Showing posts sorted by relevance for query David Cameron. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query David Cameron. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, 9 July 2009

Conservative Party condemns UAF

Many of us sit and wonder about how someone like David Cameron, who aspires to being Prime Minister of our dying country can support the actions of the vicious political terrorists of the UAF.

Why has this oily creature remained silent, when the evidence against these criminals is so widely available? There is:
  • Film footage
  • Photographs
  • Threats on web sites and forums
How many smoking guns does the man need to see?

This is not about the British National Party, this is about Freedom of Speech. It is about democracy. It is about being British. Any thinking person should be able to clearly see, that any organisation that does not stand in elections, does not elect its officers and officials, yet constantly threatens violence against a legal political party is a threat to all political parties, not just the BNP.

Well some who wondered about the above, actually took the time to write letters asking why and are to be applauded.

I received almost 100 copies of emails sent to David Cameron and other MP's asking why David Cameron was allowing his name to be used by this criminal organisation. I shall just post a couple of them, because the replies are all much the same.

From: xxxxxxxx@hotmail.co.uk
To: camerond@parliament.uk
Subject:
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 13:57:13 +0000

Mr Cameron, as a Conservative voting family it really does concern me that you are a signatory of "UAF" they are an extremist Communist organisation, please consider withdrawing from this Communist outfit or i will continue to advise my friends of your alliance to this terrorist organisation.cheers



Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:55:18 +0100
From: CAMEROND@parliament.uk
To: xxxxxxxx@hotmail.co.uk

Dear xxxxxx,


Thank you for your letter, which raises important issues about the rise of extremism in British society, as well as a specific question of why the UAF list David Cameron as a supporter.

The reference made by the UAF to David Cameron derives from correspondence between them from many years ago. Nevertheless, along with all Conservative MPs, David Cameron is extremely concerned by the recent election of BNP Members to the European Parliament. The values and views of the BNP are completely unacceptable and wrong. They are extremists who want to divide this country over the issues of race and skin colour. They have no answers to the problems in Britain today, and their policies will only make things much worse.

At the same time, David Cameron has also asked me to emphasise that he does not in any way support, and should not be taken in any way to support, any action which is unlawful or which attempts to curtail proper freedom of speech in the UK. I hope you feel reassured by that.

Thank you, again, for getting in touch about these issues.

Yours Sincerely,

Lara Moreno Perez
Office of the Leader of the Opposition
House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA


Oh dear, I fear that the tone has been set for the rest of the replies. No response to the enquirers request for Cameron to withdraw his support for the UAF, just a straight launch into an attack on the BNP.

Well, perhaps we can expect an answer in the next email. Let us see what the Rt Honourable Oliver Letwin has to say.

Dear Madam

I understand that David Cameron leader of the Conservative Party is a signed up supporter of a small group of people who call themselves 'uaf' ('unite against fascism').

I understand also that this group who say that they function as a 'Public protest body’ are nothing of the sort, but are a small group of extremist left-wing fanatics, lunatic crankson the fringes of society who carry out such acts as attacking property and innocent law abiding people with claw hammers. Most lately it was the ‘uaf’ that held a demonstration that attacked a peaceful BNP press conference outside Parliament, pelting the media and party officials with eggs, placards and bottles. Several of the UAF thugs also punched and kicked members of the BNP, including deputy leader Simon Darby who was repeatedly kicked in the back.

All this happened in front of Parliament where there was supposed to be no demonstrations where within a mile and furthermore there was no police presence or intervention.

I would consider that such a group as this ‘uaf’ would be ignored by any normal political party. Surely no one in their right mind, we would have presumed, would want to associate themselves with this sort of violent, far leftist thuggery and extremism.

It thus in deep disappointment and horror that the David Cameron Leader of the Conservative party gives his wholehearted support to such a group.

What is the Conservative party coming to?

I look forward to your response on this matter

Yours faithfully

From Rt Hon Oliver Letwin MP

Dear Mr xxxxxx,

I have now looked into the question of why the UAF list David Cameron as a supporter.

It transpires that this derives from correspondence between them many years ago.

Mr Cameron has asked me to emphasise that he does not in any way support, and should not be taken in any way to support, any action which is unlawful or which attempts to curtail proper freedom of speech in the UK.

Best wishes.

Yours sincerely,

Oliver Letwin

No answers there. Oh well. Next please. Let's just have the replies now.

From: CANNON, Peter (Office of Dominic Grieve QC MP) <CANNONPJ@parliament.uk>
Subject: RE: Contact from Dominic Grieve's website
To: xxxxxxx@yahoo.co.uk
Date: Wednesday, 1 July, 2009, 4:33 PM

Dear Mr xxxxxxx,

Thank you for your message of 27th June to Dominic Grieve QC MP regarding the actions of the Unite Against Fascism organisation. Your concerns have been duly noted and passed on to Mr Grieve.

The scenes on Parliament Green were disturbing. We must remember that tens of thousands of people elected these two men from the British National Party. People should be able to win arguments through democratic means and lawful protest. It is wrong that democratically elected representatives were physically attacked.

In response to the rise of the BNP, David Cameron has stated.

“What the mainstream parties have to do is prove their worth – get on the doorstep, explain to people how we are going to take up their concerns, how we are going to respond to their issues.”

On the question of David Cameron being a signed-up supporter of Unite Against Fascism, I would recommend that you write to him directly, as this is a matter of parliamentarians expressing their support individually rather than on behalf of entire parties. Mr Cameron can be contacted at the address below:

The Rt Hon David Cameron MP
House of Commons
London SW1A 0AA

Thank you once again for taking the time to write to Mr Grieve.
Yours Sincerely,

Peter John Cannon
Office of Dominic Grieve QC MP
Shadow Justice Secretary & Shadow Attorney-General


This is getting boring. One, maybe two more but thats it. We have to move on.

Dear Mr xxxxxxxxxx

Thank you for your email.

I have no idea whether or not David Cameron is a member of UAF, although I can tell you that it is not an organisation I have any desire to join.

Perhaps you might wish to contact David Cameron directly or contact your own MP to ask him on your behalf.

Best wishes

Philip Davies MP


Oh well done Philip. Perhaps you should have a word with your Leader, you appear to have more sense than him. Ever considered a leadership bid?

Last one. Lots to do.


Dear Mr xxxxxx,


Thank you for your email. I was not aware of UAF and have enquired about David Cameron's involvement from his office. The answer to your point is simple: David Cameron, like most people in this country (but not the BNP) is absolutely opposed to fascism, and has in the past supported the aims of the UAF. However, the Conservative Party as a whole deplores the recent violence incited by the UAF, and David Cameron in no way associates himself with that. I hope, therefore, that your concerns on that front are put to rest.

However, I should point out that the BNP, which is largely behind this effort to discredit David Cameron, is a brutish, anti-democratic, racist and fascist organization. I understand why people may vote for them - not least because normal politics is so discredited at the moment, and politicans have failed to deliver. I want to show that that need not be the case, in Ipswich at least - as I hope you have seen over the campaign to keep heart services in Ipswich, which I have led. But the BNP has no answers, other than to spray bile and spread falsehoods. That is why wherever they are elected, they soon lose their seats in the following election. I hope, therefore, that you will be able to vote for me at least, as I have already delivered, and could do so much more as your member of parliament.

