Tuesday, 16 September 2008

The Political Left and their Links with Paedophilia

All the same. All part of a Common Purpose

By Archer. A member of the Green Arrow Forum

So, GA, the Reds are calling you a paedophile, are they? I thought they disliked you? Why then are they calling you a "paedophile" –a creature they so obviously revere?

In this short article I will set out to defend GA by throwing the accusation of paedophilia (just how low can the Reds sink?) back at the accusers. I will also touch upon the issue of: “under which political system would children be better off and safer: Nationalism or Socialism/Neo-Communism?

Is it not true that the Reds are sympathetic to paedophiles? Don't they want to "empathise", "treat", "nurture", and ultimately allow back on our streets and into our parks those (paedophiles) who are mentally ill and beyond treatment? –all in the name of “human rights” and all the other sickening platitudes that any normal person would, when used in the context of defending paedophiles, find revolting?

Taken from an article on the Socialist Unity website: “Child sexual abuse is a very serious problem, but our society doesn’t face up to the reality. Child molesters often don’t match the stereotypes. They may do monstrous things, but they are not monsters. Indeed the demonisation makes it harder to deal with other aspects of the problem, for example, men who use prostitutes who may be under 16 are typically not treated as child abusers.” Judge for yourself whether I’ve taken this out of context: http://www.socialistunity.com/?p=2744

While the article from Socialist Unity makes some points worthy of consideration, I judge to be dangerous the overall liberal essence of the article. The salient and most undeniable point here is that rather than employ every conceivable recourse IN DEFENCE OF OUR CHILDREN, the Left (so fantastic, idealistic, and whimsical is their position) seek to solve problems in their own inimitable irrational way by talking, counseling, empathising… and all the other State-bureaucratic and sociologically driven “ideas” that both ensure jobs amongst their ilk and which have fallen straight out of Marxist textbooks.

The fact remains that the Left avoid tackling the issue head-on and they are completely devoid of the sense, logic, reason and rationality that is so pervasive amongst those on the Right. Morality, decency and THE SECURITY OF OUR CHILDREN demands the following –all of which the Left disagree with:

1) Capital punishment for paedophiles whose guilt is absolute;

2) The reintroduction of Clause 28 to forbid the teaching of homosexuality in schools;

3) Sex education to be taught at an appropriate age –not to four year-old impressionable toddlers (as New Labour want to introduce);

4) Displays and celebration of homosexuality to be removed from our streets, off our television screens, and therefore out of harms way of our vulnerable children;

5) The regulation of explicit material in children’s magazines and on television;

6) The reintroduction of tax incentives for married families;

7) The introduction of cash incentives and support for women wishing to remain at home and raise their brood rather than fulfil the Capitalist machine by working and fulfil “socialist” aspirations by putting their children into the filthy hands of the State ;

8) The widespread availability and active encouragement of home education;

9) Sex change operations to be illegal and therefore not to be available on the NHS and funded by taxpayers;

10) The basis of a moral and Christian society;

11) The diversion of taxpayers’ money from homosexual groups to child and family charities

Is it not also true that the Reds are extremely pro-homosexual (homosexuality, science suggests, being a further step toward paedophilia)? Evidence: http://www.theinterim.com/2002/sept/02study.html


Germany and the Neo-Communist EU are to legalise paedophilia (this would not happen under Nationalist government). "Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and vagina of their daughters. Their caresses too seldom pertain to these regions, while this is the only way the girls can develop a sense of pride in their sex," reads the booklet regarding 1-3 year olds. The authors rationalize, "The child touches all parts of their father's body, sometimes arousing him. The father should do the same." http://www.tpuc.org/node/151

Isn’t it also true that Searchlies, the Left’s ubiquitous hero State organisation –the racist, Zionist/MI5 mind controller and enemy of people who won’t get back into line– has somewhat dubious links with paedophiles and other degenerates, namely Harry Bindley –the black-marketeer, drug-trafficker, pimp and PAEDOPHILE. Evidence: http://searchlightexposed.com/searchlightpervert.htm

Compare the two: Neo-Communist New Labour’s Britain and the United States. Who is more protective of children?

1) A MAN who repeatedly sexually abused a 12-year-old boy has been jailed for two years. Adrian Hale, 59, systematically molested the youngster over a 15-month period ending in late November last year. As well as indecently assaulting the schoolboy, he also got the child to carry out depraved acts on him. http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/n... g_boy_12.php

2) A South San Francisco man was sentenced today to 225 years to life in prison after being convicted of repeatedly molesting his live-in girlfriend's daughter starting when the girl was 9 years old, prosecutors said. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...AGIPOQ8SD5.DTL

So, Readers, there you have it: undeniable truth of who the real child abusers are. It begs the question: who favours, supports and thereby unwittingly encourages paedophilia and those acts leading to it: Nationalists or those on the political Left?

I am sure you will agree that I have given irrefutable evidence that is certainly the latter

F.A.O. families: you must now see that your place and loyalty is clearly with Nationalism –for the benefit of yourselves, your future, and primarily YOUR CHILDREN.

Further reading:

(Don’t see the Left giving this useful information to families, do you? Further proof, if ever it was needed, that Nationalists have the welfare of you and your family at heart):

Names and address of convicted paedophiles. http://www.survivorsswindon.com/ore.htm

Germany and the Socialist/Neo-Communist EU http://www.tpuc.org/node/151

Boycott Amazon: they stock pro-paedophiliac books such as these:

1) It is titled, "Understanding Loved Boys and Boylovers."

2) "Loving Boys" -

3) Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex by Judith Levine -

4) http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg.../-/1560240008/

5) http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg.../-/1557410046/

Also please contact the implicated party and voice your own opinion about
these books being offered ... feedback@amazon.com

Please join us in forwarding this information as far and wide as possible.




I have had a problem importing the document into blogger and am going to have to edit the links individually. I will do this over the course of the day.

You might care to follow this link here which reveals the names and political affiliations of some of the Lib/Lab/con politicians who have been involved in Paedophilia.


Wolfblood said...


tomorrow belongs to mo said...

There is also the cultural problem of the commercial sexualisation of young children, especially pre-pubescent girls, by the advertising industry, with make-up and dresses which would be provocative on a grown women being promoted for nine-year olds.

This is not as blatant as the other forms of abuse, but it is insidiously destroying childhood and leading to precociousness and probably far worse.

Strider said...

Bravo. This information must be available to a wider audience. Strider says zero tolerance on paedophillia (death penalty for physical acts of paedophillia) and no promotion of homosexuality.

Yet another reason why the Establishment hates nationalists.

With tougue in cheek, Strider also says: in these financially difficult times, invest in rope : )

Anonymous said...

The main protagonists of the far left, are in the main, childless individuals, those who do their dirty work through youth and the fact that they are in "Uni" or living in some squat, those who make policy and direct things through "lifestyle" choice, ie homosexual. They are not, and never have been, normal citizens. Why do the supposed "intellectual elite" not realise that should Islam become the major force in this country, then their days of grooming and cottaging will be over-no more fisting for "Mr Fister", lovely "man" he no doubt is...The left has always courted criminality, and now it seems they have sunk about as low as they can get. I recall hearing that those bastions of decency and upholders of the British way of doing things, Common Purpose, have connections with child abuse, is this true?