Sunday, 18 November 2007

Less than 100 UAF turn up for BNP Conference

According to the UAF, there are only 15 people in this room

The trade unions must be starting to feel the pinch. Despite throwing buckets of their dwindling memberships money at trying to whip up enough supporters to protest outside The New Kimberley Hotel in Blackpool, where the British National Party have been holding one of their most succesful conferences ever, they managed to muster less than 100 supporters.

Unable to raise any local support, the paid agitators of the Moslem and trade union funded Urinate Against Freedom(UAF) chanted their usual nonsense and generally just wound up embarrassing themselves and the trade unions they are supposed to represent.

Click for larger image and a laugh

So pathetic was their turnout that some members of the BNP, observing them from their warm rooms inside the hotel wondered if they might have a whip around and send around a soup kitchen for the brain dead reds shivering outside. The UAF certainly looked as if they needed something decent inside of them rather than the White Lightening Cider some of them had obviously been consuming to build up their courage.

Nick Griffin, who just the day before, had attended a packed meeting of over 220 supporters in Barnsley, which you can listen to a report of here, was on fine form but more about that later.

But if you were for some strange reason to visit their sad UAF site, you would wonder if perhaps the UAF slip in and out of another dimension. According to them, there were only 15 BNP members present at the conference. The Neanderthals seemed to have forgotten the wonders of technology and the ability to post the truth and images.

This is from one of their earlier crowd entertainment shows

The police had requested that the BNP not tease the rabble outside and also that no photo's be taken of the paid little band outside. However some were taken and so no doubt we will be seeing the usual faces around the net soon. But meanwhile have a laugh at some of their regular followers.

You can still view the action by going here then clicking on Grenada Reports and selecting 17/11/07. The report is 4 minutes in.

The massed ranks of the Red Brigade - awesome

Update
Thanks to Chris Hill, Lancaster we now know that the actual number of paid demonstrators was more in the region of just 70. Remember this demonstration was to to be the mass mobilization of the left to shout down the BNP. For a Last Hurrah, it was pretty pathetic.



14 comments:

najistani said...

Possibly the number 15 represents the limit of their counting ability.

Anonymous said...

The uaf TRAVELLING FREAK show pic is priceless GA. very funny...


14

Red Squirrel said...

Hehe, very funny GA,
Idiots! The two 'gravitationally challenged' ones in red look like 'santa impersonaters' and the woman looks like Vikki Pollard!
All the Best!

Anti-gag said...

I have just returned from Blackpool after having attended both days of this weekend BNP conference, and I would like to make the following observations.

I have a 15 seconds video clip taken from one of the hotel’s 3rd floor windows, at the height of the demo, which shows that less than 70 people (including the yellow jacketed marshals) turned out for this supposed UAF mass demo.

We were told that people were to be bussed in from all over Lancashire and the surrounding counties, including mass turnouts of UNISON and other TUC members from all over the North West. UAF really are now a spent force, and these days only attracts the mentally ill and total losers.

The conference was very professionally run, and a fantastic success. The BNP is moving forward and nothing can now stop us.

From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)

bob said...

thanks for getting us on TV UAF with your sad anti democracy demonstration, we would have been ignored by the main broadcaster if it had not been for you generating this free publicity for us...great stuff!

please come again next year and bring your friends as the turnout could be better and we may have had a longer slot!

green arrow thanks for all your efforts much appreciated.

Bob.

Yorkielass said...

The government is correct then i can see the obesity problem clearly must be too much benefit money.
What do they look like?
Fashion dragged from the eighties with their little school type bags.
Churhill's words the fascist will return next time in the guise of anti fascist's. wish he'd have added dressed like tramps!
They know the people of the UK ARE WAKING UP TO THE TRUTH AT LONG LAST.
THEIR TOTALITARIAN MASTERS SHOWED THEIR HAND TOO EARLY I'M AFRAID.
MILLIBAND LET SLIP ABOUT THE EU/ARAB AXIS..THE IDIOT.
WHAT WITH ROAD TOLLS.ID CARDS. INTERNAL TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS MONITERING E-MAIL AND PHONE CALLS.FINGERPRINTING KIDS.COMMON PURPOSE.SETTING UP OF THE NEW GESTAPO.ETC
WHAT ARE THOSE IDIOTS TRYING TO WARN ABOUT THAT WHICH IS ALREADY IN PLACE?

yorkielass said...

