Saturday, 9 February 2008

So much for free speech

Hung over, after a day at The Club, where my young nephew whose 18th birthday we were celebrating, thanked me the Tankard and informed me that he was looking forward to voting BNP in future elections, I have done nothing but flip from site to site looking for something that would encourage me enough to put pen to paper.

In the end it was the views expressed by Inayat Wataplonka Bunglawal, the Assistant Secretary General of the government in waiting. The Muslim Council of Britain that energized me.

He is outraged (aren't they all and always) that the mad preacher, Yusuf al-Qaradawi has been refused a visa to come to the UK for medical treatment. Inayat sees the refusal has having worrying implications for free speech.

You may not like what is written or drawn, we were told, but as long as it does not break the law, you need to learn to put up with it.
Well I am a great believer in free speech and so I thought I had better check out just what this creature from the past had to say that was dangerous and came up with this short list of some of the things that Qaradawi advocates.
  • Killing Muslims who have turned away from Islam (apostates)
  • The execution of gay people in Islamic societies
  • Suicide bombing of innocent Israeli civilians
  • Female genital mutilation (female "circumcision")
  • Compelling women to wear the hijab, even if they don't want to
  • Violence against disobedient wives in certain circumstances
  • Blaming rape victims who dress immodestly
  • Flogging women who have sex outside marriage

All fun stuff and so it is little wonder that Qaradawi is defended by the likes of Red Ken Livingstone, The Socialist Workers Party, the Muslim Association of Britain and also the Muslim Council of Britain in his fight to live and put of the day he goes to rot in hell with the Dead Paedophile whose rantings he follows.

Peter Tatchell also defends this preacher from Hells right to come to the Country he has avowed to destroy, despite pointing out the following on his site here.
Qaradawi is also a hypocrite because he is seeking medical treatment, when there are certain circumstances in which he would apparently deny treatment to people who do not share his hardline Islamism. He believes that such people should be allowed to die. Qaradawi is on record as saying that Muslims should not donate organs to people who adopt other faiths or become atheists. An apostate should not be given an organ donation because he has transgressed Islam and "deserves killing", Qaradawi wrote in a fatwa issued on the website, Islamonline, of which he is the chief scholar, on 24 June 2002.
Personally, I think we should allow him into the Country, put him on trial and then lock him up for life. Without the medical treatment he needs. Sometime I think I boarder on being a bit of a liberal.


Wolfblood said...

The liblabcon, Searchlight, Tatchell plus Livingstone and his pals say vote this for London ->

Is that what Londoners want?

If not vote BNP on May 1st!

Anonymous said...

You may not like what is written or drawn, we were told, but as long as it does not break the law, you need to learn to put up with it.

They never said that about the

johnofgwent said...

Of course you know what the real problem with organ donation is, I blogged about it some time ago. Bottom line is the ethnics have some "interesting" tissue type problems so they need a much larger pool of organ suppliers. Which is why they are so keen to enforce the rule that if you die in hospital your organs are not yours any more.

Whereas MY problem with the organ donation program is that I can't dictate that my bits can't be used to save the life of one who follows the word of the dead paedophile. So if I can't refuse them specifically, I refuse you all. But trust me, if you knew what my life had DONE to my bits, you wouldn't want them.

Drake's Drum said...

Detectives investigating the death of a man whose decapitated body was found behind a row of shops in north London have charged a man with murder.

The victim was found wrapped in a blood-stained duvet in a supermarket goods cage in Kilburn.

Mohamed Boudjenane, 45, of Kingsgate Road, Kilburn, is due to appear in court on Monday charged with murder.

All the best!
Drake's Drum.

yorkielass said...

Qaradawi's two daughters are here also to be educated.
Recall the steps on making an islamic state.
Let the west educate us?

When the EU propagandists promised free movement being a benefit of more EU integration.
Wait until later this month for a new EU directive to come out.
Obtained from Statewatch!


