Monday, 3 November 2008

The BNP say 2+2 is still 4

Yeah right. They wish.

OK I said I would write about it and so I guess I had better do it now. Earlier on in a previous post I mentioned Edinburgh University. So here we go.

According to the academics living in their Ivory Tower at Edinburgh and indulging in only incestuous thoughts with each other, they have carried out a survey in which they proclaim that those who vote for the British National Party are of low intelligence.
THE brightest children go on to vote Liberal Democrat or Green, according to a survey.

The study by Edinburgh University researchers has found that childhood intelligence is linked to voting preferences and political involvement in adulthood.

The study – which looked at voting patterns in the 2001 general election – found that those with higher IQ ratings were more likely to vote Lib-Dem or Green in an election.

The survey – including cognitive tests at ages five and ten – was followed up with a study of voting habits at 34. Those who voted Green had an average IQ of 108.3, with Lib-Dem voters just behind at 108.2.

Conservative and Labour voters were further behind – with scores of 103.7 and 103.0 respectively, while voters for Welsh nationalist Plaid Cymru scored an average of 102.5. Scottish National Party voters had an average IQ of 102.2. The research also showed that British National Party voters had the lowest average intelligence – scoring just 98.4. Non-voters were found to have an average IQ of 99.7.
Before ripping this argument to bits, one first wonders if they would wish to carry out a survey in which the average intelligence of different races is assessed. No? That would be far more interesting and the results would most certainly reveal that all races may be equal but when it comes to intelligence some races are just brighter than others. No that would not do for the marxists of Edinburgh University.

They give no details of how many people were surveyed and how they chose their subjects. But one can guess. Very selectively. So let me give you the results of my personal survey that I have been conducting for over thirty years on the intelligence of your average patriotic True Brit.

How many fingers? From the film 1984 - Please view it


Every single British National Party voter was able to give, courageously and correctly the answer 4 to the question asked by the state. What is 2+2? In the Orwellian State of today of course the "official" answer is 5.

Every single British National Party voter was able to add up correctly the figures in the following image and come up with the correct answer. Too much. £8.8 Bn too much.


Every single British National Party voter was able to point out on a map both Iraq and Afghanistan where British Soldiers are still dieing and being maimed in illegal wars.


Every single British National Party voter is aware that it is White History Month and know exactly who our real, True British Heroes are.

During the last European Elections, almost a million people voted for the British National Party. Next year those figures will rise into the millions. Millions of people from all walks of life with a combined IQ greater than all the other parties put together.

Back in your face Edinburgh and Lancaster. You waste your breath, just as you waste taxpayers money. Your time is almost over. Learn how to make Big Macs, your days as educators are coming to an end.


Anonymous said...

My experience of the better educated, and one would hope have a higher IQ, in and around Edinburgh is that they realise 2+2 is 4 but they are so bound up in the job, career, mortgage, loan and plastic card trap that publicly they say 5 just to survive. Just like your video clip.

Most of the people I deal with are Tory voters but I note when I get them to open up, without fear of reprisal, they very much agree with BNP policy.
As for SNP, a high number of people Ive spoken to reckon that was a bit of a stich up for Scotland and not the way to any bright future. In fact some say Scotland is now becoming very much like England with the influx of immigrants and asylum seekers.

What's so special about them, what's so bad about me?

Here's another bit of edukayshun for you GA.


Have you used this search engine GA? this digs deep.

Anonymous said...

A load of old tripe from marxist academics.Who did they interview?

Anonymous said...

Oh God, please endow me with a high IQ so that I can be oblivious to whats happening in my country, and happy to let others do my thinking for me.

However, on a serious note this is yet another psycho political tactic to distance potential support for an enemy, classic text book stuff really. These "Marxist" lecturers (they probably dont even realise that they are Marxists) are as bound to pc thinking as any other government agency, and no doubt within their ranks will be informers who report anything that deviates from Common Purpose directives, and pressure from above to toe the line. Add a little bit of elitist thinking, and you end up with the sort of people who "lead from beyond their authority" lol, and so sure of their own brilliance that they are not prepared/unable to see the other side of any story.

As the left continue to lose the trust of the people, be prepared for more of the same. Though looking on the bright side, I think that this kind of mindgame ends up consolidating the views of those who have woken up to the lies.

watling said...

Why don't these academics conduct another survey, asking people the following question:

Who would you rather have fighting for you if a foreign army invaded the UK - a regiment of LibDem/Green voters or a regiment of BNP voters?

Anonymous said...

''democratic politics get dumbed down with the passage of time''.

according to Corrupt website

So even those with relative IQs can make bad choices over who they vote for...

