Blue State Digital and Searchlight breaking the law

Right, before we start, a bit of background information on who is who in this article.

Blue State Digital(BSD) is the American company brought in by the convicted communist criminal Gerry "Unstable" Gable who owns Searchlight, that is funded by the British Taxpayer and children's charities to help subvert the democratic process in Our Country. I urge you to read through these articles that are listed here.

BSD, falsely claims it was responsible for the election of the mixed race moselm, Obama in the American elections. It keeps very quiet, the fact that is was responsible for running the election campaign of the former Mayor of London and Chairman of the UAF, Ken Livingstone.

They were also paid huge sums of money by the Communications Workers Union (CWU) to run one of their campaigns but despite all my efforts I have been unable to find one single piece of work they might have produced. CWU members who object to the CWU policy of refusing to deliver perfectly legal British National Party election literature may be interested in reading this article.

There, you should be upto speed now on just who BSD are. Imported Carpetbaggers.

Now for the hero of the piece. Enter stage right, one BNP super activist of Italian origins, Mr Guiseppe de Santis who I have had reason to write about in the past in the second part of this article here.

The article revealed that Mr De Santis, had obtained the information that Tower Hamlets Primary Care Trust had paid out £87,879 on interpreters fees for the year 07/08. Frightening information, considering there are 152 PCTs in England alone.

Well our super activist has been at it again and sent the following letter to the Information Commissioner's Office that is responsible for protecting personal information.

Dear Sir/Madam,

I'm writing to you because there is something I want to bring to your attention. Recently it was reported that a company, has been hired to campaign against the British National Party: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jan/26/bnp-obama-griffin-european

THe reason I wrote to you is because of the strategy this company plans to use:
As part of the first stage of their campaign, BSD and Searchlight have sent out emails to thousands of supporters asking each one to pass on the email to five friends and make a small donation.

The software means campaigners can then track who opens the emails, where they are sent and what happens when they arrive at the other end. They can then tailor future emails to groups and individuals.

I wish to bring your attention to that software that can tracks who open those emails and can tell them if who receive them reply to other people. Now I would like to know is this technology legal?

It seems to me that they can hack on other people' computers in a way that is more similar to a giant big brother. As far as I know only the Police and the secret Services can do this, and actually there are concerns about the way this system is abused.

My request is not just of a political nature:if we allow a company to use this system for a political campaign how we can prevent other companies who want to use it to track consumers habit to do the same and prevent abuse? I hope you can look at it.

Regards.
Guiseppe de Santis

Well a good question. Is what Blue Steal Digital doing illegal? Let us see what the reply from the ICO has to say on the matter.

Case Reference Number ENQ0231619

Dear Mr Santis
Thank you for your enquiry of 26/01/09 in which you have brought our attention to the political campaign being carried out via email by Searchlight/BSD.

Please accept my apologies for the delay in replying to you, our office is currently dealing with large volumes of work. This has meant that we have been unable to deal with incoming correspondence as promptly as we would like.

As I understand it, Searchlight/BSD have sent out emails to thousands of their supporters as part of a political campaign against the BNP. These emails ask the supporters to forward the correspondence on to five other people. As the software used by Searchlight/BSD enables them to track the recipients of the forwarded emails they are then able to obtain details about those individuals.

The 1st Principle of the Data Protection Act states that personal information must be fairly and lawfully processed. In practice, fair and lawful processing means an organisation may not process an individual’s personal information in a manner which is not in the reasonable expectation of the individual.

In this case it appears that Searchlight/BSD have effectively been collecting the details of the recipients of the forwarded emails without their knowledge and consent. These individuals will not be aware that their information has been collected nor will they know the purposes for which it will be used. On the face of it this appears to be a breach of the 1st Principle. However Schedule 1, Part II of the Act also says that it is the duty of the processor of the information to provide fair processing details‘… so far as practicable…’

Where a data controller has obtained a very large number of email addresses in the course of their marketing activities then it may be that it is simply not practicable for them to be able to go back and contact each and every one of those individuals to provide them with fair processing information about how their data is going to be used.

