his unwaranted attack upon a game played by gentlemen (and occasionally by the odd ball tamperer). To quote from his wikipedia entry (well, the version in place today, at least).
In April 1990 he proposed the "Cricket test", also known as the "Tebbit Test", where he argued that whether people from ethnic minorities in Britain supported the England Cricket team (rather than the team from their country of origin) should be considered a barometer - but not the sole indicator - of whether that are truly British
As one who has, in my past, stood at one end of "four poles length of close cropped english greenery" with nothing but a stout piece of willow to defend my own honour and that of my ten fellow combatants against the worst our opponents can hurl at me, I say "The Honourable Lord Tebbit" as he is now styled does the players and supporters of that particularly sporting game a grave disservice and slanderous injury.

For when I stood at the crease and six foot three of solid muscle, black as the ace of spades and whose parents were amongst the first to step off the gangplank of the "Windrush", began his run towards the other end, and let fly a small red misssile straight at my middle stump with frightening velocity, I rose to the challenge and like Sir Garfield Sobers whacked the ball straight over the boundary. As I did, he was the first to applaud. He aplauded again when the second ball of his over went the same way. And he paced out a slightly longer run-in for his third, which would be my nemesis.

His third ball came on terrifyingly fast with a wicked curve. I never saw its trajectory properly and it would be almost five years before I would witness Michael Holding using the very same technique to devastating effect in a test match. Only then did I understand the reason for my demise at the crease. At the time, all I saw was a flurry of reddish blur and all I heard was the tiniest click of wood upon wood, that sounded to me as clear as if a thunderstorm from nowhere on a perfect late summer afternoon in deepest buckinghamshire.

I did not wait for the yell of triumph or the signal from the umpire. I did not need to. I knew the game was up. The pavilion was at the far end of the pitch, and I began the long walk to my tea and cucumber sandwiches, to applause coming from those on and off the field. But the loudest applause was when I stopped at the far end to shake my rival's hand for a delivery executed to perfection.

No, Lord Tebbit, you did the game played by english gentlemen against other gentlemen of the same standing the world over a grave disservice when you made your cheap remark. Those who take the field in white to carry on the eternal battle of willow versus leather know the difference between rivalry and riot. As do their supporters in the ground and around the world. It is those who would denounce the spirit of fairness upon which that game is modelled that you should have aimed your bile.

For the true "Tebbit Test" is needed now more than ever.

A few days ago I roundly condemned Jacqui Smith on this blog and collected five minutes of fame courtesy of UK Tabloid for my insight into the background of some of her more unworkable ideas designed to pacify the increasingly vociferous and disgruntled "vox pop" that have seen the policies of her party for what they are. The Deputy Leader of the rabble he calls His Party goes on a major weekend political discussion proramme and rants that just because a court of law says it's legal doesn't mean we're not going to find a way to prise the pension out of the ex RBS chief's cold dead hand. A stance that has her fellow cabinet ministers scuttling for a foxhole thaty provides cover against the incoming declarations of incredulity and demands for clarification, and causes the woman in question to go suddenly, and uncharacteristically, quiet.

Gordon Brown takes refuge while the rest of the cabinet conclude their discussions regarding the merit of his laissez-faire policy towards bankers benefit packages.

Gordon Brown is not a stupid man. He knows the game is up and soon he will have to find another job. That's why he has shown such remarkably little interest in curtailing the "fill yer boots" mentality of the board level directors who will be inviting him to join the table as a consultant in about a year's time. Hence his irritation at the clamour for him to do something. And also the reason for the eagerness of his Deputy to sieze the moment to stab him in the back for she sees the opportunity to sieze the reins in the forlorn hope that it will make a diference to their ultimate doom.

And that's before I get to Jack Straw the "Other Half A Home Secretary" stepping in to censor the legally approved distribution of cabinet minutes from the days whenthey were discussing Blair's illegal military belligerence in the sandy wasteland that was once the Garden of Eden and home to one of the Seven Wonders Of The World.