Yours sincerely,

Ben Gummer


I think the Ben Gummer above, is the Conservative Parliamentary Spokesman for Ipswich. What worries me about Ben, is that he wants to be in politics but does not have a clue about some of the filth out there in the political world.

Anybody notice, that in none of the replies received, did anyone say that David Cameron would now disassociate himself from the communist thugs of the UAF.

EDIT: By JohnOfGwent

GA You know I wouldn't jump into one of your posts without a damn good reason. However this tactic of your elected representatives replying asking you "why not ask David yourself" is a fraud. David Cameron is prevented by parliamentary procedure from responding to any correspondence not from a constituent.WritetoThem.Com makes this CRYSTAL CLEAR. Please see my comment below and write back pointing out your MP's error and asking them to forward your letter raising your concerns to mr Cameron as this is the only way under parliamentary procedure that he will be able to respond.


EDIT By Green Arrow

You are welcome JOG. I was aware of the parliamentary procedures and I am sorry for not mentioning them. Thank you kinsman.

Now a couple of comments have come in, that I think I should include in the main body of the article and not leave hidden away in the comments.

"You can tell a man by the company he keeps"

By the way he(Cameron) fawns over militant homosexuals on gay parades. By running in and out of mosques telling muslims how debased native Britons are and that we should integrate with the muslim way of life rather than the other way around.

By setting up all gay, feminazi, asian and black short-lists excluding native, patriotic Britons. By crawling up the arses of marxist union leaders. By being a member of Ken Livingston claw hammer gang along with the likes of Vaz, Abbot, Cohen and all the other anti-white, anti-British,
Stalin-worshipping, thieving, two-faced treasonous scum.

And more besides. Of which, later.

So how does Cameron, or rather his blathering mouthpieces respond to the challenge to his membership of the clawhammer gang?

They immediately launch into a vicious, spittle-flecked tirade against the BNP, spewing out the very words and slogans of the searchlight/clawhammer gang.

They then claim Cameron's involvement was "in the past". Add it together and there it is, clear as day.
Verbatim attack and transparent denial.

Guilty as charged!
That was from Wolfblood. The next one was from Firecrest

Mainstream parties are incapable of answering anything directly, they are also scared to move out of the comfort zone of cosy politics, hence one of many reasons i turned to the BNP was that they have the backbone to answer a question directly as they are realistic in their ideologies.

The replies appear to have denounced the victims namely the BNP rather than the perpetrators, that sadly is also a sign of the times (man found guilty of beating burglar in his home..etc...).

To quote the first reply "They are extremists who want to divide this country over the issues of race and skin colour."

Nope he got that wrong those who brought division are those who undemocraticly FORCED this multiracial disaster onto this nations people then continued this with law & legislation to give the immigrant population & other minority groups 'PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT'. The extremists are those who changed this homogeneous nation into a multiracial slum, that includes traitors in the UAF.


Then Scouse said:

So Cameron said that the values of the BNP are completely unacceptable and wrong but then , at a 7/7 memorial ,went and shook hands with convicted Garry Holness who raped two 16 year old girls. Well at least we know what standards Cameron aspires to.

Nothing surprising there then.It would be nice if you will mention that a few times GA in future when you write about Cameron and UAF.



, , ,

Friday, 3 October 2008

Where is your evidence Cameron?

David Cameron and fellow thugs and at the end. Cry babies.

David Cameron has said that the British National Party is an "appalling bunch of racist thugs" who are a "threat to our country".

But those worn out phrases no longer work Cameron. Times have changed, people now have access to the truth and can see the truth when they look into the faces of the BNP activists knocking on their doors and delivering them the truth in local Patriot leaflets.

And just as the BNP now have the ability to bring our fellow True Brits the truth, they also now have the ability to teach them history and remind them of just what sort of people govern us now. Thugs, drug takers, criminals and thieves.

Check out the image at the top, of the infamous Bullingdon Club that incidentally the groveling establishment controlled news media have been told to stop showing. See you in Court.

The drug taking Cameron is number 2 and the Turk, Boris Johnson at number 8. Both big fans of Islam, Boris has stated many times how proud he is of his links to the Cult of The Dead Paedophile and Cameron is famous for this shameful statement;
Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.
Now when it comes to real thuggery and drug taking, let us check out the past of these two over privileged clowns.
Cameron was member of the club at a time when it was de rigeur to engage in the ‘man of the people’ pursuits of washing down “a cocktail of drugs with an honest, working class box of chips and a five pound bottle of wine”.
And how does Cameron remember his days when he was a member of that bunch of thugs shown. When 550 windows of Christ Church's Tom quad were smashed in one night. When Boris Johnson was crawling around on all fours in the hedges of the botanical gardens trying to evade the police. And when like all thugs and bullies turned into a sniveling pathetic and sad namby-pamby when caught and cried like a baby.

No, "the blissful sponge of amnesia has wiped clean the slate of memory" from their minds. But not from the minds and memory of the British National Party.

How dare Cameron smear the good honest hard working activists of the BNP with a personal past that would put a Liverpool Drug Dealer to shame.
The Bullingdon modus operandi is to book a restaurant under a false name, smash it up, and throw large amounts of money at the upset owners — a form of behaviour which dates back to Victorian times.
And that is what Cameron does now. He operates under the false name of Conservatism, when at the end of the day, he is a destroyer. First of public houses and now of a country. One day we really should hang him or at least imprison him for treason.


Wednesday, 3 June 2009

Cameron will not give us the Referendum we want

David Cameron

It is about time the blue rinse brigade and retired colonels still voting and supporting the CONservative Party realised that there is no way that David Cameron, if he survives the investigation into his own legalised theft of public money, will give the True British People the Referendum they want. In or Out of Europe. Yes or No.
Mr Cameron said he could not foresee circumstances in which he would want to call a referendum on Britain remaining in the EU, adding: "If I thought that being a member of the EU was against the national interest, I would argue for us to come out, but I don't."
This former bully boy Bullingdon Club member, whose idea of fun then and now was to vandalise peoples property and who sucked £420,300 from the taxpayers in just one year thinks that he can fob the public of with a smoke and mirrors Lisbon Treaty Referendum. And we have seen what happens when countries reject that. Another Referendum, until they vote the "right way" or ways are found to reword the law to suit our unelected masters in Brussels. Bugger off Blair Cameron. The people are on to you and one day you will be just another Pig to face punishment.


Vote BNP June 4th

,

Thursday, 30 October 2008

David Cameron gets it right between the eyes

No. It is not a bullet hole. It is a Hindu Tilikmasala

I must confess when scanning the news and coming across the above image, that I thought someone had done the Country a favour and put one right between the eyes of the "anointed by the elite", David Cameron.

Of course, I am against political assassination and political violence in all forms, as is the British National Party. We leave that to our enemies that make up the New World Order. Besides they like to use blunt pen knifes or Boston Brakes when removing their enemies and those who blow the whistle on them.