In this case we would probably take the view that Searchlight/BSD could not be reasonably expected to contact the thousands of individuals involved to provide fair processing information as this would involve a disproportionate amount of effort. In addition, as the purposes for which Searchlight/BSD have collected the data do not appear to be, on the face of it, unlawful, (the purpose being to promote their political views) then it is unlikely that we would consider there to have been a breach of the 1st Principle in this case.

Although the purposes of Searchlight/BSD’s processing may be in line with the DPA, the method they have used to collect the data does raise issues with regards to the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003 (PECR).

Regulation 22 of the PECR states that you cannot ‘transmit or instigate the transmission of’ marketing by email unless the recipient has previously ‘notified the sender they consent’. The specific wording of Regulation 22 makes viral marketing difficult to achieve in compliance with the Regulations.

There is a soft-opt in where organisations can send marketing without the explicit consent of the recipient. For the soft opt-in to apply the organisation will have to have obtained the contact details of the recipient in the course of a sale, the marketing must be of similar products and the recipient must be given a simple means of opting-out when their details are collected and in every subsequent correspondence. Again, it is difficult to see how the soft opt-in could apply when considering viral marketing.

As stated in our guidance* on this issue; there are two types of viral marketing. In the scenario where a marketer asks an individual to forward their emails to other people there is a strong chance there will be a breach of Regulation 22. This is because the organisation would have to trust that the person passing on the emails had obtained the consent of the other individuals. Often, this will not be the case and by sending these people marketing emails without their consent a breach of the Regulations is likely to occur.

Depending on the content of the email, but assuming that it is marketing an organisations products in some way, the organisation will still be seen as the ‘instigator’ even if they do not send the email directly. An instigator under the Regulations is defined as the organisation whose goods or services are being promoted). Therefore, even though an organisation may not be directly marketing someone they are still responsible under the Regulations. This is similar to situations where organisation employ third party marketing companies to conduct marketing campaigns on their behalf – both the marketing company and the original organisation are responsible for ensuring compliance with the Regulations.

It would have been best practice for Searchlight/BSD to ensure that when they asked individuals to send emails on to their friends they employed some form of checking procedure to ensure consent had been obtained. It may be that they could have asked the supporters to confirm their friends consent before they sent the email on to them. However, clearly it could be difficult for them to get any guarantees that consent had actually been obtained.

In summary, it appears likely that Searchlight/BSD may have breached the PECR regulations through viral marketing by instigating the sending of emails to individual subscribers who have not consented to receiving their marketing.

I hope that this information has answered your enquiry and if I can be of any further assistance please let me know.

Yours sincerely
Phillip Davison
Case Officer

Now it would seem to me, from reading the Guidance for marketers on the Privacy and Electronic communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (You do read it don't you?), that were someone to fill in one of Searchlights illegal requests for five friends emails and then for Searclight to subsequently to contact them, then those people would be well within their legal rights for contacing the ICO and making an official complaint by following this link.

Searchlight, UAF, CWU, BNP

Trade Unions passing on members details to Searchlight

"So let's see now. I think you said £5 per ten members?"

God but I am slow on the uptake sometimes. Why did I not twig that anything Gerry Gable did, would have to have something to do with shoving money in his pocket.

I have been reading about the Searchlight owned Dopes Don't Rate organisation and their involvement with the American company Blue State Digital in an article taken from the communist newspaper Morning Star.

You remember BSD, they claimed they won the election for the mixed race Obama, being careful of course not to mention that what really won the election for the mixed race moslem, was the fact that 95% of blacks voted for a mans colour and not his policies.

Neither of course, do they mention that they helped lose the election for Red Ken Livingstone in the elections for the Mayor of what used to be London. How quick they forget. But what do they care, so long as they earn a quick buck.

So just how did BSD come over the pond to work for Searchlight? Well let Nick Knowles of Searchlight tell you himself.

“The alliance with Blue State came about in two ways,” says Lowles.

“The person who set up the European arm of the company is a friend of mine and we both worked on John Cruddas’s campaign.

Nice one son. Nothing beats the old boy network. Envelope in the post?

Also interesting, was the fact that he revealed, of just what the trade unions are doing with the information held on their members, which is now of course held by the government also. Giving it to Searchlight.

“Trade unionists have huge email lists, but now we have a huge number of people actively joining us."

The creature, then goes on to crow about how Searchlight manage to control the Church of England who he said until then "at least publicly, distanced itself from politics".