I do believe that this adds weight to the argument that we are sleepwalking into both a surveillance society and a police state.

And remember, Adolf Hitler convinced his people that all of this consolidation of power was needed for their security, because they were being terrorised and under threat from the nations around them.

The big lie then was Security, the big lie now is exactly the same.



The list below is by no means definitive, further references can be found on the UK Statute Law Database here.



Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act 2006 What the Liberals call The Removal of Parliament Act.

Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005

The Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (Consequential and Supplementary Amendments to Secondary Legislation) Order 2006

The Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (Application and Modification of Certain Enactments to Designated Staff of SOCA) Order 2006

The Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (Delegation under section 43) Order 2006

The Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (Commencement No. 5 and Transitional and Transitory Provisions and Savings) Order 2006

Terrorism Act 2006,

Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006,

Identity Cards Act 2006

Finance Act 2006

Fraud Act 2006

Companies Act 2006

Police and Justice Act 2006

The Police and Justice Act 2006 (Commencement No.1, Transitional and Saving Provisions) (Amendment) Order 2007

Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006

Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005

The Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (Continuance in force of sections 1 to 9) Order 2006

Civil Contingencies Act 2004

Local Government Act 2003

Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003

Criminal Justice Act 2003

Police Reform Act 2002

Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002

Regulatory Reform Act 2001

Social Security Fraud Act 2001

Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001

Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001

Terrorism Act 2000

The Terrorism Act 2000 (Business in the Regulated Sector) Order 2007

Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000

Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999

Criminal Justice (Terrorism and Conspiracy) Act 1998

Crime and Disorder Act 1998

Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006

Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006

Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006

The Crime Prevention (Designated Areas) Order 2006

The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and Money Laundering Regulations 2003 (Amendment) Order 2006

The Fines Collection Regulations 2006

The Information Sharing Index (England) Regulations 2006

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Business in the Regulated Sector) Order 2007

The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (References to Financial Investigators) (Amendment) Order 2006



Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 – The Act


Below are SI’s or Statutory Instruments that have been applied since 1984 to change the PACE Act to suit policy.



The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Code of Practice C and Code of Practice H) Order 2006

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Application to the Armed Forces) Order 2006

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) (Revisions to Code A) Order 2006

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) (Revisions to Code C) Order 2005

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) Order 2005

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) (Modifications to Codes C and D) (Certain Police Areas) (Amendment) Order 2004

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Remote Reviews of Detention) (Specified Police Stations) (Revocation) Regulations 2004

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) Order 2004

The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Application of Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 and Police and Criminal Evidence (Northern Ireland) Order 1989) Order 2003

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) (Codes B to E) (No. 2) Order 2003

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984(Codes of Practice) (Modifications to Codes C and D)(Certain Police Areas) Order 2003

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) (Code E) Order 2003

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) (Armed Forces) Order 2003

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Remote Reviews of Detention) (Specified Police Stations) Regulations 2003

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Visual Recording of Interviews) (Certain Police Areas) (Revocation) Order 2003

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) (Temporary Modifications to Code D) Order 2002

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Visual Recording of Interviews) (Certain Police Areas) Order 2002

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) (Modifications to Code C and Code D) (Certain Police Areas) Order 2002

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) (Visual Recording of Interviews) Order 2002

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) (Modifications to Code C and Code D) (Certain Police Areas) (Amendment) Order 2002

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Department of Trade and Industry Investigations) Order 2002

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Visual Recording of Interviews) (Certain Police Areas) (No. 2) Order 2002

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) (Statutory Powers of Stop and Search) Order 2002

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) (Modification) Order 2001

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Tape-recording of Interviews) (Amendment) Order 2001

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Drug Testing of Persons in Police Detention) (Prescribed Persons) Regulations 2001

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice No. 5) Order 1999.

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Application to the Armed Forces) Order 1997.

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) (Armed Forces) Order 1997.

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice No. 4) Order 1997 Approved by both Houses of Parliament

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Application to Customs and Excise) (Amendment ) Order 1995

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Application to Customs and Excise) (Amendment) Order 1996



Keywords: dictatorship, SOCA, government, gestapo, police
Posted to: Main Page

Post a comment
taken from pjc journal...gestapo and soca..
The bars being put in place!