So you can relax. Diddy David is quite safe and hopefully will still be around when the British National Party forms a government and will be in a position to do a more in-depth digging into his past, before bringing him to trial as a conspirator and traitor against the British People. No, we want nothing to happen to our David. We want a proper trial first.

David was just out and about trying to suck up votes from the Hindu Colonisers of Our Country. One must suppose he had got fed up with sucking up to the supporters of the Cult of the Dead Paedophile.
'Many British Asians see a society that hardly inspires them to integrate. Indeed, they see aspects of modern Britain which are a threat to the values they hold dear. Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.'
Dhimmi David was visting what used to be the largest Hindu Temple in the World (outside of India), in Neasden, London. The Shambo mourners have now build a bigger temple in the West Midlands. Lucky West Midlands.

Taking of his shoes before entering the temple of the Corned Beef haters he shamefuly allowed himself to be decorated with a "Tilak" - that is the name for the little red dot on his forehead that at first glance looks like a bullet hole and is supposed to represent the third eye of the Jiva!!!

You and I know of course that it will be seen as a symbol of servitude to the Hindus whose votes he is after.

I was hoping that David had called in to demand that the Hindus in Our Country speak out against the continuing massacre of Christians in India and where over 50,000 other Christians are either hiding in the jungle or living in refugee camps, their Churches burnt to the ground and their Nuns raped by Hindus.

But no. He was just calling in to collect votes. Way to go David - you spineless turd.


Tuesday, 19 May 2009

David Cameron launches European Election campaign. Sort of.


What a strange way for the Conservative Party to launch its European Election campaign. They waste their Party Political Broadcast by not talking about Europe and what their policies are on it (just one. Submit.) and at their launch event, call for the public to sign a petition calling for a General Election.

That is, after pulling a tacky little stunt by dragging their candidates up to a table and forcing them to sign an "ethical pledge" that they will not steal public money and promise to publish their expenses on line. Tacky.

I am also given to understand that Cameron, a major signatory to the violent and communist UAF, paid homage to his new Master and local New World Order representative Rupert Murdoch in return for the scum Sun to come out in support of his desire to become their replacement spokesman. Now we know why he was flown out to spend a little bit of prime time with Rupert and Mandy.

In August 2008 David Cameron accepted free flights to hold private talks and attend private parties with Murdoch on his yacht, the Rosehearty. Cameron has declared in the Commons register of interests he accepted a private plane provided by Murdoch's son-in-law, public relations guru Matthew Freud; Cameron has not revealed his talks with Mr Murdoch. The gift of travel in Freud's Gulfstream IV private jet was valued at around £30,000. Others guests attending the "social events" included the then EU trade commissioner Lord Mandelson, the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska and co-chairman of NBC Universal Ben Silverman. The Conservatives are not disclosing what was discussed.
No need to tell us. We know what was discussed. The betrayal of the British People.

Now we have seen how Cameron prostituted himself to the colonisers of Our Country when he made this statement here:
Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.
Well we could, but not all of us want to learn how to throw their grannies on rubbish tips, new born female girls down wells, tie bombs around our waists or hack other peoples heads off. But if it floats your boat and gets their votes David, you go for it dirt bag.

Now what else could Diddy David do to get the turnip vote? Well I suppose he could throw a big glitzy party to buy the voting block of 400 Moslem Leaders at the Eastern Pearl Restaurant in Longsight. How did the Dhimmi Brit traitors enjoy their 100% Halal meals I wonder? I also wonder who paid for the feast for our "friends" from overseas?

I also wonder what the Moslem diners made of the speech made by Camerons representative, the goat like, Caroline Spelman MP who sucked up £255,708 of taxpayer money last year for doing nothing but betray us?

Did her following statement do enough to win their support?
"I hope everyone feels we have changed. We now have 15 elected Muslim councillors, one shadow cabinet minister and the fact that we have two peers in the House of Lords speaks volumes in our effort to include people from all walks of life and different faiths.

"I would describe all this as social progress by the Conservative Party but we need to do more."

She added: "We need more Muslim candidates to stand in Westminster and at local level.

"We would encourage more Muslims to join and the Conservative Muslim Forum North West is very necessary in the party to bring Muslims together so we can achieve this goal."
I also wonder, if her statement above, was enough to make some of you conservatives realise that you have been betrayed by your leaders, who are counting on your loyalty to blindly follow them into political oblivion in just a few years from now?

Whilst here, I was going to write about the plans for a new "Super Mosque" where 60 homes have been compulsory purchased to make room for a giant fortress which can hold 2,500 colonisers breaking wind into each others faces but figured I would go have a beer instead. Wonder who lived in those 60 homes and how they feel about being enriched?


.

Thursday, 28 February 2008

Why does David Cameron continue to support the UAF?


Listen to some of the lies spread by the UAF

i just cannot understand why David Cameron, the Boy Wonder of the Blue Rinse Brigade continues to support the undemocratic and Marxist organisation that we know as, Urinate Against Freedom(UAF). By all accounts, his signature on the document of support is the one beneath that of Lee Jasper. Click here for a list of those who have added their names to this shameful list.

The Chairman of the UAF and Mayor of London is Ken Livingstone who faces possible investigation into his friendship and links to Lee Jasper, the professional black who also sits on the Steering Committee of the UAF. Jaspers jaw dropped earlier this week when he found out that the Old Bill had been asked to reopen its investigation into his dodgy dealings.

You may read The Livingstone Dossier here in pdf format. Go on - dig into the dirt.

The UAF, who never stands for elections, has only one purposed in life. And that is to destroy the British National Party on behalf of their pay masters. The Moslems and via the trade unions, the Labour Party.

Last month the British National Party informed the Electoral Commission of £80,000 of trade union donations to a group called Love Music Hate Racism (LMHR) which is organising against the BNP in the run up to the London Assembly and Mayoral elections in the capital on May 1st.

"The Unite trade union has donated £50,000 and the PCS civil service workers' union has given £30,000," a spokesman from the British National Party's Election Department told Freedom, the BNP paper. Do the members of those unions condone the way their donations are spend? One would expect Unions to be more concerned with the loss of British Jobs then paying to subvert the democratic process.

LMHR, which is allied to the violent UAF and a tool of the Communist and possibly state funded magazine, Searchlight makes no secret of the fact that the money is being specifically raised to organise against BNP candidates standing for election to the London Assembly.

It comes as no surprise that the Unite trade union is using its members' money for such an anti-democratic campaign. Its boss is hard line Communist Derek Simpson, who only joined the Labour Party when it came to power so he could wield more influence. Communists, like the Muslims are more than prepared to lie to achieve their goals.

So why does Cameron continue to toady up to this violent organisation that is an enemy of democracy? Well perhaps it has something to do with the fact that many marginal seats now depend on the votes of the colonisers, and so, Diddy David, betrays his true countrymen and country in the hopes of being the man to carry out the orders of Brussels in return for a pocketful of silver. His following words published in The Guardian here, should be enough to start the alarm bells ringing in anyones head.
'Many British Asians see a society that hardly inspires them to integrate. Indeed, they see aspects of modern Britain which are a threat to the values they hold dear. Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.'
So perhaps David does have something in common with the UAF and Islam. A desire for violence and the crushing of free thought and democracy. After all, these days, the Lib/Lab/con pact is nothing more than 3 arms of the Destroy The United Kingdom Party.

