Sunday, 1 March 2009

Treason most Foul

Both betrayed

By Albion

Our dire political situation could be likened to the result of a ship taking a direct hit on the bows. The direct torpedo hit being the plot by a number of European power elitists in collusion with our prime minister at the time, a Mr. Edward Heath, to subvert our constitution and destroy our sovereignty. The water has been steadily rushing in ever since and no political party except the British National Party is going to immediately close the bulkhead doors. Even the government-in-waiting have no plans the change the status quo.

This country has been set on a dangerous path which no-one can predict its future. When I say dangerous I refer to the civil unrest that is certain to follow once the EU flexes is political and military muscle against all those who dissent. There will be no need for any political opposition; the EU will be a one party state. Nationalism will be made illegal, and criticism of the State or its political incompetence will be considered a crime.

One thing is for certain if those water-tight bulkhead doors are not closed very smartly we are going to sink, within 50 years the whole character of this country will change. Walk around Tower Hamlets in fact most of East London, and what you see there will be mirrored across the whole of the UK heavily populated by invaders who have absolutely no allegiance to this country whatsoever. On the contrary many of those people I refer to; their allegiance is guided by the disturbed mind of Mohammed.

We do not even have an English parliament to protect its people or its constitution. All our legislation is made in Brussels. Our politicians are part of this festering cabal. What of our Queen you ask?

If our Queen is a citizen of Europe, how can she carry out her oath of allegiance to this country?

She counter-signs a document in which she agrees to waive our own constitution and pass UK loyalty to a European constitution that negates our constitution, the Lisbon Treaty, which is NOT a treaty at all but a draft European Constitution with a different outer cover on it. I thought that was Treason, correct me if I am wrong. What the hell is going on here?

It appears our Queen has no influence whatsoever on constitutional affairs. It will be interesting to read in years to come as to what advice the Parliament has been giving the Queen regarding all the treaties she has signed, which little by little has been destroying our independence as a sovereign nation. In time all this dirty business will eventually surface like an odious smelling scum on a polluted, toxic pond.

The reign of one of her forebears was referred as the Golden age of Elizabeth. Its not a nice title to be referred to as Elizabeth the Last, the Queen who sold her country piecemeal to a foreign criminal cabal due to the reckless and treasonous advice of her ministers.

A lady living overseas wrote to the Queen voicing her concerns of which I am now relating. A letter arrived back from the palace saying quote ‘It is Parliament that decides what has to be done’. Keep it simple for the peasantry.

This has all the makings of a John Le Carre thriller, one day we will find out who were and who are the quislings and just what part the small Fascist and Communist groups play in using threats and violent intimidation against any person or any political faction who dare stand in their way and which Government department gives them their orders.

The BBC hierarchy particularly need investigating regarding deals made to use our National Broadcaster to broadcast ‘feel good’ news about Brussels even taking its propaganda into our schools and used incessantly in unbalanced, stacked TV political group discussions. One could reply, why wouldn’t they when they are part funded by Brussels to push for a political union with Europe.

As a law abiding thinking peasant what astounds me is just how long this treason has been going on unchallenged by all other political parties and why there have been no concerns by academics of constitutional law. The depths of treason and sedition from within our government and elite are awesome. We know it was spawned in the capitals of Europe by Franco/German Marxist and Socialist thinkers.

It all leads to a New World Order, and Gordon Brown is not telling the peasants just what that entails. It’s just as well he doesn’t, as the people will only be left with only one party that is totally loyal to its people, who will protect its constitution and abide by its own system of Jurisprudence which has been held in good stead for hundreds of years, the envy of many other countries.

And immediately close off the bulkhead doors.

Which party is that? The British National Party.


Sarah Maid of Albion said...

A first class article Albion, and frighteningly accurate. the closer one observes the situation the more obvious the acts of treason become.

Yet, nobody, not even the queen, will oppose them.

defender said...

