Tuesday, 29 January 2008

The Booby Hatch: The Insane Takeover the Western Asylum

29th January 2008
Guy Leven-Torres

I have often thought that the ruling elites in the West are all suffering from some kind of collective insanity or psychosis, even a death-wish. There is no doubt that the current lot are by any normal standards absolutely, completely, and irretrievably nuts! A present and clear danger to us and themselves and in my book at least should be, quarantined in the nearest available asylum under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983. Mind you I am starting to like the idea that these people should be treated more like sick animals and put down by the vet instead, because far superior animals do not shit on their own kind like this lot do! No in Nature those that killed their own species would have been attacked and eliminated years ago....

We import millions of migrants every year from Africa and the Moslem world and we are continually informed it is for our 'cultural enrichment'. That cultural enrichment brought down the Twin Towers in New York and 3,000 deaths, 15,000 orphans and widows, 200 deaths and 1000-1300 wounded in Madrid, 52 deaths in London and 400 wounded, annual riots in Paris and every other French city, riots in Holland, Belgium, Denmark and Sweden, where the local natives have been informed they 'have no country any more.' Meanwhile in Malmo, a once beautiful city near Copenhagen, the local Swedes are regularly attacked by 'culturally enriching' gangs of Somali and other Moslem thugs, that according to one of their leaders 'I just love it when I get a Swede to kiss my feet and plead for his safety'. This was the grateful acknowledgment of a Moslem asylum seeker to the largesse given him and his pals by the Marxist Swedish state, eighty percent of whom live on Sweden's fast diminishing welfare budget. A former social-democrat Swedish Prime Minister, has even kindly (just a passing thought) informed the white population that their country will indeed be Islamic and he hopes that by being nice to Moslems now, 'they will be nice to us, when they run things.' And Belgium sociologist is delighted that Brussels will soon be an Islamic city.

Those that have strongly objected to all this have been hounded by police, vilified in the press, heavily fined, imprisoned and all civil amenities like work and personal finance removed. By any normal standard of acceptable sane behaviour, this is absolutely stark raving mad! Completely crackers, bats in the belfry, soft in the attic, ga-ga, barmy and a hundred other cliched euphemisms of popular description. The question is why do we, the hopefully still sane majority put up with it all? And does it not occur to anybody that it is our money that pays for all this crap and that our children and theirs. are the one's that will have to pay the cost of all this situation in years to come as we continue to primitivise by importing wholesale, the barbarity and murderous 'lifestyles' of the Third World?

Look at the recent revolting behaviour in Kenya. That is going to be Europe pretty soon believe me! Men with their skulls cut in half by meat cleavers and women with their bosoms cut off, for simply voting for the wrong party or belonging to the wrong tribe. Wonderfully culturally enriching isn't it? We already have nut cases plotting to flood and drown London Tube trains and bring down airliners in their version of 'cultural enrichment', namely an evil desert god that hates pictures of himself in Danish mags, regards homosexuals like Peter Tatchell as fit for the ovens and women and Jews as either beasts of burden or pigs and apes. Yes, all very culturally enriching to the extent that 700 Britons are leaving by the day they cannot withstand the enjoyment of it all!

Now even in Britain we have the web logger and writer 'Lionheart' threatened with arrest and seven years in prison, simply for revealing the awful behaviour of Moslem gangs in Luton. This is a fellow who has been physically attacked, abused and threatened with a death fatwa for exposing drugs and prostitution funded terrorism in his town and then exposing the police corruption as well, that allowed the fanatics to know where he was located. The man has had to flee abroad and now risks not only arrest but death either through assassination, or in one of Britain's Moslem run prisons. And one suspects that when the EU Reform Treaty goes through on the bullying tactics and scaremongering of the EuroElite and our own PM Brown, the secret Police will be coming for the rest of us too. Eurogend is coming to Britain by the way, to a street near you!

And don't bother asking for proof because only a bloody moron and imbecile could doubt this fact by now! It's thanks to bloody idiots always demanding 'proof' like 'Doubting Thomas' did to the risen Jesus that we are in the smelly manure right now, right up to our bloody necks and still drowning. And no I don't care if you are offended because idiots need to be offended big time! I am permanently offended by the way by people who forever ask for 'proof'. The proof oh simpletons is right before your eyes! As Melanie Phillips is always saying-'If you don't 'get it' now, you never will!'