So when you look at the image below and wonder why the young thug pictured, No 2 in the image grew up to become a traitor, now you know.

Who is No 6?

If you are curious as to who number 8 is in the lineup then click here.

Tuesday, 24 February 2009

David Cameron and The United Front Against Whites

Some people will do anything to win a vote

By Mister Fox

On the Tommy Boyd's talk Radio show of 17 February Weyman Bennett described David Cameron as a supporter of the Marxist UAF!

Are the Conservatives still the patriotic party or a Con that pretends to support the nation but when in power carry on with the work of the Labour Party? Bennet accused the BNP of violence but at 2008 Red White Blue, 33 arrests were recorded - including left wing thugs throwing rocks at children and elderly people. Yet no members or supporters of the BNP were arrested. What is Cameron doing with people like that if he is a Tory?

The Daily Mail of 22 January reported his speaking to think tank Demos which is The Progressive Conservatism Project developing policies and ideas that are radical. Conservatives are now pursuing progressive goals which were once left-wing like social justice, social mobility and an end to poverty. How, they ask, can these be achieved through ‘conservative’ means? They are turning the Conservative party into a neo-Marxist outfit like Nulab!

Cameron said his party wants to abolish child poverty and increase social mobility. The four aims of 'progressive Conservatism' are - a fair society, a green environment, safety for citizens and equal opportunity... 'Yes, they are ends that we share with people in the Labour Party, the Liberal Democrat Party and right across the mainstream political spectrum. But no, we do not agree about how best to achieve those ends.(1)

What people fail to understand is that the Conservative Party is no longer conservative. They should be done under Advertising Standards laws or change their name. They are another aspect of PC ideology Party. You cannot "change" the fundamental tenets of Conservatism but you can become something else behind the name. In 1991 the party got rid of the remaining traditionalists when it purged the Monday Club to make it another vehicle of neo-Marxism, PC and to serve the Globalists agenda.

What do traditional Conservatives believe? American Conservative Robert Nisbet (1966): "The ethos of Conservatism is tradition…...defence of social tradition and emphasis on the values of community, kinship, hierarchy, authority, and religion; add also Conservatism’s premonition of social chaos surmounted by absolute power once individuals have become wrenched from the context of these values by the forces of liberalism and radicalism. The Conservatives began with the reality of the institutional order as they found it, the order bequeathed by history".

The sense of belonging to a people and a putting their interests first was shown by Indian PM, Mrs Gandhi’s, 'Indianisation' policies commenced about 1962 in which Europeans were asked to leave their posts on the basis of race; the the Africanisation policies of Robert Mugabe, are cruel and brutal and, even though they can not run their society, they see it as theirs and want to do it for themselves; the Africanisation policies of the ANC are racist but multi-racialists and anti-racists support racist policies if they are against “white people”! There was the expulsion of over 10 million Europeans between 1945 and 1948 on the basis of their race and nationality.

Indigenous Indians are given preference in India - in fact we wouldn't be allowed in and if we did wouldn't be eligible for anything. Every country puts the interests of its own first, but our establishment want to see the indigenous British dispossessed in their own country. Why don't the elites just admit they hate us and want to destroy us?

In September(2008) , in a speech to the Israeli parliament, Gordon Brown called on the nations of the world to ensure that our era becomes the century of the global community. He swore to a “make a reality of the vision of a global society in which we create global civic institutions that turn words of friendship into bonds of human solidarity".

David Cameron is also a servant of the global elites pushing for globalism. During his visit to Rwanda last summer, while there was severe flooding in his Whitney, Oxfordshire constituency, he showed which people he supported: ˜There is no domestic or foreign any more. In this world today, we are all in it together.

Most of his main ideological concerns are the same as the other elites and as Brown has shown a main part of the globalist vision is the creation of a new corporate and political network which would operate beyond nations.

The Utopians believed that harmony could be made on earth not heaven by world government. H. G. Wells, the science fiction writer and socialist philosopher, was an advocate of a “permanent world congress” and specialised international agencies which would end the nation state. Patriotism, he believed, was “mere flag-waving with no constructive duties”.

Now the dreamers are in power and doing it through deceit and manipulation.
Cameron visited Bolton on Monday 5th January 2009 and addressed a more than 1,000 leading members of the Asian community, at the Reebok Stadium. Cameron ignored the indigenous populatiion. He announced: “We have hitherto been able to rise to the challenge and sustain our coherence and unity. We have done so through a combination of a steadfast faith in our institutions and values, such as freedom under the rule of law, pluralism and tolerance….and because society – not only the majority community but the minority community too – were prepared to stand together as one. There is no reason to think we cannot do the same today.

But he knows that under the EU “Rule of Law” and the other values he cited like “our institutions” are being scrapped. Very hypocritical!

The one-sided view of racism which ignores the horrendous crimes our people are subjected to including the routine raping of our little girls by older Muslim gangs is typical of the caste: “ First, a concerted attack on racism and soft bigotry. You can't even start to talk about a truly integrated society while people are suffering racist insults and abuse, as many still are in our country on a daily basis. We must also be careful about the language we use.

No Muslim I've ever met is offended by Christmas, or supports its replacement with 'Winterval'. But many Muslims I've talked to about these issues are deeply offended by the use of the word 'Islamic' or 'Islamist' to describe the terrorist threat we face today”(2) like Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith’s call to describe Muslim terrorism as “anti-Islamic activity.”

British politics are run by Utopians, optimists and Romantic Idealists since WWII - look at the practical consequences. Utopians brought millions of immigrants to make our lives better and, still say it – Cameron is one of them. There is also cheap labour for commerce.

In his 2007 conference speech Cameron spoke without notes, to suggest they were deeply felt beliefs yet he was clearly reciting a script, which said nothing. He asked the audience, “What do I believe?” and answered, “I am by nature an optimist.” We assume his answer meant, “ Everything will turn out well in the end.”

Like other “Caste” elites he has no sense of duty or honour - his political career comes first. Small differences aside the Libs, Labs, and Cons, have the same ideology and Cameron in the speech signalled that he belongs: “I think our diverse and multi-racial society is a huge benefit for Britain.” Anything less and his career is over.

He joined in the Persecution of Prince Harry demonstrating that the non-Conservatives will not defend our people's norms nor the monarchy as traditionally, but are the same as the other mainstream parties, the intellectual and cultural elites, commerce and the media - attacking our traditions and ways to prepare us for utopia. Like all Utopians, Cameron is an optimist about the ultimate conclusion of British society in a multi-racial, one-world. Prime Ministers don’t question dominant state- ideology - they slot into it.

Like the others he says what he has to to get elected not what is needed to save the country. The common features of this ilk are Political correctness, ambition and cowardice which prevents them addressing the real problems affecting us. They try to convince us that if we also fantasise that things will turn out well, they will. But things only work out well when done well.

