Wednesday, 18 April 2007

Jihard is FARD - and hard as well

Well one thing about taking on the crazy gang is that you get to learn the meanings of an whole lot of Arabic words.

Take FARD for example, there is one crazed fanatic over on MPACUK - OK I know they are all crazed fanatics over on MPACKUK but the one who wrote this article is crying (much like the image) that the other cult cowboys are not blowing themselves and others up quick enough.

Do I look FARD in this? If it is too FARD for you, let me do it? No not typing errors, FARD means duty and like all activists everywhere he is complaining that the general public - in his case - the sheep people are not doing enough to promote Jihad. In other words not being violent enough for him.

One could not help noticing in his article that he does not say when exactly he intends to go meet his hot dates in hell. You can read the rest yourself at the provided link. Perhaps he is not FARD enough to do it himself.

Moving on though - he would really like these guys over at the Middle East Research Institute (MEMRI) they are having a serious discussion on - wait for it.

Is it Legitimate to Use Nuclear Weapons Against the West? A Debate on An Islamist Forum

The Islamist website Al-Firdaws recently posted an article by a certain Abu Zabadi titled "Religious Grounds for [Launching] a Nuclear Attack." [1] The article, presented as a response to "recent rumors about Al-Qaeda's plan to attack the U.S. with WMDs such as a nuclear bomb," unequivocally opposes the use of WMDs by Muslims against the West, and attempts to counter the legal justifications for their use recently put forward by some prominent religious scholars affiliated with Al-Qaeda and other jihad movements. [2]

The article sparked a fierce debate among participants on the forum, with some participants supporting the author's reasoning and conclusions, and others forcefully rejecting them.

Yep. They really are as mad as rock apes. Go on over and read the arguments for and against nuking Our Country. Makes you wonder if a preemptive strike might not be such a bad idea. Wonder if we could persuade the Israelis to do it?

Just in case you doubt them, you can go straight to the source of the well here and check it out. Sad person that I am, I downloaded a Google beta translator and had a go. All a bit flowery but yep they mean it.

If you continue to believe that the weevil words of the politicians about Islam being a religion of peace, they you are truly damned. Me? I am now really praying for the British National Party to triumph over evil.

For once I let the FARD guy from MPACUK have the last word. This is how he ends his article.

'Jihad (holy fighting) in Allah's cause (with full force of numbers and weaponary) is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars (on which it stands). By Jihad, Islam is established, Allah's word is made superior, (His Word being La ilaha illallah which means none has the right to be worshipped but Allah) and His religion (Islam) is propagated. By abandoning Jihad (may Allah protect us from that) Islam is destroyed and the Muslims fall into an inferior position; their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim, and he who tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfill this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.'


Felicity said...

Now let me grasp this important point...MPACUK are the moderate ones right?
Thats better, I'll sleep sounder now.

Tom said...

MPACUK are a funny lot. There are a couple of "infidel" posters who are allowed to say a few things (never controversial) and the rest keep up the anti Israeli/Western diatribe of hatred for anything unislamic.They take care of the political stuff writing to newspapers the BBC and otherwise complaining that nobody loves them and everyone suffers from "Islamophobia", in my opinion a very good thing to suffer from to keep us on our toes regarding the Religion of Peace.
A funny little lot who'd be kicked around the Gaza strip by Hamas if they ever got off their internet warrior arses and took a short break there.

Anonymous said...

Rewards of jihad - 72 virgin goats? (And kids for the pedo-prophet imitators?)

Britlord said...

I don’t believe it. I have just been on the e-petition section of the official 10 Downing street website and they have changed the way their search engine works. I typed in BNP to see how the BNP petitions were doing and to my surprise one was missing. The petitions that were there were the ones calling for greater control and surveillance of far right parties like the BNP and one was calling for the BNP to be banned. The petition to disregard petitions to ban the BNP, the one that acknowledges the BNP’s right to exist was missing.

I found out though you can find the missing petition by typing in the search box B.N.P instead of BNP. Before the changes to the search engine were made however you only had to type in BNP to get all of the petitions displayed.

Who is going to think of typing in B.N.P instead of BNP??? Not many I would think, which probably means less people will sign it now.

Is this just a coincidence or intentional?

Answers on a post card please.

fido said...

Well they can quote me on this, that we should nuke em off the map. Hell we are replacing trident and having paid for it through my taxes I want my moneys worth.