But meanwhile, The Community Cohesion Committee (Six New Liebour, Three Tory, Two Lib Dem and not a single patriot amongst them) seem to be clearly worried that there is now a need for a revised Tebbit Test. And worryingly, according to the Wigan Patriot it seems that preparations are already being made by Gordon Brown and his multicultural cronies to spill more english blood, but this time on the streets of our country, not in some faraway desert.
In a stunning conversation with a friend, who is a serving member of the Armed Forces, over the weekend, it was revealed that transfers to regiments and other units in the UK on home duties are being undertaken by the MOD based upon whether an individual was prepared to 'open fire' on UK citizens during civil disturbances.

I found this long and extracted conversation to be both bizarre and frightening. I will state at this point that he is someone that I have known for years, and trust implicitly. The fact that service personnel are actually being asked in special briefing sessions whether they would fire on their own nationals indicates that the rumours about the Army being put on standby are indeed very true.

It would seemthat we live in "interesting times".

Monday, 2 March 2009

Council Debt Collectors Threaten 80 year old over £17.50 bill for "personal attack alarm"

Aberdeen City Council's latest recipient of the shock treatment
for non-payment of their many and various bills.

by johnofgwent

Well, I confess I did wonder what Harriet Harman the denier of equal opportunity for all meant when she told Andrew Marr that just because the court of law can't do anything it doesn't mean the "courtof public opinion" won't in the matter of Sir Fred and his comfy retirement plan.

But as I started out on my customary perusal of the news websites to see just how deep the fools running this country have dug themselves into their little holes, I found an example of just how low politicians are happy to stoop in the current financial crisis of their own making

For I stumbed upon the case of Aberdeen City Council and their rather interesting way of dealing with people who dispute bills they get from the council.

Now before I go any further you might like to pop over to this link where you will see the motley bunch that "govern" this place are made up of a right "rainbow alliance" constructed from one 'independent', fifteen 'liberal democrats', four 'scottish tories', ten 'scottish labour ' and thirteen 'scottish nationalists'. So I'm buggered if I can work out who is in charge, and maybe that's the key to their little problem.

Because they seem to be rather quick off the mark at sending in the men with baseball bats to sort out recalcitrant debtors. As an 80 year old, partially sighted pensioner found out to her cost.

Unhappy at the council's demand for £17.50 for provision of a "personal alarm" this vulnerable old lady sent the item back to the council and wrote two letters querying the cost. Presumably she, or one of her family, discovered the same item available for a fiver in the local B&Q or similar. I do not know. But what I do know is the council's response to this woman's actioni returning the device and disputing the bill was to get a firm of debt collectors to threaten her with legal action if she did not pay up.

And she is far from alone. Another recipient of the debt collector's bile was the mother of a young man currently being treated at The Royal Cornhill Hospital who the same council seem to think has no right to challenge their demand for £600 in connection with his treatment.

Just because Aberdeen City Council got their fingers burned when they stuffed over £120 million earmarked for the building of ten schools under one of those oh-so-dodgy "public-private-partnership" schemes into an Icelandic Bank to get more interest while they sat on their laurels and pontificated, doesn't mean you can go round taking out your anger on the old and the sick.

You would think most people standing for public office to serve the people would know that. But clearly not. So perhaps we would give more prominence to the roll of dishonour I highlighted earlier.

Sunday, 1 March 2009

Geert Wilders' Freedom Party leads polls

Geert Wilders as put his life on the line to warn the West about Islam

According to Dutch opinion polls, if parliamentary elections were held today the Freedom Party whose leader is the heroic Geert Wilders, would become the largest party. The Freedom Party has 27 seats in the polls, while the Christian Democrats - the largest party in the governing coalition - has 26.

The Freedom Party has been rising in the polls since the Amsterdam appeals court decided to try Wilders for anti-Muslim comments six weeks ago. He was also in the news because of the cowardice of our so called leaders in refusing him access to Our Country to attend a presentation of his film, Fitna that reveals the true evil of the Cult of the Dead Paedophile.