Optimists can’t solve problems that optimists have created. They thought the multiracial society would work because they thought it would. Even though their utopia is a nightmare, they will not face it but make us scapegoats when anything goes wrong by using the all-purpose pejorative “racism” which only whites can be.

The media puff him up as they did with Gordon Brown and the Archbishop of Canterbury. Politicians are always pictured in mid-flow, with a finger raised as authority figures when really they are weak and inadequate. The Daily Telegraph said the speech: “…explained in detail his vision of how to change Britain.” It did no such thing.

It was the same script we get from all establishment politicians - changing this and changing that, but they never make a real point like what they are going to change - what into what, why and how? Our inadequate leaders haven’t got it and hope something will turn up.

What they call change is more of the same in a different guise. They mean repackaging. They’ve set us on this course and they’re determined to see it through, and there will be no change until establishment liars, cowards, and parasites have been replaced by people for whom self interest is not the prime motivating factor.

Like Obama’s inaugural speech Cameron’s vision to the conference had no substance: “We need change for the long term, hope for our country and optimism for the next generation…”. Merely buzz-words - “…change …long term …hope …our country …optimism …next generation,” but no ‘detailed’ explanation of the vision that the Telegraph praised.

The only thing he stated with certainty was that he supports mass immigration: “I think this country has benefited immeasurably from immigration
”. If immigration isn’t the problem, what is? He enlightened us: “I want to tell you what's wrong with our country and I want to explain what I am going to do to put it right …if we really want to tackle crime, if we really want to make our society stronger then you have got to make families stronger and society more responsible …we must make our country safer and greener and give people more freedom and control of their lives…” …families …stronger …responsible …our country …safer …greener …freedom - more buzz-words without meaning.

The population does not see society through the same ideology and have to be browbeaten by moral lectures and corralled by totalitarian laws and a politicised police. Few indeed share his view that immigration has benefited Britain ‘immeasurably’ and most people were they not frightened of being persecuted by the state and “free” would say so.

What he really means is that he wants people to be free to say what the “caste” want them to say, and to have control over their lives so that the “caste” can manage them in the way they want to.

His knee jerk response to faux pas of Patrick Mercer and Nigel Hastilow show what this “freedom” means - persecution of dissidents.

A new kind of Tory? In his 68 minute long conference speech ostensibly about British society he didn’t refer to our Christian traditions or the threat that Islam poses to them. He is on the other side. He interpreted the worries over immigration as concern about the effect it has on services, education, health, housing, and ignored the more important effect it is having on British culture and the dispossession of ethnic Britons.
Then he enthused about what he thinks important – persuading ethnic groups to become Tories. He told the audience they must, “…get out amongst Britain's ethnic minority communities and find the brightest, the best and the most talented and get them in.”

One of “...the brightest, the best and the most talented” members of “…the ethnics ” is Baroness Warsi. He was so impressed by Warsi that he wanted her on board at any price. And when she failed to make it and lost to Labour’s Shahid Malik in the 2005 general election he had her made a Baroness to encourage other Asians. She became minister responsible for ‘cohesion’.

We’re in safe hands. He told the conference, “I am proud that I can stand here with the first Muslim woman of a Shadow Cabinet or Cabinet in Sayeeda Warsi who will be a great talent for our party and our country.” Baroness Warsi is a former immigration lawyer. She was involved with Operation Black Vote and the left wing pro-immigration Joseph Rowntree Trust. Last year she was co-author of a report that made the case for allowing refused asylum seekers to enter the economy.

She is his Lord Ahmed who Blair appointed to the House of Lords, swearing his oath of allegiance to Queen and Country on the Koran. Ahmed was both the first Muslim to be appointed to the Lords, and the first Lord to lead delegations on behalf of the British government to Saudi Arabia for the Haj, or Muslim pilgrimage.

In February 2005 he hosted a book launch for the infamous anti-Semite Jöran Jermas at the House of Lords, where Jermas launched into a fundamentalist Muslims tirade against Zionists. This fawning on immigrants presents us as weak and afraid of them which is what emboldened Ahmed to threaten to mobilise 10,000 Muslims to stop Geert Wilders entering The Palace of Westminster!(3) Jacqui smityh, Home secretary banned Wilders!

In May 2007 Cameron stayed with a Muslim family in Birmingham and wrote in the Observer of 13th may 2007: “Last week, I spent two days staying with Abdullah and Shahida Rehman and their family in Birmingham. The experience has strengthened my conviction about the right way to build a more cohesive Britain... by using the word 'Islamist' to describe the threat, we actually help do the terrorist ideologues' work for them, confirming to many impressionable young Muslim men that to be a 'good Muslim', you have to support their evil campaign.” Cameron’s argument that otherwise peaceful Muslims can be persuaded to embrace terrorism by the mere association of the words ‘Islamist’ and ‘threat’ is either absurd or the ultimate in unintentional truths.

He uses us whites as scapegoats: “Many British Asians see a society that hardly inspires them to integrate. Indeed, they see aspects of modern Britain which are a threat to the values they hold dear - values which we should all hold dear.” It’s our fault, again. I should have guessed.

He revealed the establishment agenda to deculture as well as dispossess us: “Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.

To help shift society in this direction Cameron set up the Conservative Muslim Forum, a sort of Tory equivalent of the National Black Police Association, which ‘advises’ the Conservative Party on how best to assimilate us to Muslims. The CMF wants the compulsory history curriculum in schools changed to give full recognition to the “…massive contribution (sic) that Islam has made to the development of Western civilisation".and the “caste” is introducing the same agenda into our schools and teaching our children to see 7/7 through the eyes of the bombers! This is teaching our children to submit to Islam and to cover the terrorists in glory. (4)

Recently, Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari head of the Muslim Council of Britain was calling for Britain to adopt Islamic customs and labelling us a Nazis for daring to question the infinite benefits of Islam. Good old Tory values! Conservative Cameron concludes that British society is collapsing because it’s not sufficiently Asian: “We have a responsibility to change to accommodate immigrants so they fit in”. He’s made this perfectly clear which is why the Conservative Muslim Forum and the Muslim Council of Britain are emboldened to demand that Britain change to take account of their ways and laud their achievements.

Cameron's false Conservatives like Labour are increasing the influence of Islam on this country.

Lets end by reminding ourselves what a traditional Tory is: On May 24 1929, Stanley Baldwin, three times Prime Minister, said :“Let us keep this thought ever in our mind: “that each one of us, so far as in him lies, will strive to keep these islands a fit nursery for Our Race”.


(1) http://www.divinity.cam.ac.uk/cip/documents/DavidCameronSpeech2.pdf

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/may/13/comment.communities

(2) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....o-Muslim s.html

(3)http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/3344161/britain-capitulates-to-terror.t
html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/....liberty-central

(4) http://www.independent.co.uk/news/educat....t-1627062.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/apr/07/race.world



Wednesday, 27 May 2009

Cameron starts to lose it

The spoilt brat spits his dummy out

When the going gets tough, the tough get going. But not Diddy David Cameron, when the going gets tough he cracks like an egg sat on by John Prescott.

Admitting that many people were angry at the main parties over their theft of our money he urged them to keep on voting for more of the same by not voting for the patriotic British National Party. Does he think we are as stupid at the morons who authorised his expenses?