Nice to see two diametrically opposed organisations working together. Even if one of them would wipe the other of the face of the earth. Communists and the Church united in common purpose. Strange bedfellows indeed.

Given that so far, all we have seen from BSD, is mentions of them in the press praising themselves up and that the Euro Elections are now just a few weeks away, I found the last bit of their article laughable.

A spokesman for Blue State says:.

“BSD will be working closely with Searchlight - developing messaging, email and fundraising campaigns to help supporters organise and mobilise - and then fight back against the BNP message of racism, intolerance and hate.”

Leaving it all a little bit late Elmer. If that is the best the hired rabbit gun-slinger can do, then best he get back on his horse, eat his lettuce and bugger off back over the pond.

The heavily funded BSD, weighted down by British tax payers money is a slow beast with the reaction time of a sloth.

The British National Party web activists with their sophisticated network of contacts are wiping the floor with them and it is only the "old boy network" that keeps the money rolling in for BSD and Gerry Gable.

The Guardian, Searchlight and the BNP

Eventually, five days after the event, the jobs directory for taxpayer funded non-jobs for the labour activists, otherwise known as the Guardian finally caught up with the rest of the world and reports on the employment of Blue State Digital(BSD) to take on the British National Party in the coming Euro Elections.

Of course, they do not report that BSD is an American Company and neither do they say that it is the state funded Gerry Gable family business, Searchlight that is paying for them with money received from the charity The Philip Green Memorial Trust whose charitable purpose is listed as follows;

The objectives of the Charity are raising money to help young people, the elderly, the disabled, and the needy in the community at large1.

and the: Generation Of Donations For The Purpose Of Charitable Causes In Respect Of Sick And Disabled Children2.

Hmm. Hard to see how giving money to Searchlight helps sick and disabled children but there you go.

The Gruniard also makes much of the fact that it was BSD that mobilised millions of people behind the mixed race Moslem Will Smith Obama. Well possibly but they might have also mentioned, that it was BSD that was also responsible for the campaign to get Red Ken Livingstone re-elected as Mayour of Londonistan and where is Ken now? Probably dishing out Subway sandwiches somewhere. Yet another reason why you should Boycott Subway.

Neither do they reveal that the Hope not Hate drive is also a subsidary of the Gerry Gable corporation Searchlight. Incidentally Nick Lowles who is running the campaign is a paid employee of Searchlight.

What is it with these NUJ types on the Guardian? Are they not even curious about the truth? No. Not really. Their job is to supress the truth and produce Newspeak for their masters.

However, whist it is activists delivering leaflets, selling papers and knocking on doors that will win us the Euro Seats we need, we should not overlook the importance of a "viral" campaign and the BNP are running one of their own.

So could I please ask all readers of the blog to publish the link to BNP to Launch Exclusisve Newsletter where ever you can. So Facebook and Youtube activists, we are looking for you to really promote it. Good Luck.

It would be good of you also if you could also push the link to this article here which points to the truth about Searchlight and their more violent friends in the UAF. In fact add the following links to all your emails.


How Searchlight is fianced.

Searchlight and Political Violence

Searchlight Exposed

The truth about Unite Against Fascism

Strange though isn't it how a communist organisation is fronting an American attack on the BNP with money raised from donations to charities on behalf of the Labour Party.

However BSD have come a long way for nothing. The Labour Party is finished in this Country. Come the general election, Labour MP's will be harder to find then an honourable man in the House of Lords.

Tags: British National Party, Searchlight, UAF

Spy Blog - Watching Searchlight and BSD

Searchlight and their hired American gunslinger (BSD), have come to the attention of Spy Blog whose mission statement is:

This United Kingdom based blog attempts to draw public attention to, and comments on, some of the current trends in ever cheaper and more widespread surveillance technology being deployed to satisfy the rapacious demand by state and corporate bureaucracies and criminals for your private details, and the technological ignorance of our politicians and civil servants who frame our legal systems.

They seem to believe, quite rightly in my opinion, that the state sponsored software that BSD are going to use in their attempts at manipulating the elections of a foreign country are of dubious legality and that those who sign up for Searchlight emails are going to get left a little bit more than what they expected on their machines.

To understand the communists game, it would be best to pop over to the Spy Blog site and read the details for yourself.