Now we even have government education agencies turning away books about three cowboy builder pigs as they might offend Moslems and cowboy builders. For Christ's sake where are the strait jackets? Or have we used them all up? Like the X- ray machine that can only be used by British immigration officials at Calais to catch foreign criminals hiding in trucks, only with the 'permission' of the asylum seekers first, which one would have thought rather defeats the whole idea in any normal society but not in the booby hatch that ours is become. Then we have the scandal of Channel 4 being investigated and threatened with 'prosecution' for 'inciting racial and religious hatred' after its excellent Dispatches programme, exposed Moslem clerics inciting murder and mayhem. According to one police source, the reporting of the offences was a racial 'offence' in itself! So next time you are shot at by a asylum seeker or black gangster, don't bother to report it as that is a crime as well! What kind of lunatic thought that one up? And it is going to get worse in the PC land of Never-Never Weird Think and upside down morality that infests the body politic and executive today in Britain and much of Europe!

This rot all started years ago with Feminism and some women's (or certain Leftwing women) desire to not 'offend' people. Not 'offending' people is a 'feminine' trait usually but this feminisation of society has now spread into the effete middle-classes as well! Look at our youngsters for example. Most of them are of insipid dreamy character, illiterate, ill kept, slovenly, dirty, ill mannered and appallingly ignorant and arrogant. Most follow the feminist, 'mustn't offend anybody' or 'I love the EU', or 'You are a Racist and Islamaphobe' or a 'Nazi' for being a Nationalist.

No, they are not the same! And criticising death and murder by migrant criminals is not being xenophobic either! If an asylum seeker can afford to pay $5,000-$30,000 to a people smuggler, he is hardly poor is he? If I had $30,000 I would be off out of the UK today! And where do you think these 'poor' asylum seekers got their funds? Probably through an enforced cash withdrawal via an Uzzi automatic or forging tourists' credit cards. Meanwhile genuine refugees are lost in this criminally abused system. Quite frankly why the hell are we allowing all this and our welfare systems to be abused like this? Absolutely bloody mad! Does nobody care about where their own money is spent by this dreadful government?

Our boys are bereft of their national manhood, our girls the products of some Feminist Finishing School for Debauchery and Foulness and I doubt in fact we will ever recover from this wicked full frontal assault on our lands and cultures.

Cathargo est delenda! Cried Cato in the Senate!

Perhaps it should be Europa est Delenda! How can anybody of sane mind allow this idiocy to continue?

WHAT THE MSM FAIL TO DISCLOSE KENYA SLAUGHTER STARTED WHEN THE GOV IN POWER REFUSED TO IMPLEMENT SHARIA LAW...MUSLIMS A SMALL PERCENTAGE CHRISTIANS SOMETHING LIKE 80%

5 comments:

The Green Fox said...

Great post by the guy 'Guy'.

Says what many of us already know. Now if he would only replace that vote ukip logo on his site with the only real choice, I might even buy him a beer.

http://www.guyleven-torres.co.uk/

yorkielass said...

When the French type riots occur here as they will for sure.
Those that bury their heads now will be the ones that scream the loudest.
The BBC won't alert us to what's going on. the left marxist loving elites like always will be protected it's the rest of us that will get the results of their multicultural failure.

From The Sunday Times December 2, 2007

France stunned by rioters’ savageryMatthew Campbell, Villiers-le-Bel
IN retrospect, it was not a good idea to have left his pistol at home. Called to the scene of a traffic accident in the Paris suburbs last Sunday, Jean-François Illy, a regional police chief, came face to face with a mob of immigrant youths armed with baseball bats, iron bars and shotguns.

What happened next has sickened the nation. As Illy tried to reassure the gang that there would be an investigation into the deaths of two teenagers whose motorbike had just collided with a police car, he heard a voice shouting: “Somebody must pay for this. Some pigs must die tonight!”

The 43-year-old commissaire realised it was time to leave, but that was not possible: they set his car ablaze. He stood as the mob closed in on him, parrying the first few baseball bat blows with his arms. An iron bar in the face knocked him down.

“I tried to roll myself into a ball on the ground,” said Illy from his hospital bed. He was breathing with difficulty because several of his ribs had been broken and one had punctured his lung.

His bruised and bloodied face signalled a worrying new level of barbarity in the mainly Muslim banlieues, where organised gangs of rioters used guns against police in a two-day rampage of looting and burning last week.

Not far from where Illy was lying was a policeman who lost his right eye after being hit by pellets from a shotgun. Another policeman displayed a hole the size of a 10p coin in his shoulder where a bullet had passed through his body armour.

Altogether 130 policemen were injured, dozens by shotgun pellets and shells packed with nails that were fired from a homemade bazooka. It prompted talk of urban “guerrilla warfare” being waged on French streets against the forces of law and order.

By the end of the week an extraordinarily heavy police presence in Villiers-le-Bel, where most of the rioting took place, appeared to have halted the violence: on top of public transport strikes and student protests against his reform plans, Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, could not afford a repeat of 2005, when a similar incident involving the deaths of two youths provoked the worst French urban unrest in four decades.

Things were so tense in the suburbs, however, that the riots could easily erupt again with the prospect of deaths on either side setting off a much greater explosion and, conceivably, the deployment of the army to keep peace.