David, who is getting to remind me more and more of that bigger turd, Tony Blair, does not know what it is like to hunt around for two for one special offers in the cheap supermarkets, his party wants to stop these offers because they think they encourage us to eat too much. And whilst some of us drink .25p Somerfield Specials, he quaffs Perrier-Jouet whilst watching workmen earn £700 of their our money for pruning his wisteria.

David showed his unfitness to govern when he lost the plot over a reasonable question from a member of the public at the Bath and West show in Shepton Mallet who said that the BNP "have a point when it comes to immigration".

Cameron, instead of giving a reasonable reply, snarled at the lost vote:
"Go and have a look at what the BNP have said. Do not be naive about what these people stand for.

"They dress up in a suit and knock on your door in a nice way but they are still Nazi thugs".

No David, you are the only one who dresses up in silly costume and make stupid replies because you have not got the courage to tell the truth.
"There is a proper national debate that we should have about immigration. I want us to limit the number of people coming to Britain, but do not believe that the way to beat the BNP is to half agree with them.
The time for having a debate is over David. It is too late to talk about immigration. The invasion barges emptied years ago. They are not on the beaches any more, they are in our towns and cities and we have already lost most of them to the colonisers. I doubt we will ever recover them because of scum like you but we WILL bring you to justice.

David Cameron is a major signatory to the violent Claw Hammer gang also known as the UAF. When are the press going to ask him about that and whether he condones their attacks on people and property of people exercising their democratic right to support a legal and patriotic political party.

, ,

Friday, 17 July 2009

The Day David Cameron Lost His Street Cred

The Perils Of Getting Too Big For Your Boots
And Forgetting Where Your Roots Are

By JohnOfGwent

I've been the political equivalent of a "credit card rate tart" in my life. When Peter Hain demanded Student Societies boycott Barclays, I naturally joined the Conservative Student Association to help bring the lawsuit against him for his fascist behaviour. When they failed to give Hain the kicking they promised I dumped them and joined Miss Whiplash's party. I even applied for the role of Shadow Chief Whip. (In those days I had a leaner, fitter, body mostly muscle and wannabe chippendale). These days I'd have to apply to be Minister of Lard. And I even believed Shirley Wiliams, Bill Rogers, David Owen and David Steel's pledge to break the mould of british politics, and was among the first to divvy up for a student membership.

Look I was young, and I believed the world was a place I could make better. And if one does not believe Parliamentary Democracy will do that, then all that is left is the Armalite and the Improvised Explosive Device.

But I was elated when David Cameron took it upon himself to set up his "WebCameron" website. This was a milestone. The regulars on"RevLeft" whinge endlessly that we, the British National Party, siezed the initiative in digital age communication to fellow believers, party activists and the electorate in general. Revleft of course have no interest in democracy or elections. They, like the UAF, seek only to crush the voice of the people. But "Webcameron" showed the leader of a MAJOR political party, and the man most likely God Help Us All to be our next Prime Minister, had got the message.

Admittedly most of his site was Adobe Flash Videos of Dave saying "...and that is why this afternoon I am going to make a speech .... blah blah blah". But uniquely at the time for the big parties Webcameron had a forum, and one in which anyone who could keep a civil tongue in their head were welcome regardless of their political stance.

I know because I was a member of that forum. More than once I went there to say something like "well I think David is mistaken in that view because ....." And you'd be surprised at the reaction. More than once I saw evidence that party officials and the man himself took up what was said. The finest example was a post where Cameron came in and admitted that in the light of comments he had received here and elsewhere he now thought X was a bad idea and was going to support Y instead.

Show me how someone can get that from the current shower in government without first giving Peter Mandelson a Blow Job.

And then one morning I awoke from the dream. Overnight "Webcameron" had been assimilated into the Tory Party Central Website, the forum was gone and now all that was left was Cameron's videos and the odd sycophantic comment of boot licking agreement.

That was the day "WebCameron Rejects" was born. For quite a while I hung round in there but eventually I lost interest because the party behind the original were no longer listening, and for me, the point of the forum and my whole reason for contributing my opinion and ideas was that it was a place where anyone's opinion, no matter how far fromparty policy, was givan a voice, and then often rightfully given short shrift, but all done in an impeccably polite manner.

As I said in one of my last posts before tailing off and taking up the cudgel as a Friend Of The Green Arrow, for me, the change in direction that Webcameron took when the Tory Party decided electoral success might be hindered by openly allowing opposing views to be aired, was a fatal one. As I said over there, if I was looking for a mutual dick length admiration society I would join the UAF mailing list.

The British National Party is nothing without its activists and its supporters. For as long as I have been a contributor to this blog I have heard our political enemies complain that they had nothing like our dedication, nothing like our organisation. In fact the only thing thay have going for them is money. Barrowloads of it and mostly thieved from our taxes.

I hear all manner of rumblings and rumours that the party I admittedly quite recently joined is having a "restructuring" in the wake of its electoral success.

I just hope and pray that there is still a place for those who webcameron rejected in Nick Griffin's brave New Future. For if there is not, then he's likely as not going to be joining the ranks of the "one hit wonders" like Martin Bell. But what worries me more than that is where those who put themselves out in their wallets and in their lives to get him where he is now will go once the party disowns them as Cameron disowned those who did not see eye to eye and recite from the party pager.

.

Sunday, 27 April 2008

I had a dream

David Cameron having been told his "expenses" had passed audit - for now.


I awoke a short while ago from a very vivid and in a mild way, pleasant dream.

For some reason I was sat in the Lounge of the local Club that was packed (a rare event these days) out because David Cameron, the Leader of the Incredible Shrinking Party was available for questions.

In my dream, Cameron looked sleek, oily and despite the so right clothes, there was something unclean and unhealthy about the man. He reminded me of another shiny maggot, Peter Hain. Something about both creatures, makes the flesh of men creep.

I listened to him for awhile and as I did, I felt a cold icy rage grow and I launched into an attack from my position seated opposite(who knows who arranges the seating in dreams). I attacked him on his statements about how we could learn a lot from our Islamic Colonisers and then I attacked him on his expenses to pay a mortgage for a second home.

And yet from the faces of the club members, I could see that I was making no headway and then I stated that it was disgusting that a man of such wealth, power and privileged background should resort to dipping his hands into the public petty cash tin to pay for his T.V. license fee. Ears pick up, heads swivel. The license fee is a sore point in the Welsh Valleys.

The creature is doomed and skulks from the Club, just as I awake from the dream. Is there an hidden message in the dream? I have no idea? I rarely dream. It was actually Gordon Brown and Tony Blair who claimed their TV Licenses on expenses.


Thursday, 30 October 2008

David Cameron: Toff at the Top (part1)



Excellent documentary showing the rise to power, elite connections and wavering opinions of Tory leader David Cameron.

Peter Hitchens of the Daily Mail documents the reality of Cameron's background and character and contrasts it with the image he has been careful to portray.

Essential viewing for anybody interested in the man who may one day become British Prime Minister.


Try not to vomit too much. Tomorrow, I will put up Part 2 which features Davids time in the Bullingdon Club.