Hi GA: A quick edit by john of gwent if i may. That link above returned a 404 Page Not Found for me. Try this one instead and search from the front page !


Spy Blog did attempt to get a public response from Hope Not Hate (a part of the Gable Family Searchlight business) but unsurprisingly received no response.

Since the Blue State Digital server infrastructure is based in the USA, with lax Data Protection and large scale snooping on foreigners (and on US citizens) by US Government agencies, who else gets to read the Communications Traffic Data of any particular group of political activists or campaign supporters who have been targeted this way ?

Spy Blog have asked anyone who receives one of Searchlights/BSD tracking emails to forward it to them for analysis. Rest assured, we will.

When the ball really gets rolling we will be posting instructions on how to help us cost Searchlight a small fortune for abuse of the Whitelist(more later) system.

Those patriotic people who are signing up for the British National Party Euro Elections email Newsletter, can rest assured that the BNP will only be sending you political news that will be trojan and virus free. But then again, the BNP is fighting against Big Brother government and we will always say:- 2+2=4. We will never love Big Brother or submit to him and we will bring him down.

By the way. Just had the latest BNP Euro Elections Newsletter. Good stuff.

Long live the BNP

Tags: Searchlight, BNP, British National Party, Big Brother

Searchlight, Blue State Digital and the BNP

Nothing to see here. Move on please

The game is afoot. Let's roll.

Gerry Gable, owner of the state funded Searchlight business empire, obviously worried by the sounds of the baying hounds of the British National Party, has gone to ground and left his wife Sonia to fight his battles, in an article just published over on Squirmshite, as I prefer to call them.

But first, what do we know about Sonia Gable;

Mrs. Gable is a former member of the National Party, National Front and League of Saint George (indeed at one stage she had a close relationship with 'Strasserite' Steve Brady of all three of these organisations, and other "nazi" activists - surely taking "infiltration" a bit far?).

As well as being the secretary of SET she is also sales/circulation manager of Searchlight magazine. So, she was either a White racialist - in which case is hardly suited to be involved in an "anti racist" Charity such as SET - or a political infiltrator. Being (part) Jewish, one would think she had to be an infiltrator.

Not so. Members of the League of St. George knew Miss Hochfelder was a Jewess (she wrote letters in the Feb and June 1978 editions of League Review defending Israel and Jews and condemning anti-Semitism and a Mr. C. Horner of Peterborough wrote a letter in the August 1978 edition attacking her for this).

This lends credence to the view expressed by many that Sonia Hochfelder was a "Court Jew" in 'Nationalist' circles. The National Front also had Jewish members and Jewish membership of the BNP caused concern in C18 circles circa. 1993 and reportedly in his recent court case, BNP 'No. 2' Nick Griffin admitted that the BNP has Jewish members - so this is not a new phenomenon.

Should such a known "racist" (or a political operative - an infiltrator is hardly a part-time functionary holding tea parties) be the secretary of a registered Charity which flirts with the political process; especially when one looks at the political and criminal 'background' of her husband (and others) connected with Searchlight magazine and SET?

Now I could let you have some other information about Sonia but what people do when they are single and in private is their own business but there are those who would say that group sex is hardly private.

Rejected by the old guard nationalists, pasty faced Sonia fled to the arms of Gerry and determined to get revenge on those who spurned her, has devoted her life to attacking her former "Gods". Like they say, "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned".

Clearly deranged and slightly retarded as a result of her brain being deprived of oxygen at birth(her mother probably took one look at her and tried to throttle her new born child) understandably then, makes many mistakes and is easily caught out in lies.

Let us rip her to bits shall we.

In the article that is aimed at the Searchlights small number of readers, she seeks to reassure them and refute (impossible) claims that their pathetic Dopes Don't Rate campaign is not run by the charity Searchlight Educational Trust but by Searchlights other false flag, Searchlight Information Services. All part of the same stable.

The HOPE not hate campaign is not run by Searchlight Educational Trust but by Searchlight Information Services, which is not a charity.......

Searchlight Educational Trust is a separate organisation that carries out educational work against racism and in support of community cohesion.

Now Sonia should remember that we patriots have an archive bigger than the expense claims of the Lib/Lab/con politicians combined. The following is from the Trade Unions Friends of Seachlight pamphlet that I have stowed away.