“Given the weapons being used, it was lucky that nobody was killed,” said a policeman. Nearby were the charred remains of the local constabulary. The nursery school was burnt down. So was the library.

Rioting two years ago was widely regarded as a protest against poor housing, racial discrimination and unemployment of up to 40% in the grim housing estates surrounding most big French cities.

But “Sarko” dismissed suggestions that nothing had been done to improve the situation, referring to the “Marshall plan” for the banlieues being drawn up by Fadela Amara, his urban development minister.

At the same time he argued that, far from reflecting difficult living conditions, the violence was a result of the “thugocracy” of the suburbs, where drug-trafficking criminals held sway.

“We shouldn’t try to excuse the inexcusable,” said the president in a television address to an anxious nation on Thursday, ridiculing the left’s vision of rioters as “victims of social injustice”. He pledged that those who fired at police would be tracked down, one by one, and tried on charges of attempted murder.

Lawlessness in the suburbs is an awkward issue for Sarkozy because he had promised to deal with it as interior minister, when he introduced “zero tolerance” policing, only to be accused of aggravating the problem by referring to trouble-makers as “thugs” and “scum”. Despite some successes, many of the suburban ghettoes remain a law unto their own and, like parts of New York in the bad old days, policemen do not like to set foot there.

“It felt like they were out to kill us,” said one of the officers in Villiers-le-Bel last week. “We knew that there were weapons in the suburbs, but they have never been turned against us like that. The kids were shooting at us at close range, loading and reloading their weapons. I’ve never seen anything like it.”

Sarkozy has ordered a full judicial inquiry into the teenagers’ deaths, even though all the evidence seems to support the police version that the boys were thrown from their unlicensed motorcycle when it accidentally collided with a patrol car. Friends and relatives of the victims dismiss the official account of the incident as fantasy.

As for Illy, he says he is not feeling vengeful but has identified one of his attackers from police photographs. He is certain to be able to pinpoint the rest. “Fortunately,” he said, “I’ve got a very good memory.”

On the same day a young French journalist was slaughtered on a train for refusing to be raped by a turk.
Sarkozy now in power has become dhimmi number one!

Aurora said...

Green Arrow, excellent post. Do you have a link for the Kenya stuff? I'd like to link to you and flesh the story out a bit more.
Cheers.

yorkielass said...

Atlas Shrugs is a good place to check re Kenya. The USA has a few that cover the story correctly.
Here is our own Spectator...
GOD FORBID OUR MEDIA WOULD TELL THE TRUTH. BIAFFR WAS ALSO MUSLIMS!

The Kenyan jihad
Sunday, 6th January 2008

While I was away, reading about the appalling atrocities in Kenya in which churches were torched and dozens of Christians burned to death, I wondered whether any mainstream media would get the point. They didn’t. As far as I could see, the violence was universally ascribed to ‘tribal conflict’. But this isn’t the first time churches in Kenya have been torched, as you can read here (date unknown):

On 13 June, Muslims rioting over the arrest of one of their clerics torched five churches in Bura, Tana River district, not far from Mombasa in Kenya… As impunity equals permission, this is a serious issue of national significance at a time when Muslim tensions are rising to boiling point.
or here from 2001:
Anglican Archbishop David Gitari and an interfaith team confronted rioting Muslim youths armed with swords and clubs on December 1 in Nairobi, Kenya. In response to this attempt to quell Kenya's worst outbreak of violence between Christians and Muslims, the rioters pelted the archbishop and his team with rocks. Moderate Muslim leaders plucked Gitari from the mob and rushed him to a nearby hospital, where he was treated for head injuries. ‘I survived only because Muslim leaders formed a human shield around me and in the process got more injured than myself,’ Gitari later said in local media reports.
Or here from 2003:
Muslim leaders in Kenya are threatening armed conflict if the new Kenyan constitution does not enshrine Islamic courts (known in Kenya as Kadhi courts).
For years, Kenya has been subjected to creeping Islamisation and jihadi violence by elements within the country’s ten per cent Muslims against the Christian majority. Yet unaccountably there was no mention of this key fact in the media coverage of the post-election violence. Well, fancy!
In the Christian Post, this article, (which was picked up by Stephen Pollard) written before the disputed election which led to the violence, put events in a rather more accurate context. Raila Odinga, it said, who was then the current presidential frontrunner, had promised to implement strict Islamic Sharia law if he received the Muslim vote and was elected president. Odinga had signed a secret memorandum of understanding with Sheikh Abdullahi Abdi, chairman of the National Leaders Forum, in which Odinga had allegedly stated his intention, if elected, to