Friday, 19 June 2009

Rupert Murdochs Summer Party

Murdoch - The Puppet Master

It is my own fault. I should have learned by now to have saved the images, took a screen shot and saved the web page to my hard drive. But no, I just added the link to the do list and had a can instead. Not even the Internet Archive of WayBackMachine could help me.

I am of course referring to the report on Rupert Murdoch's Summer Party, which now no longer exists, having been pulled by The Daily Mail. I did wonder at the time why The Establishment allowed it to be published in the first place.

Because, the images of the plump, oily creatures, summoned to the event, was enough to make even my battle hardened stomach turn over and my mind turn to thoughts of tumbrils and guillotines.

And the puppets of the New World Order were all there, Cameron, Brown, Mandelson and a host of others, who the sheep people of Our Country foolish think are the rulers of our enslaved land.

Cameron, was forced to cancel a previous engagement to attend his Masters summons, because when Murdoch whistles and pulls their strings the puppets start dancing.

This being the 2nd time that Cameron had to be shown who was boss by Murdoch, the first time being when Cameron had to delay a family holiday when summoned to meet Murdoch aboard his private yacht the Rosehearty lying of the Cote D'Azur in France back last year. And all expenses paid by Murdoch.

At the time the conservatives insisted that the bought creature Cameron had done nothing wrong by accepting free flights for himself and family but then again they also find nothing wrong with Cameron's theft of public money in the ongoing expenses scandal.

And what was Cameron told by Murdoch? Well Murdoch laid it out in no uncertain terms. The UK needs freer markets. Freer Markets so that Murdoch and the other Masters can tighten their grip on the throat of the World.

I can picture Murdoch dismissing Cameron by saying something along the lines of: "Help yourself to a drink now David and then toodle off, as I need to have a word with Mandelson about what to do with Brown".

And where does Mandelson fit in all this? Well he has been Murdochs puppet since at least 2002 when he defended the Puppet Masters plans to take over the worlds news medias.

And if you think Mandelson is pulling Browns strings, then remember this. It is Murdoch who is pulling Mandelsons strings and determing the government of the days policies.

And the only threat to Murdoch in Great Britain is the British National Party and so he seeks its destruction via the newspapers that he owns. No coincidence that some of the most serious lies and smears on the BNP came from The Sun, The Times, The News of the World, The Sunday Times and BSkYB, all owned by Murdoch.

Sir Richard Branson, had this to say about Murdoch.
"the Government is "scared stiff" of Mr Murdoch. "If The Sun and the Sunday Times and Sky and the News of the World all come out in favour of one particular party, the election is going to be won by that particular party," he said. "We have got rid of democracy in this country and we might as well let Murdoch decide who is going to be our Prime Minister.

"His empire should be looked at by competition authorities and it should be decided if it's good for democracy that one person has so much influence.
"
Of course, this article might just be sour grapes on my part because I did not get an invite but then again I am in the business of publishing the truth and so would have nothing in common with Murdoch or any of his perverted puppets.

Related story is that Murdoch is planning to start charging for access to his online newspapers.

, , , ,

Monday, 14 May 2007

Dhimmi David Cameron

Left:Diddy David checks to see that is official limousine is still following him with his sandwiches and wonders why they chose that strange flag to put on his new bike.

The only thing that David Cameron wishes to conserve is his personal wealth and the chance to lead Our Country under the control of his Moslem masters.

Speaking for none but himself he declared that British Moslems are Role Models for the True Brits when he offended us all by stating in the rag Guardian:-

'Many British Asians see a society that hardly inspires them to integrate. Indeed, they see aspects of modern Britain which are a threat to the values they hold dear. Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.'

He also wrote: 'The picture is seriously bleak: family breakdown, drugs, crime and incivility are part of the normal experience of modern Britain,'

Well that is easily fixed. Why doesn't he use his contacts amongst his new community and ask his Masters to instruct their people to stop selling the stuff? You can read all about the Islamic Drug cartels over on Lionheart.

In conclusion he writes:-'We must be careful about the language we use, many Muslims ... are deeply offended by the use of the word "Islamic" or "Islamist" to describe the terrorist threat we face today.'

Well he is right there. Let us call it the way it is. How about murdering Islamic Bastards who are so frightened of death that they blow themselves and others to bit?

If I was a conservative, I would want a conservative as a Leader. Not a Tone Bliar clone who prefers to read the Guardian and is a member of the Moslem sponsored UAF/SWP alliance that is seeking to destroy Our Country.



Come on True Blues - Wake up and join the B.N.P.



Monday, 20 April 2009

Top Labour Member - Labour Party has poor work ethic

What a letter box looks like.
Taken from the Labour Party Guide to Leafleting

Well can things get any better today for the British National Party? They can actually as you will find out later.

But first let us go to Rotherham, where a top Labour official, Anne Chester, the constituency agent for former government minister Dennis McShane is having a rant in the Sunday Herald about who else but the quickest growing peoples party in Our Country. The BNP - oops sorry. The British National Party.

Up in Rotherham, support from the voters for our party, as now reached almost 29%. Considering that back in 1999, our percentage was just a mere 1.5%, this shows how hard the activists of the BNP have worked and sacrificed and they are to be saluted for their efforts. Slice one off Green Arrow for the troops. (Naval salutes, different to the Armies look like a chopping motion. Hence the "slice".)
You can sense that Chester knows she is on the front line. Westminster and second homes sleaze, a "green" budget but little else, dodgy emails, all just pile on the misery when someone on the doorstep tells her: "I'm never voting Labour again." Chester adds: "And when they say they won't be voting Labour, and you know they won't vote Tory, they're going to vote for the BNP."
Good stuff Anne. Good stuff but tell us more. Tell us about how you have to pay people to deliver your leaflets. Oh and what is this business about "poor work ethic" all about. Go on tell us.
But she is honest, disconcertingly direct, and paints an unflattering picture of Labour's record in representing Rotherham at local level. "There's complacency. In some key wards we pay other people to distribute our election leaflets. We're just not out there, on the streets. Our work ethic is poor. Some of the councillors must fear there's a Jeremy Paxman behind every door, that they'll get asked difficult questions." She recalls one Labour councillor. "He used to stand in the high street and smile at people - that was it, the extent of his campaigning."
What a little darling you are Anne. Thank you, thank you, thank you. You have made the blogfather very happy.

You will also notice in the article, that the False Flags of Searchlight are also active in Rotherham. Always a good sign that an enemy ship is sinking, when those rats appear on deck. Can you swing Gerry? Sorry I meant, can you swim?

So can it get any better. I said it could and I will tell you. But not now. Not just yet.

Because first I have to tell you something that had me rolling on the floor. Where incidentally I seem to spend a lot of my time these days after story after story pops up showing the collapse and discomfort of not just Labour but all of the parties that form the One Party state, I call The Establishment.