What is Searchlight Educational Trust?
Searchlight Educational Trust (SET) is the educational wing of Searchlight, the international anti-fascist organisation that was founded in the early 1960s. SET was founded in 1992 with the aim of educating the wider community about the dangers of racism and fascism.

Now then Sonia, make your mind up. How can SET be a "separate" organisation when you have already stated that it is a "wing of Searchlight".

Damn I wish I had some warm beer. This is thirsty work, coffee is coming out of my ears and this article is going to be much larger than I first envisaged.

She then goes on to praise the success(I burst out laughing at this bit) of their on-line campaign being run by the American Cowboys, Blue State Digital who "succesfully" ran Red Ken Livingstones campaign to get him re-elected.

Now take a peak at the image heading this article, it is a screen dump of Searchlight Contents for the April issue of their hard copy rag. Another blazing success for Blue Steal Digital.

So what are Blue State Digital doing for Searchlight if they are not keeping their online presence up to date.

Well I can tell you now. They are collecting information for the state and they are helping line the pockets of Gable and Co (Family business).

Now you know I do not like linking to the red sites but many of them are speaking out about Searchlights involvement with the security services and will have nothing to do with them. This information is taken from one of those sites.

What is the main benefit that BSD appear to have brought to Searchlight? It's certainly not effectiveness in the struggle against the BNP, because the Nazis are simply copying everything they do and letting BSD's superior Stateside persuasion technology loose through their own - unfortunately many times larger - Internet presence. Giving a masterclass in online fund-raising and network building to a fascist web machine that is more popular than those of Labour, Tories and the Liberal Democrats combined has to be the stupidest way to try to 'stop the Nazis' ever.

But, of course, that's not what Gable is really interested in. He doesn't want to stop them - because a thriving fascist movement is his fat meal ticket. Worse than that, BSD's main contribution to Hope Not Hate is the technology to harvest the email addresses of anti-fascists!!! (take a look at the Hope Not Hate website www.hopenothate.org.uk, all the appeals are directed toward obtaining viewers emails addresses).

Gable and Lowles have been quite blatant about this, boasting that they have software in place that tracks their begging-letter emails as they are sent from one well-meaning anti-fascist to another. So the State gets the full picture and details of the entire anti-fascist movement and all its inter-connected socialist and radical links, while Gable and Co. in return line their pockets at the expense of the Cause!!!

Well I thought I would put this to the test and off I went to the Searchlights false flag site; Dopes Don't Rate and see if the above was true and that the Searchlight sites are just geared to gathering information for the state.

Did you check the postcode. Go on, I bet you did

The first thing I came across was the petition shown above.

And what a strange petition it is. After you have filled in your details (Do not do this at home. The Green Arrow has been specially trained to do this kind of work) with your name, email address and postcode, you are thanked and then taken to another form where you are asked to submit another 10 email addresses of friends and family.

And yet at the end they do not show the names of those who have signed and neither do they say how many people(dupes) have been conned into giving their details to the government. Like I said a rather strange petition. But the above leads nicely to the next piece of this long article.

Referring to an email that Searchlight supporters have received she says;

We would also assure readers, in case anybody doubted it, that we keep the email addressees and other personal details of our supporters absolutely secure.

And that made the cold coffee I was drinking go all over the screen and sticky my keyboard. She has already revealed that Searchlights email list is in the public domain. She knows it and so do those who broused it before it was removed from Wilkileaks who are supporters of Searchlight and the UAF. Of course nationalists have their email list. They have a lot more also that they will use when the time is right.

Thankfully for the dupes of Searchlight who have already filled in one of their forms, a BNP government will not persecute a person because of their names being on a list.

And yes, the unknown communist from the anti-freedom site was correct. There are requests on almost every page requesting people to provide their personal details. I will write more about these in a separate article some time in the next few days but we have to move on.

Finally the bit of the oxygen deprived cretins that really made me realise how far down the road of self dilusion she has travelled.

Our campaign is, even at this early stage, so successful that political scientists from the London School of Economics and Trinity College Dublin recently predicted that the BNP is unlikely to win a seat in the European Parliament in June.

