Wednesday, 18 June 2008

Did you expect anything else?


I would rather burn my business down then pay her

Back in Novemeber 2007, I reported on the money grabbing moonbat who had already been turned down by 25 other hairdressing salons after lacklustre interviews. Her appearance did not not help as you can see from the image.

Well finally she struck pay dirt. One foolish Salon owner made the foolish mistake of telling her that she would have to remove her headscarf of submission should she be given the vacant position.

Bingo. The moonbat was made. In went her vexatious claim for religious discrimination. The owner of the Salon who said in her defence;
"If an employee were wearing a baseball cap or cowboy hat I would ask them to remove it at work.

"It has nothing to do with religion. But I now feel like I have been branded a racist. My name is being dragged through the mud."

She went on: "This girl is suing me for more than I earn in a year. "I am a small business and have only had my salon a year and a half. If I lose this lawsuit, my business will fold."
Who cares in this brave new world whether your business will fold. You must submit and pay she will.

The salon owner has been ordered to pay £4,000 in compensation (robbery) to the moonbat, who in my opinion, face would sour milk. In fact she should be dressed as a letterbox to stop people retching in the street.

In its perverted judgment against the Salon owner, who had been badgered into giving the moonbat an interview the panel stated:
"We were satisfied by the respondent's evidence that the claimant was not treated less favourably than the respondent would have treated a woman who, whether Muslim or not, for a reason other than religious belief wears a hair covering at all times when at work." It added: "There was no specific evidence before us as to what would (for sure) have been the actual impact of the claimant working in her salon with her head covered at all times.
In my long time in business I have witnessed these "professional" racist claimers at work and not once have I seen an organisation large or small win against them. If you are an employer it is better to be safe than sorry. Like I said before. Home grown is always the best in the end.


6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm with you on this GA. NO WAY would I give that dog-ugly paedo-worshipper a single penny.

I'd appeal, appeal, appeal and if I didn't get my way I'd burn the lot. How justice has been corrupted in Britain and this is yet another shameful example of how Britain is rotting from the core outward.

Litigation jihad brought to you by paedo-mo's moonbats ably aided and abetted by your Brit-hating marxist traitors Common Purpose.

One day GA, one day mate.

Chris.

Anonymous said...

TWO PARASITES FOR THE PRICE OF ONE?

I see from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1027300/How-I-driven-brink-ruin-refusing-hire-Muslim-hair-stylist-wouldnt-hair.html that the schistosome went back to her native Syria to find a mate of the same species in 2006. So presumably the other half of the blood-sucking duo has now got British citizenship as well.

Anonymous said...

look at her smirking smugly. What a piece of trash. Absolutely no way would I pay money to her. I'd take this thing to the high court, until the issue becomes so big that it leads into a civil war.

Anonymous said...

i think it's the Pakistani stripper's sad old ma. Same smirk same attitude, same crap.

Anonymous said...

ME TOO...GOD SHE'S A PIG UGLY BINT...SORRY TO ALL PIGS THEY HAVE LOVELY EYES.
ENGLISH COMMON LAW IS WHAT SHE OUGHT TO USE PAY THE COW NOTHING AT ALL.

RISE IN ELEC AND GAS....WORKERS SHOULD GET ONTO BENEFITS SOD WORK.
IT'S GETTING SO WE WORK TO JUST PAY TAXES..40% RISE THIS WINTER.

johnofgwent said...

http://tinyurl.com/4lka8d is worth a read.

This is a page linked from the 'judgement' page and explains that the salon owner only gave her the interview in the first place because 'she felt sorry for her'

Well, it was an expensive lesson.

But it demonstrates al too well what sympathy will get you.