Monday, 4 February 2008

The Demographic Jihad

Click for larger image and to read text

There are two prongs to the attack on Our Country by the enrichers and colonisers. The first is the intimidation of the Country by violence and the threats of violence and the second and in my opinion more dangerous, is "invasion by the womb".

The thinkers (and they do have some) have realised that continued violence against the host country, our country would lead to a massive backlash against them and their goal of turning our Country into an Islamic state.

They prefer the second option, out breeding the native population until their numbers have increased to the point that they can take control of the country "democratically". I need not go on. You know the rest.

The cutting above is from the Guardian owned, Manchester Evening News. If you have clicked on the image and read the text, you see that they see the story as being an indicator of the Marxist success in turning Our Country into a multicultural paradise.

You and I and all True Brits will see the image as a glimpse into a future in which, we the whites are a minority in our own land. A land where our children either convert to Islam and live under Sharia Law or die.

Well there is still hope but very little time. And some of that time should be spent in wakening your friends and family to the dangers they and their children and grandchildren are facing. The rest of that time should be fighting back by supporting and joining the British National Party. The only hope now for Region 8 of Eurabia. The land once known as Great Britain.


The Illustrated P.I.G. to Islam has picked up this ball and really run with it. Check out the result of his digging about here and then add his site to your bookmarks.

Hat tip: Turner, SF


najistani said...


"A new counter-terrorism phrasebook has been drawn up within Whitehall to advise civil servants on how to talk to Muslim communities about the nature of the terror threat without implying they are specifically to blame.

Reflecting the government's decision to abandon the "aggressive rhetoric" of the so-called war on terror, the guide tells civil servants not to use terms such as Islamist extremism or jihadi-fundamentalist but instead to refer to violent extremism and criminal murderers or thugs to avoid any implication that there is an explicit link between Islam and terrorism.

It warns those engaged in counter-terrorist work that talk of a struggle for values or a battle of ideas is often heard as a "confrontation/clash between civilisations/cultures". Instead it suggests that talking about the idea of shared values works much more effectively.

The guide, which has been passed to the Guardian, is produced by a Home Office research, information and communications unit which was set up last summer to counter al-Qaida propaganda and win hearts and minds.

It shows that the government is adopting a new sophistication in its approach to counter-terrorism, based on the realisation that it must "avoid implying that specific communities are to blame" if it is to enable communities to challenge the ideas of violent extremists robustly. The new lexicon of terror surfaced briefly last month when the home secretary, Jacqui Smith, made a speech on counter-terrorism declaring violent extremism to be "anti-Islamic"....

They also reveal the crude criteria under which the communities secretary, Hazel Blears, is distributing £45m over the next three years for local communities to build resilience to violent extremism.

In the first year the funds will only be distributed to areas with a Muslim population of more than 4,000 based on 2001 census data. "This data is now 6-7 years old and given high population growth in Muslim communities is likely to be fairly out-of-date," says the internal Whitehall correspondence adding that each qualifying local authority will receive a fixed minimum allocation with increments dependent on the size of its Muslim population.

The limitations of this crude population approach suggest there is only a very limited official understanding of the geography of violent extremism in Britain.


najistani said...

SJS gets even more sudden:

"Recent research has shown the time it takes for an individual to show an initial interest in fundamentalism to actively taking part in an attack is reducing all the time.

Several years ago, experts figured that period may be up to 18 months but now with perceived threats to Muslims being featured virtually daily on our television screens, that timescale is down to just a few weeks.

In his first interview since the attacks on Glasgow Airport in June, Corrigan, who is also assistant chief constable of Strathclye Police, said: "There were some benchmarks up until 9/11 but, recently, it would be possible to find someone willing to involve themselves in a terrorist act in a much shorter timescale. That makes the challenge facing policing a bit more acute."

Corrigan said it was impossible to state with any conviction how many suspects were active in Scotland at any time.

He added: "I cannot quantify how many suspects we have in Scotland.

There is simply no way, short of getting access to the detailed plans of those who want to do harm to the UK, of telling how many individuals there are in this position.


Anonymous said...

Well done for bringing this fact to a wider audience. It is something that has been bothering me for the past few years. Sadly, mention of this inpending danger in various friend/neighbour circles has fallen on stony ground.
Definitely a time bomb slowly ticking away, with a multitude of big problems, not least the economice aspect.
Exaclty what the answer is, eludes me, except of course that us Native Brits must WAKE UP, SPEAK UP and soon.

Regards, Robbie.

johnofgwent said...

FFS is there no cable tv in Rochdale?

The Green Arrow said...

One cold night, as an Arab sat in his tent, a camel gently thrust his nose under the flap and looked in. "Master," he said, "let me put my nose in your tent. It's cold and stormy out here." "By all means," said the Arab, "and welcome" as he turned over and went to sleep.

A little later the Arab awoke to find that the camel had not only put his nose in the tent but his head and neck also. The camel, who had been turning his head from side to side, said, "I will take but little more room if I place my forelegs within the tent. It is difficult standing out here." "Yes, you may put your forelegs within," said the Arab, moving a little to make room, for the tent was small.

Finally, the camel said, "May I not stand wholly inside? I keep the tent open by standing as I do." "Yes, yes," said the Arab. "Come wholly inside. Perhaps it will be better for both of us." So the camel crowded in.

The Arab with difficulty in the crowded quarters again went to sleep. When he woke up the next time, he was outside in the cold and the camel had the tent to himself.


This is why there is no difference between "moderate"muslims and violent muslims,one wants what we have today ,the other is prepared to wait.As for "shared values"what may i ask have any English people in common with an illiterate tribesman from the boonies?or for that matter any of the worlds dross who think that they have every right to live here for free at the expense of the Englishman?

shiva said...

I have used this on my blogg

Now this busy rodent is not only busy breeding more vermin, he is pretty active outside the rathole

It is the soldier, not the reporter,
who has given us freedom of the press.

It is the soldier, not the poet,
who has given us freedom of speech.

It is the soldier, not the campus organizer,
who has given us the freedom to demonstrate.

The Green Arrow said...

Shiva, brilliant work. I will update and link back to you. Will also add to link list.

Will also spread the link.