The Coronation Oath (from the Order of Service for the Coronation)

The Queen having returned to her Chair, (her Majesty having already on Tuesday, the 4th day of November, 1952, in the presence of the two Houses of Parliament, made and signed the Declaration prescribed by Act of Parliament), the Archbishop standing before her shall administer the Coronation Oath, first asking the Queen,

Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath?

And the Queen answering,

I am willing.

The Archbishop shall minister these questions; and the Queen, having a book in her hands, shall answer each question severally as follows:

The Archbishop. Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs?

The Queen. I solemnly promise so to do.

Archbishop. Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements?

The Queen. I will.

The Archbishop. Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law? Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them?

The Queen. All this I promise to do.

Then the Queen arising out of her Chair, supported as before, the Sword of State being carried before her, shall go to the Altar, and make her solemn Oath in the sight of all the people to observe the premisses: laying her right hand upon the Holy Gospel in the great Bible (which was before carried in the procession and is now brought from the Altar by the Arch-bishop, and tendered to her as she kneels upon the steps), and saying these words:

The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God.

Then the Queen shall kiss the Book and sign the Oath.

Treason most foul has been the legacy of the Crown for many years.

Anonymous said...

We must form an alliance with other nationalists within Europe, who distrust the EU as much as we do.

The EU must be either completely dismantled, or turned into a confederation of sovereign nations working for mutual benefit, not subjugation.


This traitor is a bilderburger and expects all the privelige of her rank to remain as she is one of the elite,she has not the silghtest objection to the extermination of us or the other five sixths of the worlds population,her son is also up to his neck in this treason,so any appeal to either of them is futile.

Anonymous said...

It is treason indeed Albion, excellent article and Elizabeth the Last resonates.

I believe those guilty of "The Great Betrayal" should be tried and if found guilty, hung at traitors gate and buried there togther in a pit marked with their names followed by "Traitor". It is what they deserve for selling out their own people.

"On the contrary many of those people I refer to; their allegiance is guided by the disturbed mind of Mohammed."

There will be more about this psychopath in my next essay which I will post to GA early this week.

We have to win seats in the coming Euros or we're done for. Time is not on our side now.


Anonymous said...

Celtic Morning. Off with their heads. Including the servile traitors of the Royal family

Anonymous said...

The NWO has been in the making for decades, I myself have witnessed the effects over this period, seen with my own eyes as you might say.

Always a parallel government in the shadows, no matter what government has been elected.

A whole rash of legislation has been passed this past half century which was never put before the people, and never appeared in any manifesto.

A shadowy government made up of a loose association of the rich and influential, unelected, unaccountable, have beavered away behind the scene.

It seems that Blair's new Labour was selected to usher Britain into this brave new world, and we've all caught a glimpse of the future.

Do not think Blair and Brown are the power behind what's going on, oh no, they are just the enablers doing their master's dirty work.

The political electoral system of supposed choice is a sham, and is now seen in all its nakedness.

As those here can see, the system is broke and about to implode, goodness knows what will arise from the ashes.

We've never experienced anything like this before.

Anonymous said...

And the treason continues with the MoD being forced to purchase from the EU.

Christopher Booker
Last Updated: 7:07PM GMT 28 Feb 2009

Comments 0 | Comment on this article

There was much excitement last week when a trade union warned that, unless the Government stepped in, a British vehicle manufacturer would have to close its doors, putting 6,000 people out of work. When the big car firms all denied that this referred to them, it emerged that the firm in question was a Birmingham-based van maker LDV, hardly a household name, but still employing 850 workers, with 5,200 dealers and suppliers dependent on it staying in business.

What is truly shocking, however, is the story behind LDV's plight, which arises from one of the greatest scandals in the murky saga of Britain's defence procurement. In 1998, to compensate for Britain's failure to join the euro, Tony Blair agree with President Chirac at St Malo that we would play a central role in building a "European defence identity", independent of the US. This led in 1999 to the Helsinki accords, committing Britain to integrating her defence effort with the EU.