What a stupid, stupid woman. Did no one check her article? Where were Blue Steal Digital? I will use that clip to beat her over the head with untill she is safely locked up in an asylum that caters for the special needs of ex-nationalist groupies.

OK let's put this baby to bed and move on.

Searchlight dictating now to the BBC

Gerry and Sonia Gable already dictate government policy
Now they want to dictate BBC policy

It seems that Searchlight, the private company of Gerry "Unstable" Gable is really throwing a strop, that having stamped their feet, no one is listening to them.

They are now attacking the BBC for failing to attack the "extremist views of the BNP" until after the European Election.

So what are these extremist views that the convicted communist criminal Gable objects to.

• British Jobs for British Workers
• Ending the illegal wars
• Ending illegal immigration
• Equal rights for whites

I could go on but you get the point. Best thing is you read the article yourselves. If it is possible to smell fear over the internet, you will smell it in the ramblings of Searchlight and the toad Jon Crudass, MP.

But for any passing journalists with just an ounce of honour and professionalism, then why not investigate Searchlight?

• Why not ask them where they get their funding from?
• Ask them about their part in the attacks on on members of the British National Party.
• Why did a children's charity give them over £70,000?
• What did they spend that money on?
• Why do all the Establishment parties have Searchlight as their spokes company.
• Who is paying for Blue State Digital and what is the relationship between them.
• Is there any truth about Sonia Gables involvement with the National Front.
• What is Mark Croucher of UKIPs relationship with them
• Why are all the regional leaders of Searchlight communists.
• Ask them about their relationship with the moslem Respect Party
• Ask them their involvement with the political terrorists of the UAF and ANTIFA
  

And there is more they could ask if they were real journalists. The truth is out there. They can find most of the answers on this site or are they waiting for the documentary that I am working on to come out first.

Searchlight is a busted Flush and now the people know about them. Why not bugger off back to America with your pathetic hired gunslingers of BSD who made a pigs year of Ken Livingstones campaign and wasted oodles of CWU workers subscriptions doing nothing.

We know everything Gable. Everything.

By the way I look forward to posting more details about some of your newer supporters soon. Just editing the file now.

UPDATE - Jon Cruddas

My memory. What can I do with it. I just remembered this article from May 2007 when I asked why Crudass needed to claim £21,000 in second home allowance in 2006 when he only lived 15 miles from Westminster. Green Arrow, as usual ahead of the pack.

More here, here and here on the creature Cruddas. Or just do a search on his name in the top left search box for more revelations about this communist turd who employed by the Daily Mirror.

Searchlight, BNP, UAF

Ealing Council and Searchlight dirty tricks

Please click, enlarge and read the above image.

It is taken from Ealing Councils list of political parties that are displayed so that ratepayers and residents of Ealing can contact the party they are interested.

However, if you look at the entry for the British National Party you find the following

Now if this is someone's idea of a joke, then it is not funny, because if you ring the number, then Sonia Gable will answer the phone and if you were to write to that address it would be delivered to the home of Gerry Gable, the owner of Searchlight and the person responsible for coordinating the violent attacks on members and supporters of the British National Party.

Now currently the BNP are receiving many donations by post and requests for new membership and your average person would not be aware of just who Searchlight are.

This is a deliberate attack on democracy with possible fraudulent intent. One wonders if this was the idea of the imported American company BSD?

You can complain to Ealing Council in a number of ways. All of them listed here.

.

Searchlight - Hope to Make a Bundle from Dopes Don't Rate

Click to enlarge

The convicted criminal and communist Gerry Gable is rubbing his hands with anticipation at the money his family owned business Searchlight is going to make over the next few weeks via his false flag Dopes Don't Rate outfit.

Using sites like the Muslim Council of Britain and the mainly moslem Respect Party funded UAF sites to advertise his third party leaflets that attack the BNP and to sell his lies and distortion leaflets to trade unions, brain washed students and dupes of The Establishment.

Of course the fact that the money to print these leaflets probably came from the government in the first place, will not be mentioned. Neither will these leaflets be in support of candidates standing for elections.

Because, Searchlight has no policies. Because Searchlight needs no policies. It is not its purpose. The only reason it exists is to make money from the dupes who swallow their lies whilst propping up the crumbling Establishment.

So let us have a closer look at these leaflets. So what is on the first side. Well all a bit boring really and hardly worth mentioning.