: Commission wants two systems to track travellers entering the EU by Judith Crosbie (European Voice, link) "The European Commission will propose in February two new systems for tracking and monitoring people entering the EU. One system will require airline passengers to register online before flying to Europe while the other system will use biometrics to track people entering and leaving the Union through air, land and sea borders." Last November the Commission put forward a proposal for a EU-PNR scheme whereby airlines compile and pass over details of passengers to national security agencies to check against watch-lists (See Statewatch's Observatory: EU surveillance of passengers (PNR)) It is now proposed that in addition all passengers wanting to fly into the EU (both visitors and citizens) will have to get permission to travel. The story above also says that the Commission is intending to propose a third measure to take biometrics (fingerprints) of everyone entering and leaving the EU by air, land and sea. Tony Bunyan, Statewatch editor, comments: "Let us be clear about the effect of these three proposals. Everyone - citizens and visitors - travelling in and out of the EU is going to be placed under surveillance, have to get permission to enter and checked against national watch-lists whose scope is unknown, with data transferred to unspecified agencies in the EU and outsdie and records of movements held for years."

EU: Note of the Standing Committee of experts on international immigration, refugees and criminal law on the proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2003/109/EC to extend the scope to beneficiaries of international protection (pdf)

On visits to Hungary before the iron curtain came down i was tracked at all times. looks to me like the iron curtain is in the process of being erected again.




yorkielass said...




Starting in the 13th century and continuing into the 15th century, violent Islamists from the Ottoman Empire invaded Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Albania, North Africa, and Constantinople – all accompanied by the usual infernos, rapes, enslavements of whole populations, and beheadings. Boy children were forcibly taken from their Christian parents, to be turned into slaves and brought up as Muslims who served in the civil service and in the military as Janissaries.

By then violent Islamists had already invaded India in what is regarded as one of the bloodiest periods in human history. Between 800 AD and 1700 AD, they destroyed temples, slaughtered Hindus, and abducted Hindu women and children to slave markets. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by the sword.

In Africa, Islam was spread using the slave-trade as a tool. Theoretically believers could not be enslaved, so entire African tribes converted to Islam in an attempt to escape the depredations of Arab slave traders.

Spain ended the Islamic state in 1492, but for the next three centuries Muslims in North Africa hunted Christians in the Mediterranean and on the coasts of Europe, and sold them as slaves. It is estimated that 1.25 million Christians became slaves, among them the writer Cervantes, who was ransomed after five years in bondage.

In 1456, three years after the fall of Constantinople, Sultan Mehmed II invaded Europe, but was thrown back from the walls of Belgrade, "The White City", by Hungarian and Serb defenders. The lifting of the Siege of Belgrade decided the fate of Christendom, that is to say, Europe.

In the 16th century the Ottoman Empire again tried to establish an Islamic state across Europe. In 1529 it invaded Austria. Forced to retreat, its soldiers slaughtered 30,000 farmers. By 1543, it had conquered most of Hungary. In 1565 the Empire besieged Malta, but the Knights of Malta, the Hospitaller Order of St. John, aided by volunteers from Sicily and by desperate women and children, drove them off. In 1571 the Ottoman Empire prepared for a fullscale invasion of Italy. Venice and her Western allies, led by the young, brave Don Juan of Austria, met the Ottoman Navy at the Battle of Lepanto, and defeated it. They were helped by the Christian slaves on the Turkish galleys who used their chains to fight their oppressors.

In 1683 violent Islamists made another attempt to create an Islamic State in Europe by besieging Vienna. Though outnumbered 20 to 1, the exhausted and starving Austrians refused to surrender. The Islamists launched their assault on September 11. (Make of that date what you will. Like 9-11-2001 it may relate to verse 9.111 from the Koran - “God hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs in return is the garden of Paradise: they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth”.) God hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth.) The forces of the Hapsburgs, along with Saxons, Bavarians, Franconians, Swabians, Serbs, and Poles, arrived to help the Viennese as the attack began. On September 12, the Polish King, Jan Sobieski, led the successful cavalry charge that turned the invasion into a rout.

In the 18th century, the Knights of Malta defended Europe from Muslim pirates operating in the Mediterranean and the North Atlantic. When Malta fell to Napoleon in 1798, pirates terrorized the western Mediterranean until quelled by the Royal Navy and the Navy and Marine Corps of the young United States. Greece, with the help of the Royal Navy, was the first nation to throw off the yoke of Ottoman tyranny.

