Saturday, 20 October 2007

Blood transfusions for Muslims

Moslem Blood Donors start young

A letter on Your Say at the British National Party web site set me off digging for information.

The letter writer wondered how Muslims in need of a blood donation managed when a person who donated the blood was a follower of a real religion and also liked a nice bacon sandwich?

Would the turnips refuse the blood and die or would they accept the transfusion and if so what were the ramifications for them. Would they too crave a bacon buttie? The mad moon bats seem to think so. Anyhow read on.

I have checked out Muhammad ibn Adam al-Kawthari of Leicester whose site advises on these matters to the mindless morons who have to be told how to do everything from beheading infidels to wiping their own bottoms.

Quoting another mad moon bat, he says;
Sayyiduna Imam Shafi’i (Allah have mercy on him) states: “If one infused blood under the skin and skin grew on it, it will become obligatory to extract that blood and repeat all the prayers that were performed after infusion”. (al-Umm, 1/54).

However they will bend the rules and accept the blood of infidels if no other source is available but add the following rider to the advice.

However, scholars recommend that one should abstain from the blood of unbelievers, transgressors and sinners, when reasonably possible, for there is a risk that the evil effects found in such people may affect the one in whom the blood is transfused.

There are some other little gems that the maniac mullah, who ends his article by saying "And Allah knows best", that you should read. Check out when it is right to drink urine and when it is not right to drink a womans breast milk. Anyone for bitty?

One other piece of information. Muslims make up a really minute percentage of blood donors in Our Country as they do not believe that they should donate either blood or organs. Although as usual, they will take both - all be it ungratefully.

1 comment:

najistani said...


The primary objective of all Muslims is to spread Islam throughout the globe by whatever means may be necessary, including lying and killing. Killing kuffars (unbelievers) who resist Islam is not a sin, in fact it is the only sure way of attaining paradise. Kuffars who do not resist must be either enslaved (dhimmis) or converted to Islam.

So, with the current Jihad in the West, how does this Islamic program of killing/enslavement/conversion apply to kuffar kids?

The first wave of attacks in the present Jihad mostly killed adults, though there were a few children incinerated on the 9/11 flights. It was only with the deliberate torturing and killing of kuffar children at Beslan that the civilised world realised that Muslims worship Allah in the same way that the abominators worshipped Moloch.
In addition, many of the Beslan children were humiliated by being raped and forced to drink their own urine before being killed. Humiliation of the kuffar is very important in Islam.

Muslim theologians have called for the sacrifice of 2 million American children to Allah, and recent events in Scotland seem to show that children in the U.K. are also prime targets for attack. Jihadists tortured, castrated and murdered a fifteen year old , and the failed Glasgow airport attack was timed for the first day of the school holidays with the obvious intention of burning as many families as possible.

It is rather disconcerting to realise that this attack appears to have been carried out by doctors, especially as the Muslim Doctors and Dentists Association are on record as stating that their duty of care does not extend to kuffars.
How many of these Doctors of Death have access to childrens wards?

In summary: a jihadist who believes that killing kuffars will get him to Allah's bordello in the sky doesn't care whether his victims are men, women or children. All kuffar human-sacrifices are equally pleasing to Allah.

The Islamic abduction, rape and sexual subjugation of young kuffar girls may be new to our generation with the comparatively recent cultural enrichment of our cities, but this typical Muslim practice goes back into history, and the West has suffered from it before.

Of course every culture produces child molesters, but in non-Muslim societies these are usually isolated loners. In contrast, Muslim pedophiles are well-organised and these predators often hunt their prey in rape-gangs in a tradition of Muslim razzia going back to the 'prophet'. The reason for this cultural difference is that pedophilia and rape are abhorrent in civilised societies, but are socially acceptable to Muslims because they are dutifully following Mohammed's example.

As well as being after our children's bodies, either as burned and mangled sacrifices to Allah or living sex-slaves, they are also determined to brainwash our children's minds with their vile cult.

A favorite trick is 'role playing' to indoctrinate young children to think of themselves as Muslims.

In addition, there is an insidious program to destroy our children's cultural heritage , with attempts to abolish festivals loved by generations of kuffar children and put Islamic events in their place.

British Muslims are demanding a ban within state schools on music, dance, drama, biology, swimming and lessons about any other religion but Islam. There are also to be compulsory history lessons about the 'massive contribution that Islam has made to the development of Western civilisation'. In fact, Islamic culture is so backward that Muslims are incapable of bringing anything new to the West. The West has long ago moved on from its medieval phase and few citizens of Western countries (apart from immigrant Muslims) would want to return to it. All the things that Muslims have brought to our civilisation are negative and barbaric. However, don't expect historical accuracy to stand in the way of implementing a politically correct curriculum.

So, unless present trends can be reversed, the only foreseeable future for our children will be death, dhimmitude or conversion.