Monday 1 September 2008

Undercover Mosque: The Return



I urge you to watch this 5 minute video in its entirety. Perhaps those of you who have believed the Islamic Al-Tiqiyya (the art of deceiving the infidel) will have the scales drop from your eyes so you may see the truth.

Now moving on. The main purpose of this post is to remind of a programme being shown this evening in the U.K.

Airing Today Monday 1st sept 8.00pm C4

Undercover Mosque: The Return.

A year and a half after the critically acclaimed film Undercover Mosque was first screened, Dispatches goes undercover again to see whether extremist beliefs continue to be promoted in certain key British Muslim institutions. The film also investigates the role of the Saudi Arabian religious establishment in spreading a hardline, fundamentalist Islamic ideology in the UK: the very ideology the Government claims to be tackling.

‘He is Muslim, and he gets out of Islam...what are we going to do? We kill him, kill, kill.’

women adulterers should be stoned to death and people who have sex before marriage should get ‘100 lashes’.

Regent’s Park Mosque is one of the biggest and most prestigious Islamic institutions in the UK. Opened in 1944 by King George VI, it can hold up to 5,000 worshippers.

After the 2007 Dispatches investigation, which also looked at mosques in Birmingham, West Midlands Police and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) claimed Channel 4 had distorted sermons and tried to press charges.

But watchdog Ofcom dismissed their findings and Channel 4 won six-figure libel damages from the police and CPS.

This time, Dispatches returned to Regent’s Park Mosque to find exactly the same extremist books on sale there and the female preachers spreading radical Wahhabi Islam.

One Saudi woman, who mocks other religions, says: ‘We feel nothing sometimes going past the church. What they say with their tongues is so vile and disgusting, it’s an abomination.’

Another female preacher, Um Saleem, says it ‘breaks her heart’ to see Muslims ‘working in banks, wearing short sleeves...and make-up’.


Poor cow. It breaks her heart to see Muslims wearing short sleeves. What does she think the true British feel when they see herds of wandering letterboxes roaming the streets of what used to be their country?

Up of your knees Britain. Join the British National Party and help take Our Country back or go cower in a corner and wait for Islam to come knocking on your door.






6 comments:

Anonymous said...

what makes me sick is that we will see a number of reports about this programme and each one will use words like "extremists" etc. Not one report will tell the truth i.e. that this is everyday common or garden islam.
We need to get writing to the papers and phoning up the talk radio shows. Explode this myth, get the truth out.
Urban11

Anonymous said...

These are the filth Blears wants to "advise" the labour party.

Just look at whats already happening in the Met with
Taqiyya Guffaw and PC Bliar.

It will all end in tears - for the scum who created it.

V is for victory to the Glorious BNP!

Anonymous said...

Green up here in Aberdeen the letterbox herds are walking about looking all smug, its as if they are laughing at us, as they know they are taking our country away from our children and their is not a thing we can do about it due to the liberal freaks that want this retarded religion enveloping Britain.

I only hope that the MET police have woken up to the fact that a Muslim top ranking cop will always show true Muslim traits, as in being a backstabbing, self gaining anti British corrupt shit.

And this fool wanted to be in charge of the security for the Olympics.

Where is Winston Churchill when you need him.

Anonymous said...

They have found extremist rantings in two out of two mosques.

Had they gone undercover in other mosques and found only love, peace, blah, blah...we'd have had that shoved down our throats quick, sharp.

As far as I can see they went into two mosques and both promoted the killing message.

Anonymous said...

LONDON CALLING SIOE UK DEMO.
THEME, NO SHARIA HERE.

http://sioe.wordpress.com/

Anonymous said...

There is one problem with that video and you guys aren't going to like what I'm going to say. But nevertheless it has to be said, in the interests of truth.

That video soundtrack has one WHOPPING HUGE factual inaccuracy. Which may be because it was made before events overtook it, but i doubt it.

Go read http://tinyurl.com/5secfk

CONTRARY to the statements made in that audio track the protestor who dressed as a suicide bomber at that protest WAS arrested by the police - at the request of the Home Office - and was sent to prison. And he was sent there without a trial. because none was needed.

How could this be ?

Easy, he was a drug dealer released on licence half way through his sentence. His actions were deemed an incitement to violence, which is a breach of UK law, and back to jail he went for violating the terms of his "licence" to enjoy freedom.

Now I admit this isn't a teribly clean cut way of doing things,

I would have MUCH rather he be hauled before the beak for breach of public order and had an extra term of imprisonment added to his reactivated sentence, but the fact is, the reporter in this audio track is NOT telling the truth the guy WAS arrested and he WAS jailed for his actions.

It does NOT advance the cause to have these videos propagating inaccurate information.

SOMEONE should contact the people who amde this video and have them make it again, this time telling the truth. If they continue to propagate this video unmodified after their mistake has been pointed out to them, they are no better than blair with his lies over iraq.

Yes I know my words grate on a raw nerve. But either we fight our enemy from the moral high ground armed with the truth, or we brawl with them in the same cesspit and gutter from which they peddle their lies.

I have seen and heard too many politicians bend the truth, turning black and white into shades of grey with black propaganda until they themselves no longer know black from white or right from wrong. That is not a battle I would willingly volunteer to fight.

So now ask yourself how much BETTER that video would be if instead of saying "what you can't see is a guy dressed as a suicide bomber who wasn't arrested for his insult and incitement" it said "what you can't see is a protestor dressed as a suicide bomber, a radical islamist and convicted drug dealer who was arrested and jailed as a result of his outburst of hatred and vitriol"