I wonder who these ''marxdemics'' voted for and will vote for again...obviously an intelligent choice...

Man Of The Woods said...

Can you smell the fear emanating from the establishment?

The stench of Marxist poo is becoming almost intolerable of late.

At the age of only ten, my wife had an IQ of 168; and she is of course - a Nationalist.

While I could never hope to match that, I can say without a shadow of a doubt that my IQ is higher than the sheeple who still vote for Labour.

But it's not their fault; years of brainwashing and viewing the box of lies has that effect on a person.

Fyrdist said...

Harry, thanks for the new search engine.

Thumbs up to you, sir.

liberal fascists said...

Now get them to do the same tests but with people from the same class and education, stable homelife levels.

The working class have been effected worse than all others and will naturally vote BNP due to this, where the middle and upper classes relatively uneffected can still pick and choose with little impact.

All this report shows is a class divide which would have shown the same result at almost anytime, without any political element being added.

Ironically the `Liberal` elite, smug Ivory tower marxist traitors use this class test as propaganda to inflict even more damage on those worse off and suffering the most due to their so called Marxist intellectualism!

The Green Arrow said...


I made my position clear in an earlier comment.

To be honest, I do not have the time to waste on one individual whose sole purpose appears to be to suck up time.

I suggest you join UKDebate and there you will find others prepared to run around in a circle with you.

I also believe you to be the same person who I have played this game with before. I do not intend to play it again.

RH said...


I don't demand a personal reply from you every time; all you need to do is click 'approve'.

I have used UKDebate in the past, and found it generally tiresome, not just due to the constant demands of other posters insisting that I defend the views of others who's arguments in any way resemble my own, but simply due to the puerile level of childishness exhibited by many posters. I had hoped to engage directly with those who seem themselves as the 'carriers of truth' in the 'nationalist' community by posting comments on your site. If, however, the nationalist 'intelligentsia' which frequents this blog prefers not be challenged, I must be denied the prospect of discourse.

I have only been posting on your site under the title 'RH' and never another name. Whilst it is understandable that you will reject this as a lie, I can only offer you the truth and it is your choice whether or not to accept it.

RH said...

Though by this point the issue might be ignored by some, I very much doubt that the BNP and other 'nationalists' (who, let's remember never forget) will stop raking over it again in later posts, so I will weigh in anyway to try and shed light on where the evidence stands here.

liberal fascists
Allow me to explain how they carried out the survey to allay your fears that it was carried out in a biased way:
In 1983, over 6000 (I can't find the exact figure) 10 year-olds were given verbal and non-verbal IQ tests - tests designed to test basic intelligence and not schooling. 24 years later, the same people were surveyed about political involvement, including how they voted in the 2001 general election. After adjusting for class (which meant taking into account traditional class voting patterns and measuring how much each interviewee had moved away from what might be considered their 'class loyalty') the only notable spike in the results was that those who went on to vote Green and LibDem had a significantly higher average IQ (as measured aged 10).

Whilst in pure numbers, BNP and UKIP voters were shown to have the lowest average IQs, after adjusting for class and other factors this correlation vanished and it was shown that IQ had no bearing on people changing their vote from what would otherwise be expected of their upbringing and education any more than those who voted Labour or Conservative - it's not that 'stupid people vote BNP', simply that people who might be expected to vote BNP do not change their mind, however high or low their IQ. The fact that the deeper research found no correlation between IQ and changing your political views to support the BNP is why many reports (amongst others the Press association release) do not even mention the BNP. In short, the study shows no correlation between IQ and the desire to vote BNP merely that those who voted Green/LibDem had the highest average IQ.

It could easily be argued that those with higher IQs generally go on to university education and establishment-linked jobs, spending more time inside the 'Marxist infiltrated education system' and naturally being 'brainwashed' to the will of the establishment.

tomorrow belongs to mo said...

These figures have as much relevance to reality as output statistics from Stalinist tractor factories.

Average intelligence is 100% (by definition)

Greens have a positive deviation of 8.3
Lib-Dhimms of 8.2
Connedservatives 3.7
Liebour 3.0
Plaid 2.5
Scots Nats 2.2

The only negative deviations were non-voters with an insignificantly minuscule -0.3
and BNP with -1.6

Now you don't need a Nobel prize in mathematics to see that if these figures were true, and the BNP voters were the only ones to have a singnificant negative deviation from the average, then THEY WOULD HAVE TO OUTNUMBER ALL OTHER VOTERS TO PULL THE AVERAGE BACK TO 100%

The guys who produced this work may have PhDs in sociology, but they obviously failed GCSE maths.