However the film was still shown in the House of Lords on February 12 despite Mr Wilders enforced absence.

Shamefully, only 30 people attended the screening, five of them members of the Upper House. All 743 peers were invited, as were the 646 MPs, none of whom attended.

Hats of to those who watched the film and everlasting shame on those who did not.


Treason most Foul

Both betrayed

By Albion

Our dire political situation could be likened to the result of a ship taking a direct hit on the bows. The direct torpedo hit being the plot by a number of European power elitists in collusion with our prime minister at the time, a Mr. Edward Heath, to subvert our constitution and destroy our sovereignty. The water has been steadily rushing in ever since and no political party except the British National Party is going to immediately close the bulkhead doors. Even the government-in-waiting have no plans the change the status quo.

This country has been set on a dangerous path which no-one can predict its future. When I say dangerous I refer to the civil unrest that is certain to follow once the EU flexes is political and military muscle against all those who dissent. There will be no need for any political opposition; the EU will be a one party state. Nationalism will be made illegal, and criticism of the State or its political incompetence will be considered a crime.

One thing is for certain if those water-tight bulkhead doors are not closed very smartly we are going to sink, within 50 years the whole character of this country will change. Walk around Tower Hamlets in fact most of East London, and what you see there will be mirrored across the whole of the UK heavily populated by invaders who have absolutely no allegiance to this country whatsoever. On the contrary many of those people I refer to; their allegiance is guided by the disturbed mind of Mohammed.

We do not even have an English parliament to protect its people or its constitution. All our legislation is made in Brussels. Our politicians are part of this festering cabal. What of our Queen you ask?

If our Queen is a citizen of Europe, how can she carry out her oath of allegiance to this country?

She counter-signs a document in which she agrees to waive our own constitution and pass UK loyalty to a European constitution that negates our constitution, the Lisbon Treaty, which is NOT a treaty at all but a draft European Constitution with a different outer cover on it. I thought that was Treason, correct me if I am wrong. What the hell is going on here?

It appears our Queen has no influence whatsoever on constitutional affairs. It will be interesting to read in years to come as to what advice the Parliament has been giving the Queen regarding all the treaties she has signed, which little by little has been destroying our independence as a sovereign nation. In time all this dirty business will eventually surface like an odious smelling scum on a polluted, toxic pond.

The reign of one of her forebears was referred as the Golden age of Elizabeth. Its not a nice title to be referred to as Elizabeth the Last, the Queen who sold her country piecemeal to a foreign criminal cabal due to the reckless and treasonous advice of her ministers.

A lady living overseas wrote to the Queen voicing her concerns of which I am now relating. A letter arrived back from the palace saying quote ‘It is Parliament that decides what has to be done’. Keep it simple for the peasantry.

This has all the makings of a John Le Carre thriller, one day we will find out who were and who are the quislings and just what part the small Fascist and Communist groups play in using threats and violent intimidation against any person or any political faction who dare stand in their way and which Government department gives them their orders.

The BBC hierarchy particularly need investigating regarding deals made to use our National Broadcaster to broadcast ‘feel good’ news about Brussels even taking its propaganda into our schools and used incessantly in unbalanced, stacked TV political group discussions. One could reply, why wouldn’t they when they are part funded by Brussels to push for a political union with Europe.

As a law abiding thinking peasant what astounds me is just how long this treason has been going on unchallenged by all other political parties and why there have been no concerns by academics of constitutional law. The depths of treason and sedition from within our government and elite are awesome. We know it was spawned in the capitals of Europe by Franco/German Marxist and Socialist thinkers.

It all leads to a New World Order, and Gordon Brown is not telling the peasants just what that entails. It’s just as well he doesn’t, as the people will only be left with only one party that is totally loyal to its people, who will protect its constitution and abide by its own system of Jurisprudence which has been held in good stead for hundreds of years, the envy of many other countries.

And immediately close off the bulkhead doors.

Which party is that? The British National Party.


Guess what Day it is

Need a clue?

Happy Birthday Dear Brother