Aberdeen Patriot said...

Hi Green. The pic you show does not tell the full story as that was taken on saturday after about 40% of the ones in the room had left to attend another training event in the back room. The pic also does not show the large left hand side seating area. On sunday every seat was full including more that had been added down the sides and all floor space was standing room only.
It was brill being there and the BNP have got some serious plans in action that will se them grow more and more.

Anonymous said...

And by God they're the ugliest bunch of misfits that you will ever meet..do none of them wash or have any dental hygiene?

Anonymous said...

well, mr griffin wasnt allowed at all universities to spout his racist and unhelpful rant because his safety could not be guaranteed. but regarding the comments above, are your commenters qualified to make diagnoses ranging from brain dead to ugly and is the aesthetic attraction level of human beings important anonymous (comment above)? would you prefer beautiful blondes and blue eyes to oppose you?! and by god...is their dental hygiene relevant?! er. No. by god, why dont YOU raise some intelligent point or comment yourself?!

Red Squirrel said...

Anonymous no 2,
Don't we all sometimes tend to take the piss out of others if we totally disagree with their viewpoint? I think that it is part of human nature.
I think most of us are very glad to see the reds discredited, I am, because basically they are ignorant and bigoted. Their overused use of the words 'nazi' and 'fascist' are not having the same effect anymore.
Glad all went well at the conference
Anyway I bet they would all run back to mummy and daddy if there was a revolution!

Anonymous said...

Yes, we all make fun. Humour is part of being human. But humour can be used for damaging consequences too. In this case, humour is damaging your reputation. The problem is that the BNP is so massively unpopular that when your website stories are almost full of childish insults like the story we are commenting on, it is simply the commentors who look ignorant and biggoted. It is as if the commenters are wearing blinkers and are too stupid (and i use that term seriously, not in humour) to see that their feelings of negativitiy towards "the reds" are mixed up with out and out useless and facile comments about things that simply dont matter (dental hygiene, looks, soup kitchens - y'know, random idiocy). When making a serious point, lets hear the facts and the perspectives and the solutions. You see, yours was the first sensible point on the whole board, but then you ruin it with the mummy and daddy comment. There isnt going to be a revolution for socialists. You dont know the situation of socialists and your comment is so facile, that i could raise the same response to you personally and it would have just a limited basis. It simply seeks to inflame the situation. Yet, in your head and in your thoughts, you may well have something intelligent and useful to say. I cant see that because of all the piss taking! Nothing is serious all the time and humour is good but when its measured. If you count the number of times someone has a helpful comment versus the number of times someone just takes the piss, you have a scarey statistic on your hands. And then you look infantile, not serious. Try it and see what i mean.

The Green Arrow said...

OK anon, your really stopping me from writing a post on South Africa but you deserve a reply. Something I should try to do more often as courtesy to all who post. Good and bad.

There are hundreds of sites that promote the same message as this one. Some of them very serious and in a depth that I could never attain.

Because of this and because of the type of person I am and not being a professional writer, I write the way I feel at the time.

I believe that were you and I to sit in a pub then I could hold my own in any debate on most subjects and demolish your arguments with facts and figures.

A sense of humour is of paramount importance when your watching your world burn otherwise a person would go insane. The situation does not change but at least it is bearable.

Check out the The Right Side - link on the right - cartoons and see what you think.

Anonymous said...

GA: There is nothing wrong with the fact that you are not a professional writer. It was the tone of the post that I was challenging, not the way it was written. It simply encourages that 'ooohhhh horror' response when any picture tells a thousand different stories. I dont doubt that you could hold your own in a pub in a debate with me. I just dont think that I have really stated any arguments for you to demolish. I was simply asking you to tell me what your arguments or points were! You see, it just smacks of defensiveness. And the problem is, as I have hinted at previously, when people just rant and when they resort to sensational images it removes the thrust of the point. It leaves people like me who are pretty open minded to integration, human rights and so on to suspect that there is just fear driving this and hatred and precious little else. Its not your argument that causes me concern its the evangelical presentation of it. Its just not sustainable. Its just as bad when you see any extremist argument, it reeks of instability.