There is the usual sort of stuff;

The BNP is a racist Nazi party. It is not interested in fairness, but motivated only by hatred towards those it does not like. It thrives on conflict, mistrust and exploiting people's genuine concerns. It is always looking for someone to blame, rather than getting on with the difficult job of sorting out complex problems.

It is also a foul party. It is packed full of criminals, thugs and Nazis. It does not believe that a black person can ever be British and would outlaw marriages between people of difference(their typo) ethnic backgrounds.

All a bit rich really and easily revealed to be rubbish. But I suppose, that they do at least admit that the people of Britain do have concerns. Concerns like, illegal wars, stolen pensions, jobs lost, homes lost, freedom lost, etc, etc, etc.

But unlike Searchlight, the British National Party are putting forward candidates and are at least taking part in these elections in a democratic fashion and do have the answers needed to resolve the British Peoples concerns.

If Searchlight has answers why not tell us what they are. Why do they not tell the people? Why do they not put forward candidates? But you already know the answers to those questions. So we move on.

As for thugs and Nazis. Is it not Searchlight who hunts down British National Party members and points their locations to the thugs of the UAF (of which David Cameron is still a signatory) to attack, regardless of their age or sex, as seen time after time after time. The British People know who the thugs are and they are not the British National Party.

No, the real Nazis are the Establishment and the likes of the UAF and Searchlight. Thugs who, unable to win the hearts and minds of the people use the same methods of the moslems to silence their critics. Intimidation and violence to crush democracy and choke the Voice of Freedom.

As for their pathetic claim that the BNP would outlaw mixed marriages, they are fully aware that many BNP members and supporters are in mixed race relations and whilst some, are understandably not wild about the idea, because of the decline of white people in the world, they would not outlaw it. You cannot make love a crime and neither would the BNP want to.

Click to enlarge

So what do we have on the other side of this piece of tat that is not even suitable to wipe your butt with.

Well we have something or someone called Eddie Lizard or something like that, shooting his mouth off. Well taking a look at him below, you can see why there is no need to say any more about this thing.

Eddie Lizard. Skin Crawler

Then we have the strutting Bantam Chicken of the ring and the road, Amir Khan.

The conviction related to an incident that occurred on 2 March 2006 in the centre of Bolton, when Khan's car hit and broke the leg of a pedestrian who was running on a pelican crossing trying to avoid cars. Immediately prior to the accident Khan had swerved around a line of stopped cars and went through a traffic light that had just turned red. He was cleared of dangerous driving and the pedestrian received an interim payment of £40,000.

Khan was also summoned to appear in court in Rochdale on 26 October 2007, accused of travelling in excess of 140 mph on the M62 motorway on 31 December 2006. He failed to appear and the case was adjourned to 2 November 2007, with the District Judge warning that he would issue an arrest warrant if the accused did not appear by then. He was also charged with not producing his driving licence and insurance certificate. On 7 January 2008 Khan was fined £1000 and banned for 42 days for the speeding offence.

Another convicted criminal, who only escaped jail because of who he is. So what has Khan got to say. Oh that is it. He thinks that holding up an English Flag makes him "British". No, having a British passport (if legal) makes you a "British Citizen". You are a Pakistani living in England Khan. You are no more British than Joanna Lumley who was born in Kashmir is an Indian.

Getting fed up with this article now. It is just too easy to ridicule their pathetic leaflet. Did Blue Steal Digital have anything to do with it?

You know BSD, the American Company whose European director is close friends with Gerry and Co and who have been brought in at vast expense to Searchlight and ultimately the British Taxpayer.

So "Celebrity" wise (laugh my socks off), we then have the moron Andy Whyment who plays himself(a moron) on Coronation Street. He is in a mixed marriage and is worried about the future of any children he might have in the future. Taking one look at him, I cannot see that happening. He does not look as if he has it in him.

Finally, we have a nice bit from the Daily Mirror, whose former proprietor stole his workforces pension money, just as this government that it supports, has stolen the pensions of the entire country.

Remember it was the Daily Mirror who thinks that our critically injured servicemen fighting in illegal wars should go to the back of the queue when needing medical treatment.

All together then a very nice piece of work that should win even more votes for the British National Party on June the 4th.

.