‘within six months, rewrite the Constitution of Kenya to recognize Sharia as the only true law sanctioned by the Holy Quran for Muslim declared regions’.
The Evangelical Alliance of Kenya released a statement in which church leaders said Odinga
‘comes across as a presumptive Muslim president bent on forcing Islamic law, religion and culture down the throats of the Kenyan people in total disregard of the Constitutionally guaranteed rights of freedom of worship and equal protection of the law for all Kenyans.’
The Africa regional manager for International Christian Concern, Darara Gubo, said the agreement
‘undermines the secular nature of Kenya and opens a Pandora’s box of chaos and conflict similar to what happened in Nigeria and Sudan. This is not a stand-alone incident; rather, it is part of strategy to Islamize Eastern Africa and the Horn of Africa, through the introduction of Sharia law’.
Subsequently Joshua Hammer wrote a piece in the New York Times which, without going so far as to join up all the dots (please, this is the NYT!), nevertheless provided a hint of the same, ahem, context. Writing about sitting Kenyan MP Joseph Lekuton, he described his challenger, Godana Harugura, as
… a convert to fundamentalist Islam
who had reportedly raised money from Muslims along Kenya’s volatile border with Somalia by promising to
‘reclaim’ the region for Islam — and by attacking Lekuton for inviting Christian development groups into the area…Indeed, in the view of some of Lekuton’s supporters the election was shaping up to be a proxy confrontation between the West and Islam — a clash of civilizations in the Kenyan bush…
A sizable, largely poor Muslim population concentrated along the coast — and proximity to the volatile states in the Horn of Africa, including Somalia and Sudan — have made Kenya especially vulnerable, in the views of counterterrorism experts, to the call for jihad. Since the early 1990s, the mosques of Mombasa and other towns have resonated with militant Islamic rhetoric. Radical imams have preached violence against Westerners, attacked the Kenyan government as the lackey of the United States and Israel and called for the implementation of Shariah. Members of the Qaeda cells that blew up the U.S. embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, on Aug. 7, 1998, were recruited in mosques near the Indian Ocean beaches where hundreds of thousands of Western tourists flock each year.

Apart from that, I have found plenty of worthy hand-wringing in the mainstream media about tribal violence between equally bloodthirsty Kenyan sectarian groups, but diddly squat about the Kenyan jihad and the remorseless creation of Africastan.


And now look at this on Atlas Shrugs which, after railing at the media for failing to report what is actually going on in Kenya, makes the following claim:
Raila Odinga has, in his own words, a 'close personal friendship' with Barrack Hussein Obama Junior.When Obama went to Kenya in August of 2006, he was hosted by Raila and spoke in praise of him at rallies in Nairobi: Obama's bias for his fellow Luo was so blatant that a Kenya government spokesman denounced Obama during his visit as Raila's ‘stooge.’
Oh dear. Maybe this is what Obama means by being the candidate of ‘change’.



Click here to go back to the blog

More blogs: Coffee House | Americano | Clive Davis | Stephen Pollard

Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (20)

YORKIELASS said...

Voice of Biafra International....THAT IS THE NAME OF THE SITE THE FIRST LINE. BY THE WAY AT ATLAS SHRUGS PAMELA PRIVIDES ACTUAL DOCUMENTED PROOF RE OBAMA'S FRIENDSHIP'S.
the British government representing an arch-Christian country has done everything in its power to enable and support Muslims in Nigeria in the latter's unconscionable aggression which often crosses mere religious intolerance and arrogance into the area of genocide against Igbo-Biafrans. Britain supported Nigeria during the war of genocide waged by mostly Muslim Nigerians (joined by the Yoruba) against Biafrans who were still reeling from the worst pogrom that the world had ever witnessed (and remained silent about). Britain provided the Muslims with the armament and personnel and technical support needed to mount an effective blockade of Biafra during that war between 1967 and 1970, a blockade that was so effective and hence so inhumane as to provide the world with the startling and disturbing pictures of the Biafran Child, the Poster-Child of protein-calorie malnutrition called Kwashiorkor. Unfortunately, the British government continues to aid the Muslims today in Nigeria.

If we told the story of Muslim brutality, it might be considered predictable and redundant--as if there is anything redundant about speaking out and crying out every time the murderer takes the life of your loved ones. So, here, we publish the account of systematic and continuous Muslim brutality and mayhem perpetrated on non-Muslims and Christians of Northern Nigeria, in the Northerners' own words. Keep in mind, though, that a huge proportion of the victims are still Igbo and other Biafrans residing in Northern Nigeria. And, these accounts corroborate and validate our own previously published grievances and victimization posted elsewhere on this website (see also "Genocide Toll").

We do not believe that God will allow Islam to swallow up Christians. We have no plans to succumb to Islam. That's why we have Biafra; that's why we must actualize Biafra.

It appears the British governments have always sided with muslims against Christians. much like we saw in Yugoslavia so it should come as no surprise they now do the same here!
What one uncovers when the seeds of doubt are planted.

WE NEED REGIME CHANGE HERE IN THE UK.