Stonewall and the British National Party
In your face advertising from StonewallRecently, Stonewall, the homosexual pressure group has been running a campaign to promote a positive message about homosexuals in our communities. This campaign was linked to a change in the law that they were supporting to to make an amendment to the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill that would make it an offence to link homosexuality to paedophilia.
I will reiterate my personal stance on homosexuality later in this article. But first the amendment to the law and the debate in the House of Lords.
Liberal Democrat peer Lord Thomas of Gresford told the House:
"We are concerned about the suggestion very frequently made by the British National Party and others that homosexuality and paedophilia are directly connected and that a person who is homosexual has a propensity to be a paedophile.Now I am not sure whether or not the BNP has ever stated that, but what hacked me off about the Stonewall campaign was the full in the face statement of their adverts. Pictured top.
Neither am I pleased that apart from the 600 billboards carrying their message, they distributed posters, stickers and postcards to 5,000 schools. Young children should be left alone to develop at a natural pace. So in response to Stonewall, I asked Norman D Landings of Abex to design the following poster. Thank you NDL.
Back in your face advertising from The Home of The Green ArrowGet used to it. Now back to the Amendment to the Law. It was ruled unnecessary and quite rightly dropped on the grounds that the current provisions of the hate(thought) crimes laws are sufficient.
Earl Ferrers described the amendment as, 'rather alarming'. He said, 'I find it frightening because you will end up with people being too frightened to say anything. To accept the amendment would be a retrograde step.'I urge you to read the above link that points to research carried out by Pierre J. Trembley.
Now as for my personal stance, it is this. I do not care what people do in the privacy of their own homes. I do not care what their sexuality is and have no problems with working with or socialising with homosexuals. I have no problem with them being members of the British National Party. The BNP policy is Don't ask and Don't tell. A sensible policy.
I do however have a problem with homosexuals serving in the armed forces (an article for the future) and have a major problem with groups like Stonewall promoting it in schools as if it is something to be proud of. I do have a problem with the "age of consent" being 16. I have a problem with young boys being buggered by predatory homosexuals but that is the law at the moment and should be changed via the democratic process.
But how stupid are people who clap a "celebrity" for being gay and rolling on the floor laughing at terms like "fisting" and "rimming"? Do they even know what they mean?
Something to be proud of is being a part of a Family that is made up of a Mother, Father and Children. Perhaps we should have Parades and fly flags from City Halls in Support of Families, which at the end of the day are the future.
Some time ago I wrote an article with many sources of reference on homosexuality. You can go read it here. It is not for those with weak stomaches. The article is not an attack on tangerines, it just a pointer to information that is in the public domain, although I am sure there are those who would prefer it not to be.
8 comments:
I dont have any problem with homosexuals either GA. What they do in their own homes with consenting adults is fine by me. I know a few gays and they are the type that I call ok.
They are the way they are, they dont scream the house down to get attention, they keep themselves to themselves, they can be quite fun too, every one gets on fine.
I do wonder though if homosexuality is natures way of saying that the gay male or female has nothing to contibute to the human gene pool therefore they are attracted to type. Just an thought.
Many gay people through the centuries have contributed to society in many ways, via art, music, science, etc and Im sure we would be the poorer, as humans, if it weren't for their contribution.
On the other hand there are some gays Ive met who were the most disgusting people I ever set eyes on and it sends a shiver down my back thinking about them as I write.
You are right GA, dont ask, dont tell is the best way, and dont allow promotion or indoctrination in our schools.
Nature knows best, "man" does not. And it's hight time "man" realised this.
Let's be adult about homosexuality, most folks are straight, so yes, get over it.
Cheers,
Harry.
Why do they need to connect the BNP with anti homosexuality?..could it be because they were behind the fight for the firemens rights to remain impartial to attending their marches?. It had nothing to do with the BNP being homophobic (oops another pc dirty Labour word flogged to death similar to that other chestnut racism), more the BNP were campaigning for a persons individual right to make up their own mind instead of being coerced into promoting a certain lifestyle. In fact common sense would indicate that in the near future, when islam does finally take over, that the BNP will be the only party to be protecting homosexuals from the stone throwing. If I were a homosexual, I certainly wouldnt be voting Labour, or any of the other parties, as they have capitulated to islamic demands time and again, and who is to say that the next demand wont be connected to the way they view the decadent west's immorality?. I would imagine there are more than a few homosexuals who vote BNP, those that have an eye on the future.
Two CONSENTING ADULTS in privacy should do as they wish, no problem, this should not be criminalised.
BUT it should never be passed off as the norm as sexual activity first and foremost is the act of procreation and perpetuity of the human race, vital to the continuity of a nation and impossible between to male/female participents.
The disproportionate abuse of boys by male paedophiles is a matter of statistics but I suspect it is mainly to do with opportunity - society puts men in sole charge of boys but never allows them to be in sole charge of girls.
Perhaps, considering the male nature, it would be sensible to always ensure there is a female presence.
I have great respect for the Green Arrow and I really admire the significant contribution he makes to our common cause. However, as a regular contributor to this blog and forum, I wish to make it quite clear that I do not share The Green Arrow's views in relation to homosexuality
I have posted a comment to the Forum expressing my views (and stating my position) on this thread here is a link
http://tinyurl.com/353w3y
Homosexuality and NARTH.
National Association for the Reasearch and therapy of Homosexuality.
Get over it!
Well Sarah, in a civilised democracy that is what we do, politely agree to disagree, which is why we fight to keep the way of life that we have. Of course when Mr Mo comes a 'knocking, I doubt if he will be so inderstanding.
Ed:
That was a very good thoughtful post. I personally have never met a single homophobic BNP member.
We tend to be live and let live but there should be certain standards when it comes to young people who as you rightly point out are unsure of their sexuality at an earlier age.
Post a Comment