The result was a dramatic shift in the Ministry of Defence's procurement policy. Wherever possible, Britain would in future buy from European rather than American suppliers. Over the next few years contracts worth billions of pounds accordingly went to EU-based firms.

One of the MoD's biggest projects was re-equipping the Army with 8,000 new trucks, the largest such contract in the Army's history. Two of the three bidders were US-led consortia: that led by the US truck-maker Stewart & Stevenson also included three British firms, one of which was LDV. On paper the bid looked ideal. The vehicles were battle-proven, met all the MoD's specifications, and the trucks would be built by LDV in Birmingham, creating thousands of new jobs.

To observers' astonishment, however, in 2004 the contract, then worth £1.6 billion, went instead to a German-owned firm, Man-Nutzfarzheuge (which in 2000 had swallowed up Britain's last major truck manufacturer, ERF). The Man trucks failed to meet the MoD specifications in two crucial respects – as was confirmed by the National Audit Office in 2006 – one being that they were unsuited to hot climate conditions like those in Iraq and Afghanistan. Furthermore, the fact that they were to be assembled in Vienna meant that British taxpayers would be creating thousands of Austrian rather than British jobs. The loss of this contract was a body blow to LDV, which was eventually bought up by the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska.

The Man vehicles, however, were found to be so unsuitable that the MoD had to pay for extensive modifications, costing hundreds of millions of pounds. The exact additional cost has never been revealed, because the MoD says it is subject to "commercial confidentiality".

Then, one after another, the projects awarded by the MoD to EU rather than US firms came unstuck. An Italian firm supplied 400 Panther command vehicles, for £166 million, which proved so useless that they have never been deployed. Had we bought US cruise missiles instead of 900 EU Storm Shadows at £1 million each, we could have saved £830 million. We committed £5 billion to buy five Type-45 destroyers, solely because these were equipped with EU-made missiles, when by buying US-designed Arleigh-Burke destroyers we could have got much more capable ships at a saving of £2 billion.

So it went on, with frigates, unmanned aerial vehicles, radar and sonar systems. In several cases the EU alternatives, such as the A400M transport aircraft, proved so flawed or late in delivery that we had to lease cheaper and more efficient US equipment to fill the gap. My colleague Dr Richard North, on his Defence of the Realm blog, estimated in 2006 that these blunders had cost British taxpayers at least £8.8 billion.

The MoD may belatedly have now reversed its "Europe-first" policy, but we are still paying the bill, as was evidenced when LDV executives recently attempted a management-buyout to save their firm from closure. Ironically, Stewart & Stevenson, the consortium leader in that 2004 bid. was bought in 2007 by BAe Systems, so that, as a British company, it might have qualified to win the truck contract after all.

When LDV last week pleaded for Government aid, the trade minister Ian Pearson loftily responded "the British taxpayer cannot be expected to pay for the company's losses". What he didn't admit, of course, is that if it hadn't been for his own Government those losses would never have arisen. And for the British taxpayer to pay up to £2 billion to keep Austrian workers employed is, it seems, perfectly acceptable.

Anonymous said...

Your right the BNP is the only party challenging the EUSSR, that is because we are the only party not bought and paid for by it. We have many treasonous enemies destroying this country fom within. Your right about the BBC this has also been corrupted by the EUSSR in the shape of CP. Time really is of the essence we need to get our country back quickly, even the Queen has betrayed us. This is the real reason the establishment hate the BNP because we are the ONLY threat to the Federal EU, and if it can it will crush the British people under its Jackboot, we need to withdraw before its to late and the only credible party to do that is the BNP. politicalMIZZ

Anonymous said...

What if I walked into my local police station and reported them for the crime of treason? Is that valid? Treason is still a crime (although Bliar removed the death penalty for it). Should crime not be reported and investigated by the police?
I really want to do this - has anyone got any advice?