In the 19th century Muslims who called themselves Salafis said they were following the earliest and purest Muslim teachings which advocated the violent overthrow of all governments and religious rule. Their 20th and 21st century descendants include the Muslim Brotherhood. Beginning in the late 19th century and ending only in the 1920s, the Ottoman Empire carried out the genocidal slaughter of an estimated one million Christian Armenians. In 1922, violent Islamists massacred 100,000 Greek Christians at Smyrna.

We mention these events because today violent Islamists say they intend to bring back the Caliphate that once stretched from what is now Iraq to Spain. Indeed they plan to turn Britain into a Muslim state and conquer the whole world. Since 1980 they have mounted gruesome attacks on the people of Britain, Indonesia, the Philippines, Denmark, Bali, Spain, East Timor, Australia, Kenya, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, Thailand, Iraq, India, France, Nigeria, the Netherlands, Sudan, Tanzania, Kenya, Holland, Russia, and America.


Those of us who look at the fruits of their governments wonder why anyone would want to be ruled by a theocratic tyranny that debases women, humiliates and marginalizes non-Muslims, prevents representative government and free speech, and, as if this were not enough, suffocates innovation, and causes widespread impoverishment. Their idea of a centralized authoritarian state enforcing blanket obedience to an all-encompassing ideology reminds us of fascism. Violent Islamists and their supporters have brought poverty, suffering, and death to many parts of the world, testimony to the misshapen ugliness and fruitlessness of their idea of a totalitarian Islam.

Many believe that Palestinians have been treated unfairly. Palestinians should obtain their rights, but this is not the reason that violent Islamists plague the world's peoples today. Violent Islamists have been waging war for 1400 years, and for most of that time they controlled the Middle East and Jerusalem.

Violent Islamists are fueled by an inability to change the corrupt and unjust governments of their own societies, by greed for loot and power, by a sense of failure, envy, and false grievance, and by a warped view of God that refuses God's gifts of freedom and reason. They also tend to dislike the overt sexual degradation exhibited in many parts of the world. There are people sympathetic to this last point of view, but not to the other notions held by violent Islamists.

Violent, and usually jobless, Islamists have attacked Buddhists in Thailand, Hindus in India, Christians and Jews and secularists wherever they find them, and even other Muslims, slaughtering innocents and drowning justice and mercy in blood. They have beheaded care workers. They have used children and women as human shields. Their code of behaviour is focused on outward compliance and savage punishments for supposed waywardness.

Imprisoned in a fantastical and murderous mindset that misinterprets God, they destroy respect for Islam. They pose a severe and crucial question to men and women around the world.


We want to create happy families, vibrant arts, justice and prosperity for all, creative innovation, learning, the celebration of peaceful communities and countries, inspiring achievements, and cures for illness, to name but a few. Violent Islamists and their supporters aim to inflict on us their version of Islamic law, sharia.

Sharia allows polygamy, slavery, sexual relations with slaves, amputation for theft, flogging for drinking alcohol, the killing of daughters who want to marry non-Muslims, the murder of gays, being stoned to death for adultery, and being killed for converting to another faith.

There is tremendous variance in the interpretation and implementation of sharia in Muslim societies today, but judging by its punishments, sharia is not compatible with life and culture in any free country. It is not compatible with Britain's Common Law or the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. If Islamists now living in Britain and the other English-speaking countries obtain sharia, those countries are doomed.


According to historians, repressive rule, corruption, contempt for work, particularly work with the hands, slavery, education limited to small numbers of people, the oppression of women, and non-productive economies pre-date Islam in the Middle East. Indeed this description has applied to many societies in the history of the world.

Some Muslims introduced the idea that later verses in the Koran "abrogate", that is, cancel out earlier verses. Unfortunately, the earlier verses are tolerant. The later verses advocate the sword, declare that disbelievers should be killed and that women as inferior to men may be beaten if they are disobedient. These beliefs are opposed to the teachings of Jesus, Buddha, and Confucius and to liberal democracy.

From Britsattheirbest.


allah does not = the Christian God that is just more bull.
Common purpose it is claimed infiltrated the Church leaders recent Dhimmi Williams tends to back this up.