Because over on the marxist Tribune site that proudly displays the following in its about area:
A thorn in the side of all governments, constructively to Labour, unforgiving to Conservatives.
they are writing about David Cameron (UAF signatory) and are really unforgiving when thff d................f asd. Sorry, just getting up of the floor again. Let's try that again. Take two.

they are writing about David Cameron (UAF signatory) and are really unforgiving (steady now) when they write;
Cameron cannot play the race card. He is a liberal cosmopolitan without a gram of racism in his make-up. To his credit, he has promoted ethnic minority candidates, MPs and peers. He needs votes from Hindi, Muslim and other faith communities in order to win a majority.
So now you know what tickles the mind of an independent BNP blogger. But we already knew the real reason why Cameron said the following about moslems, back in 2007.(We never forget):
Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.
Cameron you are nothing short of a political carpetbagger who would sell his own butt to anyone who will vote for you. You are as dirty and repulsive as the slimy slugs of Squirmshite.

When the Tribune starts praising a Tory Party leader, you just know that finally the Lib/Lab/con alliance have finally reached the end of their road. One Party with three wings all with only two polices. Retain their places at the trough of public money and defeat the British National Party that intends to drag them from them and to justice.

Right. I asked at the beginning, if things could get any better today for the BNP? I said they can and they will but sadly I am out of time and so you will have to call back later.

.

Friday, 4 April 2008

Hey Camerclown. Remember this? We do.

David Cameron's role models.

Remember David Cameron declaring that the True Brits had a lot to learn from the Moslem Community? Well we who watch and wait do. Lets have a look at some of the statements he made back in May of last year in a little more depth.
'The picture is seriously bleak: family breakdown, drugs, crime and incivility are part of the normal experience of modern Britain,'
And indeed it is. David is talking about the True Brits and to be honest there is an element of truth in some of what he says. But the family breakdowns, drugs and crime have all been part of the Common Purpose plan, which he is a part of, a plan to destroy the identity of the True British People. The British National Party will repair the damage, although it will take time.

But pointing to the Moslems as role models is a bit rich. It is the Moslems who tend to break up their families by murdering their female members in the name of honour in between running their drug rings and rioting on the streets over a few cartoons. Not the British.
'Many Muslims ... are deeply offended by the use of the word "Islamic" or "Islamist" to describe the terrorist threat we face today.'
So how does he suggest we describe the so called "British Muslims" currently on trial for plotting to blow up seven transatlantic airliners? Peace Ambassadors? What sort of madmen even think about taking their wives and children on suicide missions? Well the cult followers of the Dead Paedophile do and the last time I checked, they were....Moslems.

Are these our role models David? Are you really that desperate for the moslem vote that you can utter the following without choking on your words?
Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.'
And not for the first time David, the True British People have been thinking that you are in fact a complete 100% plonker and the sooner we have a British National Party government, the better and safer for us all.

Now trot along and see if you can dig up some receipts for all that money that you have tucked into your pockets from the ever suffering British Taxpayers. Your nothing but a liar and a crook and rest assured. You will be brought to justice.
Mr Cameron had by far the highest mortgage claims of all the MPs listed, only to be followed by another two senior Tories - shadow chancellor George Osborne who claimed £18,360 and shadow foreign secretary William Hague who claimed £18,626.

Monday, 25 February 2008

David Cameron and the Holocaust

The word 'Holocaust' does not belong to the Jews.

I was just about to write a really positive item about something good happening in Our Country and then I was forced to change my mind.

First I could find no good news and secondly I found yet another article in the press attacking David Cameron, for labeling the visits to Auschwitz by school children as a gimmick.

On the first point about the good news, it is extremely depressing to discover that apart from the continued growth of the British National Party, there is nothing to write about of a positive nature.

Our Country, from which so many great inventions and ideas sprung from, now leads the world in nothing but despair and self hatred of our skin colour and history. So moving on.

Of course the governments plans for the visits to the concentration camp are a gimmick. But a gimmick with a duel purpose. The children will return with a sense of guilt and a feeling of obligation to support any actions carried out by Israel and the Jews and more shameful. Distraction.

The holocaust was a terrible time in the history of the world. The deaths of 6 million people dieing in horrendous ways is right up there with the quoted figure of 20 million people who died because of Stalin and communism. However, historians have since calculated that the true numbers killed, should be nearer 62 million.

Should we send our children to the Gulags to learn about the evil of communism? A disease still with us.

But you cannot measure such atrocities against humanity in how many died. Did the families of a tank crew, killed whilst liberating Europe grieve any less than the families of those who died in a concentration camp? Everyone loses and grieves in a time of evil.

And what about the mountains of skulls created in Cambodia by Pol Pot, another crazed communist? What about the 2 million deaths there, when another madman took his country back to Year Zero. Should we send our children to see these mountains of skulls to remind them of the evil of communism?

And then there was the genocide of the Armenians, when the Turks murdered 1.2 million, or is that figure too low to warrant a trip to those mass burial grounds by our children?

No. David Cameron, a man I personally loath, should stand his ground. This is a labour gimmick. Millions of deaths used by Labour to start an argument that detracts the sheep people from the crimes and corruption of their government. A shameful gimmick. Nothing more.

UPDATE

There is a poem here that you may like over at Quod in mente.





Tags:

Friday, 31 October 2008

David Cameron: Toff at the Top (part 2)



In this part Peter Hitchens documents Cameron's early years including his membership of the notorious Bullingdon club and his closeness to New Labour circles and his friendship with Boris and other infamous Bullingdon bully boys.

Tomorrow we see how David decides that he has to do something to line his pockets.

Wednesday, 25 July 2007

A Clockwork Clown

After some claret. Droogs of the Bullingdon Club about to entertain a guest

Is it just me or are the images and voice of the Diddyman David Cameron starting to grate as much as those of Tone Bliar and his crooked cow?

Mind you, Cameron is good for a laugh and the fact that he is the leader of what was once a great political party is a gift from heaven for the British National Party. Proof that the BNP are indeed the chosen party (tongue in cheek).

He rides around town on a bike that he learned to ride just weeks before coming conservative leader, followed by a convoy of cars to protect him, carry his sandwiches and put the bike in the back if his little legs get tired. He is priceless.

And now that the pubs and clubs of Oxford are flooded out, this former member of the Bullingdon Club, the exclusive gang of Old Etonians who like to get ringed right up until they have the courage to gang up and trash 15th century pubs in Oxford has fled to Africa for a free drink.

Yep. Africa, where suicidal people without the bottle to to top themselves go and become farmers so some murderous creatures will do the job for them.

Read this reply he made to a tiny audience in Rwanda when asked why wasn't he back home with his wet Oxford constituents?

"There are some people in Britain who told me not to come. They said I should stay at home and worry about domestic concerns.

"Let me tell them and let me tell you - in the 21st century, a century of global trade, global migration and global terrorism, there is no domestic and foreign. We are all in it together."


But that one statement reveals it all. Cameron and his conservatives have moved so far to the left that Karl Marx would be proud of them. Suddenly the fool is not so funny.

He also called for a complete end to trade barriers and by that he means a complete end to British Jobs - other than his and the other members of the political establishment in thrall to Global Business. What an alliance. What a traitor.

You can read more about Diddyman Daves jungle exploits here.

The British National Party has been trying to warn Our Country for years that the effects of building on flood plains would be disastrous. Perhaps more people will listen to them now.